Review Article |
|
Corresponding author: Hany Akeel Al-Hussaniy ( hanyakeel2018@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Spiro Konstantinov
© 2025 Zahraa Alkhafaje, Attaa S. Dawood, Hiba G. Hussain, Raghad Layth Fadhil, Huda A. Rasheed, Hussein A. Dawood, Bassam A. Al-Zubaidi, Mostafa Adnan Abdalrahman, Amjad I. Oraibi, Hiba Ezzat Hameed, Ferial Majed, Hany Akeel Al-Hussaniy.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Alkhafaje Z, Dawood AS, Hussain HG, Fadhil RL, Rasheed HA, Dawood HA, Al-Zubaidi BA, Abdalrahman MA, Oraibi AI, Hameed HE, Majed F, Al-Hussaniy HA (2025) Targeting HER2: a decade of progress in breast and gastric cancer therapy. Pharmacia 72: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.72.e148259
|
Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a key member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family and a crucial driver of tumorigenesis in breast and gastric cancers. HER2 amplification and overexpression are associated with poor prognosis, making HER2 an essential therapeutic target. Over the last two decades, significant advancements in HER2-targeted therapies have transformed the treatment landscape, with numerous monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody–drug conjugates providing substantial survival benefits.
Aim: This review aims to summarize the progress in HER2-targeted therapies for breast and gastric cancer over the past decade, highlighting their mechanisms of action, clinical applications, patient selection, and associated side effects.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies published between 2013 and 2023, written in English, and focused on HER2-positive breast or gastric cancers were included. Eligible articles comprised clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and real-world studies that evaluated the mechanism, efficacy, safety, or resistance patterns of HER2-targeted therapies such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and lapatinib. Exclusion criteria were studies involving HER2-negative cancers, non-human or preclinical research without clinical correlation, case reports, editorials, conference abstracts, and non-English publications without available translations.
Results: HER2-targeted therapies have shown remarkable efficacy in both early and advanced stages of HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. Trastuzumab remains the cornerstone of treatment, while pertuzumab improves outcomes in combination regimens. Antibody–drug conjugates such as T-DM1 and T-DXd offer novel mechanisms to deliver cytotoxic agents directly to cancer cells, improving therapeutic indices and reducing systemic toxicity. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors like lapatinib provide unique advantages in treating brain metastases and overcoming resistance.
Conclusion: The last decade has seen tremendous progress in HER2-targeted therapies, revolutionizing the management of HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. Continued innovation and clinical trials promise to extend these advancements, improving patients’ survival and quality of life. The integration of novel agents, personalized approaches, and enhanced understanding of tumor biology will be instrumental in overcoming current limitations and shaping the future of HER2-targeted cancer therapy.
ERBB2 protein, human, ado-trastuzumab, lapatinib, pertuzumab
Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family, is a promising target for treating breast and gastric cancer. Over the past 20 years, treatment has evolved considerably. Following a decade of large-scale randomized studies showing significant survival benefits from adding anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies to cytotoxic agents, this improvement represents a considerable advance. To overcome or prevent resistance, advances in understanding the biology of the ERBB2 gene, along with the mechanisms of action of treatments demonstrating a clear clinical impact, have led to the development of small-molecule multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibody–drug conjugates. Additionally, in light of the need to enhance the level and safety of immune responses for the benefit of immunotherapeutic checkpoint inhibition, understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment has also expanded (
The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family comprises several membrane-located receptor tyrosine kinases that play critical roles in essential cellular processes. Among them, the amplification and overexpression of HER2 – leading to the proliferation of tumor cells, angiogenesis, or suppression of apoptosis – have received particular attention, as HER2 positivity indicates a poor prognosis for cancer patients. In the following decades, research confirmed the importance of HER2-positive tumors, and monoclonal antibodies against HER2, especially trastuzumab, were approved for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer and later for HER2-positive gastric cancer. Additionally, trastuzumab labeling was extended to early breast cancer patients. More recently, further HER2-targeted drugs, including the tyrosine kinase inhibitors lapatinib and neratinib, the antibody–drug conjugates trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan, and several others, have emerged and enriched the therapeutic landscape for HER2-positive cancer patients (
In this article, we review recent developments and discuss patient selection, mechanisms of action, clinical usage, and potential side effects of these drugs.
This review employed a structured literature search to evaluate the advancements in HER2-targeted therapies for breast and gastric cancer over the last decade. The databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles published between January 2013 and December 2023 using keywords such as “HER2,” “trastuzumab,” “pertuzumab,” “T-DM1,” “T-DXd,” “lapatinib,” “gastric cancer,” “breast cancer,” and “HER2-targeted therapy.”
All relevant data were independently screened and extracted, focusing on drug types, mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and safety profiles. This ensured comprehensive and up-to-date coverage of HER2-targeted treatment options and their implications in clinical oncology.
The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene is located on chromosome 17q21 and encodes a 185-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein of the type I receptor tyrosine kinase family. Similar to other family members, including epidermal growth factor receptor, HER3, and HER4, the structure of HER2 comprises an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a hydrophobic membrane-spanning region, and a cytoplasmic domain with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity. With only minor differences in amino acid sequences, the distinct functional domains of HER2 are conserved among the HER family (
According to breast cancer statistics, 1 in 8 women will develop invasive breast cancer in her lifetime, and the disease accounts for 1 in 3 cancer diagnoses. Five molecular profiles are commonly used to categorize breast cancer: luminal A, luminal B, HER2+, basal-like, and normal-like, of which HER2+ cancer represents approximately 15–20% of all diagnoses. HER2 overexpression and amplification are defining features of breast cancer. Importantly, substantial progress has been made in the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer over the past two decades. Currently, approved first-line HER2-targeting agents include two monoclonal antibodies, trastuzumab and pertuzumab, and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, lapatinib, while trastuzumab emtansine is the recommended second-line drug. In addition, novel HER2-targeting therapies are under development and in various stages of clinical trials (
This schematic diagram illustrates the downstream molecular signaling pathways activated by HER2 dimerization with other HER family members (HER1/EGFR, HER3, and HER4) upon ligand binding. The left pathway shows activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT axis, which leads to the inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) and p53 and the activation of mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), promoting cell survival and proliferation. The right pathway highlights the GRB2-mediated RAS/RAF/MEK/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade, which also contributes to cell cycle progression and tumorigenesis. These pathways are key mediators of oncogenic transformation in HER2-overexpressing breast and gastric cancers, depicted at the bottom by anatomical images of tumor growth in breast and gastric tissue(
Overexpression of a given receptor provides an opportunity to block its function selectively. For HER2, the extreme case of pathway addiction ensures that nearly all cancer cells are dependent on the pathway, providing a strong rationale for selectively blocking its function with potent drugs. HER2 is an ideal example of cancer biology-based targeting. While this concept is relatively advanced for only a few other receptors beyond HER2 and EGFR, it is anticipated that profiling patients for reliance on oncogenic activity or related genes, combined with the use of selective inhibitors, will be extended to other cancer-driving alterations, promoting the development and approval of targeted therapies relevant to a significant fraction of patients (
The discovery of T-DM1, with its relatively high cost–benefit profile, has opened the way for the development of additional potent HER2 antibodies, which are expected to be favored over chemotherapy. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) provides a lower residual risk of neuromuscular disease, congestive heart failure, and alopecia. Combination therapy may enhance the accumulation of T-DXd in the targeted cancer, provide a concomitant blockade of angiogenesis, and protect the patient’s immune system from added immune toxicity while improving clinical outcomes (
| Drug name | Mechanism of action | Side effects | Approval status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trastuzumab (Herceptin) | Monoclonal antibody inhibits dimerization and signaling of the HER2 receptor. | Cardiomyopathy, infusion reactions, and neutropenia. | Approved ( |
| Pertuzumab (Perjeta) | Monoclonal antibody prevents HER2 dimerization with other HER receptors. | Diarrhea, fatigue, neutropenia, and cardiotoxicity. | Approved ( |
| ( |
Dual TKI; inhibits HER2 and EGFR tyrosine kinases. | Diarrhea, hepatotoxicity, and rash. | Approved ( |
| Neratinib (Nerlynx) | Irreversible TKI; inhibits HER1, HER2, and HER4. | Severe diarrhea, nausea, and abdominal pain. | Approved ( |
| Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) | ADC delivers cytotoxic DM1 to HER2+ cells. | Thrombocytopenia, hepatotoxicity, nausea, and fatigue. | Approved ( |
| Tucatinib (Tukysa) | Selective HER2 TKI; inhibits HER2 signaling. | Diarrhea, hepatotoxicity, and hand-foot syndrome. | Approved ( |
| Margetuximab | Engineered mAb enhances immune-mediated killing of HER2+ cells. | Infusion reactions, fatigue, and nausea. | Approved ( |
| Trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu) | ADC delivers a cytotoxic payload to HER2+ cells. | Interstitial lung disease, neutropenia, and nausea. | Approved ( |
| Pyrotinib | Irreversible pan-HER TKI; inhibits HER1, HER2, and HER4. | Diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, and liver dysfunction. | Under Research ( |
| Afatinib | Irreversible TKI; inhibits HER1, HER2, and HER4. | Diarrhea, rash, stomatitis, and hepatotoxicity. | Approved for NSCLC, research for HER2 ( |
| Zanidatamab | Bispecific antibody targets two distinct HER2 epitopes. | Infusion reactions, diarrhea, and nausea. | Under Research ( |
| Poziotinib | Irreversible pan-HER TKI; targets HER1, HER2, and HER4. | Severe diarrhea, rash, and hepatotoxicity. | Under Research ( |
| RC48-ADC | ADC delivers cytotoxic agents to HER2+ cells. | Neutropenia, liver enzyme elevation, and diarrhea. | Under Research ( |
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, an oncogenic transmembrane glycoprotein, is overexpressed in 15–20% of breast carcinomas. Its protein overexpression and/or gene amplification are closely associated with a poor prognosis and can increase the risk of recurrence. Recent clinical trials have suggested that tumors with strong HER2 expression may increase sensitivity to trastuzumab. Trastuzumab, a 148-kDa humanized monoclonal antibody directed against HER2, is the initial member of the treatment class known as HER2-targeted therapy and is widely used for treating HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. This immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) kappa was the first treatment to target HER2, a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family (
Its preclinical efficacy was intensive until clinical studies further defined its effect. In 1998, trastuzumab was approved as a first-line single agent for patients with metastatic breast cancer and was later approved in combination with paclitaxel after the landmark Phase III trials in 2001 (
The pertuzumab epitope targets HER2’s dimerization subdomain II. It is a type 1 humanized monoclonal antibody and received breakthrough designation from the US FDA in 2013 (
Since the launch of the technology, progress in this field has involved the preparation, evaluation, clinical testing, and reverse translational studies of different antibody models, used either as naked antibodies or conjugated to chemotherapeutic agents against breast and gastric cancer. Among the first results of this research, ado-trastuzumab emtansine emerged as a potent antibody–drug conjugate and was the first to be used in breast cancer patients. Its clinical success helped raise interest in other antibody conjugates. Cooperation with the same institution has also been valuable in selecting targeted chemotherapy prodrugs and antibody-assisting agents, affiliated with a biotechnology company that has produced effective antibody–drug conjugates against other cancer-related antigens. Results from ongoing reverse translational studies using T-DM1 models will most likely provide a basis for developing other antibody–drug conjugates for different cancer types (
Ado-trastuzumab emtansine is an antibody–drug conjugate consisting of the HER2-binding monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, a linker–payload, and the microtubule inhibitor-derived maytansinoid emtansine. Its favorable clinical profile indicates that T-DM1 is an optimal therapeutic option both for heavily pretreated breast cancer patients and for those receiving first-line treatment (
Lapatinib is another TKI/EGFR HER1/HER2 inhibitor that blocks HER1 and HER2 protein kinases by reversibly binding to the receptors’ adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding pocket. In the USA, lapatinib combined with capecitabine was approved in 2007. In some regions, it is used as monotherapy in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer that overexpresses HER2 and has progressed through chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and other novel agents. Currently, lapatinib is being studied in clinical trials for early breast cancer. Furthermore, lapatinib may concentrate in brain metastases, exhibiting preferential activity that can circumvent CNS lesions in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. These distinctive features make lapatinib promising for the treatment of HER2-positive brain metastases of breast cancer (
In laboratory studies, lapatinib combined with trastuzumab showed significant antiproliferative properties compared with either single-agent therapy in various experimental HER2+ breast cancer cell lines. In addition, lapatinib can target and eradicate HER2-positive macrometastases in distal organs by targeting and eradicating inducible head and neck or breast cancer cell line models using in vitro selection. With an appropriate dose and distribution, administration of lapatinib delayed tumor growth, reduced established lung metastases, and induced substantial apoptosis in lung macrometastases in mice. This promising approach not only provides ancillary preclinical evidence for using lapatinib as part of adjuvant therapy – which could help reduce or eliminate micro- and macrometastases of HER2 cancers, thereby delaying local relapses or distant organ metastases – but also points to another potential means of increasing the response rate to standard adjuvant therapy (
A series of HER2-targeted therapy regimens have been approved for HER2-positive breast and gastric cancer patients in recent years. Large-scale evidence supports their benefits and safety, particularly in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy, which require intensive and accurate clinical validation. Several clinical trials have assessed combinations of trastuzumab with paclitaxel, docetaxel, capecitabine, anthracycline, carboplatin, and monoclonal antibodies such as bevacizumab. The prevalence of resistance to trastuzumab and the risk of severe cardiotoxicities have driven the development of additional anti-HER2 treatments in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Clinical trials for lapatinib, pertuzumab, T-DM1, tucatinib, and trastuzumab biosimilars have been designed and executed (
The adverse effects of anti-HER2 drugs are an essential consideration for ensuring the safety of treatment in both early and palliative settings. It is necessary to understand not only the primary side effects but also the secondary effects observed in long-term follow-up (
Resistance to various HER2-targeted therapies poses a significant clinical challenge, as it prevents sustained tumor regression. Both preclinical and clinical studies have identified several potential mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance. These include the activation of alternative signal transduction pathways, crosstalk between HER2 and other cell surface receptors, overexpression of inactive p95HER2 or truncated p95HER2 proteins, altered activation of downstream effectors, disruption of apoptosis, and increased HER2 expression. A comprehensive and tumor-specific understanding of these processes is essential for developing effective regimens against trastuzumab-resistant tumors. PTP1B and uPA/uPAR have emerged as viable therapeutic targets for trastuzumab-resistant tumors. Combination therapy involving inhibitors of PTP1B or uPA/uPAR presents a potentially promising approach for overcoming primary and secondary resistance to trastuzumab in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer (Gelmon 2017).
The mechanisms underlying tumor resistance to lapatinib or trastuzumab and subsequent disease progression remain incompletely defined. The emergence of new on-target or off-target HER2 mutations represents a major mechanism of lapatinib resistance. Only two amino acid substitution mutations in the HER2 kinase domain are known to confer resistance to lapatinib. This mutation is analogous to another substitution in the EGFR kinase domain, a well-defined secondary resistance mechanism. Another unusual mutation identified in patients may act by altering lapatinib binding to an inactive enzyme conformation. The gatekeeper mutation is associated with resensitivity to lapatinib treatment. Patients who acquire lapatinib resistance often experience rapid disease progression. In the case of trastuzumab, another mode of action is undoubtedly required to overcome this type of resistance. Previous studies showing that trastuzumab-resistant cells remain sensitive to growth inhibition by siRNA-mediated knockdown of HER2 and Notch support the hypothesis that a combination of trastuzumab and siRNA-based knockdown of HER2 and Notch signaling could enhance the antitumor effect of trastuzumab and possibly delay the onset of resistance. Here, we review the leading causes of HER2-targeted therapy resistance and list potential agents for neutralizing primary and secondary resistance (Al-Naqqash et al. 2020).
The majority of HER2-positive breast cancer patients significantly benefit from the combined use of anti-HER2-targeted therapies with standard chemotherapy. However, one-third of adjuvant therapy patients fail treatment and develop metastases, indicating primary resistance to trastuzumab. The mechanisms involved in the development of resistance are poorly understood. HER2 overexpression in breast cancer, along with the subsequent activation of multiple signaling cascades, has been suggested as a predictive factor for resistance to trastuzumab therapy (
The onset of resistance is a major problem associated with anti-HER2 therapies. Because cytokine/chemokine signaling in the tumor microenvironment has previously been shown to thwart therapy, a model was generated to determine whether perturbation of tumor–immune intercommunication could prevent the onset of de novo resistance. This work indicates that tumors with high stromal cell content, presumably including many immune effector cells, are most often refractory to anti-HER2 therapy. Stromal immune cells activate and release cytokines/chemokines that stimulate HER2 pathway output to high levels, thereby conferring resistance. These findings suggest that the early addition of a stromal immune-tempering agent to an anti-HER2 regimen – rather than adding it only at the time of progression – might delay the onset of resistance by prolonging the time required for activated cytokines/chemokines to be released during therapy response, as well as the time required for HER2 signaling rounds to expand dedicated resistance clones (
In breast and gastric cancer, patients receiving standard doses of trastuzumab with chemotherapy have achieved better outcomes than those receiving chemotherapy alone. The successful use of trastuzumab together with paclitaxel, vinorelbine, or lapatinib led to additional promising Phase II and III trials combining erlotinib, pertuzumab, or pertuzumab with trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Another later-generation HER2 therapy, margetuximab, in combination with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, has also been tested in different solid tumor malignancies compared to earlier generations. Given these impressive overall response rates of trastuzumab and the paclitaxel antibody–drug conjugate T-DM1 at the tumor mass, a longstanding challenge will be further exploring and developing improved combination therapies. Among novel suggestions, some of the more straightforward options include lapatinib plus hormonal therapy as a second-line option for metastasis or as a preoperative treatment; T-DM1 combined with other drugs, which may enhance activity through additional signaling pathways or immune modulation; and trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy (
The success of trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast and gastric cancer patients has encouraged clinicians to establish new treatment strategies targeting the HER2 pathway to increase its therapeutic impact. Ongoing preclinical and clinical studies have shown that trastuzumab likely does not achieve saturation of the HER2 pathway in vivo, and HER2-targeting agents can be combined in different ways to increase pathway downregulation. Moreover, given the increasing evidence of treatment failure due to PTEN loss, HER3 stimulation, or mutations in downstream pathways, combined treatment strategies must also account for these mechanisms and the tumor microenvironment. A neoadjuvant Phase II clinical trial demonstrated that adding lapatinib to trastuzumab can increase the fraction of patients achieving a pathologic complete response (Al-hussaniy et al. 2023;
Dual HER2 blockade with lapatinib and trastuzumab has increasingly demonstrated therapeutic activity in combination with chemotherapy in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic breast cancer settings. In a meta-analysis of clinical trials, the addition of lapatinib to trastuzumab increased the rate of pathologic complete response and reduced mastectomy rates, with an increased risk of toxicity but no increased risk of surgical complications. Recently, two adjuvant Phase III trials evaluated the addition of 1 year of lapatinib to 1 year of trastuzumab; however, these studies did not demonstrate a clear benefit of dual HER2 blockade. Due to study design differences – such as variation in dose, timing of initial trastuzumab administration, and inclusion of specific patient subpopulations – the impact of dual HER2 blockade remains under investigation (
Standard chemotherapy regimens are widely used for adjuvant therapy, for metastatic disease, and for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing and endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer (
Although taxanes do not directly inhibit HER2, they are believed to exert parallel effects on mitotic microtubule dynamics, thereby preventing the completion of mitosis. This contributes to their partial impact on targeting the mitotic spindle (
HER2-targeted therapy is active in breast and gastric cancer treatment but requires careful patient selection. Differences in response rates to HER2-targeted therapies often reflect intrinsic differences in histotypes and tumor biology, rather than being solely attributable to treatment modalities. The cross-development of novel HER2 antibodies makes rigorous comparisons difficult, given the frequent nuances among different cell lines. Breast cancer, however, is much more strongly influenced by hormonal pathways, which can significantly modify cancer growth (
Tumoral tissue is usually considered the best source for HER2 assessment, with overexpression regarded as a positive predictive factor for benefit from therapy. However, in small Phase II trials, luminal membrane expression has been adequately detected in blood, as shown in both metastatic and early breast cancer patients. Serum HER2 concentrations can stratify patients by progression-free survival with high sensitivity and specificity. Serum HER2 protein concentration has thus been considered a composite predictive biomarker that directly reflects the protein underlying the treatment effect, and evidence from larger studies supports its predictive value. In addition, identifying soluble fragments of the receptor’s extracellular domain released by metalloproteases may represent a highly valuable, non-invasive method to estimate treatment benefit (
The use of trastuzumab is associated with a risk of cardiotoxicity. Unlike anthracyclines, trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity is typically reversible and not dose-dependent, but it is primarily attributed to the inhibition of HER2 signaling in cardiomyocytes, which plays a vital role in cellular repair and survival via the neuregulin-1/ErbB4–HER2 pathway (
Cases of interstitial lung disease have been reported with an increased frequency in trastuzumab-treated patients, although its cause has not been clearly established. Risk factors include concomitant chemotherapy and a history of interstitial pneumonitis. Chest X-rays should be performed if symptoms occur, and discontinuation of trastuzumab should be considered for patients who develop interstitial lung disease (
Trastuzumab, the cornerstone of HER2-targeted therapy, is generally well tolerated but poses a notable risk of cardiotoxicity. Pertuzumab contributes additional risks, including diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and fatigue. Antibody–drug conjugates such as ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) introduce further complexities, with toxicities related to their cytotoxic payloads. T-DM1 is associated with thrombocytopenia and hepatotoxicity, while T-DXd carries a significant risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD), a potentially fatal complication that mandates vigilant respiratory monitoring.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including lapatinib and neratinib, are frequently associated with gastrointestinal disturbances such as diarrhea and hepatotoxicity. Notably, neratinib-induced diarrhea can be severe and persistent, requiring prophylactic loperamide and dose adjustments.
Furthermore, emerging HER2-directed agents – such as tucatinib and zanidatamab – have shown more favorable safety profiles in early studies, particularly regarding CNS penetration and tolerability, but long-term data remain limited(
The obstacles faced by current HER2-targeted therapies are drug resistance, therapy-related adverse effects, and the high expense of these products. Although much work has been performed regarding the mechanisms of drug resistance, practical strategies for overcoming resistance are required. Introducing combinatorial approaches, including anti-IgG or FGFR2-directed therapy, in the clinical setting prior to and/or after the emergence of resistance or in a neoadjuvant setting, could help address this issue. In particular, rather than continuous therapy, switching between different targeted pathways or combining them with chemotherapy may reduce side effects. Additionally, improving drug accessibility or decreasing drug clearance may attenuate the financial burden on HER2-positive patients. Under current conditions, we believe that using a potent, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that can be administered at high doses to decrease tumor burden, followed by long-term adjuvant administration, should be the best strategy for extending patient survival with the least negative impact.
In addition to focusing on current targeted therapies, specific molecular targets have been identified in many cancer types. Future strategies can also shift toward more precise and personalized treatments for breast and gastric cancer. As some resistance-related pathways are also present in other molecular subtypes, validating critical signals for these subtypes may enable simultaneous targeting of multiple cancer types. The presence of immune cells further increases the potential for combination treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (
Recent advancements in cancer immunotherapy have brought immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to the forefront of oncologic treatment, particularly in malignancies previously deemed poorly immunogenic. HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers have demonstrated immunogenic potential due to their elevated tumor mutational burden and increased infiltration of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). ICIs such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors have shown early promise, especially when combined with HER2-targeted therapies. These combinations may enhance antitumor immune responses by reversing HER2-induced immunosuppression and promoting immune cell activation. Clinical trials investigating combinations of trastuzumab with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab have reported encouraging results, particularly in the metastatic setting. In HER2-positive gastric cancer, where prognosis remains poor despite existing targeted therapies, combining ICIs with trastuzumab and chemotherapy is being actively explored and may help overcome immune evasion mechanisms. Future integration of ICIs in treatment protocols – guided by predictive biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression, TIL density, and microsatellite instability status – may redefine therapeutic outcomes in HER2-positive malignancies by offering more durable responses and improved survival rates.
Anti-HER2 therapies have revolutionized the treatment landscape of both breast and gastric cancers by offering targeted, effective, and often more tolerable alternatives to conventional cytotoxic regimens. Trastuzumab and newer agents such as pertuzumab, T-DM1, and trastuzumab deruxtecan have extended survival in HER2-positive patients and improved quality of life through more precise oncologic intervention. In gastric cancer, despite more modest responses compared to breast cancer, HER2 targeting remains the cornerstone of personalized therapy. Continued advances in combination strategies, biomarker refinement, and immune checkpoint integration promise to overcome resistance mechanisms and further tailor treatment. Moving forward, a deeper understanding of HER2 heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment interactions will be essential to fully harness the potential of HER2-directed therapeutics across tumor types.
The author thanks the Dr. Hany Akeel Institute for their outstanding support of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Ethical statements
The authors declared that no clinical trials were used in the present study.
The authors declared that no experiments on humans or human tissues were performed for the present study.
The authors declared that no informed consent was obtained from the humans, donors or donors’ representatives participating in the study.
The authors declared that no experiments on animals were performed for the present study.
The authors declared that no commercially available immortalised human and animal cell lines were used in the present study.
Use of AI
No AI-assisted technologies were used in the generation of this article.
Funding
No funding was reported.
Author contributions
All authors have contributed equally.
Author ORCIDs
Zahraa Alkhafaje https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8275-5399
Attaa S. Dawood https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9054-7066
Hiba G. Hussain https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4211-8712
Raghad Layth Fadhil https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0500-7820
Huda A. Rasheed https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-939X
Hussein A. Dawood https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1933-9753
Bassam A. Al-Zubaidi https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0212-5841
Mostafa Adnan Abdalrahman https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8797-9534
Amjad I. Oraibi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1458-8135
Hiba Ezzat Hameed https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0378-0205
Ferial Majed https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2378-4330
Hany Akeel Al-Hussaniy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2647-8574
Data availability
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.