Research Article
Print
Research Article
Oral acute toxicity study extract ethanol of balakka fruit (Phyllanthus emblica)
expand article infoEndy Juli Anto, Rony Abdi Syahputra§, Hendrika Andriana Silitonga, Putri Cahaya Situmorang§, Sony Eka Nugaraha§
‡ Universitas Methodist Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia
§ Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
Open Access

Abstract

Phyllanthus emblica (PE) is a plant widely found in Indonesia, especially in Sumatra island, and in India. This study followed the OECD No. 420. The groups were divided based on gender, male and female rats. Male rats were divided into 6 groups, which were male/female control, male/female 2000 mg/kgBW, and male/female 5000 mg/kgBW. This study revealed that the ethanol extract of Phyllanthus emblica (EEPE) doses of 2000 mg/kgBW and 5000 mg/kgBW did not cause histological changes in the heart, liver, testes, ovaries, and kidneys, and did not cause changes to the hematological parameters, kidney biochemical parameters, liver biochemical parameters, and electrolyte parameters both in male and female rats. The results show that the LD50 of EEPE is higher than 5000 mg/kgBW. In short, this study provides information regarding the antioxidant activity and the safe use of EEPE. The LD50 of extract ethanol of Phyllanthus emblica is higher than 5000 mg/kgBW.

Keywords

Phyllanthus emblica, Acute Toxicity Study, LD50, OECD

Introduction

Phyllanthus emblica (PE) is a plant widely found in Indonesia, especially in Sumatra island under the name Balakka, and in India, this plant, named Indian gooseberry, is also commonly found and widely used in Ayurvedic medicine. PE is traditionally used for daily treatment for hair growth, anti-constipation, and reducing fever and pain. Phyllanthus emblica belongs to the family Euphorbiaceae and is widely distributed in the subtropics and tropics, such as China, India, Malaysia, and Thailand. Phyllanthus emblica fruit is very popular because it contains vitamin C and high phenolic compounds. From various pharmacological activities reported, Phyllanthus emblica fruit has antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and anticancer activities (Khopde et al. 2001; Anila and Vijayalakshmi 2003; Liu et al. 2012), analgesic, anti-pyretic, antidiabetic, and antimicrobial. (Perianayagam et al. 2004; Liu et al. 2009; Sharma et al. 2020).

All parts of Phyllanthus emblica, including fruits, flowers, seeds, leaves, and bark have been widely used in various traditional medicines, such as in Indian Medicine (Ayurveda), Chinese Traditional Medicine, Tibetan Medicine, and Greek Arabic Medicine. Southwest China’s minority residents apply Phyllanthus emblica root to treat Eczema and its fruit to treat jaundice and diarrhea. Besides, in Nepal, it is used as an astringent and hemostatic (Mirunalini and Krishnaveni 2010; Gaire and Subedi 2014). The bark of Phyllanthus emblica has antioxidant activity and radical scavenging due to its polyphenol compounds (Liu et al. 2008; Charoenteeraboon et al. 2010). As a tannin-rich plant (21–33%), the bark of Phyllanthus emblica is used as a material for tannin extraction in China. Many pharmacological studies have identified Phyllanthus emblica but primarily focused on the fruit, whereas other parts, such as the bark, have rarely been examined.

PE is rich in metabolite compounds, including flavonoids, saponins, tannins, steroids, and glycosides. The flavonoid compounds contained in PE are kaempferol-3-O α-L-(6"-methyl)-rhamnopyranoside, kaempferol-3-O-α-L-(6"-ethyl) rhamnopyranoside, and other compounds, such as Triacontanol, Triacontanoic acid, β-Amyrin ketone, Betulonic acid, Daucosterol, Lupeol acetate, β-Amyrin-3-palmitate, Gallic acid, Betulinic acid, Ursolic acid, Oleanolic acid, Quercetin, Rutin, and Bisabolane. Also, PE fruit is rich in vitamin C, luteolin, and corilagin (Habib-ur-Rehman Yasin et al. 2007; Poltanov et al. 2009; Luo et al. 2011; Pientaweeratch et al. 2016).

Many studies have been conducted to determine the pharmacological activities of PE, including on immunomodulators, hepatoprotective, antiaging, anti-inflammatory, nephroprotective, anti-proliferative, anticancer, cardiac disorder, antibacterial, and antioxidant activities. A study conducted by Juree (2010) reported that water extract of PE had strong antioxidant activity using the DPPH method that yielded a value of 51.3 ± 16.5, a value of 295 ± 5.4 using ABTS, and a value of 0.65 ± 0.04 using DCF. PE also contains a total flavonoid of 389.33 ± 1.25 mg quercetin hydrate/g and a total phenol value of 99.52 ± 1.91 mg GAE/g; this proves that PE has strong antioxidants (Chaphalkar et al. 2013; Renuka Chaphalka 2017).

According to WHO, ensuring the safe use of herbs is very important to prevent toxic effects. Some toxicity tests must follow the standard guidelines from OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), including acute, subacute, subchronic, chronic, and teratogenic toxicities (Jonsson et al. 2013). Acute toxicity study is used to determine the LD50 (lethal dose) of Phyllanthus emblica ethanol extract and comprehensively evaluate its biochemical parameters.

Materials and methods

Regaents and chemical

The chemicals and reagents used were Ethanol (BrataChem), Methanol (BrataChem) Water pro-injection (Sigma Aldrich), Hematoxylin and Eosin (Sigma Aldrich), AST kit (Roche), ALT kit (Roche), ALP kit (Roche), Total Protein kit (Roche), Bilirubin direct kit (Roche), Albumin kit (Roche), Urea kit (Roche), Uric acid kit (Roche), and Creatinine kit (Roche).

Animals

Male and female rats were obtained from the Animal House, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara. A total of 30 Sprague rats with an average weight of 150–200 g were used in this study. Acclimatization and dark/light cycle for 12 hours in 22–25 °C room temperature at 50–60% humidity was carried out for seven days before the study began. Rats were given food and water ad libitum. The acute oral toxicity procedure of this study has received approval from the Ethics Commission of Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.

Plant collection

Fruits were obtained from Padang Sidimpuan, North Sumatra, Indonesia (01°08'07"N–01°28'19"N North Latitude and 99°13'53"E–99°21'31"E East Longitude). After washed and dried, the fruits were crushed until obtaining dry fruit powder.

Extract preparation

As much as 700 g dry PE fruit powder was dissolved using 96% ethanol and macerated for seven days, and occasionally steered every day. The solution was then filtered using Whatman paper no 1, and the filtered result was evaporated using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure until crude extract/ethanol extract of PE (EEPE) was obtained. Phytochemical screening (alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, glycosides, steroids/triterpenoids) was then performed.

Acute toxicity experimental design

This study followed the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) protocol guideline No. 420. The groups were divided based on gender, male and female rats. Male rats were divided into 3 groups, which were male control (MC), male 2000 mg/kgBW (M2000), and male 5000 mg/kgBW (M5000). Meanwhile, the female rats were divided into 3 groups, which were female control (FC), female 2000 mg/kgBW (F2000), and female 5000 mg/kgBW (F5000). All groups were given a single dose of ethanol extract of PE according to the dose using oral gavage on the first day. Then, clinical (dyspnea, dullness, abdominal cramp, diarrhea) and mortality observations were performed for 48 hours and continued for 14 days. At the end of the study, rats were fasted overnight and sacrificed by using diethyl ether inhalation. Blood was directly taken from the heart for hematological analysis. Blood was centrifuged at 4000 rpm 50C for 15 minutes, then the serum was taken, and biochemical parameter analysis was performed.

Hematological analysis

The hematological analysis was conducted using cell-dyn at Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital. The parameters examined included red blood cells (RBC), white blood cells (WBC), hemoglobin, hematocrit, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and mean cell hemoglobin (MCH) using a hematology analyzer (Roche Diagnostic, Switzerland).

Biochemical analysis

The parameters examined in this study were total protein, direct bilirubin, Alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransaminase (AST), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Urea, Creatinine, and Uric Acid using Cobas 6000 (Roche diagnostic, Switzerland). The measurement of sodium, chloride, and potassium levels was done using Cobas b 221 (Roche diagnostic, Switzerland) (Van Gammeren et al. 2008; Ameijeiras et al. 2010).

Histopathology

Heart, liver, kidney, pancreas, ovary, and testis were taken, and the samples were soaked with liquid paraffin at 60–70 °C for 2 hours. It was molded and allowed to freeze, then the paraffin blocks were cut using a microtome with a thickness of 5–7 μm and were attached to slides. The organ incision that has been attached to the slide was immediately placed on a heating surface at a temperature of 56–58 °C for approximately 10 seconds, so that the organ stretches and sticks to the slide; adjustments were made to avoid wrinkled or folded organs. Further, hematoxylin-eosin staining was carried out. First, the preparations were soaked in xylene solution for the deparaffination process for 12 minutes. Next, the dehydration process was carried out by soaking the preparations in 70%, 80%, 90%, and absolute ethanol for 5 minutes, and followed by washing using running water. Subsequently, the preparations were soaked with hematoxylin solution for 5 minutes, washed with running water, stained with eosin, and then dipped in ethanol 70%, 80%, 90%, and absolute ethanol for 10 minutes. Finally, the preparations were put in xylene for 12 minutes. A microscope (Thermo, German) at 100× magnifications was used to observe the preparations.

Data analysis

Data analysis in this study used SPSS (statistical program for social sciences) version 21 using the one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) test. If the p-value was less than 0.05, there was a significant difference between groups, and if the p-value was higher than 0.05, there was no difference between groups.

Results and discussion

Acute toxicity result

The 48-hour observation showed no deaths from the rats either at the dose of 2000 mg/kgBW or 5000 mg/kgBW; thus, it can be concluded that the LD50 of EEPE is above 5000 mg/kgBW. During the 48 hours, there were no clinical symptoms, including dyspnea, dullness, abdominal cramp, and diarrhea in all treatment groups.

Body weight, organ weight, and relative organ

Data on body weight from each experimental group can be seen in Table 1. The data above shows that body, organ, and relative organ weight in all groups increased, seen from the initial body weight and the final body weight. The highest increase in body weight was in MC group while the smallest was in M2000. The heaviest heart in M2000 group was 0.668 g, the heaviest liver in M group was 7.63 g, and the heaviest left kidney was 0.674 g. Body weight, organ weight, and relative organ weight between the groups showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 1.

Body weight, organ weight, and relative organ.

Parameters Units Groups (Mean ± SD)
MC FC M2000 F2000 M5000 F5000
BW (Day 1) g 154.8 ± 7.79 151.2 ± 116 193 ± 17.13 150.2 ± 5.5 211.6 ± 15.8 151 ± 9.4
BW (Day 7) g 165.8 ± 9.98 150.8 ± 8.4 192.6 ± 17.7 153.6 ± 5.94 205.6 ± 16.08 153.6 ± 10.4
BW (Day 14) g 173.4 ± 13.2 153.4 ± 9.4 202.4 ± 18.5 164 ± 7.61 205.8 ± 21.2 162.4 ± 12.1
Heart g 0.56 ± 0.03 0.54 ± 0.02 0.66 ± 0.07 0.53 ± 0.07 0.68 ± 0.07 0.474 ± 0.01
Liver g 6.58 ± 0.62 6.33 ± 0.55 7.63 ± 0.96 6.79 ± 0.69 6.52 ± 0.84 5.68 ± 0.48
Left Kidney g 0.62 ± 0.03 0.48 ± 0.51 0.622 ± 0.03 0.56 ± 0.02 0.67 ± 0.11 0.51 ± 0.01
Right Kidney g 0.61 ± 0.05 0.54 ± 0.02 0.64 ± 0.03 0.57 ± 0.04 0.68 ± 0.08 0.51 ± 0.01
Limfa g 0.43 ± 0.06 0.44 ± 0.04 0.5 ± 0.035 0.53 ± 0.42 0.6 ± 0.101 0.41 ± 0.06
Pancreas g 0.32 ± 0.05 0.43 ± 0.06 0.31 ± 0.07 0.36 ± 0.12 0.46 ± 0.11 0.39 ± 0.03
Left Ovarium g - 0.03 ± 0.01 - 0.02 ± 0.007 - 0.032 ± 0.01
Right Ovarium g - 0.03 ± 0.01 - 0.02 ± 0.008 - 0.032 ± 0.0
Left Testis g 1.26 ± 0.07 - 1.27 ± 0.13 - 1.32 ± 0.09 -
Right Testis g 1.23 ± 0.07 - 1.28 ± 0.15 - 1.53 ± 0.03 -
Heart % 0.32 0.35 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.31
Liver % 3.79 4.12 3.76 4.14 3.16 4.1
Left Kidney % 0.35 0.31 0.30 0.34 0.32 0.33
Right Kidney % 0.35 0.35 0.31 0.34 0.33 0.33
Limfa % 0.24 0.28 0.24 0.32 0.29 0.27
Pancreas % 0.18 0.28 0.15 0.21 0.22 0.02
Left Ovarium % - 0.019 - 0.012 - 0.021
Right Ovarium % - 0.019 - 0.012 - 0.021
Left Testis % 0.72 - 0.62 0.64 -
Right Testis % 0.70 - 0.63 0.74 -

Hematological analysis

The effect of EEPE on hematological parameters including WBC (white blood cells), RBC (red blood cell), hemoglobin, hematocrit, MCV (mean corpuscular volume), MCH (mean corpuscular hemoglobin), and MCHC (mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration) can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2.

Hematological analysis parameters.

Parameters Units Groups (Mean ± SD)
MC FC M2000 F2000 M5000 F2000
WBC 103/uL 6.71 ± 0.14 7.21 ± 0.09 6.91 ± 0,21 6.64 ± 0.41 8.21 ± 0.22 7.21 ± 0.11
RBC 106/uL 9.03 ± 0.21 8.84 ± 0.19 10.3 ± 0.28 8.67 ± 0.51 11.6 ± 0.41 10.21 ± 0.31
HGB g/dL 16.4 ± 0.21 17.24 ± 0.26 15.46 ± 0.19 18.49 ± 0.56 17.96 ± 0.65 16.87 ± 0.51
HCT % 55.65 ± 0.05 58.9 ± 0.45 58.94 ± 0.17 55.76 ± 0.76 59.83 ± 0.31 57.41 ± 0.25
MCV fL 62.3 ± 0.18 69.43 ± 0.38 73.1 ± 0.27* 65.31 ± 0.63 58.41 ± 0.18 71.3 ± 0.43
MCH Pg 21.3 ± 0.11 20.9 ± 0.31 22.4 ± 0.16 25.31 ± 0.5* 21.3 ± 0.61 20.1 ± 0.74
MCHC g/dL 24.3 ± 0.45 26.31 ± 0.31 25.43 ± 0.18 26.7 ± 0.61 25.43 ± 0.25 26.2 ± 0.33

Table 2 shows WBC, RBC, HGB, HCT, MCV, MCH, and MCHC levels from each treatment group. The values of WBC, RBC, and HGB did not differ significantly between treatment groups (p > 0.05). Meanwhile, there was a significant increase in the MCV value in M2000 group compared to normal MCV group (p < 0.05). The MCH value in the F2000 group showed a significant increase compared to FC group (p < 0.05). There was no difference between the MCHC values between groups (p > 0.05).

Serum biochemical parameters

The effect of EEPE on kidney biochemical parameters, including urea, creatinine, and uric acid, showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the groups.

Table 3 shows the urea, creatinine, and uric acid levels. The highest urea value was in M2000 group (31.3±0.37 mg/dL), while the lowest urea value was in F5000 group (22.3 ± 0.13 mg/dL). The highest creatinine value was in F2000 group (1.52±0.01 mg/dL), while the lowest creatinine value was in MC group (0.56±0.16 mg/dL). The highest uric acid value was in M2000 group (3.07±0.41 mg/dL), while the lowest uric acid value was in MC group (2.13±0.21 mg/dL).

Table 3.

Kidney Biochemical Parameters.

Parameters Units Groups (Mean ± SD)
MC FC M2000 F2000 M5000 F5000
Urea mg/dL 21.3 ± 0,41 24 ± 0,21 31.3 ± 0,37 23,06 ± 0,25 25.35 ± 0,21 22,3 ± 0,13
Creatinine mg/dL 0.56 ± 0,16 1.03 ± 0,31 1.26 ± 0,15 1.52 ± 0,01 1.12 ± 0,32 0,8 ± 0,14
Uric Acid mg/dL 2,13 ± 0,21 2,25 ± 0,32 3,07 ± 0,41 2,25 ± 0,03 2,23 ± 0,03 2,53 ± 0,09

Hepar Biochemical Parameters : Biochemical parameters of the liver are essential to determine whether EEPE has an effect on the liver. Blood taken from all groups on day 14 was analyzed for total protein, albumin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (AST), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Complete data can be seen in Table 4.

Table 4.

Liver Biochemical Parameters.

Parameters Units Groups (Mean ± SD)
MC FC M2000 F2000 M5000 F5000
Total protein g/dL 5.39 ± 0.16 5.27 ± 0.14 5.31 ± 0.10 6.18 ± 0.05 5.35 ± 0.18 5.5 ± 0.15
Albumin g % 3.10 ± 0.10 4.67 ± 0.11 3.2 ± 0.14 3.21 ± 0.28 3.12 ± 0.07 3.26 ± 0.09
Billirubin direct mg/dL 0.009 ± 0.001 0.02 ± 0.01 0.01 ± 0.016 0.016 ± 0.004 0.023 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.068*
AST U/L 110.4 ± 8.47 129.6 ± 8.70 123 ± 3.67 121 ± 8.09 97 ± 5.89 65.6 ± 3.43*
ALT U/L 57.1 ± 9.75 63 ± 3.57 65.8 ± 5.01 45.5 ± 3.57 36.6 ± 5.31* 24.6 ± 3.50*
ALP U/L 165.8 ± 4.08 203.2 ± 5.35 357.8 ± 21.8* 153 ± 4.18 201 ± 3.08 119.4 ± 3.64

Table 4 shows the value of liver biochemical parameters, that are total protein, albumin, direct bilirubin, AST, ALT, and ALP. The highest total protein value was in F2000 group (6.18 ± 0.05 g/dL) while the lowest protein value was in FC group (5.27 ± 0.14 g/dL). The highest albumin value was in FC group (4.67 ± 0.11 g%), while the lowest albumin value was in MC group (3.10±0.10 g%). Interestingly, the albumin value of the female groups was higher than that of all male groups. The highest direct bilirubin value was in F5000 group (0.06±0.068 mg/dL), while the lowest direct bilirubin value was in MC group (0.009±0.001 mg/dL); there was a statistically significant difference between the FC and F5000 groups (p < 0.05). The highest AST value was in FC group (129.6 ± 8.70 U/L), while the lowest bilirubin value was in F5000 group (65.6 ± 3.43 U/L); there was a statistically significant decrease in AST values in F5000 group compared to FC group (p < 0.05). The highest ALT value was in M2000 group (65.8 ± 5.01 U/L), while the lowest ALT value was in F5000 group (24.6 ± 3.50 U/L), there was a statistically significant decrease in ALT levels in M5000 and F5000 groups contrary to FC and MC groups, respectively (p < 0.05). The highest ALP value was in M2000 group (357.8 ± 21.8 U/L), while the lowest was in F5000 group (119.4 ± 3.64 U/L), the ALP value in the M2000 group had a statistically significant increase compared to MC group (p < 0.05).

Electrolyte paramaters : In this study, the measurements of Na+, K+, and Cl- levels in all groups were done on day 14. Complete data can be seen in Table 5.

Table 5.

Electrolyte parameters.

Parameters Units Groups (Mean ± SD)
MC FC M2000 F2000 M5000 F5000
Sodium mmol 112.4 ± 2.41 124 ± 2.915 117.6 ± 2.40 121 ± 6.81 113.9 ± 4.50 104 ± 2.8
Potassium mmol 3.65 ± 0.28 4.70 ± 0.08 7.58 ± 0.14* 5.18 ± 0.04 5.91 ± 0.08 4.71 ± 0.22
Chloride mmol 84 ± 2.23 85.36 ± 1.58 85.24 ± 39 84.36 ± 3.39 83.98 ± 3.33 75.88 ± 2.31

Table 5 above shows Na+, K+, and Cl- levels in all groups. The highest sodium value was in FC group (124 ± 2,915 mmol), while the lowest value was in F2000 group (121 ± 6.81 mmol). The highest potassium value was in M2000 group (7.58 ± 0.14 mmol), while the lowest potassium value was in MC group (3.65 ± 0.28 mmol); there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the M2000 and MC groups. The highest chloride value was in M2000 group (85.24 ± 39 mmol), while the lowest chloride value was in F5000 group (75.88 ± 2.31 mmol).

Histopathology of the organs

The histopathology results of the heart, kidneys, liver, testes and ovaries can be seen in figure 1.

Histopathology of Organs including the heart, testis, ovary, liver, and kidney from CM, CF, M2000 (M2), F2000 (F2), M5000 (M5), and F5000 (F5) (H&E x20). Testis ST: seminiferous tubules; IT: Intestinal tissue. Heart MC: cardiac muscle cells; MC: muscle nucleus cell. Ovary O: Oocytes. Liver tissue PA: portal area; H: hepatocytes. Kidney tissue G: glomerulus; BS: Bowmen space, DT: Distal Convoluted tubule. Tissues from the liver, testes, ovaries, liver, and kidneys were observed using a x100 microscope (Thermo, Germany). The images above show that the heart tissue for the M5000 and F5000 mg/kgBW groups did not experience structural changes of the cardiac muscle cells compared to CM and FM groups as well as M2000 and F2000 groups. Ovarian tissue showed that the oocytes in F2000 and F5000 groups did not experience any structural changes compared to FM group. It indicates that EEPE groups did not have a toxic effect on the ovarium. Testis tissue in M2000 and M5000 groups did not change compared to MC group. The liver tissue disclosed that the groups given EEPE showed no changes in the portal area and hepatocytes compared to normal group. Likewise, the kidney tissue also showed no changes on glomerulus, bowmen space, and also distal convoluted tubule in the groups given EEPE. Overall, all of the tissues in the heart, testis, ovary, liver, and kidney organs were normal after given EEPE doses of 2000 mg/kgBW and 5000 mg/kgBW.

Phyllanthus emblica (PE) or Indian gooseberry has been widely used as traditional and Ayurvedic medicine in India. PE is commonly spread in Southeast Asia, including Malaysia and Indonesia. A comprehensive toxicity evaluation is needed to ensure the safe use of PE (Khan 2009; Bhandari and Kamdod 2012; Yadav 2017). This study found that the LD50 of EEPE is higher than 5000 mg/kgBW, indicating that PE is safe for use and consumption. In general, toxicity will be characterized by body weight changes, such as weight loss and organ relative ratio, and harm will be indicated by organ damages so that other parameters will also be affected, such as hematological parameters. In this study, there was an increase in body weight of both male and female rats (Table 1).

Evaluation of hematology parameters was done on white blood cell, red blood cell, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin. These parameters are needed to determine whether EEPE influences blood parameters. It is because the hematological parameters are susceptible, if an herb causes toxicity, there will be a change in the hematologic value (Zhou et al. 2016), for example, inflammation due to drug administration causes WBC and RBC parameters to increase, a decrease in hemoglobin level indicates anemia, a decrease in MCV value indicates thalassemia (Lee and Tang 2003; Muncie Jr and Campbell 2009; Richard et al. 2016). In this study, it is observed that EEPE did not have any effect on hematology parameters (Table 2). This is in line with research on the toxicity evaluation of PE, including water extract of PE, that did not show toxicity in both acute and chronic doses of 300, 600, and 1200 mg/kgBW. It was also reported that a dose of 1125 mg/kgBW did not show any side effect in clinical observation. Furthermore, studies on the oral acute toxicity of PE did not show any toxicity (Jaijoy et al. 2010; Passaporn 2018).

The liver toxicity can be analyzed using some biochemical parameters, including AST, ALT, Total Protein, Albumin, Bilirubin direct, and ALP (Dara et al. 2008). Mostly, these parameters will increase when there is damage to the liver. It is because liver is an organ that has a vital role in metabolizing compounds. When injuries occur, AST and ALT will increase; moreover, ALT is more sensitive than AST if liver damage occurs (Anderson et al. 2000). In this study, there was no increase in the parameters (Table 4). This is also highly correlated with the histological results of the liver, which showed no damage. Previous studies have revealed that PE has a hepatoprotective effect by significantly reducing AST, ALP, ALP, and total protein levels. Other studies have also proven that PE upregulates PI3K/Akt/GSK3β/β-catenin pathway (Thirunavukkarasu et al. 2015).

Acute kidney injury will occur if there is a toxic drug exposure that will generally increase the level of kidney biochemical parameters, such as urea, creatinine, and uric acid (Coca and Parikh 2012). In this study, the results showed that the levels of urea, creatinine, and uric acid did not increase in both male and female groups given EEPE, either the dose of 2000 mg/kgBW or 5000 mg/kgBW. It is also in line with the results of kidney histology, which showed no changes in the morphology of the kidney (Figure 1). Several studies revealed that Phyllanthus emblica has a nephroprotective effect by reducing levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), lipid peroxidation, and increasing levels of endogenous antioxidants, such as SOD, GPx, CAT, and GR in cisplatin-induced mice (Pinmai 2008; Purena et al. 2018). The active compounds found in PE are apigenin-7-O-(6”-butyryl-β-glucopyranoside), gallic acid, and luteolin-4’-O-neohesperidoside (Liu et al. 2012). This compound has an antioxidant role; in this study, the scavenging ability of EEPE has an IC50 value of 7.626 ± 0.41 µg/dL (Table 1). Another study also revealed that luteolin has several cardioprotective mechanisms by means of anti-calcium overload, other luteolin functions can also reduce radical compounds (O-, H2O2, and OH-), luteolin also has anticancer activity by stimulating pathway apoptosis (Xu and Jiang 2012). Moreover, Luteolin has LD50 higher than 5000 mg/kgBW, while Gallic acid has LD50 more than 2000 mg/kgBW (Seelinger et al. 2008; Variya et al. 2019). Research on Antioxidant activity of methanolic extract of Emblica fruit (Phyllanthus emblica L.) from six regions in China, Liu et al. (2007) showed that methanol extract of Phyllanthus emblica fruit has strong antioxidant activity derived from phenolic compounds as much as 81.5–120.9 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g, flavonoid compounds as much as 20.3–3.7 mg quercetin equivalent (QE)/g and proanthocyanidin compounds as much as 3.7–18.7 catechin equivalent (CE)/g, The high levels of flavonoids, phenols, and antioxidant activity in Phyllanthus emblica offer benefits in their use as traditional therapy together with LD50 higher than 5000 mg/kgBW, no toxic effect on organs, and no effect on biochemical parameters, thus confirm that PE is safe to use.

Figure 1. 

Histopathology of Organs including the heart, testis, ovary, liver, and kidney from CM, CF, M2000 (M2), F2000 (F2), M5000 (M5), and F5000 (F5) (H&e x20). Testis ST: seminiferous tubules; IT: Intestinal tissue. Heart MC: cardiac muscle cells; MC: muscle nucleus. Ovary O: Oocytes. Liver tissue PA: portal area; H: hepatocytes. Kidney tissue G: glomerulus; BS: Bowmen space, DT: Distal Concoluted tubule.

Conclusion

In short, this study provides information that Phyllanthus emblica fruit has high antioxidant activities, LD50 higher than 5000 mg/kgBW, no histological changes in the organs, and does not cause significant changes in the biochemical parameters of the kidney, liver, and electrolyte. In future, a chronic toxicity study is recommended to confirm the safe use of Phyllanthus emblica.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Universitas Sumatera Utara.

References

  • Bhandari PR, Kamdod MA (2012) Emblica officinalis (Amla): A review of potential therapeutic applications. International Journal of Green Pharmacy (IJGP), 6(4): e1. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-8258.108204
  • Chaphalkar R, Apte KG, Talekar Y, Nandave M (2013) Ethanolic Extract of Phyllanthus emblica L. Bark Provides Hepatic Protection: Physicochemical Characterization and In Vivo Pharmacological Evaluation. In: Indian Journal of Pharmacology [B-9, Kanara Business Centre, Off Link RD, Ghaktopar-E, Mumbai, 400075, India: Medknow Publications & Media PVT Ltd.] 45(1): s76–77.
  • Chaphalkar R, Apte KG, Talekar Y, Ojha SK, Nandave M (2017) Antioxidants of Phyllanthus emblica L. bark extract provide hepatoprotection against ethanol-induced hepatic damage: A comparison with silymarin. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2017: e3876040. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3876040
  • Charoenteeraboon J, Ngamkitidechakul C, Soonthornchareonnon N, Jaijoy K, Sireeratawong S (2010) Antioxidant activities of the standardized water extract from fruit of Phyllanthus emblica Linn. Sonklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 32(6): e599.
  • Coca SG, Singanamala S, Parikh CR (2012) Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney international 81(5): 442–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.379
  • Dara L, Hewett J, Lim JK (2008) Hydroxycut hepatotoxicity: a case series and review of liver toxicity from herbal weight loss supplements. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG 14(45): e6999. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.6999
  • Habib-ur-Rehman Yasin KA, Choudhary MA, Khaliq N, Atta-ur-Rahman Choudhary MI, Malik S (2007) Studies on the chemical constituents of Phyllanthus emblica. Natural Product Research 21(9): 775–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786410601124664
  • Jaijoy K, Soonthornchareonnon N, Lertprasertsuke N, Panthong A, Sireeratawong S (2010) Acute and chronic oral toxicity of standardized water extract from the fruit of Phyllanthus emblica Linn. International Journal of Applied Research in Natural Products 3(1): 48–58.
  • Jonsson M, Jestoi M, Nathanail AV, Kokkonen UM, Anttila M, Koivisto P, Peltonen K (2013) Application of OECD Guideline 423 in assessing the acute oral toxicity of moniliformin. Food and Chemical Toxicology 53: 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.11.023
  • Khan KH (2009) Roles of Emblica officinalis in medicine-A review. Botany Research International 2(4): 218–228.
  • Khopde SM, Priyadarsini KI, Mohan H, Gawandi VB, Satav JG, Yakhmi JV, Mittal JP (2001) Characterizing the antioxidant activity of amla (Phyllanthus emblica) extract. Current Science 185–190.
  • Liu X, Cui C, Zhao M, Wang J, Luo W, Yang B, Jiang Y (2008) Identification of phenolics in the fruit of emblica (Phyllanthus emblica L.) and their antioxidant activities. Food Chemistry 109(4): 909–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.01.071
  • Liu X, Zhao M, Luo W, Yang B, Jiang Y (2009) Identification of volatile components in Phyllanthus emblica L. and their antimicrobial activity. Journal of Medicinal Food 12(2): 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2007.0679
  • Liu X, Zhao M, Wu K, Chai X, Yu H, Tao Z, Wang J (2012) Immunomodulatory and anticancer activities of phenolics from emblica fruit (Phyllanthus emblica L.). Food Chemistry 131(2): 685–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.09.063
  • Luo W, Zhao M, Yang B, Ren J, Shen G, Rao G (2011) Antioxidant and antiproliferative capacities of phenolics purified from Phyllanthus emblica L. fruit. Food Chemistry 126(1): 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.09.063
  • Mirunalini S, Krishnaveni M (2010) Therapeutic potential of Phyllanthus emblica (amla): the ayurvedic wonder. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology 21(1): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/JBCPP.2010.21.1.93
  • Muncie Jr HL, Campbell JS (2009) Alpha and beta thalassemia. American Family Physician 80(4): 339–344.
  • Srimangkornkaew P, Kengkhoom K, Chansriniyom C, Sirimontaporn A, Praduptong A (2018) Acute Oral Toxicity Study of Ethanolic Extract from Indian Gooseberry (Phyllanthus emblica Linn.) in Sprague Dawley rats. Bioscience Discovery 9(4): 464–468.
  • Perianayagam JB, Sharma SK, Joseph A, Christina AJM (2004) Evaluation of anti-pyretic and analgesic activity of Emblica officinalis Gaertn. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 95(1): 83–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.06.020
  • Pientaweeratch S, Panapisal V, Tansirikongkol A (2016) Antioxidant, anti-collagenase and anti-elastase activities of Phyllanthus emblica, Manilkara zapota and silymarin: An in vitro comparative study for anti-aging applications. Pharmaceutical Biology 54(9): 1865–1872. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2015.1133658
  • Pinmai K, Chunlaratthanabhorn S, Ngamkitidechakul C, Soonthornchareon N, Hahnvajanawong C (2008) Synergistic growth inhibitory effects of Phyllanthus emblica and Terminalia bellerica extracts with conventional cytotoxic agents: doxorubicin and cisplatin against human hepatocellular carcinoma and lung cancer cells. World journal of Gastroenterology: WJG 14(10): e1491. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.1491
  • Poltanov EA, Shikov AN, Dorman HD, Pozharitskaya ON, Makarov VG, Tikhonov VP, Hiltunen R (2009) Chemical and antioxidant evaluation of Indian gooseberry (Emblica officinalis Gaertn., syn. Phyllanthus emblica L.) supplements. Phytotherapy Research: An International Journal Devoted to Pharmacological and Toxicological Evaluation of Natural Product Derivatives 23(9): 1309–1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2775
  • Purena R, Seth R, Bhatt R (2018) Protective role of Emblica officinalis hydro-ethanolic leaf extract in cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity in Rats. Toxicology Reports 5: 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.01.008
  • Richards AL, Hendrickson JE, Zimring JC, Hudson KE (2016) Erythrophagocytosis by plasmacytoid dendritic cells and monocytes is enhanced during inflammation. Transfusion 56(4): 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.13497
  • Seelinger G, Merfort I, Schempp CM (2008) Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic activities of luteolin. Planta Medica 74(14): 1667–1677. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1088314
  • Sharma P, Joshi T, Joshi T, Chandra S, Tamta S (2020) In silico screening of potential antidiabetic phytochemicals from Phyllanthus emblica against therapeutic targets of type 2 diabetes. Journal of ethnopharmacology 248: e112268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.112268
  • Sinaga SM, Sudarmi S, Iksen I, Kevin K, Sari MP (2017) Evaluation of total phenolic, flavonoid content, antioxidant and in vitro antilithogenesis activities of Chives leaf (Allium schoenoprasum, L.). Rasayan Journal of Chemistry 11(4): 1604–1608. http://dx.doi.org/10.31788/RJC.2018.1144067
  • Thirunavukkarasu M, Selvaraju V, Tapias L, Sanchez JA, Palesty JA, Maulik N (2015) Protective effects of Phyllanthus emblica against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: the role of PI3-kinase/glycogen synthase kinase 3β/β-catenin pathway. Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, 71(4): 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13105-015-0426-8
  • Van Gammeren AJ, van Gool N, de Groot MJ, Cobbaert CM (2008) Analytical performance evaluation of the Cobas 6000 analyzer-special emphasis on trueness verification. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 46(6): 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.159
  • Variya BC, Bakrania AK, Madan P, Patel SS (2019) Acute and 28-days repeated dose sub-acute toxicity study of gallic acid in albino mice. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 101: 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.11.010
  • Xu T, Li D, Jiang D (2012) Targeting cell signaling and apoptotic pathways by luteolin: cardioprotective role in rat cardiomyocytes following ischemia/reperfusion. Nutrients 4(12): 2008–2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4122008
  • Yadav SS, Singh MK, Singh PK, Kumar V (2017) Traditional knowledge to clinical trials: A review on therapeutic actions of Emblica officinalis. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 93: 1292–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.065
  • Zhou DC, Zhang H, Luo ZM, Zhu QX, Zhou CF (2016) Prognostic value of hematological parameters in patients with paraquat poisoning. Scientific Reports 6(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36235
login to comment