Corresponding author: Ngoc-Van Thi Nguyen ( ntnvan@ctump.edu.vn ) Corresponding author: Hassan Y. Aboul-Enein ( haboulenein@yahoo.com ) Academic editor: Plamen Peikov
© 2021 Ngoc-Van Thi Nguyen, Kim-Ngan Huynh Nguyen, Kien Trung Nguyen, Kyeong Ho Kim, Hassan Y. Aboul-Enein.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Nguyen N-VT, Nguyen K-NH, Nguyen KT, Kim KH, Aboul-Enein HY (2021) The impact of chirality on the analysis of alkaloids in plant. Pharmacia 68(3): 643-656. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.68.e71101
|
Most of the alkaloids are chiral compounds and are clinically administered as the racemic mixture, even though its enantiomers have been known to exert different pharmacological activity. The determination of the enantiomeric composition of alkaloid-containing plants is subject to severe attention from pharmacological and toxicological points of view. This review gives an overview of the chiral analysis of alkaloids that were used in theoretical studies and applications for plants in recent years.
chiral alkaloids, high performance liquid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, chiral selectors, chiral separations
Chirality is one of the universal phenomena in nature. For instance, chiral biomolecules such as amino acids, sugars, proteins and nucleic acids have created living organisms. In natural surroundings, these biomolecules are present in one of the two possible enantiomeric forms, e.g., amino acids in the L-form and sugars in the D-form (
The separation techniques most widely employed to perform chiral analysis have been those based on chromatographic and electrophoretic principles, such as Thin-layer Chromatography (TLC), High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Gas Chromatography (GC), Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC), and Capillary Electrophoresis (CE). Up to date, HPLC has been by far the most used technique to achieve chiral separations (55% of the publications related to chiral analysis), followed by CE (22%) and GC (15%), while SFC and TLC have been the less employed (5 and 3%, respectively) (Fig.
Alkaloids are the secondary metabolites that are important because of their therapeutic properties. On the basis of their biosynthetic precursor and heterocyclic ring system, the compounds have been classified into various categories which include indole, piperidine, tropane, purine, pyrrolizidine, imidazole, quinolizidine, iso-quinoline and pyrrolidine alkaloids. Alkaloids are able to prevent the onset of various degenerative diseases by free radical scavenging or binding with the oxidative reaction catalyst (
The chiral separation of alkaloids in natural product was conducted by direct method which is based on diastereomer formation by using a chiral stationary phase (CSP) (
Application of nine major types of CSP and their commercial CSP (Aboul-Enein HY et al. 2003).
Type | CSP | Typical column trade name | Application |
---|---|---|---|
I | Polysaccharide | AD, OD, OJ, AS, IA, IB, IC | alkaloids, tropines, amines, beta blockers, aryl methyl esters, aryl methoxy esters |
II | Synthetic-Polymer CSPs | Kromasil CHI-DMB and CHI-TBB | acidic, neutral, and basic compounds |
III | Protein Phases | Chiral HSA, Chiral AGP, Ultron ES-OVM, Chiral CBH | Benzodiazepine, Warfarin and oxazepam, beta blockers |
IV | Cyclodextrin | Cyclobond I, II, III | beta blockers |
V | Macrocyclic Antibiotic | Chirobiotic V, T, R, TAG; vancomycin | polar compounds such as underivatized amino acids |
VI | Chiral Crown-Ether | ChiroSil RCA(+); SCA(−); ChiralHyun-CR-1 | amino acids, amino acid esters, amino alcohols |
VII | Donor-Acceptor Phases | Whelk-O 1, ULMO, Sumichiral 2500, Sumichiral OA 4900 | amides, epoxides, esters, ureas, carbamates, ethers, aziridines, phosphonates, aldehydes,ketones, carboxylic acids, alcohols |
VIII | Chiral Ion-Exchangers | Chiralpak QN-AX; Chiralpak QD-AX | Chiral carboxylic, sulfonic, phosphonic, and phosphoric acids |
IX | Chiral Ligand-Exchange | Chiralpak MA+, Nucleosil Chiral-1 | amino acids |
Polysaccharide selectors have a long tradition in enantioselective liquid chromatography. In 1973, Hesse and Hagel introduced microcrystalline cellulose triacetate (MCTA) as a polymeric selector material (without supporting matrix) for enantioselective liquid chromatography. While MCTA exhibits widely applicable enantio-recognition and favorable loading capacities for preparative separations, it suffers from poor pressure stability, slow separations, and low chromatographic efficiency. A solution to the mechanical stability problem of MCTA was proposed by Okamoto and co-workers in 1984. The cellulose derivatives were coated at about 20 wt% onto the surface of macro-porous silica beads (100 or 400 nm pore size). These materials exhibited considerably improved mechanical stability and much better efficiencies, and permitted HPLC enantiomer separations. Such coated polysaccharide-based CSPs were state-of-the-art for several decades (Lammerhofer et al. 2010).
Until now, they have prepared about 200 kinds of polysaccharide derivatives based on different polysaccharides including cellulose, amylose, chitin, chitosan, galactosamine, curdlan, dextran, xylan, and inulin (Fig.
The enantioselectivity and the elution order of the various enantiomers differed among these polysaccharides depending on the sugar units, linkage position, and linkage type. Among them, the derivatives of cellulose and amylose usually exhibit higher recognition abilities than the others, although it depends on the structure of a specific racemate. Triesters and tricarbamate are the most useful and successful cellulose and amylose’s derivatives. It has been claimed by Aboul-Enein and Ali that for the resolution of about 500 test racemates, about 80% of them have been successfully resolved on only two kinds of polysaccharide derivative-based CSPs (cellulose and amylose tris (3,5-diphenylcarbamate) CSPs) (Aboul-Enein et al. 2003). The application of coated polysaccharide-derived CSPs has been reviewed in Table
Various Polysaccharide-Based Commercial CSP (Aboul-Enein et al. 2003;
Trade name | Chemical name | Applications |
---|---|---|
Cellulose CSPs | ||
Chiralcel OB | Cellulose trisbenzoate | Small aliphatic and aromatic compounds |
Chiralcel OB-Hb | Cellulose trisbenzoate | Small aliphatic and aromatic compounds |
Chiralcel OJ | Cellulose tris(4-methyl benzoate) | Aryl methyl esters, aryl methoxy esters |
Chiralcel OJ-Rb | Cellulose tris(4-methyl benzoate) | Aryl methyl esters, aryl methoxy esters |
Chiralcel CMB | Cellulose tris(3-methylbenzoate) | Aryl esters and arylalkoxy esters |
Chiralcel OC | Cellulose trisphenylcarbamate | Cyclopentanones |
Chiralcel OD | Cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) | Alkaloids, amines, β-adrenergic blockers |
Chiralcel OD-Hb | Cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) | Alkaloids, amines, β-adrenergic blockers |
Chiralcel OD-Rc | Cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) | Alkaloids, amines, β-adrenergic blockers |
Chiralcel OD-RHd | Cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) | Alkaloids, amines, β-adrenergic blockers |
Chiralcel OF | Cellulose tris(4-chlorophenylcarbamate) | β-Lactams, dihydroxypryidines, alkaloids |
Chiralcel OG | Cellulose tris(4-methylphenylcarbamate) | β-Lactams, alkaloids |
Chiralcel OA | Cellulose triacetate on silica gel | Small aliphatie compounds |
Chiralcel CTA | Cellulose triacetate, microcrystalline | Amides, biaryl compounds |
Chiralcel OK | Cellulose triscinnamate | Aromatic compounds |
Amylose CSPs | ||
Chiralpak AD | Amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) | Alkaloids, tropines, amines, β-adrenergic blockers |
Chiralpak AD-Ra | Amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) | Alkaloids, tropines, amines, β-adrenergic blockers |
Chiralpak AD-RHb | Amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) | Alkaloids, tropines, amines, β-adrenergic blockers |
Chiralpak AR | Amylose tris(R)-1-phenylethylcarbamate | Alkaloids, tropines, amines |
Chiralpak AS | Amylose tris(S)-1-methylphenylcarbamate | Alkaloids, tropines, amines |
Chiral analysis is one of the main fields of the chemical quality control of pharmaceuticals in which CE plays a pivotal role (Pellati et al. 2007). Because of the versatility and the high separation power, capillary electrophoresis (CE) meets the requirements for the herbal drugs’s quality control. The wide opportunity for selectivity tuning allows the analysis of molecules with a wide range of polarity and molecular weight (
A particular mode of fast capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) is non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis (NACE), which employ non aqueous buffer system. Using organic solvents instead of water not only helps increase the hydrophobic analytes solubility but also improves selectivity. Actually, NACE widened the set of physicochemical characteristics of the solvents, which affect the electrophoretic characteristic by their influence on solute–solvent, solute–additive and ion–ion interactions. Most importantly, pKa values of basic analytes in organic solvents are notable different from those in water allowing separations which are difficult to be obtained in water. Moreover, NACE can be ideally suited for online coupling with mass spectrometry thanks to the high volatility and low surface tension of many organic solvents. A chiral microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography method has been developed to split up the enantiomers of the phenethylamines ephedrine, N-methylephedrine, norephedrine, pseudoephedrine, adrenaline (epinephrine), 2-amino-1-phenylethanol, diethylnorephedrine, and 2-(dibutylamino)-1-phenyl-1-propanol, respectively. The separations were achieved using an oil-in-water microemulsion consisting of the oil-component ethyl acetate, the surfactant sodium dodecylsulfate, the cosurfactant 1-butanol, the organic modifier propan-2-ol and 20 mM phosphate buffer pH 2.5 as aqueous phase. For enantio-separation sulphated -cyclodextrin was added. The developed method was successfully applied to impurity analysis (Borst et al. 2010). Electrokinetic chromatography (EKC), and in particular micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) has been introduced in 1984 by Terabe and proved to be not only the method of choice in analysis of neutral compounds but also one of the most versatile separation approach among the electromigration methods. In MEKC a surfactant (often sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS) is introduced into the background electrolyte (BGE) at concentration above the critical micelle concentration in order to generate a micellar pseudo-stationary phase. Separation mechanism is a combination of chromatographic partitioning of solutes between pseudo-stationary phase and continuous phase and the electrophoretic mechanism.
In MEKC, the separation selectivity can be modulated not only by variation of BGE type, pH and concentration, but also by benefit of the proper surfactant selected with the optimal concentration. Because phyto-markers to be simultaneously analyzed in plant materials are often acidic, basic and neutral compounds, MEKC is widely applied. The polymeric chiral surfactant as a pseudo-stationary phase or chiral selector in MEKC proved to be a powerful and useful technique for the simultaneous quantitative analysis of chiral alkaloids with high sensitivity.
Microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography (MEEKC), which is similar to MEKC, is used as separation environment with pseudo-stationary phases represented by microemulsions. Typically, the microemulsions are composed of nanometer-sized oil droplets suspended in an aqueous buffer (oil-in-water microemulsions, O/W). These systems are stabilized by using surfactant i.e. SDS and a co-surfactant - a short-chain alcohol such as butanol. The oil droplets are collected by dispersing n-octane or other types of hydrophobic solvents (
The analytical separation of chiral analytes is one of the most popular applications in capillary electrophoresis (CE), commonly achieved by adding chiral selectors, most frequently cyclodextrins (CDs) to the background electrolyte (BGE). These popular selectors are composed of (1,4)-linked α-D-glucopyranose units forming a truncated cone shape and contain a hydrophilic outer surface surrounding a rather lipophilic cavity (Saz et al. 2016).
It is worth mentioning due to the different complexity of the matrices in natural pant, different sample preparation procedures have been evaluated including ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), microwave assisted extraction (MAE), pressurized solvent extraction (PSE), and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) (see in Table
Methods | Extraction characteristic | Advantages | Disadvantages | Major factors affecting the technique efficiencies | Method applications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAE (Ultrasound assisted extraction) | – Using of acoustic waves in kilohertz range | – High extraction efficiency and good reproducibility | – Heat generation leading to the degradation and racemization of chiral compounds (Samar et al. 2018; |
Extraction solvent, liquid to solid ratio, temperature, extraction time, ultrasonic power and frequency | – Opium alkaloids from papaver plants ( |
– Accelerating both mass transfer and solvent penetration | – Low solvent consumption | ||||
– Low cost | – Tropane alkaloids from Radix physochlainae ( |
||||
– Environmental friendliness (Samar et al. 2018) | |||||
MAE (Microwave assisted extraction) | – Utilizing electromagnetic radiations with a frequency ranging from 0.3–300 GHz. | – Low solvent consumption. | – Nonhomogeneous heating distribution | Microwave power, sample size, solid to liquid ratio, extraction time, solvent and sample nature | – Berberine and palmitine from Rhizoma coptidis ( |
– Simultaneous extract many samples | – Overheating of extraction solvent ( |
– Atropine and scopolamine from Solanaceae family plants ( |
|||
– Heating dielectric mateirals and improving solvent penetration | – Short extraction time (Samar et al. 2018; |
||||
SFE (Supercritical fluid extraction) | – Using pressurized fluids called as supercritical fluids (mainly CO2) as extraction solvents (King et al. 1989) | – High flexibility and selectivity ( |
– Complexity of system configuration | Pressure, temperature, Modifier (methanol, ethanol and water), flow of carbon dioxide ( |
– dl-tetrahydropalmatine from Corydalis yanhusu ( |
– Extraction solvents can be removed easily from extracts ( |
– Requirement for a personal training program to operate the instrument ( |
– Evodiamine and rutaecarpine from Evodia rutaecarpa ( |
|||
– Environmental friendliness ( |
|||||
PSE (Pressurized solvent extraction) | – Utilizing pressurize solvents | – Using an extensive range of solvents | – Using expensive laboratory equipment | Solvents nature, temperature, Pressure ( |
– Quaternary alkaloids from Macleaya microcarpa ( |
– Low solvent consumption | – Requirement for a personal training program to operate the instrument (Samar et al. 2018) | ||||
– Enhancing transport capacity of solvents and mass transfer rates (Kaufmann et al. 2002) | – Short extraction time | – Galanthamine and lycorine from Amaryllidaceae plants (Mroczek et al. 2009) | |||
– Automated instruments | |||||
– Performing an oxygen- and light – free extraction condition (Samar et al. 2018) |
Ultrasound Assisted Extraction (UAE) technique is based on the using of acoustic waves in the kilohertz range spreading in liquid medium (
The UAE procedure is optimized with regard to extraction solvent, liquid to solid ratio, extraction time and temperature for the plant sample (
The MAE process utilizes the electromagnetic radiations with a frequency ranging from 0.3–300 GHz, that induces ion migration and dipole rotation resulting in the heating of dielectric materials and accelerating the penetration of extraction solvent into the matrix (
For MAE optimization, several factors can affect the extraction yield, including sample size, solid to liquid ratio, extraction time, solvent nature and microwave power should be modified (
Due to the complexity of sample matrices (as plant and biological samples) and the low concentration of existed alkaloids, samples should be purified and enriched right after extraction step to facilitate the identification and/or quantification process. Practically, the most popular clean-up methods utilized for sample purification of alkaloids are liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE). Besides, new techniques such as Liquid Membrane Extraction (LME) and Solid-Phase Micro Extraction (SPME) have also been developed based on LLE and SPE, respectively.
Actually, liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) is primarily used to extract and purify alkaloids from crude plant samples. This method is based on the relative solubility of compounds between two immiscible solvents. Alkaloids have polarity varying between pH which depends on its pKa, the solubility in specific solvent are also affected by pH (Fattorusso et al. 2008). In the acid solutions (pH is lower than its pKa), alkaloids are protonated which leads to better water solubility so this aqueous phase can be washed with less polar organic solvents such as ethyl acetate, n-hexane and diethyl ether to eliminate hydrophobic interferences (as lipids, resins, carotenoids and chlorophylls). Aiming to eliminate hydrophilic interferences, the extracted aqueous layer should be alkalinized which leads to the alkaloids becoming non-polarity and can be easily extracted from aqueous to organic solvents (
In the extraction of (±)-ammodendrine, (±)-anabasine, (±)-coniine and (±)-nornicotine from Lupinus sulphureus and Lupinus formosus, the extraction solvent was a mixture of chloroform and HCl 1M solution. The target alkaloids were extracted to acid solutions while other more hydrophobic interferences were distributed in chloroform and removed. After that, the pH of the aqueous layer was adjusted to 9.0–9.5 with concentrated ammonium hydroxide. Then, the alkaloids were extracted to chloroform layers and more hydrophilic interferences in basic aqueous layer were removed (
The major drawback of this method is requirement for repetitive extraction causing time consuming and solvent wasting. Moreover, the formation of emulsions is difficult to break and may be effect to the extraction yields (
Aiming to overcome the disadvantages of LLE method, solid phase extraction (SPE) has been developed and applied in sample preparation since the 1970s. In this method, sorbent phase loading the extract onto will retain alkaloids. Then, interferences in extract are washed away and the analytes is eluted by suitable solvents (Thurman et al. 1998). The SPE process has five stages including conditioning, loading, washing and elution step. Practically, SPE is utilized to purify and enrich alkaloids from both biological and crude plant samples (Table
Sample matrices | Analytes | SPE sorbent types | Loading solvents | Washing solvents | Elution solvents | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rauwolfia serpentina | Indole alkaloids | SCX | Acidified MeOH | MeOH | 5% NH4OH /MeOH | ( |
Solanaceous hairy roots | Tropane alkaloids | C18 | MeOH : 30 mM phosphate buffer pH 8 (25:75) | 1) MeOH : 30 mM phosphate buffer pH 8 (25:75) | 1) 0.2% TFA/H2O | ( |
2) H2O | 2) MeOH : 0.2% TFA/H2O (98 : 2) | |||||
Stephania cepharantha | Isoquinoline alkaloids | SCX | 0.01 M HCl | 1) H2O | MeOH : 25% NH4OH (97.5 : 2.5) | ( |
2) MeOH | ||||||
Human hair | Nicotine and its metabolites | SCX | Acidified aqueous solution | 1) 2% FA | 1) 5% NH4OH/MeOH | ( |
2) MeOH | 2) CHCl3 : isopropOH : NH4OH (78 : 20 : 2) | |||||
Mice plasma | Piperine analogues | C18 | Diluted (1:4, v/v) plasma samples | H2O | MeOH | ( |
Chinese medicinal prescriptions | Caffeine | C18 | H2O | H2O | CH2Cl2 | ( |
Senecio leucophyllus | Pyrrolizidine alkaloids | C18 | Acidified H2O and acidified MeOH | H2O | 25% MeOH | ( |
Rat serum | Pyrrolizidine alkaloids | C18 | Phosphate buffer pH 8.1 | H2O | 1% NH4OH/MeOH | ( |
Dog plasma | Quinolizidine alkaloids | Poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) | Diluted (1:1, v/v) plasma samples | 2% ACN | ACN | ( |
Evodiae fructus | Evodiamine Rutaecarpine | C18 | MeOH | 30% isopropOH | ACN | ( |
The chemical structures of alkaloids always have secondary or tertiary amine groups, the strong cation exchange (SCX) sorbents are an ideal choice, in which washing solvent will be aqueous solution and organic solvent to seperate and eliminate both hydrophilic compounds and hydrophobic compounds from plant matrices. After that, alkaloids will be deprotonated for elution by alkalized solvents which has pH at 2 units above pKa of analytes and evaporated to enrich sample (Thurman et al. 1998). Due to the effectiveness of SCX sorbents in the elimination of hydrophobic interferences, this sorbent tend to be suitable for chiral reversed-phase HPLC. In other to enrich alkaloids (cycleanine, isotetrandrine and cepharanthine) extracted from Stephania cepharantha and remove matrix compounds, several solid phases including C18, PEP (polydivinylbenzene), SCX and C8/SCX were evaluated. The authors observed that SCX and C8/SCX provides selective extraction, reproducible results and a clean extract. In contrary, C18 and PEP failed to provide satisfactory alkaloid yields due to the decreased alkaloid solubility in alkalized aqueous loading solvent (
If the analytes are unstable in strong alkaline solutions, the weak cation exchange (WCX) will be used instead. The WCX sorbent has carboxylic acid as functional group which has pKa value about 4.8, so these sorbents should be conditioned by solutions having pH above 6.8 for sorbent ionization. In addition, the loading and washing solvent pH should be adjusted at the value above 6.8 and below 2 values of analytes’s pKa to maintain the ionized state of both sorbent and analytes. Finally, the alkaloids will be eluted by the acidic solutions (
Besides, the C18 and C8 sorbents are also applied to extract aromatic alkaloids and eliminate hydrophilic interferences from matrices as reported for the purification and enrichment of evodiamine and rutaecarpine from Evodiae fructus. In this study, SPE C18 was utilized with methanol as loading solvent. Matrix interferences were removed by 30% isopropanol in water. Then, the alkaloids were eluted by acetonitrile (
A variety of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation techniques have been employed for the qualitative and quantitative determination of alkaloids (Pellati et al. 2007). CE is rapid, efficient, versatile, and low cost, whereas HPLC is well established, accurate, sensitive, reproducible, and robust (
Analytical applications, including analyte, separation conditions and CSPs, are summarized in Table
Summary of CSPs, mobile phase compositions, and applications in analysis of chiral alkaloids.
Alkaloid groups | Analyte | Plant | Columns | Separation conditions | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tropane alkaloids | (-) and (+) hyoscyamine | Solanaceaes seeds | Chirobiotic V, Chiralpak-AY3 | Ethanol, 0.1% DEA | ( |
(+)-(3R,6R)- and (–)-(3S,6S)-3α,6β-tropanediol | Erythroxylaceae species | Chiralpak AD-H | n-hexane and 2-propanol (9:1) with 0.1% of diethylamine | ( |
|
Aconitine alkaloids | (R)-nicotine; (S)-nicotine; anabasine, and anatabine | Tobacco | Chiralpak AGP | NH4OH- methanol (90:10) | ( |
Isoquinoline alkaloids | Mucroniferanine A | Corydalis mucronifera | Chiralpak AD-H | n-hexane−2-propanol (70:30) | ( |
(±) Zanthonitidine A | Zanthoxylum nitidum | Daicel Chiralpak ID | EtOH– TFA, 100:0.1 | ( |
|
Pyrrolizidine alkaloids | intermedine and lycopsamine | Symphytum uplandicum | Chiralpak IA | ACN/methanol (80:20) and methanol/methyl-t-butyl ether (90:10) | ( |
Indole alkaloids | (12S, 22S)-Dihydroxyisoechinulin A (2) and (12R/S)- Neoechinulin A | Cannabis sativa L | Chiralpak AS-H column | Hexane/ isopropanol/diethylamine (4:1:0.05) | ( |
dihydrocarneamide A and iso-notoamide B | Paecilomyces variotii | Phenomenex-Chirex-3126 column | MeCN–H2O (5:95). | ( |
New column materials also improved the ability of tropane alkaloids enantiomer separation. Separation of (R, S)-hyoscyamine was achieved using chiral stationary phase with immobilizing α-1-acid glycoprotein (Chiral AGP) (
Chiral separation of isoquinoline alkaloid has also achieved by using chiral stationary phase, for example with tetrahydropalmatine (THP) which was analyzed by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a Chiralcel. Quantification of OJ column by UV at 230 nm. The method was used to determine the pharmacokinetics of THP enantiomers in rats and dogs after oral administration of racemic THP or (-)-THP (
Indole derivatives are popular in chiral synthesis, chemical asymmetric catalysis, biological and medicinal chemistry. Lately, there were reports about the enantiomeric separation of several chiral plant growth regulators and related compounds, such as 3-(3-indolyl)-butyric acid, abscisic acid and structurally related molecules including a variety of substituted tryptophan compounds. Recently, Zhao et al., reported that a coated and immobilized chiral stationary phases were suitable for the separation of indole derivatives; however, the coated CSP possesses a higher resolving power than the immobilized one (
One of the most popular applications in capillary electrophoresis (CE) is the analytical scale separation of chiral analytes which is commonly succeeded by adding chiral selectors, most frequently cyclodextrins (CDs) to the background electrolyte (BGE). Since decades, cyclodextrins (CDs) are one of the most powerful selectors in chiral capillary electrophoresis for the enantio-separation of diverse organic compounds. A wide range of different CD derivatives (such as methylated, sulfated, carboxymethylated, sulfobutylated ones) were available as randomly substituted derivatives in order to meet the urgent need of market (Zhu et al. 2016). CDs still continue to be the most frequently used chiral selectors in CE as can be seen from the large number of applications even in the relative short period of time covered by this review (Table
Overview of approaches for enantioseparation of chiral alkaloids by CE and CEC.
Chiral alkaloids | Chiral selector | Background electrolyte (BGE) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Ephedra alkaloids | DM-β-CD (5%) | Tris/phosphoric acid, pH 2.5, 5% tetrabutylammonium chloride | ( |
Amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and norephedrine | (+)-(18-crown-6)-tetracarboxylic acid and/or carboxymethyl-ß-cyclodextri | Acetic acid (pH 2.5 and 2.8) | ( |
Tropane alkaloids | HDMS-β-CD, HDAS-β-CD, or sulfated β -CD (varying concentrations) | Sodium borate, pH 9.2, 0.8% octane, 6.6% 1-butanol, 2.0% SDS |
(Bitar et al. 2007) |
(S)-hyoscyamine, (R)-hyoscyamine | sulfated β-cyclodextrin | 35 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate solution pH 8.5 | ( |
Cocaine and its stereoisomers | sulfated β-cyclodextrin | 10 mmol L(-1) phosphate buffer, 10% methanol at pH 3 | ( |
Phenethylamines ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and methylephedrine | β-cyclodextrin | 125 mmol/L tetrabutylammonium L-argininate in a 75 mmol/L phosphate buffer pH 1.5 | (Wahl et al. 2018) |
Quinine, quinidine, cinchonine, and cinchonidine | hydroxypropyl-β- cyclodextrin | 25 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH = 5) | ( |
dl-tetrahydropalmatine and (RS)-tetrahydroberberine | (2-hydroxy)propyl-β-cyclodextrin | deionized water 0.1 M NaOH and the BGE | ( |
Vincamine, vinpocetine and vincadifformine | Methylated-β-cyclodextrin (2-hydroxy)propyl- β -CD | 15 mM NaOH (pH 2.5-H3PO4) | ( |
A CZE method using dimethyl--cyclodextrin (DM--CD) as modifier with tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBAC) as addition has been developed for the chiral separation of ()-ephedrine, ()-pseudoephedrine, ()-N-methylephedrine, and ()-norephedrine in Ephedra sinica and its medicinal preparation (
Tropane alkaloids are obtained from Solanaceae, e.g., Atropa belladonna, Hyoscyamus niger, and Datura stramonium (Aehle et al. 2010). The first pure compounds were atropine isolated from Atropa belladonna and hyoscyamine from Hyoscyamus niger (
Enantio-separations with high resolution and short migration times of all tropane alkaloids were achieved by using heptakis (2, 3-di-O-methyl-6-O-sulfo)-β-CD and sulfated β-CD in the microemulsion BGE and were superior to corresponding CD modified CE methods (Yaser et al. 2007). The enantiomeric separation of three vinca alkaloid enantiomers (vincamine, vinpocetine and vincadifformine) has achieved in an aqueous capillary electrophoresis (CE) system using Methylated-β-cyclodextrin and (2-hydroxy)propyl- β -CD of CD (
Camptothecins (CPT) are valuable quinoline alkaloids present in Camptotheca acuminata, Nothapodytes foetida, Ophiorrhiza pumila and Tabernaemontana heyneana. It occurs in different plant parts such as the roots, twigs, and leaves. It consists of a pentacyclic ring structure that includes a pyrrole quinoline moiety and one asymmetric center within the -hydroxy lactone. Only the (S)-enantiomers of CPTs exhibit antitumor activity (
In general, the enantiomeric separation of a pure chiral alkaloids developed on pure compounds whereas there were only a few methods reporting the simultaneous chiral separation of different alkaloids on plant matrix. It is worth to mention, chiral capillary electrophoretic determination of alkaloids focusing on enantiomeric purity. Therefore, the development of multicomponent methods to achieve the simultaneous enantiomeric separation of different kinds of alkaloids is still a challenge. In this sense, the challenges for the next years in this field should focus on the development of sample preparation to achieve the simultaneous enantiomeric separation of alkaloids belonging to different chemical families, as well as their environmentally friendly extraction from different matrices by using solid phase extraction techniques with low consumption of time, samples and solvents.
The authors would like to express their hearty gratitude to Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy. We also thank all of our colleagues for their excellent assistance.