Research Article |
Corresponding author: Leo Jumadi Simanjuntak ( leosimanjuntak@uhn.ac.id ) Academic editor: Rumiana Simeonova
© 2022 Leo Jumadi Simanjuntak, Cheryl Grace Pratiwi Rumahorbo.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Simanjuntak LJ, Rumahorbo CGP (2022) Acute toxicity test nanoherbal mahkota dewa fruit (Phaleria macrocarpa). Pharmacia 69(4): 1063-1074. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.69.e94436
|
A common plant from Papua, Indonesia, called Phaleria macrocarpa (mahkota dewa), has potent therapeutic components. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity level of nanoherbal mahkota dewa and its effect on the changes in hematology, biochemistry, electrolytes, and histopathology of the organ. High Energy Milling (HEM) was used to produce nanoherbal mahkota dewa. LD50 was determined in three stages: dose orientation test (12 mice), preliminary test (20 mice), and LD50 determination (30 mice) for 14 days using the Thomson Weil formula. LC50 was determined using the Brine Shrimp Lethality Test method with concentrations of 1, 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000 ppm. This study revealed that the LD50 value was 1g/kg BW 0,075 and the LC50 value was 2145,0407 ppm. The nanoherbal mahkota dewa affected the histological organs, hematological, biochemical, and electrolyte parameters but did not affect the weight of the organ significantly. From this study, it can be concluded that nanoherbal mahkota dewa belongs to the category of moderate toxicity. In a proper dose, it could be processed as an herbal medicine in the future.
Acute toxicity, mahkota dewa, LC50, LD50, nanoherbal
Phaleria macrocarpa, from the family of Thymelaceae, commonly known as Mahkota dewa, is a medicinal plant that is indigenous to Indonesia and Malaysia. Phaleria macrocarpa (mahkota dewa) is one of the thousand plants in Indonesia that can be used as traditional medicine. P. macrocarpa flesh fruits are reported for several pharmacological activities, including anti-tumor, anti-hyperglycemia, anti-inflammation, anti-diarrheal, vasodilator, anti-oxidant, anti-viral, anti-bacterial, and anti-fungal effects. Its stem is used to treat bone cancer; egg shells of seeds are used to treat breast cancer, cervix cancer, preeclampsia, lung diseases, liver and cardiac diseases, while leaves contain constituents that treat impotence, blood diseases, allergies, diabetes mellitus, and tumors (
According to Altaf (2013), Phaleria macrocarpa fruit chemical content showed that from extracts of hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol, the seed shell and the flesh of Mahkota dewa obtained flavonoid compounds, phenols, tannins, saponins, and sterols/terpenes. Isolation is performed to obtain a group of polyphenols with known structures, namely lignans, which are thought to be cytotoxic. In addition, other specific bioactive ingredients such as Phalerin, gallic acid, Icaricide C, magniferin, mahkoside A, dodecanoic acid, palmitic acid, des-acetylflavicordin-A, flavicordin-A, flavicordin-D, flavicordin-A glucoside, ethyl stearate, and others obtained from Phaleria macrocarpa fruit can be used as the reason this plant has strong biopharmaceutical activity.
Herbs have thousands of ingredients and at the same time fight disease (
Although nanoherbal has opportunities in the treatment of various diseases, its safety is still questionable (
Mahkota dewa was obtained from traditional markets in Medan. Mice were obtained from animal cages in the Biology Laboratory, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Artemia Viper Eggs (Jeannie Hoo., LTD, China). Flacon, artemia hatchery (local), micropipette (Socorex ISBA S.A), 5-watt lamps (dop), aerator (Niko Nk 1200), 0,9% NaCl from Otsuka, drop pipette, analytical balance (Mettler Toledo AB204), Vortex (Dijkstra), 1 set of surgical instruments (PT. Glorya Medica Abadi), formalin and hematoxylin-eosin stains (PT. Arjuna Utama Kimia), paraffin (PT. Kirana Mitra Abadi), xylene (PT. Anugrah Putra Kencana) and Mayer’s albumin (PT. Indo Achitama Chemical Industry).
Nanoherbal mahkota dewa has been made using High Energy Milling (HCl 2M, Tokyo, Japan) at NanoTech Indonesia. The procedure for changing the size of herbal mahkota dewa to nano-size was to put balls as a crushing medium into a larger diameter jar, then small balls and samples. HEM was turned on for 2 hours. The size of this nanoherbal was 246,5 nm ± 55,5. The methods and results of this study are being registered under a simple patent.
DMSO (Sigma Aldrich), water pro-injection (Sigma Aldrich), Hematoxylin and Eosin (Sigma Aldrich), AST kit (Roche), ALT kit (Roche), ALP kit (Roche), Albumin kit (Roche), Total Protein kit (Roche), Bilirubin direct kit (Roche), Urea kit (Roche), Uric acid kit (Roche), and Creatinine kit (Roche).
LC50 used the Brine Shrimp Lethality Test (BSLT). Artemia larvae into 5 mL vial bottles containing 1, 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000 ppm nanoherbal mahkota dewa, then calculated using the LC50 Calculator, AAT Bioquest.
For the LD50 determination we used mice (Mus musculus) at around 18–20 g BW. Experimental animals were from the biology animal cages at the Universitas Sumatera Utara. For LD50, 3 stages were used; the dose orientation test (12 Mus musculus) for 24 hours; the preliminary test (20 Mus musculus) for 24 hours, and the determination of LD50 (25 Mus musculus). 20 mice were used for treatment and 5 mice as controls during 14 days (BPOM RI 2014). In the final stage, the death motility and LD50 values were calculated by the Thomson Weil formula. Histological descriptions of the liver, kidneys, lungs, heart, and brain were observed by the process of Hematoxylin-Eosin staining. The Thomson-Weil formula used is:
Log m = Log D + d (f+1) (1)
LD50 range = antilog (log m ± 2 × log m) (2)
Description: m is the LD50 value, D is the smallest dose used, d is the log of the multiple of the dose, and f is the factor value from the Thomson Weil table.
The Data were calculated by statistical software version 23. The test carried out was a two-way ANOVA (α = 0,05) with a 5% significance level.
The hematological analysis was conducted at Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital. The parameters examined included red blood cells (RBC), white blood cells (WBC), hemoglobin, hematocrit, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and mean cell hemoglobin (MCH) using a hematology analyzer (Roche Diagnostic, Switzerland).
The parameters examined in this study were total protein, direct bilirubin, Alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransaminase (AST), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Urea, Creatinine, and Uric Acid using Cobas 6000 (Roche Diagnostic, Switzerland). The measurement of sodium, chloride, and potassium levels was done using Cobas b 221 (Roche Diagnostic, Switzerland) (
The samples of the liver, lungs, kidney, heart, and brain were collected and then immersed in liquid paraffin at 60 to 70 degrees Celsius for two hours. The paraffin blocks were cut using a microtome with a thickness of 5 to 7 m and connected to slides after being molded and given time to freeze. The organ incision that had been attached to the slide was immediately placed on a heating surface between 56 and 58 °C for about 10 seconds to stretch it and make it adhere to the slide. Adjustments were made to prevent wrinkled or folded organs. Additionally, hematoxylin-eosin staining was done. The preparations were first immersed for 12 minutes in a xylene solution to begin the deparaffination process. After 5 minutes of immersion in 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% ethanol, the preparations were dehydrated by being washed under running water. After 5 minutes in the hematoxylin solution, the preparations were rinsed under running water, stained with eosin, and then submerged in 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% ethanol for 10 minutes. In the last step, the preparations were submerged for 12 minutes in xylene and examined with a 100× magnification microscope (Thermo, German).
Data analysis in this study was conducted using SPSS (a statistical program for social sciences) version 23 using the one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) test. If the p-value was less than 0,05, there was a significant difference between groups, and if the p-value was higher than 0,05, there was no difference between groups.
This research has been evaluated and received a recommendation for approval from the Animal Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara, No. 231/KEPH-FMIPA/2022, July 12, 2022.
The lowest larval mortality rate of 3% in LC50 was observed under treatment with 1 ppm nanoherbal mahkota dewa, whereas the highest larval mortality rate of 90% was observed under treatment with 10000 ppm nanoherbal Mahkota dewa (Table
Concentration (ppm) | Log10 | % Mortality | Probit |
---|---|---|---|
10000 | 4 | 90 | 6,28 |
1000 | 3 | 13 | 3,87 |
100 | 2 | 13 | 3,87 |
10 | 1 | 6 | 3,45 |
1 | 0 | 3 | 3,12 |
The relationship between the % mortality of A. franciscana larvae with nanoherbal in various concentrations was calculated using the LC50 Calculator, AAT Bioquest, and the resulting LC50 value of 2145, 0407 ppm (Fig.
A. Profile of the relationship between % mortality of A. franciscana larvae with nano herbal extracts in various concentrations. The graphs were produced using the LC50 Calculator, AAT Bioquest (https7/www.aatbio.com/tools/lc50-caleulator); B. The appearance of dead A. franciscana larvae from the results of the BSLT test.
The dose orientation stage (Table
Group | Test Stages | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orientation Test | Preliminary Test | LD50 Determination Test | |||||||
mice | Dose (mg/Kg BW) | Mortality | mice | Dose (mg/Kg BW) | Mortality | mice | Dose (mg/Kg BW) | Mortality | |
Control | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5 | CMC-Na | 0 |
P1 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 5 | 200 | 0 | 5 | 400 | 0 |
P2 | 3 | 64 | 0 | 5 | 400 | 0 | 5 | 635,2 | 1 |
P3 | 3 | 108 | 0 | 5 | 800 | 1 | 5 | 1.008,6 | 2 |
P4 | 3 | 216 | 1 | 5 | 1600 | 3 | 5 | 1601,8 | 3 |
Nanoherbal mahkota dewa belongs to the moderate toxic category. It was not difficult to penetrate the body’s lipid membrane (
The administration of nanoherbal mahkota dewa did not significantly affect the weight of the liver, lungs, and kidneys (p > 0,05) (Table
Treatments | Organs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Livers | Lungs | Heart | Brain | Kidney | |
Control | 1,48±0,01 | 0,29±0,02 | 0,16±0,02 | 0,43±0,08 | 0,28±0,02 |
P1 | 1,30±0,02 | 0,59±0,02 | 0,14±0,07 | 0,47±0,09 | 0,35±0,02 |
P2 | 1,65±0,03 | 0,27±0,01 | 0,20±0,01 | 0,41±0,05 | 0,39±0,03 |
P3 | 1,68±0,08 | 0,37±0,07 | 0,23±0,00 | 0,46±0,02 | 0,37±0,03 |
P4 | 1,65±0,06 | 0,30±0,07 | 0,23±0,02 | 0,45±0,02 | 0,39±0,04 |
The liver was the largest organ in the body, and it was very sensitive when toxins, chemicals, or harmful substances entered the body. The liver acts as a detoxifying organ in the body. When the nanoherbal entered the mice’s bodies, the liver responded quickly. The kidneys had a statistical analysis result that was almost similar to the data on the liver because the dissolved compounds that entered the mice’s kidneys derived from this nanoherbal mahkota dewa made the kidney organs work harder. The cardiac was an organ that was resistant to stressful conditions. The heart will undergo histological changes when the exposure given was exposure to a relatively severe level of stress.
The effect of nanoherbal mahkota dewa on hematological parameters including WBC (white blood cells), RBC (red blood cells), hemoglobin, hematocrit, MCV (mean corpuscular volume), MCH (mean corpuscular hemoglobin), and MCHC (mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration) can be seen in Table
Parameters | Units | Groups (Mean±SD) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | ||
WBC | 103/uL | 7,2± 0,3 | 8,32±1,07 | 6,85±0,67 | 7,26±2,51 | 8,33±0,58 |
RBC | 106/uL | 9,3±0,5 | 12,00±1,29* | 7,97±0,94 | 13,05±1,36* | 11,33±0,58 |
HGB | g/dL | 17,4±0,7 | 15,28±0,69 | 19,76±0,77 | 18,32±1,27 | 17,67±0,58 |
HCT | % | 59,1±5,3 | 59,95±1,12 | 57,02±0,63 | 58,39±0,51 | 55,00±1,00* |
MCV | fL | 62,0±3,3 | 76,37±4,21* | 67,14±1,69* | 56,68±1,90* | 73,33±0,58* |
MCH | Pg | 27,3±6,3 | 25,56±1,16 | 28,02±1,77 | 22,72±0,87* | 22,33±1,53* |
MCHC | g/dL | 27,4±2,9 | 26,80±1,84 | 27,78±0,38 | 24,90±1,38* | 24,63±3,07* |
From the results that were presented in Table
Hematology parameters such as white blood cells, red blood cells, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin were all evaluated. These measurements are required to determine whether nanoherbal mahkota dewa has an effect on blood parameters. Because hematological parameters are susceptible, if a herb causes toxicity, the hematologic value will change (
The effect of nanoherbal mahkota dewa on kidney biochemical parameters, including urea, creatinine, and uric acid, showed a significant difference (p < 0,05) between the groups.
Based on Table
Parameters | Units | Groups (Mean±SD) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | ||
Urea | mg/dL | 19,17±1,00 | 22,60±2,48* | 21,98±1,57 | 21,28±1,11 | 21,69±1,62 |
Creatinine | mg/dL | 0,93±0,73 | 1,09±0,10 | 2,23±0,59* | 0,78±0,32 | 0,98±0,13 |
Uric Acid | mg/dL | 1,48±0,54 | 1,31±0,28 | 3,00±0,22* | 2,01±0,90 | 1,61±0,45 |
Acute kidney injury will occur if a toxic drug is used that raises the levels of kidney biochemical parameters such as urea, creatinine, and uric acid (
A biomarker examination was needed to ascertain whether the nanoherbal mahkota dewa affected the liver. The biomarkers were total protein, albumin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (AST), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were all measured in blood drawn from all groups on day 14. Complete data can be seen in Table
Parameters | Units | Groups (Mean±SD) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | ||
Total protein | g/dL | 5,3±1,0 | 4,9±0,4 | 6,6±0,7 | 5,9±0,3 | 7,1±0,6* |
Albumin | g % | 3,0±0,2 | 5,6±0,5* | 2,9±0,4 | 3,6±0,5 | 2,9±0,4 |
Billirubin direct | mg/dL | 0,01±0,01 | 0,0±0,0 | 0,09±0,4 | 0,3±0,5* | 0,01±0,0 |
AST | U/L | 111,6±5,0 | 105,0±9,5 | 70,0±3,0* | 92,6±11,3* | 117,0±3,0 |
ALT | U/L | 51,3±3,5 | 51,3±4,9 | 21,0±2,5* | 37,3±6,6* | 58,0±5,1 |
ALP | U/L | 154,0±7,2 | 204,0±7,9* | 120,0±3,2* | 210,3±14,1* | 218,0±13,6* |
Liver biochemistry was assessed from the parameters such as total protein, albumin, direct bilirubin, AST, ALT, and ALP (Table
Some biochemical parameters, such as AST, ALT, Total Protein, Albumin, Bilirubin Direct, and ALP, can be used to assess liver toxicity (Abou, 2016). These parameters typically rise when there is liver damage. It is because the liver is a vital organ in the metabolsm of compounds. When injuries occur, AST and ALT levels rise. Additionally, ALT is more sensitive than AST to liver damage (
On day 14, all groups in this study had their Na+, K+, and Cl-levels measured (Table
There was a significant difference (p < 0,05) in normal hepatocyte cells, parenchymatic degeneration, hydropic degeneration, and necrosis (Table
Treatments | Normal Hepatocytes (400X) | Parenchymal Degeneration (%) | Hydropic Degeneration (%) | Necrosis (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 233.67±2.44 | 36.67±17.32 | 25±15.21 | 8.1±3.82 |
P1 | 216.44±1.07 | 34.44±20.68 | 22.2±21.52 | 9.4±5.27 |
P2 | 230.67±3.80 | 24.44±16.09* | 8.3±4.33* | 10.7±8.97 |
P3 | 75.11±3.62* | 50.00±8.66* | 36.6±5* | 11.1±2.20* |
P4 | 172.78±2.29* | 32.22±23.19 | 20±18.54 | 10.6±5.27 |
Based on the observations of the liver (Fig.
Many cell nuclei emerge from hepatocyte cells in the liver. The dead cells of the nuclei appear smaller, chromatin, and reticular fibers multiply. Increased hepatocyte damage by chemical compounds in mahkota dewa fruit A study also proved that hepatic protectors are widely known to protect the liver from damage (Kaplowits 2002). However, herbal liver protection was preferred by the public. Terpenoid compounds can be used as insecticides and are highly toxic to animals (
Based on Table
Treatments | Alveolar inflammation | Lung Parenchyma Damage (%) | Alveolar lumen narrowing |
---|---|---|---|
Control | 3,00±0.00 | 3,00±0.00 | 3,00±0.00 |
P1 | 3,00±0.00 | 3,00±0.00 | 3,00±0.00 |
P2 | 3,00±0.00 | 3,00±0.00 | 3,00±0.00 |
P3 | 3,00±0.00 | 3,00±0.00 | 3,00±0.00 |
P4 | 2,33±1.15 | 2,33±1.15 | 2,33±1.15 |
Inflammation degree: 0 = normal, 1 = light, 2 = medium, 3 = weight. Parenchymal Damage: 0 = normal, 1 = 0–30% damage, 2 = 31–60% damaged, 3 = > 61% damaged. Alveolar shape: 0 = normal, 1 = 0–30% have narrowing, 2 = 31–60% have narrowing, 3 = > 61% have narrowing.
The alveolar pattern of inflammation was related in part to the fact that the terminal bronchioles, alveolar ducts, and adjacent alveoli were the sites of maximum deposition of inhaled small particles (
Physiologically, free radicals or incoming toxic substances are detoxified by macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils. However, an excessive increase in the airway would trigger the movement of macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils, which could cause an inflammatory reaction that could lead to more cell damage and death (
Cardiac damage affects cardiac muscle cells after giving nanoherbal mahkota dewa (Table
Treatments | Normal Cardiocytes | Parenchymal Degeneration (%) | Vacuolar Degeneration (%) | Necrosis (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | The boundary between the cardiocyte cells is not clear, so a normal cardiocyte count cannot be performed | 0,78±0,44 | 0,89±0,33 | 0,67±0,50 |
P1 | 0,78±0,44 | 0,89±0,33 | 0,00±0,00* | |
P2 | 1,00±0,00* | 1,22±0,44* | 0,67±0,50 | |
P3 | 0,89±0,33 | 0,89±0,33 | 0,67±0,50 | |
P4 | 1,44±0,53* | 1,11±0,33* | 1,22±0,44* |
Parenchymal degeneration was reversible, and cells could return to their original state. However, in severe or persistent stress and injury, irreversibility occurs. Cardiac muscle is a target for autoimmune inflammation. Old age, thymoma, and anti-CV1 antibodies appear to be risk factors that may lead to recognizing cardiac involvement (
Parenchymal and hydrophic degeneration: 0 = normal, 1 = 0–30% degenerate, 2 = 31–60% degenerate, 3 = > 61% degenerate. Necrosis: 0 = normal, 1 = 0–30% have Necrosis, 2 = 31–60%, Necrosis3 = > 61% have necrosis.
A Purkinje cell is a class of GABAergic inhibitory neurons located in the cerebellum. However, in this preparation, no slices were found, indicating the presence of a cerebellum due to cerebellar tissue that could have been damaged during surgical procedures or other extrinsic factors. There was a significant difference (p < 0,05) in the number of Purkinje cells. However, there was no significant difference (p > 0,05) in the number of necrotic cell parameters. The nanoherbal of mahkota dewa affects the number of Purkinje cells in the brains of mice. The number of Purkinje cells in the control group had the highest value compared to all other treatment groups. The higher the dose used, the lower the number of Purkinje cells found.
Based on statistical tests, there was a significant difference (p < 0,05) in the necrosis cell of the mouse brain after giving nanoherbal mahkota dewa at each dose level (Table
Treatments | Purkinje cell | Necrosis |
---|---|---|
Control | 30,78±0,54 | 2,17±0,11 |
P1 | 26,56±0,89* | 3,48±0,08 |
P2 | 27,11±0,73 | 10,32±0,23* |
P3 | 22,22±0,52* | 8,88±0,17* |
P4 | 21,00±1,01* | 12,22±0,87* |
The cerebellum and hippocampus were the parts of the brain that were the most susceptible to damage from oxidative stress. Some researchers claim that oxidative stress could induce the formation of free radicals that cause cell damage and death (
In this study, the histopathological features of the kidneys were assessed using experiments as described below. Based on Table
Types of tissue | Description | Score |
---|---|---|
Tubular | No damage | 0 |
The loss of the brush border was less than 25% in the tubular cells. The integrity of the basement membrane is intact. | 1 | |
Over 25% of tubular cells have lost their brush border. Basement membrane thickening | 2 | |
Inflammation cast formation, necrosis of up to 60% of tubular cells. | 3 | |
(Additionally, more than 60% of tubular cells are necrotic.) | 4 | |
Endothelium | No damage | 0 |
Swelling of the endothelium | 1 | |
Endothelial disorders | 2 | |
Endothelial loss | 3 | |
Glomerulus | No damage | 0 |
Bowman’s Capsule Thickening | 1 | |
Retraction of the juxtaglomerular apparatus | 2 | |
Fibrosis of the glomerulus | 3 | |
Tubulointerstitial | No damage | 0 |
Inflammation, hemorrhage of less than 25% of tissue | 1 | |
Necrosis in less than 25% of tissue | 2 | |
Necrosis up to 60% | 3 | |
Necrosis more than 60% | 4 |
Treatments | Tubular | Glomerulus | Endothelium | Tubulointerstitial |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
P1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
P2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
P3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
P4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
The endothelium is characterized by swelling of the endothelium (Fig.
Considering that the nanoherbal mahkota dewa has a moderate toxicity value, the tested dose exposure did not cause significant tissue damage to the kidneys. In addition, exposure that was only carried out for 2 weeks gave only mild inflammation (Level 1) and hemorrhage of less than 25% of the tissue in the entire dose treatment group (Table
In short, this study provides information that the LC50 and LD50 values of nanoherbal Phaleria macrocarpha fruit are 2145,0407 ppm and 1g/kg BW±0,075. Nanoherbal Phaleria macrocarpha fruit affects the histological changes in the organs, biochemical parameters of the kidney, liver, and electrolytes. In the future, a chronic toxicity study is recommended to confirm the safe use of Phaleria macrocarpa.
This work was supported by Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan.