Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Yancho Zarev ( zarev.yancho@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Niko Benbassat
© 2024 Preslav Enchev, Yancho Zarev, Anzhelika Dakovska, Teodora Todorova, Martin Dimitrov, Andrés Rivera-Mondragón, Iliana Ionkova.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Enchev P, Zarev Y, Dakovska A, Todorova T, Dimitrov M, Rivera-Mondragón A, Ionkova I (2024) Pentacyclic triterpenoids from the leaves of Cecropia longipes. Pharmacia 71: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.71.e134276
|
The genus Cecropia (Urticaceae) comprises 61 tree species primarily found in tropical rainforests from Mexico to South America, including Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Panama. These species are under-researched, with most studies focusing on phenolic derivatives from leaf extracts. Traditionally, Cecropia species are used to treat ailments such as asthma, bronchitis, and diabetes. This study focuses on the underexplored species C. longipes from Panama, aiming to analyze triterpene derivatives in its leaves. Through a series of chromatographic separations and purifications, three pentacyclic triterpenoids were isolated. Using 1D and 2D NMR experiments and HRESI-MS analysis, the following compounds were identified: 19α hydroxyasiatic acid, 1α,3β,23-trihydroxyolean-12-en-28-oic acid, and rosamultic acid. These compounds were isolated for the first time from C. longipes and the genus Cecropia. Genotoxicity tests using S. cerevisiae revealed that two compounds exhibited genotoxic activity at all concentrations. For 19α hydroxyasiatic acid, genotoxic potential was observed at higher concentrations, unrelated to oxidative stress, suggesting other mechanisms.
Cecropia longipes, isolation, pentacyclic triterpenoids, genotoxicity
The genus Cecropia Loefl. (Urticaceae) is widely distributed throughout the tropical and subtropical regions from Mexico to South America, including Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Panama. It is represented mainly by trees and comprises 61 species. Cecropia trees typically range from 5–25 m in height with a sectioned stem and upright, hollow, and broad leaves with unique textures forming umbrella-like shapes. Many of these species have stinging trichomes (plant hairs) all over the stems and leaves that cause a painful rash when in contact with the skin (
In the present study were used leaves from Cecropia longipes Loefl., collected in Panamá Oeste (Arraiján) province, 8°55'59"N, 79°44'20"W, November 2021. The taxonomic classification was carried out by the botanist Orlando O. Ortiz and deposited at the Herbarium of the University of Panama, voucher № 4004.
All solvents, including EtOAc, MeOH, CHCL3, CH2CL2, and C6D5N, were sourced from Fischer Chemicals (Loughborough, UK). Water for assays was collected from a dispenser via a Milli-Q system from Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA) and filtered through a 0.22 μM membrane filter before use. Analytical thin layer chromatography plates used were TLC Silica gel 60 F254 (20 × 20). Chromatographic plates were observed after development with the appropriate reagent. The anisaldehyde-sulfuric acid reagent was prepared by dissolving 0.500 mL of anisaldehyde in 10 mL of concentrated acetic acid, 85 mL of methanol, and 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid. Column chromatography (CC) at atmospheric pressure: glass columns; the stationary phases used in this type of CC are: polyamide CC6, particle size 0.05–0.16 mm (Sigma-Aldrich, Bornem, Belgium); 50 CC at very low pressure: glass columns and nitrogen under pressure (1.2 bar); the stationary phases used in this type of (CC) are: silica gel, class-high purity, pore size 60 Å, 230–400, particle size 40–60 µm (Sigma-Aldrich); MCI gel CHP20P, particle size 75–150 μm (Mitsubishi Chemical Co., Japan); Diaion HP-20. Flash chromatographic purification and isolation was performed on a Reveleris® X2 system (Grace, Columbia, MD, USA) using Reveleris® Navigator™ software. The system consists of a binary pump capable of mixing up to four solvents, an ultraviolet (UV) detector, an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD), and a fraction collector. Silica gel columns Claricept Flash, particle size 40–60 μm, 60 Å 120 g, and 80 g were used, in which the samples for analysis are applied in dry form, and a Claricept Flash Spherical C18 column with particle size 40–60 μm, 100 Å 80 g, in which the samples for analysis are applied in liquid. Fractionation is based on simultaneous UV and ELSD detection. Mass spectra were obtained by LC-HRESI-MS analysis with a Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer coupled to a Dionex UltiMate 3000 LC system (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Germering, Germany). Sample recording was performed under both positive and negative ionization. The full MS scan lasts 18.5 min with a run time of 0.5 to 19.0 min, resolution 70 000, AGC target 3e6, max. IT 100 ms, scan range 150 to 1500 m/z. The MS/MS scan was set to resolution 17 500 and AGC target 1e5, maximum IT 50 ms, scan range 200 to 2000 m/z, isolation window 2.0 m/z, and step (N)CE 10, 30, 60 The following parameters were used: dry gas flow (N2 8.0 L/min, capillary temperature 320 °C, source temperature 320 °C, sheath gas flow – 36 AU, auxiliary flow – 11 AU, source voltage -3.5 kV, and capillary voltage -320 V. Data acquisition and processing were performed using Thermo Xcalibur 2.2 software (Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).Optimum separation was performed on a Zorbax SB-C18 inverted column phase (150 mm x 2.1 mm inner diameter; 3.5 μm particle size) (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) under gradient elution conditions using a binary mobile phase composed of 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B). The following gradient program was used: 0 min, 5% B; 11 min, 40% B; 17.5 min, 95% B; and 19.5 min, 95% B. The mobile phase flow rate was 0.3 mL/min, and the column temperature was set at 40.0 °C. The injection volume is 2.5 μL. 1H and 13C-NMR spectra were taken on a Bruker Avance II+ 600 with a BVO head at 600.13 and 150 MHz, respectively, in C5D5N (99.5%, Deutero GmbH). For correlated spectroscopy (COSY), reflecting the 1H-1H correlations; heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC); reflecting the direct correlation of 1H-13C; and heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC), reflecting the direct correlation of 1H-13C on long, standard pulses were used programs and phase cycles. NMR data were recorded and processed by Bruker Topspin 4.0.7 software.
The air-dried and ground leaves of the species C. longipes (660 g) were extracted with 70% MeOH (8 L) in an ultrasonic bath. After filtration and evaporation with a vacuum evaporator, a total of 42 g dry extract was obtained. This extract was dissolved in water (0.1% FA) and fractionated using normal pressure chromatography with Diaion HP-20 sorbent. Elution was performed gradually, using a gradient from H2O to MeOH with increasing percentages of MeOH. This process resulted in the collection of six fractions: 0%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90%. In the initial stage of purification, a Reverelis X2 chromatographic system was employed. A pre-packed column with silica gel, having a particle size of 40–60 μm and a pore size of 60Å, weighing 120 g (ClaricepTMSi C-Series, 120 g), was used for the separation. The 90% fraction was prepared by suspending it in silica gel (Kieselgur) before application. The elution process was carried out in a gradient across four steps, with a flow rate of 5 mL/min. Detection was performed using both ELSD and UV at 254 nm, resulting in the collection of 414 fractions, each 10 mL in volume. Subsequent TLC analysis led to the combination of these fractions into 21 subfractions. Fraction number 17 underwent further purification using normal pressure column chromatography. A column with dimensions of 35 cm by 3 cm and polyamide CC6 sorbent (20.9 g) was utilized. Gradient elution was performed from CHCl3 to MeOH in steps, collecting fractions with a volume of 20 mL each. This process resulted in 41 fractions, which, after TLC analysis, were combined into the subfractions 90_17А, 90_17В, 90_17С, 90_17D, and 90_17E. Fraction 90_17B was chromatographed using the Reveleris X2 system with a pre-packed C18 column, 40 μm (12 g) (FlashPure BUCHI). The fraction was prepared for elution by dissolving it in MeOH (50:50). Elution was performed in three steps at a flow rate of 10 mL/min, collecting 220 fractions of 4 mL each, which were combined into six fractions through TLC analysis. Each of the six fractions underwent further chromatographic purification using a semi-preparative HPLC system. This process utilized an Ascentis® C18 column (250 mm x 15 mm, 5 μm) (Supelco) under isocratic elution for 50 minutes with a 40% acetonitrile (0.1% FA). As a result, three compounds were isolated. Their structures were elucidated by 1D and 2D NMR experiments (COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) as well as LC-HRESI-MS analysis.
19α-hydroxyasiatic acid was isolated as a white powder (1.9 mg), and during LC-HRESI-MS analysis, it was observed as a protonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 503.3387, corresponding to the molecular formula C30H47O6. NMR spectral data for 19α-hydroxyasiatic acid: 1H NMR (C5D5N) δ, ppm: 0.88 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.04 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.13 (d, 3H, J=6.55, −CH3), 1.14 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.29; 2.35 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.35, 2.08 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.41; 1.83 (t, 2H, −CH2−), 1.43 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.50 (t, 1H, −CH=), 1.61; 1.40 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.68 (s, 3H, −CH3) 1.83, 1.95 (t, dd, 2H, J=4.47, 12.25, −CH2−), 2.06, 3.11 (m, td, 2H, J=4.84; 13.53, −CH2−), 2.08, 2.17 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 2.11 (m, 1H, −CH=), 2.12, 2.19 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 2.19 (m, 1H, −CH=), 3.06 (brs, 1H, −CH=), 3.76, 3.94 (d, 2H, J=10.77; 10.77, −CH2OH), 4.16 (d, 1H, J=2.69, −CH=), 4.30 (dt, 1H, J=3.27; 10.95, −CH=), 5.61 (t, 1H, Ar, −CH=) (Suppl. material
1α,3β,23-trihydroxyolean-12-en-28-oic acid was isolated as white powder (5.3 mg) and during LC-HRESI-MS analysis was observed as a deprotonated molecule [M-H]- at m/z 487.3437, corresponding to the molecular formula C30H47O5. NMR spectral data for 1α,3β,23-trihydroxyolean-12-en-28-oic acid: 1H NMR (C5D5N) δ, ppm: 0.93 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.00 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.06 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.08 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.08, 1.95 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.09 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.15, 1.43 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.21 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.27, 1.76 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.32, 1.67 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.35, 2.18 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.42, 2.32 (d, dd, 2H, J=11.03; 4.10, 12.44, −CH2−), 1.46, 1.75 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.82, 2.05 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.85 (m, 1H, −CH=), 1.93 (m, 1H, −CH=), 2.05 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 3.30 (dd, 1H, J=4.21, 13.96, −CH=), 3.75, 4.23 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 4.23 (dd, 1H, J=4.12, 10.43, −CH=), 4.27 (dd, 1H, J=4.07, 9.6, −CH=), 5.48 (t, 1H, Ar, −CH=) (Suppl. material
Rosamultic acid was isolated as a white powder (1.4 mg), and during LC-HRESI-MS analysis, it was observed as a deprotonated molecule [M-H]- at m/z 485.3273, corresponding to the molecular formula C30H45O5. NMR spectral data for rosamultic acid: 1H NMR (C5D5N) δ, ppm: 1.12 (d, 3H, J=6.56, −CH3), 1.16 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.25 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.35, 2.08 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 1.43 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.49 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.50 (m, 1H, −CH=), 1.73 (s, 3H, −CH3), 1.82 (s, 1H, −CH=), 2.07, 2.14 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 2.38, 2.48 (m, 2H, −CH2−), 2.59 (m, 1H, −CH=), 3.05 (m, 1H, −CH=), 3.86, 4.06 (m, 2H, J=10.45; 10.45, −CH2OH), 4.50, 4.64 (d, 2H, J=15.45; 15.45, −CH2OH), 5.62 (m, 1H, −CH=), 6.12 (s, 1H, −CH=) (Suppl. material
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a useful eukaryotic model to study the cellular response to different compounds and stressors (
Data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism software, version 9.5.1 (San Diego, USA). Differences among strains, tested concentrations, and positive controls were evaluated using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test and two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Significance levels were indicated as follows: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Each test was performed in at least three independent experiments.
Compound 1 was isolated as a white crystalline powder (1.9 mg). The data from HRESI-MS analysis shows a protonated molecule ion [M+H]+ at m/z 503.3387, corresponding to the molecular formula C30H47O6. The NMR assignments of the compound match those of the β-glycosyl ester of 19α-hydroxyursolic acid, isolated from Symplocos spicata (
The biological activity of compounds 1, 2, and 3 was evaluated using the S. cerevisiae model system to assess their potential genotoxic effects. The analysis using S. cerevisiae indicated that both compounds 2 and 3 demonstrated genotoxic effects across all tested concentrations. In contrast, compound 1 did not affect cell survival at concentrations of 0.001 and 0.01 µg/mL. However, genotoxicity was observed at higher concentrations of 0.05 and 0.1 µg/mL (Fig.
To determine if the antioxidant defense system was involved in the genotoxic activity of compound 1, we compared results between the 551 rho+ strain and the 551Δyap1 strain. Although significant differences were observed between the effects on the two strains, the variance was around 10% (Fig.
This suggests that the genotoxic effects of compound 1 may not be primarily due to oxidative stress but could be due to other mechanisms.
During the research, a phytochemical study of the leaves of C. longipes was carried out to investigate the presence of pentacyclic triterpenoids. Using a series of chromatographic methods on a 70% MeOH extract of the leaves, three compounds were isolated. The results of the 1H NMR analysis indicated the presence of a pentacyclic triterpenoid structure in the isolated substances. The structures of the three compounds were determined by 1D (1H NMR, 13C NMR) and 2D NMR (COSY, HSQC, HMBC) as 19α hydroxyasiatic acid, 1α,3β,23-trihydroxyolean-12-en-28-oic acid, and rosamultic acid. These compounds were isolated for the first time from the genus Cecropia and the species C. longipes. Additionally, a genotoxicity test was conducted on the isolated compounds using the S. cerevisiae model system. The results revealed that compounds 2 n and 3 exhibited genotoxic activity at all tested concentrations. For 19α hydroxyasiatic acid, no effect on cell survival was observed at concentrations of 0.001 and 0.01 µg/mL, but genotoxic potential was noted at higher concentrations of 0.05 and 0.1 µg/mL. Comparing the results between the 551 rho+ strain and the 551Δyap1 strain suggested that the genotoxicity of 19α hydroxyasiatic acid is not strongly related to oxidative stress but likely involves other mechanisms. This finding provides a deeper understanding of the biological activity and safety profile of these newly isolated compounds.
The Council of Medicinal Science at the Medical University of Sofia, contract № D-155/03.08.2023 is acknowledged.
Supplementary data
Data type: docx