Print
HPLC study of phenolic compounds in Mirabilis jalapa raw material
expand article infoDhurgham Khalid Abed Sarray, Liliia M. Horiacha, Iryna O. Zhuravel, Andrii I. Fedosov
‡ National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Open Access

Abstract

Mirabilis jalapa is a popular decorative plant valued for its beautiful multicolored flowers. Folk medicine in various countries applies Mirabilis jalapa as anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, diuretic, spasmolytic drug. Chemical composition of different types of Mirabilis jalapa has not yet been adequately studied which is an obstacle for its application in medicine.

The qualitative composition and quantitative content of phenolic compounds were studied by the HPLC method. The performed experiment revealed presence of hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonoids, isoflavonoids and coumarins in tested herb.

The content of phenolic compounds was the highest in Mirabilis jalapa flowers, counting as much as 2977.41 ± 59.55 µg/mg. Total content of phenolic compounds in Mirabilis jalapa herb was 304.25 ± 6.08 µg/mg, in fruits – 67.92 ± 1.36 µg/mg, and in roots – 12.44 ± 0.25 µg/mg.

Quantitatively neochlorogenic acid dominated in flowers, chlorogenic acid in fruits, whereas Mirabilis jalapa herb mostly contained rutin and hyperoside.

The obtained results will be useful in the development of quality control methods for Mirabilis jalapa herb and manufacture of drug preparations on its basis.

Keywords

Mirabilis jalapa, four-o’clocks, phenolic compounds, HPLC

Introduction

Mirabilis jalapa Linn. (clavillia or four-o’clocks) belongs to Nyctaginaceae family. This decorative plant is cultivated all over the world. Mirabilis jalapa flowers bear pink, yellow, red, orange, white colors or several colors simultaneously (Akanji et al. 2016).

Mirabilis jalapa is also known for its healing properties. Folk medicine in various countries applies it to treat dysentery, diarrhea, inflammations, muscular pain, diabetes, urogenital disorders (Ramesh and Mahalakshmi 2014).

Mirabilis jalapa herb, leaves, flowers, fruits and roots contain phenolic compounds, steroids and triterpenoids, carbohydrates, lipids, amino acids (Lai et al. 2008; Yakubu et al. 2019; Zachariah et al. 2012).

Mirabilis jalapa herb and roots contain phytosterols: β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, brassicasterol, ursolic, oleanolic and betulinic acids (Siddiqui et al. 1994; Gogoi et al. 2016). Mirabilis jalapa roots and leaves contain trigonelline which demonstrates anti-diabetic activity (Sathe and Dighe 2017; Subramanian et al. 2014). Rotenoids from Mirabilis jalapa roots show cytotoxic activity (Xu et al. 2010).

Pharmacological researchers in various countries confirmed anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, anthelmintic, anti-inflammatory, diuretic activity (Gogoi et al. 2016; Hajji et al. 2010; Salman et al. 2015; Singh et al. 2010; Yakubu et al. 2019).

Nigerian scientists established anti-malaria activity of Mirabilis jalapa leaves extract (Akanji et al. 2016), whereas scientists from Mexico found spasmolytic effect of Mirabilis jalapa flowers extract (Aoki et al. 2008).

The object of the present work was the study of phenolic compounds in Mirabilis jalapa herb, flowers, fruits and roots.

Materials and methods

Sample preparation

Plant . The powdered materials of plant (0.3 g) were weighed into a volumetric flask and extracted with methanol (10 mL) in an ultrasonic bath at room temperature (20 ± 2 °C) for 20 min. The solutions were filtered through a membrane filter (0.45 μm) prior to use.

HPLC conditions. Chromatographic separation of phenolic compounds was carried out using an ACE C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5.0 μm; Pennsylvania, USA). Elution was performed at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% acetic acid in water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). A linear gradient program was applied as follows: 0–8 min, 5–15% B; 8–30 min, 15–20% B; 30–48 min, 20–40% B; 48–58 min, 40–50% B; 58–65 min, 50%; 65–66 min, 50–95% B. The column temperature was constant 25 °C. The injection volume of the sample solution was 10 μL. The chromatograms were recorded at different wavelengths according to substances. Phenolic acids were quantified at 320 nm, flavonoids and ononin at 350 nm, coumarin at 275 nm.

Instrument. Liquid chromatography separation was performed using a Shimadzu Nexera X2 LC-30AD HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan) composed of a quaternary pump, an on-line degasser, a column temperature controller, the SIL-30AC autosampler (Shimadzu, Japan); the CTO-20AC thermostat (Shimadzu, Japan) as well as the SPD-M20A diode array detector (DAD). Other instruments such as Ultrasonic Cleaner Set for ultra-sonication using (Wise Clean WUC-A06H, Witeg Labortechnik GmbH, Germany), Libra UniBloc AUW120D (Shimadzu Analytical Scale, Japan); class A analytical vassals that meets evaluation 2019).

The identification of the chromatographic peaks was achieved by comparing the retention times and spectral characteristics (λ = 200–600 nm)of the eluting peaks with those of the reference compounds (Table 1). The compounds identified were confirmed by spiking the sample with the standard compound and monitoring the changes in the peak shape and spectral characteristics. For quantitative analysis, a calibration curve was obtained by the injection of known concentrations of different standard compounds. The concentrations of phenolic compounds identified in the extracts were within the limits of the calibration curves.

The following validation characteristics of method were evaluated as specificity, reproducibility of results (accuracy), limits of detection and quantitative evaluation, linearity (Tables 2, 3).

The method specificity was confirmed by coincidence between peak retention time of identified phenolic compounds and the corresponding peak retention time in standard samples and divisibility of substance peaks in chromatogram.

Table 1.

Retention time, detected at wavelength and UV spectrum of identified phenolic compounds.

Compound Retention time, min Detected at wavelength λ, nm UV spectrum
Neochlorogenic acid 9.86 ± 0.20 320
Chlorogenic acid 11.96 ±0.30 320
Caffeic acid 14.18 ± 0.30 320
Rutin 21.48 ± 0.50 353
Ferulic acid 23.16 ± 0.50 320
Hyperoside 23.89 ± 0.30 350
Isoquercitrin 24.83 ± 0.20 350
Avicularin 30.94 ± 0.65 350
Coumarin 33.77 ± 0.30 275
Ononin 39,52 ± 0.20 350
Table 2.

Linearity, LOD, LOQ of the HPLC method for the quantitative evaluation of phenolic compounds.

Compound Calibration curve Correlation coefficient R2 (n = 6) Linear range (μg/mL) RSD, % LODb (μg/mL) LOQc (μg/mL)
Neochlorogenic acid f(x) = 30834.6*x-613.100 0.9999 0.38–48.00 1.18 0.03 0.08
Chlorogenic acid f(x) = 29930.2*x-538.361 0.9999 0.36–46.00 1.29 0.02 0.07
Caffeic acid f(x) = 57646.8*x-3853.48 0.9999 0.72–91.92 1.56 0.02 0.06
Ferulic acid f(x) = 54955.4*x-638.345 0.9999 0.44–56.50 1.60 0.03 0.08
Rutin f(x) = 16072.5*x+1499.73 0.9999 0.16–20.24 1.07 0.09 0.29
Hyperoside f(x) = 22498.4*x+2508.57 0.9999 0.21–27.04 1.19 0.07 0.23
Isoquercitrin f(x) = 24139.7*x+3904.44 0.9999 0.35–44.56 1.02 0.07 0.22
Ononin f(x) = 37456.2*x+5132.42 0.9998 0.21–26.24 1.29 0.05 0.15
Avicularin f(x) = 16508.5*x-158.335 0.9999 0.16–10.39 1.35 0.004 0.01
Coumarin f(x) = 34481.8*x+42631.1 0.9999 1.85–237.50 0.81 0.14 0.42
Table 3.

Precision of the HPLC method for the quantitative evaluation of phenolic compounds.

Compound Concentrate (µg/mL) Deviation (%) Intra-Day (n = 3) Inter-Day (n=3)
RSD (%) Accuracy (%) RSD (%) Accuracy (%)
Neochlorogenic acid 6.05 100.17 0.87 100.35 0.88 101.16
24.12 98.58 1.25 99.17 0.97 102.37
48.43 100.14 1.22 100.25 0.71 101.27
Chlorogenic acid 5.75 100.69 1.31 101.12 0.38 98.40
23.20 99.58 0.42 99.08 0.73 99.43
46.58 101.91 0.96 100.27 0.48 98.24
Caffeic acid 11.49 100.01 1.05 102.02 0.52 98.49
45.96 99.39 1.08 98.78 0.67 99.73
91.92 100.17 0.64 100.35 0.95 98.17
Ferulic acid 7.06 99.11 0.68 100.22 0.90 98.29
28.25 99.60 0.93 98.20 0.29 99.31
56.50 100.12 1.22 100.24 0.46 98.28
Rutin 2.53 100.18 1.26 100.35 0.62 100.15
10.12 100.65 1.29 101.12 0.80 99.21
20.24 99.78 0.76 99.56 1.14 100.94
Hiperoside 3.433 100.78 0.99 101.06 0.86 98.95
13.72 100.72 0.50 101.04 0.70 99.07
26.92 99.77 0.42 99.53 0.80 100.97
Isoquercitrin 5.57 100.13 0.86 100.26 0.41 100.23
22.28 99.64 1.12 101.27 0.98 99.24
44.56 97.79 0.80 99.58 0.91 100.92
Ononin 3.28 100.56 0.81 100.12 0.32 98.39
13.12 100.72 0.69 100.44 0.75 99.08
26.24 99.75 0.84 99.50 0.82 100.00
Avicularin 0.32 100.15 1.02 98.75 1.06 100.63
1.29 99.59 0.78 101.78 0.97 99.12
5.19 99.41 0.94 100.10 0.71 99.95
Coumarin 1.85 99.82 0.79 100.12 0.98 100.02
7.42 99.57 0.86 99.34 1.07 99.87
29.68 100.11 0.90 98.99 1.10 99.32

The limit of detection (LOD) may be expressed as: DL = 3.3 *σ/S, where σ = the standard deviation of the response, S = the slope of the calibration curve. The limit of quantification (LOQ) may be expressed as DL = 3.3 *σ/S, where σ = the standard deviation of the response, S = the slope of the calibration curve. The determined LOQ was within the range from 14.00 ng/mL to 420.00 ng/mL. The obtained results confirmed method eligibility for quantitative evaluation of phenolic compounds.

The correlation coefficient (R2) was always above 0,999, which confirmed the linearity of quantitative evaluation method.

The total content of phenolic compounds was calculated by summing the identified components.

Results and discussion

The results of experiment enabled the identification of hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonoids, isoflavonoids and coumarins in tested Mirabilis jalapa herb.

The HPLC chromatogram of Mirabilis jalapa flowers is specified in Fig. 1, of roots in Fig. 2, of fruits in Fig. 3 and herb in Fig. 4.

Nine phenolic compounds were detected in Mirabilis jalapa flowers, namely: hydroxycinnamic acids (neochlorogenic, caffeic, ferulic acids), flavonoids (rutin, hyperoside, isoquercirtrin, avicularin), isoflavonoids (ononin) and coumarins (coumarin). Eight compounds were identified in Mirabilis jalapa herb: hydroxycinnamic acids (neochlorogenic, chlorogenic, caffeic, ferulic acids), flavonoids (rutin, hyperoside, isoquercirtrin) and coumarins (coumarin). Among four phenolic compounds found in Mirabilis jalapa fruits were two hydroxycinnamic acids (chlorogenic and caffeic acids), one flavonoid (hyperoside) andone isoflavonoid (ononin). In roots of this plant only hydroxycinnamic acids (caffeic and ferulic acids) were detected.

The quantitative content of phenolic compounds as determined by the HPLC method in Mirabilis jalapa raw material is presented in Table 4.

Table 4.

The content of phenolic compounds in Mirabilis jalapa raw material.

Сompound Flowers Roots Fruits Herb
Retention time, min Quantitative content, µg/mg Retention time, min Quantitative content, µg/mg Retention time, min Quantitative content, µg/mg Retention time, min Quantitative content, µg/mg
Neochlorogenic acid 9.92 2060.10 ± 41.20 9.94 69.87 ± 3.49
Chlorogenic acid 10.98 51.73 ± 1.03 11.36 5.30 ± 0.11
Caffeic acid 14.04 76.77 ± 1.54 13.88 4.40 ± 0.09 14.26 10.13 ± 0.20 14.05 8.60 ± 0.17
Rutin 21.09 131.63 ± 2.63 21.23 110.33 ± 2.21
Ferulic acid 22.73 79.37 ± 1.59 23.67 4.57 ± 0.09 22.80 12.93 ± 0.26
Hyperoside 23.66 292.67 ± 5.85 23.67 4.37 ± 0.09 23.77 93.20 ± 1.86
Isoquercitrine 24.89 3.20 ± 0.06 24.87 1.00 ± 0.02
Avicularin 31.55 322.30 ± 6.45
Coumarin 33.55 8.96 ± 0.18 33.62 3.02 ± 0.06
Ononin 39.58 2.41 ± 0.05 39.41 1.69 ± 0.03
Figure 1. 

The HPLC chromatogram of phenolic compounds in Mirabilis jalapa flowers.

Figure 2. 

The HPLC chromatogram of phenolic compounds in Mirabilis jalapa roots.

Figure 3. 

The HPLC chromatogram of phenolic compounds in Mirabilis jalapa fruits.

Figure 4. 

The HPLC chromatogram of phenolic compounds in Mirabilis jalapa herb.

The highest content of phenolic compounds was found in Mirabilis jalapa flowers, as much as 2977.41 µg/mg. Among hydroxycinnamic acids the most abundant was neochlorogenic acid (2060.10 µg/mg). The amount of flavonoids in flowers was 749.80 µg/mg, mostly avicularin (322.30 µg/mg), hyperoside (292.67 µg/mg) and rutin (131.63 µg/mg). Coumarin and ononin content in Mirabilis jalapa flowers was negligible – 8.96 µg/mg and 2.41 µg/mg respectively.

Mirabilis jalapa herb contained 304.25 µg/mg phenolic compounds, including 204.53 µg/mg flavonoids, 96.70 µg/mg hydroxycinnamic acids and 3.02 µg/mg coumarins. The most abundant in the herb were rutin (110.33 µg/mg) and neochlorogenic acid (69.87 µg/mg).

In Mirabilis jalapa fruits chlorogenic acid dominated (51.73 µg/mg). The total content of identified phenolic compounds in fruits was 67.92 µg/mg.

The lowest content of phenolic compounds among tested parts of herb was in roots – 12.44 µg/mg. The amounts of ferulic and caffeic acids in these was almost identical (4.57 µg/mg and 4.40 µg/mg respectively).

Conclusion

Our experiment enabled the identification of flavonoids, isoflavonoids, hydroxycinnamic acids and coumarins in Mirabilis jalapa raw material. The neochlorogenic acid (2060.10 µg/mg) dominated in Mirabilis jalapa flowers. The rutin (110.33 µg/mg) and hyperoside (93.20 µg/mg) prevailed in herb. The chlorogenic acid content in Mirabilis jalapa fruits was 51.73 µg/mg, much more than all other identified phenolic compounds in this part of herb. The least of all phenolic compounds were found in roots.

The obtained results will be useful in the development of quality control methods for Mirabilis jalapa herb and manufacture of drug preparations on its basis.

References

  • Akanji OC, Cyril-Olutayo CM, Elufioye OT, Ogunsusi OO (2016) The antimalaria effect of Momordica charantia L. and Mirabilis jalapa leaf extracts using animal model. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 10(24): 344–350. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR2016.6046
  • Aoki K, Cortes AR, Ramіrez MC, Gomez-Hernandez M, Lopez-Munoz FJ (2008) Pharmacological study of antispasmodic activity of Mirabilis jalapa Linn flowers. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 116: 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.11.004
  • Gogoi J, Nakhuru KS, Policegoudra RS, Chattopadhyay P, Rai AK, Veer V (2016) Isolation and characterization of bioactive components from Mirabilis jalapa L. radix. Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine 6(1): 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2014.11.028
  • Hajji M, Jarraya R, Lassoued I, Masmoudi O, Damak M, Nasri M (2010) GC/MS and LC/MS analysis, and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of various solvent extracts from Mirabilis jalapa tubers. Process Biochemistry 45: 1486–1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2010.05.027
  • Kuznietsova V, Kyslychenko V, Goryachaya L (2019) Plant phenylpropanoids as sources of new medicines. Norwegian Journal of development of the International Science 33: 37–41.
  • Lai GF, Luo SD, Cao JX, Wang YF (2008) Studies on chemical constituents from roots of Mirabilis jalapa. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 33(1): 42–46.
  • Salman SM, Din IU, Lutfullah G, Shahwar D, Shah Z, Kamran AW, Nawaz S, Ali S (2015) Antimicrobial activities, essential element analysis and preliminary phytochemical analysis of ethanolic extract of Mirabilis jalapa. IJB 7(4): 186–195.
  • Sathe PS, Dighe VV (2017) HPLC method development and validation for quantitation of trigonelline from Mirabilis jalapa Linn. leaves and enhancement in extraction yield from ultra-fine powder. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research 9(1): 62–66. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2017v9i1.16611
  • Singh M, Kumar V, Singh I, Gauttam V, Kalia AN (2010) Anti-inflammatory activity of aqueous extract of Mirabilis jalapa Linn. leaves. Pharmacognosy Research 2(6): 364–367. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.75456
  • Subramanian SP, Prasath GS (2014) Antidiabetic and antidyslipidemic nature of trigonelline, a major alkaloid of fenugreek seeds studied in high-fat-fed and low-dose streptozotocin-induced experimental diabetic rats. Biomedicine and Preventive Nutrition 4(4): 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bionut.2014.07.001
  • Yakubu MT, Oyagoke AM, Quadri LA, Agboola AO, Oloyede HOB (2019) Diuretic activity of ethanol extract of Mirabilis jalapa (Linn.) leaf in normal male Wistar rats. Journal of Medicinal Plants for Economic Development 3(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/jomped.v3i1.70
  • Zachariah SM, Aleykutty NA, Jayakav B, Viswanad V, Gopal RV (2012) In vitro anthelmintic activity of aerial parts of Mirabilis jalapa Linn. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research 12(1): 107–110. https://nanopdf.com/download/5b16d07f14eba_pdf
login to comment