Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Liliia Budniak ( stoyko_li@tdmu.edu.ua ) Academic editor: Plamen Peikov
© 2022 Liliia Budniak, Liudmyla Slobodianiuk, Svitlana Marchyshyn, Ihor Potishnyi.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Budniak L, Slobodianiuk L, Marchyshyn S, Potishnyi I (2022) Determination of amino acids of plants from Angelica L. genus by HPLC method. Pharmacia 69(2): 437-446. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.69.e83705
|
One of the tasks of pharmaceutical science is to find new sources of effective drugs. Such sources include plants such as Angelica archangelica L. and Angelica sylvestris L., which have been used for many years to treat various diseases in folk medicine. Because the chemical composition of these plants is poorly understood, the aim of our study was to investigate the amino acid composition of the leaves of A. archangelica L. and A. sylvestris L. The amino acids of the leaves of the study species of the genus Angelica L. were determined by the HPLC method. Eighteen free and nineteen bound amino acids were identified in the leaves of A. archangelica L. The A. sylvestris L. leaves contained nineteen free and the same amount of bound amino acids. High concentrations of free and bound amino acids such as L-glutamic acid and L-aspartic acid predominate in A. archangelica L. and A. sylvestris L. This allowed these amino acids to be considered distinguishing markers of the study plants. Character metabolic processes in which these amino acids take part may be associated with the medicinal properties of these plants pursuant to their use in medicine and, therefore, may contribute to the insight of their therapeutic properties.
Angelica archangelica L., Angelica sylvestris L., leaves, amino acids, HPLC
One of the tasks of pharmaceutical science, at the present stage of development, is to find new sources of effective drugs (
Angelica L. is among the largest genus of the Apiaceae family. It has approximately 110 species of biennial and perennial herbs (
For many centuries, species of this genus namely A. archangelica, A. sylvestris, A. californica, A. atropupurea, A. dahurica, A. keiskei, A. lucida, A. tomentosa, A. venenosa, A. tenuissima, A. kingie have been used as an expectorant, diuretic, anti-inflammatory, and diaphoretic, and means for flu, chronic bronch, pleurisy, colds, fever, typhoid, coughs, hepatitis, indigestion, colic, headaches, rheumatism, arthritis, bacterial and fungal infections (
A. archangelica and A. sylvestris are the most common species in Ukraine. They grow on wetlands and waterfronts (
A. archangelica is a plant that is part of the European Pharmacopoeia, the Ukrainian Pharmacopoeia, the British Herbal Pharmacopoeia, the Complete German Commission E, the British Pharmacopoeia, and many other pharmacopeias.
A. sylvestris, also known as “European wild angelica”, “wild angelica and is analogous to A. archangelica in terms of their common characteristics. As a result of ethnobotanical research, the use was established A. sylvestris disorders of digestive, respiratory, and nervous systems, fever, infection and influenza, in cases of indigestion, as an analgesic, anticarcinogenic, antipyretic remedy (
Previous studies revealed various groups of biologically active substances in A. archangelica and A. sylvestris, but amino acids were not studied. Based on the literature data and analysis of the chemical composition of biologically active substances of A. archangelica and A. sylvestris, it is important to study the amino acids composition of these plants.
The leaves of A. archangelica and A. sylvestris were collected in Ukraine, on meadows and swamps of the Ternopil region during the flowering period in July-August 2017. The leaves of the study objects were authenticated by professor Svitlana Marchyshyn (TNMU, Ternopil, Ukraine) (
Standards of amino acids, including L-asparagine (Asn), L-glutamic acid (Glu), L-alanine (Ala), L-leucine (Leu), L-serine (Ser), L-isoleucine (Ile), L-aspartic acid (Asp), L‑arginine (Arg), Glycine (Gly), L-valine (Val), L-methionine (Met), L‑cystine (CyS-SCy), L-cysteine (Cys), L-phenylalanine (Phe), L-threonine (Thr), L-glutamine (Gln), L-proline (Pro), L-histidine (His), L-tyrosine (Tyr), L-lysine (Lys) obtained from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), were of analytical grade (> 99% purity) (
Reagents 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC-Cl), Hydrochloric acid (HCl), Acetonitrile (ACN), β-mercaptoethanol, Amantadine hydrochloride were from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). All other reagents were of the highest purity. The water used in the studies was produced by the MilliQ Gradient water deionization system (Millipore, USA).
The amino acids composition of the leaves of A. archangelica and A. sylvestris is determined by the HPLC method on high-performance liquid chromatograph Agilent 1100 (Agilent Technologies, USA) equipped with a flow-through vacuum degasser G1379A, a four-channel pump of the low-pressure gradient G13111A, an automatic injector G1313A, a column thermostat G13116A, and a diode array detector G1316A. Samples were analyzed using a column length ZORBAX-XDB-C18 - 50 mm, inner diameter - 4.6 mm, and the diameter of octadecylsilyl sorbent grain 1.8 µm.
For the extraction of free amino acids the samples of the study raw material were ground into a powder by laboratory mill, then about 0.3 g (accurately weighed) was selected and placed into a flask with 3.0 ml of 0.1 M aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid containing 0.2% β-mercaptoethanol. The extractions were carried out in the ultrasonic water bath at 50 °C for 2 hours.
Extraction of bound amino acids was carried out by adding 3 ml of 6 M an aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid containing 0.4% β-mercaptoethanol to 0.2 g (accurately weighed) of powdered herbal raw materials. Hydrolysis was carried out for 24 hours in a thermostat at 110 °C.
The resulting extracts were centrifuged at 3000 rpm and filtered. Obtaining filtrates were placed in a vacuum desiccator at a temperature of 40–45 °С and a pressure of 1.5 mm Hg until hydrochloric acid is completely removed.
Then 200 μl of 0.8 M borate buffer pH 9.0 and 200 μl of a 20 mM solution of 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chloride (FMOC-Cl) in acetonitrile was sequentially added with an automatic dispenser. After a 10-minute, 20 μl of a 150 mM solution of amantadine hydrochloride in 50% aqueous acetonitrile was added.
For analysis, the following chromatography mode was set:
The identification of amino acids was performed according to their hold-up time (using standards as a reference). The quantitative content of amino acids is calculated from the value of the peak area of the amino acids. The content of bound amino acids was determined by subtracting the content of free amino acids from their total content (
The validation method and the analysis procedure of the amino acid content were performed according to validation guides for EURACHEM analytical methods.
To evaluate the sensitivity and linearity of the signal in relation to the concentration, linear calibrations were generated for each amino acid. To determine the linearity of the amino acids, five different concentrations, namely 0.1 mg/100 g, 0.3 mg/100 g, 0.6 mg/100 g, 1.3 mg/100 g and 3.3 mg/100 g of standards were used for the amino acids. The correlation coefficients (R2) ranged from 0.9981 to 0.9999, as shown in Table
| Retention time, min | A% 0.05M sodium acetate solution, pH 6.5 | B% 0.10 M sodium acetate solution: ACN = (23:22, v/v), pH 6.5 | С% H2O | D% ACN | mobile phase feed rate, mL/min |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 70 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| 3.87 | 27 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| 5.73 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| 7.83 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| 8.17 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 85 | 1.5 |
| 10.00 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 98 | 2.0 |
| 10.10 | 70 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 |
| 11.00 | 70 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 |
The amino acids profiles of A. archangelica leaves and A. sylvestris leaves were determined using HPLC method (Figs
| Amino acid | Correlation coefficient R2 | Limit of detection LOD, mg/100 g | Limit of quantification LOQ, mg/100 g |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asp | 0.9999 | 0.0391 | 0.1307 |
| Glu | 0.9997 | 0.0138 | 0.0456 |
| Asn | 0.9981 | 0.0221 | 0.0744 |
| Gln | 0.9991 | 0.0168 | 0.0556 |
| Ser | 0.9989 | 0.0153 | 0.0508 |
| Arg | 0.9998 | 0.0184 | 0.0610 |
| Gly | 0.9994 | 0.0163 | 0.0551 |
| Thr | 0.9996 | 0.0335 | 0.1114 |
| Ala | 0.9991 | 0.0109 | 0.0360 |
| Pro | 0.9998 | 0.0186 | 0.0612 |
| Val | 0.9999 | 0.0524 | 0.1751 |
| Met | 0.9996 | 0.0149 | 0.0504 |
| Ile | 0.9999 | 0.0593 | 0.1977 |
| Leu | 0.9989 | 0.0112 | 0.0379 |
| Phe | 0.9995 | 0.0226 | 0.0749 |
| CyS-SCy | 0.9987 | 0.0181 | 0.0607 |
| His | 0.9993 | 0.0072 | 0.0236 |
| Lys | 0.9999 | 0.0432 | 0.1435 |
| Cys | 0.9987 | 0.0134 | 0.0452 |
| Tyr | 0.9996 | 0.0172 | 0.0579 |
The amino acid composition content of the leaves of Angelica archangelica L. and Angelica sylvestris L.
| Name of amino acid | Amino acids content, mg/100 g | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelica archangelica L. | Angelica sylvestris L. | |||
| Free | Bound | Free | Bound | |
| Asp | 37.1±0.29 | 1298.5±12.86 | 66.9±0.47 | 861.0±8.51 |
| Glu | 130.9±1.47 | 1471.3±11.62 | 96.3±0.94 | 1155.6±19.67 |
| Asn | 8.1±0.02 | 2.8±0.03 | 377.6±2.19 | 5.4±0.02 |
| Gln | 15.8±0.19 | n/d | 547.8±7.26 | n/d |
| Ser | 18.7±0.26 | 779.2±5.81 | 90.4±0.72 | 294.3±2.95 |
| Arg | 14.3±0.40 | 735.2±6.49 | 22.0±0.19 | 269.1±3.67 |
| Gly | 19.1±0.34 | 830.1±6.34 | 14.6±0.11 | 363.1±7.25 |
| Thr | 15.8±0.19 | 660.8±5.98 | 82.9±1.75 | 258.4±2.18 |
| Ala | 14.6±0.17 | 849.1±6.42 | 25.6±0.21 | 320.4±4.22 |
| Pro | 25.0±0.24 | 667.2±6.13 | 148.1±1.37 | 235.4±5.31 |
| Val | 5.5±0.01 | 442.3±4.87 | 92.1±0.98 | 150.9±2.89 |
| Met | 1.1±0.02 | 95.2±0.83 | 15.4±0.18 | 17.7±0.36 |
| Ile | 2.9±0.04 | 334.1±1.78 | 51.0±0.11 | 127.9±1.97 |
| Leu | 5.4±0.11 | 766.9±5.12 | 34.9±0.65 | 286.7±5.13 |
| Phe | 4.8±0.09 | 458.1±4.64 | 38.1±0.27 | 187.4±3.78 |
| CyS-SCy | n/d | 6.7±0.05 | n/d | 6.0±0.14 |
| His | 7.1±0.07 | 238.7±1.08 | 16.0±0.41 | 126.0±2.49 |
| Lys | 10.4±0.13 | 435.2±1.13 | 21.1±0.37 | 214.3±3.76 |
| Cys | n/d | 20.9±0.16 | 0.4±0.01 | 8.4±0.03 |
| Tyr | 9.3±0.18 | 423.1±1.94 | 54.9±0.58 | 197.6±2.52 |
The HPLC method identified eighteen free amino acids in the leaves of A. archangelica. Among them, eight amino acids are essential namely L-threonine, L-valine, L-methionine, L-isoleucine, L-leucine, L-phenylalanine, L-histidine, and L-lysine. Two acids, such as L-arginine and L-tyrosine are semi-essential amino acids. The other eight amino acids are nonessential amino acids.
Free glutamic acid was present in the leaves of A. archangelica in the greatest amount, its content was 130.9 mg/100g. This acid takes part in a significant amount of metabolic reactions and affects metabolic processes in the brain. Glutamic acid is a source of glucose and holds its normal blood level (Okasha et al. 2019). It maintains acid-base homeostasis in blood and tissues (
Nineteen bound amino acids were identified in the leaves of A. archangelica. Eight amino acids are essential, eight – nonessential, and three acids namely L-arginine, L-cysteine, and L-tyrosine are semi-essential amino acids. Among the bound amino acids, L-glutamic and L-aspartic acids were present in the leaves of A. archangelica in the greatest amount, their content was 1471.3 mg/100g, 1298.5 mg/100 g, respectively. Aspartic acid is a major component of antibodies, immunoglobulins, and the immune system as a whole. With this acid, carbohydrates are transformed into energy which helps the body to reduce ammonia levels after exercise. It has hepatoprotective properties and is involved in reamination reactions, and synthesis of methionine, threonine, and lysine (
The leaves of A. sylvestris L. contained nineteen free amino acids and as many bound amino acids. L-glutamine, L-asparagine, and L-proline dominate among free amino acids in the studied plant these content was 547.8 mg/100 g, 377.6 mg/100 g, and 148.1 mg/100 g, respectively. Asparagine supports the normal functioning of the nervous system and liver, able to bind ammonia in tissues. Also, this acid prevents both excessive excitation and excessive inhibition, participates in metabolic processes and stimulates immunity (
By HPLC method in the leaves of A. archangelica L. and A. sylvestris L. were identified amino acids and determined their quantitative content. As a result of this research there was found in study species a significant amount of free and bound amino acids. High concentrations of free and bound amino acids such as L-glutamic acid and L-aspartic acid predominate in A. archangelica L. and A. sylvestris L. This allowed these amino acids to be considered distinguishing markers of the study plants. Character metabolic processes in which these amino acids take part may be associated with the medicinal properties of these plants pursuant to their use in medicine and, therefore, may contribute to the insight of their therapeutic properties.