The caltrop plant was harvested in 2016–2018 in the fructification period (June–August) in southern areas of Ukraine.

For furostanol glycosides identification and quantification in caltrop plant we developed analytical methodologies considering the peculiarities of the material under study.

Furostanol glycosides were identified in caltrop herb by thin-layer chromatography (TLC).

Sample preparation: To 1.0 g of raw material 10 ml of 80% ethanol were added, the mixture was heated at 60 °C on reflux water bath for 15 minutes, cooled, filtered and evaporated to 1 ml volume. This loading (with the help of 0.5 ml water) was moved to a separatory funnel, extracted twice with 1 ml aliquots of chloroform, and then the chloroform extracts were discarded.

Reference solution: 0.2 g of caltrop dry extract was dissolved in 5 ml methanol.

Plate: Silica gel F₂₅₄ Merck, size 20*10 cm on glass substrate.

After sample application the plate was dried on air for about 5–10 minutes and put in a chamber.

When the solvent reached the plate front, the TLC chromatogram was taken out, dried on air and spots were observed after sprinkling with p-dimethylamine benzaldehyde solution and then heating at 105 °С.

Mobile phase: Mixture of solvents: chloroform : methanol : water : anhydrous formic acid (61:32:7:0.5).

Sample volume: Experimental solution 10 μl, reference solution 15 μl.

Developer reagent: p-dimethylamine benzaldehyde solution (0,5 g p-dimethylamine benzaldehyde was dissolved in 17 ml concentrated hydrochloric acid and 50 ml methanol), heating was done at 105 °С.

Furostanol glycosides were quantified by UV-vis spectrophotometry.

Sample preparation: To a conical flask, an aliquot of 0.5 g of ground caltrop herb was put and extracted with 50 ml methanol 30 minutes on ultrasonic bath at room temperature. The obtained extract was filtered by filter paper to a round-bottom flask. The extraction was repeted: 20 ml methanol was added to the raw material residue, ultrasonicated for 15 minutes and filtered by filter paper to a round-bottom flask. The flask content (the combined methanol extract from the first and the methanol extract from the second extraction) was evaporated to dryness and then 20 ml 3 M hydrochloric acid solution was added and ultrasonicated until complete dissolution for 15 minutes at room temperature. The obtained solution was heated at 60 °C on reflux water bath for 30 minutes and cooled. Then 30 ml of chloroform were added and heated at 60 °C on reflux water bath for another 15 minutes. The mixture was cooled and the chloroform layer was separated on a separatory funnel. The water layer was returned back to round-bottom flask, 30 ml chloroform were added to it and the mixture was heated at 60 °C on reflux water bath for 15 minutes. The solution was cooled, transferred to a separatory funnel and the chloroform layer was separated. The chloroform extracts were combined, filtered through filter paper into a round-bottom flask, and the filter was washed with chloroform. The combined chloroform extracts were evaporated to dryness. To the residue, were added 50 ml of methanol in portions, the mixture was transferred to a graduated flask and methanol was added up to the mark of 50 ml. 0.5 ml of the obtained solution was taken to a screw-top vial, boiled to dryness The dry extract was dissolved by ultrasonication with 2 ml ethyl acetate. Further, 1 ml of solution A and 1 ml of solution B were mixed stirred, closed with cover and maintained at 60 °С for 20 minutes. The obtained solution was quickly cooled to room temperature under running water and after 15 minutes its absorbance was measured at 430 nm wavelength on Mecasys Optizen POP spectrophotometer.

Preparation of solution A: 0.5 ml anisic aldehyde was diluted in 100 ml graduated flask with ethyl acetate and added up to the mark.

Preparation of solution B: 25 ml sulfuric acid was mixed with 25 ml ethyl acetate.

Preparation of reference solution: 0.015 g standard diosgenin sample was dissolved in 50 ml graduated flask and with 50 ml methanol, the latter being added up to the mark. 5.0 ml of the obtained reference solution was pipette into 25 ml graduated flask, and methanol was added up to the mark. 0.5 ml from the obtained solution was poured to a screw-top vial, boiled to dryness. Then 2 ml ethyl acetate were added to the dry extract and it was dissolved with the help of ultrasound. Further 1 ml of solution A and 1 ml of solution B were added, stirred, closed with a stopper and maintained for 20 minutes at 60 °С. The solution was quickly cooled to room temperature under running water and after 15 minutes the absorbance was measured at wavelength 430 nm.

Preparation of compensation solution: 2 ml ethyl acetate was put to screw-top vial, 1 ml of solution A and 1 ml of solution B were added, maintained for 20 minutes at 60 °С and quickly cooled to room temperature under running water.

The content of furostanol glycosides (Х, %) as diosgenin equivalents was calculated by the formula:

$X=\frac{A_1·50·0,015·5·0,5·100·100}{A_0·m_2·0,5·50·25·(100-W)}$,

A₁ – absorbance of tested solution;

A₀ – absorbance of reference solution;

m₂ – mass of tested raw material aliquot, g;

W – moisture content in raw material, %.