Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Mohammad Daud Ali ( dali.niper@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Maria Dimitrova
© 2025 Mohammad Daud Ali, Danah Mubarak Aldhufairi, Lama Nadir Alharbi, Zahraa Yousif Qalaf, Maryam Adel Algheryafi, Lujain Essa Almarhoon, Fatimah Saleh Almohsen, Zainab Al Trefe, Nousheen Aslam, Nuzhat Banu, Ayaz Ahmad, Yousif Amin.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Ali MD, Mubarak Aldhufairi D, Nadir Alharbi L, Qalaf ZY, Algheryafi MA, Almarhoon LE, Almohsen FS, Al Trefe Z, Aslam N, Banu N, Ahmad A, Amin Y (2025) Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of community pharmacists towards providing counselling on acid suppressant medications in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Pharmacia 72: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.72.e142218
|
Acid suppressant medications, widely used to manage gastric acid secretions and related disorders, rely heavily on the expertise of community pharmacists. This underscores the importance of understanding community pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding counseling on acid-suppressant medications. A cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted from the end of 23rd August 2024 to the beginning of 30th September 2024. This study showed that most participants, 146 (64.6%), were females. 119 (52.65%), participants have good knowledge regarding acid suppressants vs. 107 (47.35%) with poor knowledge. Additionally, 101 (84%) of participants who have good knowledge state that they have direct interaction or contact with patients/customers, while only 18 (15.13%) (p-value = 0.15) of participants have no direct interaction or contact with patients/customers. Patients in Saudi Arabia are typically prescribed acid-suppressant drugs by community pharmacists. Over-the-counter (OTC) acid suppressant pharmaceuticals used in community pharmacy settings must be managed to ensure patient and drug safety.
Acid suppressant medications, community pharmacists, counselling, clinical guideline, Saudi Arabia
The most common drugs used to treat increased or disturbed stomach acid secretions, H. Pylori, GERD (Gastroesophageal reflux disease), peptic ulcers, and other illnesses related to high levels of HCl acid are acid suppressants (
Furthermore, a 2019 study in Saudi Arabia found that all community pharmacists routinely recommend PPIs to their patients (
Pharmacists play an important role in proper medicine use, preventing adverse drug reactions, improving health outcomes in geriatric care, and better managing chronic diseases (
Investigations have been carried out in Saudi Arabia to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of healthcare professionals toward PPI use, and these studies highlighted the importance of increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals to cut down on PPI use (
Therefore, this study seeks to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of community pharmacists in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia regarding their counseling on acid-suppressant medications.
This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among licensed community pharmacists certified at the bachelor’s level or above across Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Community pharmacists outside Saudi Arabia and pharmacists working in hospitals, universities, industry, or other pharmacy departments were excluded. Within the study, community pharmacies are typically managed by one or two pharmacists, who work at least 8 to 12-hour shifts six days a week. The placement of community pharmacies across the Eastern Province is quite balanced, although many of these pharmaceutical establishments are located within the central business district.
The sample size was calculated using the Raosoft calculator (Mohammad Daud Ali and Ebrahim Ahmed Jaber Al Hatef 2024), considering a 95% confidence level, a 5% margin of error, and an estimated 20% non-response rate. The target sample size is 350.
Researchers reviewed previous literature to design the original questionnaire. After a small-scale pre-investigation, the questionnaire was modified and improved to form the final version. A sample of 15 patients from the community evaluated the questionnaire’s face validity, and all the researchers assessed its content validity. The questionnaire’s Cronbach’s alpha value is 0.6. The pilot study results will not be included in the final analysis. The first section of the questionnaire contains demographic information such as age, gender, educational attainment, and work status. The second section includes the pharmacist’s understanding and knowledge of acid suppressants, using seven questions on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree = 0 to strongly agree = 5). The third section probed the pharmacist’s perspective towards dispensing advice for acid suppressant medications, while the last section investigated the actual practice of such counseling.
Data collection used a convenient sampling technique. The survey instrument was incorporated into a Google form for distribution to the proposed participants. It will take an average of 8–12 minutes to complete. The survey link was emailed conveniently to pharmacy chain managers and accompanied by a cover letter that clarified the study’s nature and objectives. The data was collected between 23rd August 2024 and the beginning of 30th September 2024.
The data was gathered and structured in an Excel sheet and exported to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27 for analysis. The demographic attributes of the surveyed population were assessed and categorized based on their descriptive statistics. The total knowledge scores were calculated to evaluate pharmacists’ knowledge. The participants who scored at least equal to or above the median score on all knowledge items featured in the study were considered to have “good knowledge.” Pearson’s Chi-squared, Fisher’s exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to evaluate the predictors of knowledge and practice. A “p” value of less than 0.05 is set as the significance threshold for this study.
A total of 226 respondents completed the survey. Most were between 20 and 29 years of age 149 (65.9%). Most of the participants (64.6%) were females; the percentage of pharmacists participating in this research, 164 (72.6%), was higher compared to the technicians, with only 62 (27.4%), 90 (39.8%) have less than one year of practice and 73 (32.3%) 1–5 years of training, 125 (55.3%) work in chain pharmacy. In comparison, 101 (44.7%) work in independent pharmacies, and 184 (81.4%) of participants directly interact with patients/customers. Table
| Characteristic | N = 226 (%) |
|---|---|
| Age (Years) | |
| 20-29 | 149 (65.9) |
| 30-39 | 46 (20.4) |
| ≥ 40 | 31 (13.7) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 80 (35.4) |
| Female | 146 (64.6) |
| Marital status | |
| Married | 103 (45.6) |
| Unmarried | 123 (54.4) |
| Highest qualification | |
| Diploma in Pharmacy | 55 (24.3) |
| B.Sc Pharmacy | 99 (43.8) |
| PharmD. | 53 (23.5) |
| Master/PhD | 19 (8.4) |
| Current professional level* | |
| Pharmacist | 164 (72.6) |
| Technician | 62 (27.4) |
| Type of community pharmacy do you work in | |
| Chain pharmacy | 125 (55.3) |
| Independent Pharmacy | 101 (44.7) |
| Employment contract status | |
| Full-time | 149 (65.9) |
| Part-time | 64 (28.3) |
| Temporary/casual | 13 (5.8) |
| Working in shifts | |
| Yes | 137 (60.6) |
| No | 89 (39.4) |
| Years of experience in pharmacy. | |
| Less than 1 year | 90 (39.8) |
| 1-5 Years | 73 (32.3) |
| 6-10 Years | 28 (12.4) |
| More than 10 years | 35 (15.5) |
| Rate your job satisfaction. | |
| 1 (Unsatisfied) | 22 (9.7) |
| 2 | 32 (14.2) |
| 3 | 102 (45.1) |
| 4 | 50 (22.1) |
| 5 (Very satisfied) | 20 (8.8) |
| Direct interaction or contact withpatients/customers | |
| Yes | 184 (81.4) |
| No | 42 (18.6) |
| Number of prescriptions/customers served daily. | |
| < 100 | 107 (47.3) |
| 100-200 | 98 (43.4) |
| > 200 | 21 (9.3) |
As shown in Table
| Characteristic | Good knowledge, n = 119 (%) (52.65%) | Poor knowledge, n = 107 (%) (47.35%) | p-value** |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Years) | |||
| 20-29 | 83 (69.75) | 65 (60.75) | 0.34 |
| 30-39 | 22 (18.49) | 24 (22.43) | |
| ≥ 40 | 14 (11.76) | 18 (16.82) | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 46 (38.66) | 73 (68.22) | 0.28 |
| Female | 73 (61.34) | 34 (31.78) | |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 57 (47.90) | 45 (42.06) | 0.59 |
| Unmarried | 62 (52.10) | 52 (48.60) | |
| Highest qualification | |||
| Diploma in Pharmacy | 37 (31.09) | 19 (17.76) | 0.09 |
| B.Sc. Pharmacy | 51 (42.86) | 48 (44.86) | |
| PharmD | 23 (19.33) | 29 (27.10) | |
| Master/PhD | 8 (6.72) | 11 (10.28) | |
| Current professional level* | |||
| Pharmacist | 81 (68.07) | 83 (77.57) | 0.10 |
| Technician | 38 (31.93) | 24 (22.43) | |
| Type of community pharmacy do you work in | |||
| Chain pharmacy | 66 (55.46) | 59 (55.14) | 0.96 |
| Independent Pharmacy | 53 (44.54) | 48 (44.86) | |
| Employment contract status | |||
| Full-time | 74 (62.18) | 75 (70.09) | 0.44 |
| Part-time | 37 (31.09) | 27 (25.23) | |
| Temporary/casual | 8 (6.72) | 5 (4.67) | |
| Working in shifts | |||
| Yes | 76 (63.87) | 61 (57.01) | 0.29 |
| No | 43 (36.13) | 46 (42.99) | |
| Years of experience in pharmacy | |||
| Less than 1 year | 48 (40.34) | 42 (39.25) | 0.88 |
| 1-5 Years | 36 (30.25) | 37 (34.58) | |
| 6-10 Years | 15 (12.61) | 13 (12.15) | |
| More than 10 years | 20 (16.81) | 15 (14.02) | |
| Rate your job satisfaction. | |||
| 1 (Unsatisfied) | 12 (10.08) | 9 (8.41) | 0.50 |
| 2 | 13 (10.92) | 19 (17.76) | |
| 3 | 52 (43.70) | 50 (46.73) | |
| 4 | 30 (25.21) | 21 (19.63) | |
| 5 (Very satisfied) | 12 (10.08) | 8 (7.48) | |
| Direct interaction or contact with patients/customers | |||
| Yes | 101 (84.87) | 83 (77.57) | 0.15 |
| No | 18 (15.13) | 24 (22.43) | |
| Number of prescriptions/customers served daily. | |||
| < 100 | 64 (53.78) | 42 (42) | 0.06 |
| 100-200 | 43 (36.13) | 55 (55) | |
| > 200 | 12 (10.08) | 10 (10) | |
| Resources for enhancing counseling for acid suppressant medications | |||
| Textbooks | 12 (10.08) | 10 (9.35) | 0.27 |
| Clinical guideline | 37 (31.09) | 43 (40.19) | |
| Mobile applications | 14 (11.76) | 11 (10.28) | |
| Online articles | 20 (16.81) | 24 (22.43) | |
| Social media platforms | 30 (25.21) | 17 (15.89) | |
| Participating in programs and workshop | 6 (5.04) | 2 (1.87) | |
| Interested in participating in collaborative initiatives with other healthcare professionals to improve patient counseling for acid-suppressant | |||
| Yes | 99 (83.19) | 79 (73.83) | 0.08 |
| No | 20 (16.81) | 28 (26.17) | |
Additionally, 101 (84%) of participants who have good knowledge state that they have direct interaction or contact with patients/customers, while only 18 (15.13%) (p-value = 0.15) of participants have no direct interaction or contact with patients/customers. Regarding the number of prescription customers who served daily, 64 (53.78) of participants with good knowledge mentioned that they prescribed < 100 prescriptions per day Vs 43 (36.16%) prescribed between 100–200 and only 12 (10.08%) prescribed > 200 prescriptions per day (p-value = 0.06). Study participants used different resources for enhancing counseling for acid suppressant medications. The clinical guideline comes first in the list with 37 (31.09%) followed by social media platforms 30 (25.21%), 20 (16.81%) of participants used online articles, 14 (11.76%) mobile application, 12 (10.08%) used textbooks, while participating in programs and workshop was the least of the resources used by participants , at just 6 (5.04%) (p-value = 0.27). In total, 99 (83.19%) of participants with sound knowledge regarding acid suppressants are interested in collaborating with other healthcare professionals to improve patient counseling for acid suppressants. In comparison, only 20 (16.81%) participants are not interested in such matters (p-value = 0.08).
This study showed that 162 (71.7%) community pharmacists prescribed acid-suppressant medications to their patients. Moreover, 95 (42%) participants mentioned that 11–20% of their patients require acid-suppressant medications (Table
| Characteristic | N = 226 (%) |
|---|---|
| Do you prescribe acid-suppressant medications to your patients? | |
| Yes | 162 (71.7) |
| No | 64 (28.3) |
| Percentage of patients who require acid suppressant medications | |
| 10% | 57 (25.2) |
| 11-20% | 95 (42) |
| 21-30 | 48 (21.3) |
| > 30% | 26 (11.5) |
| The most common indication for prescribing acid suppressants* | |
| Gastritis | 99 (43.8) |
| Heartburn | 128 (56.6) |
| Stress ulcer | 48 (21.2) |
| Indigestion | 46 (20.4) |
| Gastro-esophageal reflux disease | 110 (48.7) |
| Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs | 67 (29.6) |
| What acid suppressant medicationis it preferably prescribed? | |
| Antacid | 62 (27.4) |
| H2 receptor blocker | 95 (27.4) |
| Proton pump inhibitors | 95 (42) |
| Any Herbals, such as antacids | 15 (6.6) |
| Asking patients about their symptoms and medical history before recommending acid-suppressant medications | |
| Always | 115 (50.9) |
| Often | 55 (24.3) |
| Sometimes | 41 (18.1) |
| Rarely | 7 (3.1) |
| Never | 8 (3.5) |
| Providing information on the appropriate dosage and administration of acid-suppressant medications | |
| Always | 116 (51.3) |
| Often | 45 (19.9) |
| Sometimes | 43 (19) |
| Rarely | 13 (5.8) |
| Never | 9 (4) |
| Discussing potential side effects and drug interactions of acid suppressant medications with patients | |
| Always | 79 (35) |
| Often | 58 (25.7) |
| Sometimes | 62 (27.4) |
| Rarely | 20 (8.8) |
| Never | 7 (3.1) |
| Advising patients on lifestyle modifications or dietary changes to manage acid reflux or indigestion | |
| Always | 89 (39.4) |
| Often | 60 (26.5) |
| Sometimes | 49 (21.7) |
| Rarely | 22 (9.7) |
| Never | 6 (2.7) |
| How do you ensure patient adherence to the prescribed acid suppressant medication regimen? | |
| Assess patient understanding | 106 (46.9) |
| Follow up with the patient | 77 (34.1) |
| Provide clear instruction | 43 (19) |
Additionally, this study showed that the most common indication for prescribing acid suppressants was Heartburn 128(56.6%), followed by Gastro-esophageal reflux disease 110 (48.7), Gastritis (43.8%), use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 67 (29.6%) and the least common i indication is stress ulcer 48 (21.2%). A total 95 (42%) of community pharmacists mentioned that Proton pump inhibitors are preferably prescribed as acid suppressant medication followed by Antacid and H2 receptor blockers 62 (27.4%); any herbals as antacids are the least prescribed acid suppressant medication 15 (6.6%).
Also, this study revealed that most of the community pharmacists 115 (50.9%) always asked patients about their symptoms and medical history before recommending acid-suppressant medications. Also, 116 (51.3%) pharmacy practitioners provide patients with information on the appropriate dosage and administration of acid-suppressant medicines. Only 89 (39.4%) of participants always discussed potential side effects and drug interactions of acid suppressant medications with their patients (Table
Furthermore, this study showed that 106 (46.9%) of community pharmacists assessed patient understanding to ensure patient adherence to the prescribed acid suppressant medication regimen, 77 (34.1%) ensured patient adherence to the prescribed Acid suppressant medication regimen by following up with the patient, and 43 (19%) provided clear instructions to their patients to ensure patient adherence to the prescribed acid suppressant medication regimen.
As shown in Table
| Characteristic | Acid suppressant medication prescription | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No n = 64 (28.3) | Yes n = 162 (71.7) | p-value** | |
| Age (Years) | |||
| 20–29 | 45 (70.31) | 104 (64.20) | 0.67 |
| 30–39 | 11 (17.19) | 35 (21.60) | |
| ≥ 40 | 8 (12.50) | 23 (14.20) | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 20 (31.25) | 102 (62.96) | <0.05 |
| Female | 44 (68.75) | 60 (37.04) | |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 22 (34.38) | 81 (50) | 0.06 |
| Unmarried | 42 (65.63) | 81 (50) | |
| Highest qualification | |||
| Diploma in Pharmacy | 18 (28.13) | 37 (22.84) | 0.78 |
| B.Sc Pharmacy | 27 (42.19) | 72 (44.44) | |
| PharmD | 15 (23.44) | 38 (23.46) | |
| Master/PhD | 4 (6.25) | 15 (9.26) | |
| Current professional level* | |||
| Pharmacist | 43 (67.19) | 121 (74.69) | 0.25 |
| Technician | 21 (32.81) | 41 (25.31) | |
| Type of community pharmacy do you work in | |||
| Chain pharmacy | 33 (51.56) | 92 (56.79) | 0.48 |
| Independent Pharmacy | 31 (48.44) | 70 (43.21) | |
| Employment contract status | |||
| Full-time | 36 (56.25) | 113 (69.75) | 0.08 |
| Part-time | 25 (39.06) | 39 (24.07) | |
| Temporary/casual | 3(4.69) | 10 (6.17) | |
| Working in shifts | |||
| Yes | 36 (56.25) | 101 (62.35) | 0.40 |
| No | 28 (43.75) | 61 (37.65) | |
| Years of experience in pharmacy | |||
| Less than 1 year | 25 (39.06) | 65 (40.12) | 0.83 |
| 1–5 Years | 22 (34.38) | 51 (31.48) | |
| 6–10 Years | 9 (14.06) | 19 (11.73) | |
| More than 10 years | 8 (12.50) | 27 (16.67) | |
| Rate your job satisfaction. | |||
| 1 (Unsatisfied) | 5 (7.81) | 17 (10.49) | 0.07 |
| 2 | 12 (18.75) | 20 (12.35) | |
| 3 | 35 (54.69) | 67 (41.36) | |
| 4 | 10 (15.63) | 40 (24.69) | |
| 5 (Very satisfied) | 2 (3.13) | 18 (11.11) | |
| Direct interaction or contact with patients/customers | |||
| Yes | 51(79.69) | 133 (82.10) | 0.67 |
| No | 13(20.31) | 29 (17.90) | |
| Number of prescriptions/customers served daily. | |||
| < 100 | 31 (48.44) | 76 (46.91) | 0.31 |
| 100–200 | 30 (46.88) | 68 (41.98) | |
| > 200 | 3 (4.69) | 18 (11.11) | |
| Knowledge of acid suppressant medicine | |||
| Yes | 58 (90.63) | 150 (92.59) | 0.80 |
| No | 4 (6.25) | 12 (7.41) | |
| Knowledge of adverse events during the administration of acid-suppressant medication | |||
| Yes | 56 (87.50) | 157 (96.91) | 0.02 |
| No | 6 (9.38) | 5 (3.09) | |
| Knowledge of potential complications associated with long-term or excessive use of acid-suppressant medication | |||
| Yes | 58 (90.63) | 161 (99.38) | 0.007 |
| No | 6 (9.38) | 3 (1.85) | |
Table
Perceived barriers and facilitators towards counseling for acid suppressant.
| Characteristic | n = 226 (%) |
|---|---|
| Resources enhance counseling for acid-suppressant medications. | |
| Textbooks | 21 (9.3) |
| Clinical guideline | 81 (35.8) |
| Mobile applications | 25 (11.1) |
| Online articles | 44 (19.5) |
| Social media platforms | 47 (20.8) |
| Participating in programs and workshop | 8 (3.5) |
| Perceived barriers toward counseling for acid suppressant medications* | |
| Lack of time during patient interactions | 111 (49.1) |
| Limited patient interest in counseling | 118 (52.2) |
| Language barriers with patients | 81 (35.8) |
| Insufficient knowledge of acid medications | 54 (23.9) |
| Perceived facilitators towards counseling for acid suppressant medications* | |
| Patient-centered communication skills | 143 (63.8) |
| Supportive work environment and resources | 113 (50.4) |
| Continuous professional development opportunities | 70 (31.3) |
| Preferred method of receiving educational updates on acid suppressant medications* | |
| In-person workshops or training sessions | 108 (47.8) |
| Journal publications or research articles | 74 (32.7) |
| Attendance at conferences or seminars | 68 (30.1) |
| Online webinars or electronic learning modules | 112 (49.6) |
On the other hand, participants perceived many barriers toward counseling for acid suppressant medications. In total, 118 (52.2%) found that limited patient interest in counseling is a significant barrier, followed by lack of time during patient interactions 111 (49.1%), 81 (35.8%) found language barriers with patients is one of the challenges, and 54 (23.9%) of participants found that insufficient knowledge of acid medications was a factor in anther barriers toward counseling for acid suppressant medications.
143 (63.8%) of community pharmacists found that patient-centered communication skills are the primary facilitators for counseling for acid suppressant medications. In comparison, 113 (50.4%) depend mainly on a supportive work environment and resources as facilitators, and 70 (31.3%) found that continuous professional development opportunities are another facilitator towards counseling for acid suppressant medications. Furthermore, the results show that 112 (49.6%) of participants preferred online webinars or electronic learning modules as a method of receiving educational updates on acid suppressant medications, followed by In-person workshops or training sessions 108 (47.8%), Journal publications or research articles 74 (32.7%) and 68 (30.1%) preferred attendance at conferences or seminars as a method of receiving educational updates on acid suppressant medications.
The study recruited two hundred and twenty-six community pharmacists as study participants to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding counseling on acid-suppressant medications. The results showed a promising youthful workforce of community pharmacists. However, a notable gender disparity was observed, with more female pharmacists working in community pharmacies. It shows a growing trend among female pharmacists to join community pharmacists, which was not reported in previous studies (
Most participants had a professional qualification of four or more years (BSc Pharmacy, PharmD, and postgraduate). They were full-time pharmacists compared to the diploma holders, part-time and casual or temporary workers. The prevalence of a PharmD degree indicates an increasing trend of clinical pharmacy degree holders joining community pharmacy (
Most participants exhibited an excellent knowledge of acid suppressants, reflecting these pharmacists’ robust education and training. However, an insignificant difference between the two groups of pharmacists (good knowledge Vs poor knowledge) indicates that their demographics, such as age, gender, academic qualification, professional experience, and job satisfaction, did not influence their knowledge about acid suppressants. This insignificant result may imply that all the participants had access to similar sources of information that resulted in a uniform baseline knowledge score. Despite having more pharmacists with good knowledge, the uniformity between the two groups indicates a need for educational initiatives to enhance their knowledge and information. This finding is consistent with previous studies, which reported no correlation between the pharmacists’ demographics and their demographic characteristics. Alhossan et al. have reported that community pharmacists in Saudi Arabia often recommend and prescribe proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (
Regarding the prescribing practice of acid-suppress antacid-suppressant medications, there has been an increase in the pharmacists’ role in prescribing acid-suppress antacid-suppressant drugs, mainly PPIs (
The only determinants that influenced the prescribing practice were gender difference and the knowledge about adverse events and potential complications with long-term use of acid-suppressant medications. Female pharmacists and those pharmacists with a better understanding of adverse events and long-term use complications were significantly more involved in prescribing these medications than their respective groups (Azizah et al. 2021;
Lack of patient interest and time constraints were the most common barriers towards counseling for acid suppressant medications, as reported by study participants, and this is evident from other studies as well. These barriers confine the ability and desire of pharmacists to be involved in the discussion about these medications. It may also result in truncated counseling by pharmacists that may not produce the desired patient outcomes (Ayesha et al. 2023;
On the other hand, pharmacists perceived that patient-centered communication skills could be a strong facilitator of counseling for acid-suppressants, especially when pharmacists and patients do not share the same language or the patient is unable to understand some medical terms and language used by the pharmacist (Ghazi 2022;
Similarly, a supportive work environment, such as encouragement or incentives from management and access to updated resources, was perceived as a strong facilitator for pharmacists toward effective counseling. The pharmacists also showed a positive attitude toward continuous professional development if they were provided with opportunities. However, most of them favored online learning and in-person workshops to learn how to deal with the challenges of patient counseling, improve their communication skills, and learning about the recent advancements in healthcare information and technology.
This study assessed community pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding counseling on acid-suppressant medications in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Although most of the study participants were young and reported professional education, good knowledge about acid suppressant medicines, and encouraging involvement in patient counseling, there were profound gaps in their counseling practices. These gaps were identified due to specific barriers, such as lack of patient interest and the pharmacist’s time for counseling. The language barrier was also one of the constraints for effective patient counseling. The pharmacists showed a positive attitude towards improving their communication and counseling skills through online and in-person professional development programs.
Several limitations have been identified for this study. Firstly, the observation period was short. Restrictions on the data collection window timeframe may have prevented some community pharmacists from participating in the survey, a noted limitation of this study. Secondly, the desired sample size was not able to be found within a defined timeline since this study was related to students’ graduation projects, and they had to submit their projects within the stipulated timeline to accomplish their graduation project. As per study methods, we need at least a 385-sample size; however, we included in our study 226 survey response. Thirdly, a survey was conducted online instead of online. If the survey could be conducted with physical visits to the respondents by the researcher, it could help minimize the biasing of the response. In the future, a related study could be conducted with significant responses, and a survey could be conducted by physical visits to the community pharmacist to minimize potential bias.
The authors recommend developing target training and educational programs for the community pharmacists to implement the standard counseling protocols and regularly evaluate the pervasiveness and effectiveness of the community pharmacists-led patient counseling service regarding acid-suppressant medications. The authors also recommend increasing public awareness about acid-suppressant medication utilization and the importance of counseling by a pharmacist.
Before the commencement of the study, the Institutional Review Board of Mohammed Al-Mana College for Medical Sciences obtained ethical approval and prior permission (Ref: SR/RP/189). The respondents also provided online consent before participation. No financial incentive was provided for respondents. We confirm that the study adhered to the Helsinki Declaration of Human Participation principle.
All the author(s) would like to express their sincere thanks to all the community pharmacists of Eastern Province Saudi Arabia who participated in the survey and gave their valuable responses to the study within their busy schedules.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Ethical statements
The authors declared that no clinical trials were used in the present study.
The authors declared that no experiments on humans or human tissues were performed for the present study.
The authors declared that no informed consent was obtained from the humans, donors or donors’ representatives participating in the study.
The authors declared that no experiments on animals were performed for the present study.
The authors declared that no commercially available immortalised human and animal cell lines were used in the present study.
Funding
No funding was reported.
Author contributions
Mohammad Daud Ali (MDA)- Idea and Conceptualization, Methodology, Data analysis. Lama Nadir Alharbi (LNA), Lama Nadir Alharbi (LNA), Zahraa Yousif Qalaf (ZYQ), Maryam Adel Algheryafi (MAA), Lujain Essa Almarhoon (LEA), Fatimah Saleh Almohsen (FSA)- Data Collection, Data acquisition. Zainab Al Trefe (ZAT), Nousheen Aslam (NA), Nousheen Aslam (NA)- Interpretation, Writing – original draft preparation, review and editing. Ayaz Ahmed (AY), Yousif Amin (YA)- Manuscript proofreading. All authors: MDA, DMA, LNA, ZYQ, MAA, LEA, FSA, ZAT, NA, NB, AY and YA. I reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and approved it for communication.
Author ORCIDs
Mohammad Daud Ali https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-2331
Zainab Al Trefe https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8944-6831
Nuzhat Banu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6253-5463
Ayaz Ahmad https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-637X
Yousif Amin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4227-5849
Data availability
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.