Research Article
Print
Research Article
Determination of amino acids of plants from Angelica L. genus by HPLC method
expand article infoLiliia Budniak, Liudmyla Slobodianiuk, Svitlana Marchyshyn, Ihor Potishnyi
‡ I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
Open Access

Abstract

One of the tasks of pharmaceutical science is to find new sources of effective drugs. Such sources include plants such as Angelica archangelica L. and Angelica sylvestris L., which have been used for many years to treat various diseases in folk medicine. Because the chemical composition of these plants is poorly understood, the aim of our study was to investigate the amino acid composition of the leaves of A. archangelica L. and A. sylvestris L. The amino acids of the leaves of the study species of the genus Angelica L. were determined by the HPLC method. Eighteen free and nineteen bound amino acids were identified in the leaves of A. archangelica L. The A. sylvestris L. leaves contained nineteen free and the same amount of bound amino acids. High concentrations of free and bound amino acids such as L-glutamic acid and L-aspartic acid predominate in A. archangelica L. and A. sylvestris L. This allowed these amino acids to be considered distinguishing markers of the study plants. Character metabolic processes in which these amino acids take part may be associated with the medicinal properties of these plants pursuant to their use in medicine and, therefore, may contribute to the insight of their therapeutic properties.

Keywords

Angelica archangelica L., Angelica sylvestris L., leaves, amino acids, HPLC

Introduction

One of the tasks of pharmaceutical science, at the present stage of development, is to find new sources of effective drugs (Feshchenko et al. 2021a). This is possible due to the expansion of the range of medicinal plants through the full use of own resources of wild raw materials. When creating new herbal remedies, scientists pay special attention to plants that have long been used in folk medicine (Budniak et al. 2021a, b, e; Marchyshyn et al. 2021c; Vasenda et al. 2021). The advantage of herbal medicine is the availability and relative cheapness compared to synthetic drugs. Herbal medicines show a wide range of pharmacological properties, which are realized through different groups of biologically active substances (Darzuli et al. 2021; Slobodianiuk et al. 2021d). Herbal medicines are low-toxic, can be used for a long time, have fewer side effects on the human body, and are well combined with synthetic drugs (Stoiko and Kurylo 2018; Darzuli et al. 2019; Budniak et al. 2020; Huzio et al. 2020; Budniak and Vasenda 2021). Plants of the genus Angelica L. are promising in this regard.

Angelica L. is among the largest genus of the Apiaceae family. It has approximately 110 species of biennial and perennial herbs (Daşkın and Kaynak 2012; Liao et al. 2020). More than 50 of these species are used in traditional medicine in many countries (Lobiuc et al. 2012; Ağalar et al. 2020). Angelica species are found on all continents of the Northern Hemisphere, reaching as far north as Iceland, Lapland, Greenland, and East Asia host the highest number of species (Liao et al. 2012; Pimenov 2017; Wang et al. 2017).

For many centuries, species of this genus namely A. archangelica, A. sylvestris, A. californica, A. atropupurea, A. dahurica, A. keiskei, A. lucida, A. tomentosa, A. venenosa, A. tenuissima, A. kingie have been used as an expectorant, diuretic, anti-inflammatory, and diaphoretic, and means for flu, chronic bronch, pleurisy, colds, fever, typhoid, coughs, hepatitis, indigestion, colic, headaches, rheumatism, arthritis, bacterial and fungal infections (Sarker and Nahar 2004). These properties are the result of the availability of many groups of biologically active compounds. Among them are coumarins, sesquiterpenes, flavonoids, polysaccharides, acetylenic compounds, and chalcones (Skakun and Stepanova 1988; Sarker and Nahar 2004; Wang et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2017; Shawky and Abou El Kheir 2018; Xie et al. 2018; Karakaya et al. 2020; Alkan Türkuçar et al. 2021).

A. archangelica and A. sylvestris are the most common species in Ukraine. They grow on wetlands and waterfronts (Ağalar et al. 2020). A. archangelica has a wide range of biological activities namely anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic, diuretic, antimutagenic, diaphoretic, sedative, cytotoxic, and anxiolytic properties, increases bile secretion, secretion of gastric and pancreatic juice, enhances intestinal motor function, inhibits fermentation (Salikhova and Poroshenko 1995; Pathak et al. 2010). The root is used for bronchitis, gastric ulcers, anorexia, chronic fatigue, migraine, and obstetric complaints (Bhat et al. 2011; Maurya et al. 2017). Yeh et al. established that A. archangelica is a cytoprotective agent effective against chronic hepatotoxicity, which hence indirectly protects the liver from oxidative stress (Yeh et al. 2003). Khayyal et al. found that extract of A. archangelica has anti-ulcerogenic activity associated with an increase in prostaglandin E2 release, a reduced acid output, a decrease in leukotrienes, and increased mucin secretion (Khayyal et al. 2001). Sigurdsson et al. revealed that the antiproliferative activity of a tincture is from fruits of this plant. It is results presence of A. archangelica two furanocoumarins, such as xanthotoxin (8-methoxypsoralen) and imperatorin (8-isopentenyloxypsoralen) (Sigurdsson et al. 2004; Sigurdsson and Gudbjarnason 2007; Wszelaki et al. 2011). Also, antitumor activity in vivo and antiproliferative activity in vitro of extract of Angelica archangelica leaves were found by researchers (Sigurdsson et al. 2005). The essential oil obtained from A. archangelica roots has good antimicrobial activity against Enterococcus faecalis, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Clostridium perfringen, Clostridium difficile, Eubacterium limosum, and Candida albicans. The main proportion of oil consists of monoterpene (up to 88%). α-pinene (21.3%), δ-3-carene (16.5%), limonene (16.4%), and α-phellandrene (8.7%) are its major compounds (Chalchat and Garry 1997; Doneanu and Anitescu 1998; Nivinskiene et al. 2003; Fraternale et al. 2014; Simonović et al. 2014). Also, A. archangelica contains the following biologically active substances: bittering agents, flavonoids, tanning agents, resins, silica, carbohydrates, terpenes, and organic acids (Wahlin and Blixt 1994).

A. archangelica is a plant that is part of the European Pharmacopoeia, the Ukrainian Pharmacopoeia, the British Herbal Pharmacopoeia, the Complete German Commission E, the British Pharmacopoeia, and many other pharmacopeias.

A. sylvestris, also known as “European wild angelica”, “wild angelica and is analogous to A. archangelica in terms of their common characteristics. As a result of ethnobotanical research, the use was established A. sylvestris disorders of digestive, respiratory, and nervous systems, fever, infection and influenza, in cases of indigestion, as an analgesic, anticarcinogenic, antipyretic remedy (Özek et al. 2008; Vogl et al. 2013). A. sylvestris contain simple coumarins and furanocoumarins, such as umbelliprenin, aviprin, imperatorin, bisabolangelone, bergapten, xanthotoxol, isoimperatorin, byakangelicin, 5-β-cyclolavandulyloxy-psoralen, 1’-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(2S,3R)-3-hydroxymarmesin, 4-[(2,4,4-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)methoxy]-7H-furo[3,2-g][1]-benzopyran-7-one, etc (Muckensturm et al. 1981; Carbonnier and Molho 1982; Lemmich et al. 1983; Murphy et al. 2004). Sitosterol, campesterol, a-saccharostenon, stigmasterol, ergosta-5,24-dien3a-ol, cholesterol, stigmast-7-en-3-ol were defined in the plant (Krzaczek and Nowak 2000). Ağalar et al. determined that the main compounds of essential oil of A. sylvestris were α-pinen (42.0%) and β-phellandrene (25.5%) in the flower; 10-epi-γ-eudesmol (5.4%), elemol (5.4%), spathulenol (4.8%) in the root; spathulenol (12.4%), germacrene D (10.6%), α-humulene (7.6%) in the leaves; α -pinen (23.2%) and β-phellandrene (9.1%) in the fruit (Ağalar et al. 2020).

Previous studies revealed various groups of biologically active substances in A. archangelica and A. sylvestris, but amino acids were not studied. Based on the literature data and analysis of the chemical composition of biologically active substances of A. archangelica and A. sylvestris, it is important to study the amino acids composition of these plants.

Material and method

Plant materials

The leaves of A. archangelica and A. sylvestris were collected in Ukraine, on meadows and swamps of the Ternopil region during the flowering period in July-August 2017. The leaves of the study objects were authenticated by professor Svitlana Marchyshyn (TNMU, Ternopil, Ukraine) (Budniak et al. 2021c, d). A voucher specimen was deposited in the laboratory herbarium of the Department of Pharmacognosy and Medical Botany (TNMU, Ternopil, Ukraine) (Marchyshyn et al. 2021b, d; Slobodianiuk et al. 2021a, c). The study raw materials were then dried, crushed, and stored according to the general GACP requirements (WHO 2003; Husak et al. 2018).

Standards and chemicals

Standards of amino acids, including L-asparagine (Asn), L-glutamic acid (Glu), L-alanine (Ala), L-leucine (Leu), L-serine (Ser), L-isoleucine (Ile), L-aspartic acid (Asp), L‑arginine (Arg), Glycine (Gly), L-valine (Val), L-methionine (Met), L‑cystine (CyS-SCy), L-cysteine (Cys), L-phenylalanine (Phe), L-threonine (Thr), L-glutamine (Gln), L-proline (Pro), L-histidine (His), L-tyrosine (Tyr), L-lysine (Lys) obtained from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), were of analytical grade (> 99% purity) (Slobodianiuk et al. 2021b, e).

Reagents 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC-Cl), Hydrochloric acid (HCl), Acetonitrile (ACN), β-mercaptoethanol, Amantadine hydrochloride were from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). All other reagents were of the highest purity. The water used in the studies was produced by the MilliQ Gradient water deionization system (Millipore, USA).

Chromatographic equipment

The amino acids composition of the leaves of A. archangelica and A. sylvestris is determined by the HPLC method on high-performance liquid chromatograph Agilent 1100 (Agilent Technologies, USA) equipped with a flow-through vacuum degasser G1379A, a four-channel pump of the low-pressure gradient G13111A, an automatic injector G1313A, a column thermostat G13116A, and a diode array detector G1316A. Samples were analyzed using a column length ZORBAX-XDB-C18 - 50 mm, inner diameter - 4.6 mm, and the diameter of octadecylsilyl sorbent grain 1.8 µm.

Sample preparation for the analysis of plant raw materials

For the extraction of free amino acids the samples of the study raw material were ground into a powder by laboratory mill, then about 0.3 g (accurately weighed) was selected and placed into a flask with 3.0 ml of 0.1 M aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid containing 0.2% β-mercaptoethanol. The extractions were carried out in the ultrasonic water bath at 50 °C for 2 hours.

Extraction of bound amino acids was carried out by adding 3 ml of 6 M an aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid containing 0.4% β-mercaptoethanol to 0.2 g (accurately weighed) of powdered herbal raw materials. Hydrolysis was carried out for 24 hours in a thermostat at 110 °C.

The resulting extracts were centrifuged at 3000 rpm and filtered. Obtaining filtrates were placed in a vacuum desiccator at a temperature of 40–45 °С and a pressure of 1.5 mm Hg until hydrochloric acid is completely removed.

Then 200 μl of 0.8 M borate buffer pH 9.0 and 200 μl of a 20 mM solution of 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chloride (FMOC-Cl) in acetonitrile was sequentially added with an automatic dispenser. After a 10-minute, 20 μl of a 150 mM solution of amantadine hydrochloride in 50% aqueous acetonitrile was added.

Chromatography conditions

For analysis, the following chromatography mode was set:

  • gradient chromatography mode (Table 1);
  • eluent working pressure 220–275 kPa; column thermostat temperature 50 °C;
  • sample volume 2 µl; The detection parameters were set as follows: measurement scale 1.0; scan time 0.5 s. The detection wavelength is 265 nm.

Identification and calculation of content of amino acids

The identification of amino acids was performed according to their hold-up time (using standards as a reference). The quantitative content of amino acids is calculated from the value of the peak area of the amino acids. The content of bound amino acids was determined by subtracting the content of free amino acids from their total content (Jámbor and Molnár-Perl 2009a, b; Chen et. al. 2010; Feshchenko et. al. 2021b).

Validation of the method

The validation method and the analysis procedure of the amino acid content were performed according to validation guides for EURACHEM analytical methods.

To evaluate the sensitivity and linearity of the signal in relation to the concentration, linear calibrations were generated for each amino acid. To determine the linearity of the amino acids, five different concentrations, namely 0.1 mg/100 g, 0.3 mg/100 g, 0.6 mg/100 g, 1.3 mg/100 g and 3.3 mg/100 g of standards were used for the amino acids. The correlation coefficients (R2) ranged from 0.9981 to 0.9999, as shown in Table 2. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of each analyte were determined as the concentration of a standard solution with S/N = 3 (signal-to-noise ratio) and S/N = 10 (Slobodianiuk et al. 2022). In Table 1, the LODs were calculated by dividing three times the standard error of the calibration line at the intercept by the slope of the calibration line, and the LOQs were calculated by dividing 10 times the standard error of the calibration line at the intercept by the slope of the calibration line. As tabulated in Table 1 the LODs and the LOQs were in the ranges of 0.0072–0.0593 mg/100g and 0.0236–0.1977 mg/100g, respectively, depending on the amino acid under consideration. The performance parameters of the reference amino acid method, concentrations, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were statistically calculated using Statistica v 10.0 (StatSoft Inc.) (Marchyshyn et al. 2021a).

Table 1.

Gradient chromatography mode.

Retention time, min A% 0.05M sodium acetate solution, pH 6.5 B% 0.10 M sodium acetate solution: ACN = (23:22, v/v), pH 6.5 С% H2O D% ACN mobile phase feed rate, mL/min
0 70 30 0 0 1.5
3.87 27 73 0 0 1.5
5.73 0 100 0 0 1.5
7.83 0 100 0 0 1.5
8.17 0 0 15 85 1.5
10.00 0 0 2 98 2.0
10.10 70 30 0 0 2.0
11.00 70 30 0 0 2.0

Results and discussion

The amino acids profiles of A. archangelica leaves and A. sylvestris leaves were determined using HPLC method (Figs 14, Table 3).

Table 2.

Performance parameters of the amino acid determination method.

Amino acid Correlation coefficient R2 Limit of detection LOD, mg/100 g Limit of quantification LOQ, mg/100 g
Asp 0.9999 0.0391 0.1307
Glu 0.9997 0.0138 0.0456
Asn 0.9981 0.0221 0.0744
Gln 0.9991 0.0168 0.0556
Ser 0.9989 0.0153 0.0508
Arg 0.9998 0.0184 0.0610
Gly 0.9994 0.0163 0.0551
Thr 0.9996 0.0335 0.1114
Ala 0.9991 0.0109 0.0360
Pro 0.9998 0.0186 0.0612
Val 0.9999 0.0524 0.1751
Met 0.9996 0.0149 0.0504
Ile 0.9999 0.0593 0.1977
Leu 0.9989 0.0112 0.0379
Phe 0.9995 0.0226 0.0749
CyS-SCy 0.9987 0.0181 0.0607
His 0.9993 0.0072 0.0236
Lys 0.9999 0.0432 0.1435
Cys 0.9987 0.0134 0.0452
Tyr 0.9996 0.0172 0.0579
Table 3.

The amino acid composition content of the leaves of Angelica archangelica L. and Angelica sylvestris L.

Name of amino acid Amino acids content, mg/100 g
Angelica archangelica L. Angelica sylvestris L.
Free Bound Free Bound
Asp 37.1±0.29 1298.5±12.86 66.9±0.47 861.0±8.51
Glu 130.9±1.47 1471.3±11.62 96.3±0.94 1155.6±19.67
Asn 8.1±0.02 2.8±0.03 377.6±2.19 5.4±0.02
Gln 15.8±0.19 n/d 547.8±7.26 n/d
Ser 18.7±0.26 779.2±5.81 90.4±0.72 294.3±2.95
Arg 14.3±0.40 735.2±6.49 22.0±0.19 269.1±3.67
Gly 19.1±0.34 830.1±6.34 14.6±0.11 363.1±7.25
Thr 15.8±0.19 660.8±5.98 82.9±1.75 258.4±2.18
Ala 14.6±0.17 849.1±6.42 25.6±0.21 320.4±4.22
Pro 25.0±0.24 667.2±6.13 148.1±1.37 235.4±5.31
Val 5.5±0.01 442.3±4.87 92.1±0.98 150.9±2.89
Met 1.1±0.02 95.2±0.83 15.4±0.18 17.7±0.36
Ile 2.9±0.04 334.1±1.78 51.0±0.11 127.9±1.97
Leu 5.4±0.11 766.9±5.12 34.9±0.65 286.7±5.13
Phe 4.8±0.09 458.1±4.64 38.1±0.27 187.4±3.78
CyS-SCy n/d 6.7±0.05 n/d 6.0±0.14
His 7.1±0.07 238.7±1.08 16.0±0.41 126.0±2.49
Lys 10.4±0.13 435.2±1.13 21.1±0.37 214.3±3.76
Cys n/d 20.9±0.16 0.4±0.01 8.4±0.03
Tyr 9.3±0.18 423.1±1.94 54.9±0.58 197.6±2.52

The HPLC method identified eighteen free amino acids in the leaves of A. archangelica. Among them, eight amino acids are essential namely L-threonine, L-valine, L-methionine, L-isoleucine, L-leucine, L-phenylalanine, L-histidine, and L-lysine. Two acids, such as L-arginine and L-tyrosine are semi-essential amino acids. The other eight amino acids are nonessential amino acids.

Figure 1. 

HPLC chromatogram of free amino acids of Angelica archangelica L. leaves.

Free glutamic acid was present in the leaves of A. archangelica in the greatest amount, its content was 130.9 mg/100g. This acid takes part in a significant amount of metabolic reactions and affects metabolic processes in the brain. Glutamic acid is a source of glucose and holds its normal blood level (Okasha et al. 2019). It maintains acid-base homeostasis in blood and tissues (Lyisikov 2012). This acid is a precursor in the synthesis of ornithine and proline and contributes to the temporary neutralization of ammonia with the formation of non-toxic glutamine (Pharmaceutical encyclopedia 2016). Glutamic acid is used as a conjugate because it improves the efficiency of anticancer agent and reduces its toxicity in relation to normal cells. The synthetic amides acid show activity with relation to Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (Dutta et al. 2013). The content of other amino acids was lower.

Figure 2. 

HPLC chromatogram of amino acids after hydrolysis of Angelica archangelica L. leaves.

Nineteen bound amino acids were identified in the leaves of A. archangelica. Eight amino acids are essential, eight – nonessential, and three acids namely L-arginine, L-cysteine, and L-tyrosine are semi-essential amino acids. Among the bound amino acids, L-glutamic and L-aspartic acids were present in the leaves of A. archangelica in the greatest amount, their content was 1471.3 mg/100g, 1298.5 mg/100 g, respectively. Aspartic acid is a major component of antibodies, immunoglobulins, and the immune system as a whole. With this acid, carbohydrates are transformed into energy which helps the body to reduce ammonia levels after exercise. It has hepatoprotective properties and is involved in reamination reactions, and synthesis of methionine, threonine, and lysine (Sirovaya et al. 2014). Also, a significant content of L-alanine (849.1 mg/100 g), Glycine (830.1 mg/100 g), L-serine (779.2 mg/100 g), L-leucine (766.9 mg/100 g), L-arginine (735.2 mg/100 g), L-proline (667.2 mg/100 g), L-threonine (660.8 mg/100 g) bound amino acids was found. L-alanine contributes as an intermediary between protein catabolism and carbohydrates synthesis. Alanine plays a central role in the metabolism of muscle protein and is the main criterion in nitrogen metabolism. With help of this acid, muscles use the energy produced by other amino acids. It is used as a component in infusion solutions, a food additive, and a precursor for pharmaceutical and chemical products (VKM 2017; Hatazawa et al. 2018; Tomé 2018). Glycine is the nonessential amino acid, which is a substrate for the synthesis of several biologically important compounds and biomolecules. It participates in detoxification reactions, in the synthesis of tripeptide glutathione, and of proteins. Glycine has a wide spectrum of immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and cytoprotective properties. To exert its effects, this acid binds to various receptors (Pérez-Torres et al. 2017). L-serine plays a major role in neurological development, cellular proliferation, brain development, and function (Koning et al. 2003). It has different functions and roles from primary protein structure to cell signaling. Deficits in this acid may have profound health effects from embryo to geriatrics. Dietary supplementation with serine is considered a probable therapy for progressive neurodegenerative diseases namely Alzheimer’s diseases and myotrophic lateral sclerosis (Metcalf et al. 2018). L-leucine promotes to energy metabolism renderenergy for protein synthesis, inhibiting protein degradation (Duan et al. 2016). It plays an exceptional signaling role in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle (Li et al. 2011; Carpentier 2020), mammary epithelial cells (Lei et al. 2012), placental cells, and as well as other cell views (Kim et al. 2007; Li et al. 2007; Kim et al. 2011). L-arginine is a semi-essential amino acid, which constitutes 5–7% of the total amino acids in people with normal nutrition. This amino acid is used by all cells and by the body for protein synthesis, tissue repairing, and immune cell function. It is also converted to citrulline and act as a vasodilator (Pahlavani et al. 2014). Because of arginine’s NO-stimulating effects, it can be utilized for congestive heart failure, preeclampsia, hypertension, angina pectoris, coronary heart disease, and erectile dysfunction (Appleton 2002). L-proline is an exceptional amino acid for maintaining cell structure and function (Hu et al. 2008; Kaul et al. 2008). They constitute one-third of amino acids in the collagen proteins which appertain about 30% of body proteins (Wu et al. 2011). It is the main component of collagen and promotes the healing of wounds, burns, ulcers, and good joint function. Proline contributes to buffering cellular redox potential under stress conditions, stabilizing sub-cellular structures, and scavenging free radicals (Serraj and Sinclair 2002; Hayat et al. 2012; Slobodianiuk et al. 2021b). L-threonine has been broadly used in food and pharmaceutical manufacturing. It protects the liver by preventing the accumulation of fat in the cells and has the ability to remove toxins (Dong et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2019). L‑cystine and L-cysteine were found only bound.

Figure 3. 

HPLC chromatogram of free amino acids of Angelica sylvestris L. leaves.

The leaves of A. sylvestris L. contained nineteen free amino acids and as many bound amino acids. L-glutamine, L-asparagine, and L-proline dominate among free amino acids in the studied plant these content was 547.8 mg/100 g, 377.6 mg/100 g, and 148.1 mg/100 g, respectively. Asparagine supports the normal functioning of the nervous system and liver, able to bind ammonia in tissues. Also, this acid prevents both excessive excitation and excessive inhibition, participates in metabolic processes and stimulates immunity (Sirovaya et al. 2014). Glutamine is responsible for the state of the immune system and is the main source of energy for the kidneys and intestines (Fedosov 2017). Among bound amino acids, L-glutamic and L-aspartic acids were present in the leaves of A. sylvestris in the greatest amount, which was 1155.6 mg/100 g, and 861.0 mg/100 g, respectively. L‑cystine was found only bound.

Figure 4. 

HPLC chromatogram of amino acids after hydrolysis of Angelica sylvestris L. leaves.

Conclusions

By HPLC method in the leaves of A. archangelica L. and A. sylvestris L. were identified amino acids and determined their quantitative content. As a result of this research there was found in study species a significant amount of free and bound amino acids. High concentrations of free and bound amino acids such as L-glutamic acid and L-aspartic acid predominate in A. archangelica L. and A. sylvestris L. This allowed these amino acids to be considered distinguishing markers of the study plants. Character metabolic processes in which these amino acids take part may be associated with the medicinal properties of these plants pursuant to their use in medicine and, therefore, may contribute to the insight of their therapeutic properties.

References

  • Ağalar HG, Göger F, Demirci B, Malyer P, Kırımer N (2020) Angelica sylvestris var. sylvestris L.: essential oils and antioxidant activity evaluation. Eskişehir technical university journal of science and technology applied sciences and engineering 21(1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.544889
  • Alkan Türkuçar S, Aktaş Karaçelik A, Karaköse M (2021) Phenolic compounds, essential oil composition, and antioxidant activity of Angelica purpurascens (Avé-Lall.) Gill. Turkish journal of chemistry 45(3): 956–966. https://doi.org/10.3906/kim-2101-28
  • Appleton J (2002) Arginine: Clinical potential of a semi-essential amino acid. Alternative medicine review: a journal of clinical therapeutic 7(6): 512–522.
  • Bhat ZA, Kumar D, Shah MY (2011) Angelica archangelica Linn. is an angel on earth for the treatment of diseases. International Journal of Nutrition, Pharmacology, Neurological Diseases 1: 36–50. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0738.77531
  • Budniak L, Slobodianiuk L, Darzuli N, Honcharuk Ya (2021a) The antibacterial activity of the tablets with dry extract of round-leaved wintergreen leaves. Pharmacologyonline 2: 672–679.
  • Budniak L, Slobodianiuk L, Marchyshyn S, Demydiak O (2020) Determination of Arnica foliosa Nutt. fatty acids content by GC/MS method. ScienceRise: Pharmaceutical Science 6(28): 14–18. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4852.2020.216474
  • Budniak L, Slobodianiuk L, Marchyshyn S, Ilashchuk P (2021b) Determination of polysaccharides in Gentiana cruciata L. herb. Pharmacologyonline 2: 1473–1479.
  • Budniak L, Slobodianiuk L, Marchyshyn S, Klepach P (2021c) Investigation of the influence of the thick extract of common centaury (Centaurium erythraea Rafn.) herb on the secretory function of the stomach. Pharmacologyonline 2: 352–360.
  • Budniak L, Slobodianiuk L, Marchyshyn S, Parashchuk E (2021d) Determination of carbohydrates in burnet saxifrage (Pimpinella saxifraga L.). Pharmacologyonline 2: 1374–1382.
  • Budniak L, Vasenda M (2021) Study of the influence of qualitative factors on the pharmacotechnological parameters of granular masses with plant extract having expectorant properties. Pharmacologyonline 3: 1884–1892.
  • Budniak L, Vasenda M, Slobodianiuk L (2021e) Determination of flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic acids in tablets with thick extract of Primula denticulata SMITH. Pharmacologyonline 2: 1244–1253.
  • Carbonnier J, Molho D (1982) Furocoumarins in Archangelica officinalis and Angelica silvestris. Distribution of 5-beta-cyclolavandulyloxy-psoralen in the genus Angelica. Planta medica 44(3): 162–165. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-971430
  • Chalchat JC, Garry RP (1997) Essential oil of Angelica roots (Angelica archangelica L.): optimization of distillation, location in plant and chemical composition. Journal of Essential Oil Research 9: 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1997.10554250
  • Chen WP, Yang XY, Hegeman AD, Gray WM, Cohen JD (2010) Microscale analysis of amino acids using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry after methyl chloroformate derivatization. Journal of chromatography B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life 878(24): 2199–2208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.06.027
  • Darzuli N, Budniak L, Hroshovyi T (2019) Selected excipients in oral solid dosage form with dry extract of Pyrola rotundifolia L. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics 11(6): 210–216. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2019v11i6.35282
  • Darzuli N, Budniak L, Slobodianiuk L (2021) Investigation of the antibacterial and antifungal activity of the Pyrola rotundifolia L. leaves dry extract. PharmacologyOnLine 1: 395–403.
  • Daşkın R, Kaynak G (2012) Angelica archangelica (Apiaceae), a new species to Turkey: a contribution to its taxonomy and distribution. Phytologia Balcanica: International Journal of Balkan Flora and Vegetation 18: 5–9.
  • Duan Y, Li F, Li Y, Tang Y, Kong X, Feng Z, Anthony GT, Watford M, Hou Y, Wu G, Yin Y (2016) The role of leucine and its metabolites in protein and energy metabolism. Amino Acids 48: 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-015-2067-1
  • Fedosov AI (2017) Amino acid composition of artichoke inflorescence. Pharmaceutical Review 3: 25–30. [in Ukrainian]
  • Feshchenko H, Marchyshyn S, Budniak L, Slobodianiuk L, Basaraba R (2021a) Study of antibacterial and antifungal properties of the lyophilized extract of fireweed (Chamaenerion angustifolium L.) herb. Pharmacologyonline 2: 1464–1472.
  • Feshchenko H, Oleshchuk O, Slobodianiuk L, Milian I (2021b) Study of Epilobium angustifolium L. amino acids content by HPLC method. ScienceRise: Pharmaceutical Science 6(34): 85–90. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4852.2021.249836
  • Fraternale D, Flamini G, Ricci D (2014) Essential oil composition and antimicrobial activity of Angelica archangelica L. (Apiaceae) roots. Journal of medicinal food 17(9): 1043–1047. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2013.0012
  • Hayat S, Hayat Q, Alyemeni MN, Wani AS, Pichtel J, Ahmad A (2012) Role of proline under changing environments. Plant Signaling & Behavior 7(11): 1456–1466. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.21949
  • Holvik K, Froylamd L, Haugem M, Henjuman S, Lovik M, Stea TH, Strand TA (2017) Risk assessment of “other substances” – L-alanine. Opinion of the Panel on Nutrition, dietetic products, Novel Food an Allergy of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety, (VKM) 2017, 6.
  • Hu CA, Khalil S, Zhaorigetu S, Liu Z, Tyler M, Wan G, Valle D (2008) Human Delta1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase: function and regulation. Amino Acids 35(4): 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0075-0
  • Husak L, Dakhym I, Marchyshyn S, Nakonechna S (2018) Determination of sugars and fructans content in Stachys sieboldii. International Journal of Green Pharmacy 12: 70–74. https://doi.org/10.22377/ijgp.v12i01.1527
  • Jámbor A, Molnár-Perl I (2009a) Amino acid analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography after derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride Literature overview and further study. Journal of chromatography, A, 1216(15): 3064–3077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.01.068
  • Jámbor A, Molnár-Perl I (2009b) Quantitation of amino acids in plasma by high performance liquid chromatography: simultaneous deproteinization and derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride. Journal of chromatography A 1216(34): 6218–6223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.06.083
  • Karakaya S, Bingol Z, Koca MS, Dagoglu S, Pınar QNM, Demirci B, Gulcin I, Brestič M, Sytar O (2020) Identification of non-alkaloid natural compounds of Angelica purpurascens (Avé-Lall.) Gilli. (Apiaceae) with cholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase inhibition potential. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 28: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2019.11.001
  • Khayyal MT, el-Ghazaly MA, Kenawy SA, Seif-el-Nasr M, Mahran LG, Kafafi YA, Okpanyi SN (2001) Antiulcerogenic effect of some gastrointestinally acting plant extracts and their combination. Arzneimittel-Forschung 51(7): 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1300078
  • Kim JY, Burghardt RC, Wu G, Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Bazer FW (2011) Select nutrients in the ovine uterine lumen: VII. Effects of arginine, leucine, glutamine, and glucose on trophectoderm cell signaling, proliferation, and migration. Biology of Reproduction 84: 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.085738
  • Kim SW, Mateo RD, Yin YL, Wu GY (2007) Functional amino acids and fatty acids for enhancing production performance of sows and piglets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 20: 295–306. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.295.
  • Koning TJ, Snell K, Duran M, Berger R, Poll-The BT, Surtees R (2003) L-serine in disease and development. The Biochemical journal 371(Pt3): 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20021785
  • Krzaczek T, Nowak R (2000) Sterols in the roots and fruits from Angelica sylvestris L. Herba Polonica 46(4): 274–277.
  • Lei J, Feng DY, Zhang YL, Zhao FQ, Wu ZL, San Gabriel A, Fujishima Y, Uneyama H, Wu G (2012) Nutritional and regulatory role of branched-chain amino acids in lactation. Frontiers in Bioscience 17: 2725–2739. https://doi.org/10.2741/4082
  • Liao C, Downie SR, Yu Y, He X (2012) Historical biogeography of the Angelica group (Apiaceae tribe Selineae) inferred from analyses of nrDNA and cpDNA sequences. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 50(3): 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-6831.2012.00182.x
  • Liao CY, Gao Q, Katz-Downie DS, Downie SR (2020) A systematic study of North American Angelica species (Apiaceae) based on nrDNA ITS and cpDNA sequences and fruit morphology. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12702
  • Liu Y, Li Q, Zheng P, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Sun C, Cao G, Zhou W, Wang X, Zhang D, Zhang T, Sun J, Ma Y (2015) Developing a high-throughput screening method for threonine overproduction based on an artificial promoter. Microbial Cell Factories 14: e121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0311-8
  • Lobiuc A, Zamfirache MM, Stratu A (2012) Physiological aspects in two Angelica L. taxa (Apiaceae). Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii ”Al I Cuza” din Iasi 58: 81–87.
  • Lyisikov YuA (2012) Amino acids in human nutrition. Experimental & clinical gastroenterology 2: 88–105. [in Russian]
  • Marchyshyn S, Budniak L, Slobodianiuk L (2021a) Chemical composition of the garden nasturtium essential oil and antibacterial activity of fresh juice of the herb. Pharmacologyonline 3: 1463–1473.
  • Marchyshyn S, Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Ivasiuk I (2021b) Hypoglycemic effect of Cyperus esculentus L. tubers extract. Pharmacologyonline 2: 1383–1392.
  • Marchyshyn S, Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Ivasiuk I (2021c) Study the anti-inflammatory and wound-healing activity of the dry extract of the herb Cyperus esculentus L. Pharmacologyonline 3: 282–290.
  • Metcalf JS, Dunlop RA, Powell JT, Banack SA, Cox PA (2018) L-Serine: a Naturally-Occurring Amino Acid with Therapeutic Potential. Neurotoxicity Research 33(1): 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-017-9814-x
  • Muckensturm B, Duplay D, Robert P, Simonis M, Kienlen JC (1981) Substances antiappétantes pour insectes phytophages présentes dans Angelica silvestris et Heracleum sphondylium. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 9: 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-1978(81)90010-7
  • Murphy EM, Nahar L, Byres M, Shoeb M, Siakalima M, Rahman MM, Gray AI, Sarker SD (2004) Coumarins from the seeds of Angelica sylvestris (Apiaceae) and their distribution within the genus Angelica. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32: 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-1978(03)00171-6
  • Nivinskiene O, Butkiene R, Mockute D (2003) Changes in the chemical composition of essential oil of Angelica archangelica L. roots during storage. Chemija (Vilnius) 14: 52–56.
  • Özek T, Özek G, Başer KH, Duran A, Sağiroğlu M (2008) Composition of the Essential Oils of Angelica sylvestris L. var. sylvestris Isolated from the Fruits by Different Isolation Techniques. Journal of Essential Oil Research 20: 408–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2008.9700042
  • Pahlavani N, Jafari M, Sadeghi O, Rezaei M, Rasad H, Rahdar HA, Entezari MH (2014) L-arginine supplementation and risk factors of cardiovascular diseases in healthy men: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. F1000Research 3: e306. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5877.2
  • Pathak S, Wanjari MM, Jain SK, Tripathi M (2010) Evaluation of Antiseizure Activity of Essential Oil from Roots of Angelica archangelica Linn. in Mice. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 72(3): 371–375. https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.70487
  • Salikhova RA, Poroshenko GG (1995) Antimutagenic properties of Angelica archangelica L. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii meditsinskikh nauk 1: 58–61.
  • Shawky E, Abou El Kheir RM (2018) Rapid discrimination of different Apiaceae species based on HPTLC fingerprints and targeted flavonoids determination using multivariate image analysis. Phytochemical analysis: PCA 29(5): 452–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.2749
  • Sigurdsson S, Gudbjarnason S (2007) Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by extracts and constituents from Angelica archangelica and Geranium sylvaticum. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C, Journal of biosciences 62(9–10): 689–693. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2007-9-1011
  • Sigurdsson S, Ogmundsdottir HM, Gudbjarnason S (2004) Antiproliferative effect of Angelica archangelica fruits. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C, Journal of biosciences 59(7–8), 523–527. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2004-7-813
  • Sigurdsson S, Ogmundsdottir HM, Hallgrímsson J, Gudbjarnason S (2005) Antitumour activity of Angelica archangelica leaf extract. In vivo 19(1): 191–194 .
  • Simonović SR, Stankov-Jovanović VP, Mitić VD, Ilić MD, Petrović GM, Stojanović GS (2014) Chemical composition of Angelica pancicii essential oil determined by liquid and headspace GC-MS techniques. Natural Product Communications 9(2): 271–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1400900235
  • Sirovaya AO, Shapoval LG, Makarov VA, Petyunina VN, Grabovetskaya ER, Andreeva SV, Nakonechanaya SA, Bachinskii RO, Lukiyanova LV, Kozub SH, Levashova OL (2014) Amino acids through the eyes of chemists, pharmacists, biologists. Shchedra sadiba plyus, Kharkov (2nd vol.). [in Russian]
  • Skakun N, Stepanova Yu (1988) Comparative evaluation of the hepatoprotective, antioxidant and choleretic activity of flavonoid drugs. Vrachebnoe Delo 12: 52–54. [in Russian]
  • Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Feshchenko H, Sverstiuk A, Palaniza Y (2022) Quantitative analysis of fatty acids and monosaccharides composition in Chamerion angustifolium L. by GC/MS method. Pharmacia 69(1): 167–174. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.69.e76687
  • Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Demydiak O (2021a) Investigation of the anti-inflammatory effect of the dry extract from the herb of Stachys sieboldii MIQ. Pharmacologyonline 2: 590–597.
  • Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Kostyshyn L, Ezhned M (2021b) Determination of amino acids content of the Tagetes lucida Cav. by GC/MS. Pharmacia 68(4): 859–867. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.68.e73325
  • Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Kostyshyn L, Zakharchuk O (2021c) Analysis of carbohydrates in Saponaria officinalis L. using GC/MS method. Pharmacia 68(2): 339–345. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.68.e62691
  • Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Parashchuk E, Levytska L (2021d) Experimental studies on expectorant effect of extract from Pimpinella saxifraga L. PharmacologyOnLine 1: 404–410.
  • Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Sinichenko A, Demydiak O (2021e) Determination of amino acids of cultivated species of the genus Primula L. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry 11: 8969–8977. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC112.89698977
  • Stoiko L, Kurylo Kh (2018) Development of optimal technology of alcohol extract Centaurium erythraea Rafn. herb. Archives of the Balkan Medical Union 53(4): 523–528. https://doi.org/10.31688/ABMU.2018.53.4.06
  • Vasenda M, Budniak L, Slobodianiuk L (2021) Impact of quantitative factors on pharmaco-technological properties of tablets with thick extract of Primula denticulata SMITH. Pharmacologyonline 3: 927–936.
  • VKM (2017) Risk assessment of “other substances” – beta-alanine. Opinion of the Panel on Nutrition, dietetic products, Novel Food an Allergy of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety.
  • Vogl S, Picker P, Mihaly-Bison J, Fakhrudin N, Atanasov AG, Heiss EH, Wawrosch C, Reznicek G, Dirsch VM, Saukel J, Kopp B (2013) Ethnopharmacological in vitro studies on Austria’s folk medicine-an unexplored lore in vitro anti-inflammatory activities of 71 Austrian traditional herbal drugs. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 149(3): 750–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2013.06.007
  • Wahlin B, Blixt S (1994) Nordiska Medicinalväxter. Nordiska Genbanken 24: 15–16. [in Sweden]
  • Wang J, Lian P, Yu Q, Wei J, Kang WY (2017) Purification, characterization and procoagulant activity of polysaccharides from Angelica dahurice roots. Chemistry Central journal 11: e17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-017-0243-y
  • Wang J, Ma W, Fang Y, Yang J, Zhan J, Chen S, Wang X (2019) Increasing L-threonine production in Escherichia coli by overexpressing the gene cluster phaCAB. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 46(11): 1557–1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-019-02215-0
  • Wszelaki N, Paradowska K, Jamróz MK, Granica S, Kiss AK (2011) Bioactivity-guided fractionation for the butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of furanocoumarins from Angelica archangelica L. roots and fruits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59(17): 9186–9193. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf201971s
  • Xie Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Wang C, Duan D, Wang Z (2018) Chinese Angelica Polysaccharide (CAP) Alleviates LPS-Induced Inflammation and Apoptosis by Down-Regulating COX-1 in PC12 Cells. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry: International Journal of Experimental Cellular Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology 49(4): 1380–1388. https://doi.org/10.1159/000493415
  • Yeh ML, Liu CF, Huang CL, Huang TC (2003) Hepatoprotective effect of Angelica archangelica in chronically ethanol-treated mice. Pharmacology 68(2): 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1159/000069530
login to comment