Research Article |
Corresponding author: Iyan Sopyan ( i.sopyan@unpad.ac.id ) Academic editor: Paraskev Nedialkov
© 2024 Fery Indradewi Armadany, Iyan Sopyan, Resmi Mustarichie, Ruslin, Arfan.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Indradewi Armadany F, Sopyan I, Mustarichie R, Ruslin, Arfan (2024) Antifungal activity and hair growth stimulation of purple sweet potato leaf fraction (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lamk) and its molecular mechanism through androgen receptor inhibition. Pharmacia 71: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.71.e119384
|
Alopecia presented a global challenge, spurring the search for new treatments. This study evaluated Ipomoea batatas leaf extracts for their ability to stimulate hair growth and inhibit Malassezia furfur. Secondary metabolites were identified and assessed for their potential to inhibit androgen receptors (AR) via LC-MS/MS and in silico analysis. The hair tonic formulation was optimized using a D-optimal mixture design to improve physicochemical properties. The plant’s extracts and fractions exhibited strong antifungal activity against M. furfur and significant hair growth stimulation compared to minoxidil. In silico analysis identified pyropheophorbide A, methyl-Pyropheophorbide A, hyperoside, and quercetin with superior affinity and stability in interacting with AR. The optimized formulation included 96% ethanol, propylene glycol, and Tween 80 to enhance hair tonic properties. I. batatas leaves showed promising potential in treating alopecia through hair growth stimulation, antifungal activity, and potential inhibition of AR. These findings opened avenues for further research and development in alopecia therapeutics.
Alopecia, androgen receptor, hair loss, Ipomoea batatas, Malassezia furfur, molecular dynamics
Hair loss, known medically as alopecia, is a dermatological condition affecting the scalp and often significantly impacting an individual’s quality of life due to psychosocial consequences. The causes of hair loss are varied and encompass factors such as microbial (fungal) infections, genetic influences (hormonal), exposure to chemicals, medication usage, and environmental factors. Studies suggest that around 60 to 70% of the global population encounters androgenetic alopecia (AGA), primarily linked to excessive production of the androgen 5α-dihydrotestosterone (5α-DHT) in hair follicles, particularly in dermal papilla cells, which play a crucial role in regulating hair growth (
Officially recognized alopecia treatments include topical minoxidil and oral finasteride (
The abundance of compounds in natural sources presents diverse pharmacological potentials, offering a promising avenue for drug discovery and development, especially in the field of hair care cosmetics for alopecia treatment (
Moreover, previous research has indicated that purple sweet potato leaves contain a variety of secondary metabolites, including steroids, terpenoids, alkaloids, polyphenols, tannins, flavonoids, vitamins, and minerals (
In this study, our focus is on exploring the secondary metabolites, antifungal effects, and hair growth-stimulating potential of fractions from I. batatas leaves. Additionally, a computational study was conducted to comprehend the molecular mechanisms of metabolites from these plants toward the androgen receptor. This investigation is intended to provide scientific insights as an alternative for the development of natural-based treatments to stimulate hair growth affected by alopecia.
The leaves of Ipomoea batatas were collected from Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. The I. batatas plant was identified by the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Bandung Institute of Technology, West Java, Indonesia, under registration number 6726/I1.CO2.2/PL/2019. The leaves underwent a series of preparations, including sample harvesting, wet sorting, water washing, deformation by cutting into small pieces, and subsequent drying in an Air Performance Ovens Frailabo® at 50 °C to obtain dry simplicial. The simplicia powder (7000 g) was macerated with ethanol as a solvent, and the solvent was changed daily over three days. It was then concentrated using a rotary evaporator (Buchi R-100) at 50 °C into a crude extract (711.34 g) with a yield of 10.16% (w/w). A total of 260 g of the ethanolic extract underwent fractionation through successive steps: it was dissolved in hot distilled water and then fractionated with n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and butanol solvents. This process yielded an n-hexane fraction of 50 g (19.23% (w/w)), an ethyl acetate fraction of 71 g (27.31% (w/w)), a butanol fraction of 74 g (28.46% (w/w)), and aqueous fractions of 50 g (19.23% (w/w)). The ethyl acetate fraction was selected for further analysis using LC-MS/MS.
The ethyl acetate fraction (50 g) underwent fractionation using column vacuum chromatography employing silica gel 60H254 p.a (E. Merck). Elution was carried out utilizing eluents (n-hexane – ethyl acetate) at various ratios. This chromatographic separation yielded twenty-seven subfractions, subsequently combined based on similar separation profiles observed on thin layer chromatography (TLC). Eight primary subfractions were obtained: subfraction A (comprising subfractions 1–5), B (subfractions 6–10), C (subfractions 11–12), D (subfractions 13–15), E (subfractions 16–17), F (subfractions 18–19), G (subfractions 20–21), and H (subfractions 22–27). All subfractions were selected for further LC-MS/MS analysis using a Waters Xevo G2-XS Quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry equipped with an electrospray ionization interface (ESI). The ESI source operated in positive ion mode within the m/z range of 50 to 1200, with optimization parameters set as follows: acquisition time 0–17 min, high CE ramp 10–40 eV, collision energy 6 eV, cone voltage 30 V, desolvation gas flow, and temperature set at 1000 L/h and 500 °C. The column temperature was maintained at 40 °C. Solvents consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water (eluent A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (eluent B) were utilized with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The eluent composition was as follows: 0–1 min 5% eluent B, 11–14 min 100% eluent B, 17 min 5% eluent B. Samples, each with a volume of 1 µL, were injected into the column. Post-processing of the samples was conducted using Waters UNIFI® software and compared with the built-in library database from the Waters instrument (Waters Corp. Milford, MA, USA).
Additionally, the identification of flavonoid compounds from the ethyl acetate fraction of I. batatas utilized the ACQUITY UPLC BEH Shield RP18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) with eluent A (water + 0.1% formic acid) and eluent B (acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid). The flow rate was set at 0.3 mL/minute, column temperature at 40 °C, injection volume of 3 µL, and both UV and MS detectors were employed. Post-processing of the samples was carried out using the MarkHerb database (EBM Scientific and Technology, Ltd).
The Malassezia furfur samples were obtained from Indonesia University, Jakarta. These fungi were maintained on a potato dextrose agar-olive oil (PDA-oil) medium. For three days, the fungal culture was grown in PDA oil at 35 °C. The fungal culture suspension was adjusted to a visually comparable turbidity of 0.5 MacFarland standard scales, which equated to 1.5 × 109 CFU/ml. The antifungal activity of the extract and its fractions was assessed using the agar diffusion method (
Two-month-old local rabbits, weighing approximately 2 kg, were utilized in this study. The rabbits underwent acclimatization to laboratory conditions and received standard feed and water. The photoperiod was set at 12 hours of light and 12 hours of darkness at room temperature (25 ± 3 °C). Following protocol approval from the Halu Oleo University Ethics Committee, all treatments on the tested animals were performed to minimize the number of animals and their suffering. Three male rabbits were selected for the study, and the Tanaka method with modifications was employed (
To prepare for the application of the extract and fraction, the dorsal area hairs on the rabbits’ backs were shaved and treated with depilatory cream 24 hours before application. Six boxes, each measuring 2 × 2 cm2, were created with a spacing of 2 cm between them. Each rabbit received different doses of extract suspensions (5%, 10%, 20%, and 40%, respectively), while a vehicle control (1% Sodium CMC suspension) served as the negative control, and 2% minoxidil suspension acted as the positive control. The samples were applied to the test area box with 1 ml twice daily for 21 days. Hair growth stimulating activity was assessed by observing hair growth on the rabbit’s back skin.
Hair length measurements began on the third day to evaluate the growth state of newly grown hair. Following the initiation of treatment, all rabbit hairs were selected for measurement, and the average length was calculated. The results were presented as the average hair length + SD (standard deviation) of 10 hairs. Tests were conducted to identify hair growth activity in the extract and its fractions.
The analyzed data were expressed as mean ± SD. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistical software version 25. All data underwent one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the significance level between treatment means was determined using the LSD range test at p < 0.05.
We obtained the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the androgen receptor (AR) from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 4K7A) (https://www.rcsb.org/) (
The four best compounds from the docking results were then proceeded to the molecular dynamics simulation stage using GROMACS 2016 (
The Design-Expert 10 (DX-10) software was utilized to optimize the proportions of excipients in the hair tonic formulation of the ethyl acetate fraction from I. batatas leaves. A D-optimal mixture design was employed with the constraint ethanol 96% (X1) + propylene glycol (X2) + Tween 80 (X3) = 30%, as depicted in Table
Mixture composition in hair tonic formulation with ethanol 96%, propylene glycol, and tween 80 in a three-component constrained D-optimal mixture design.
Run | Formulation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 (ethanol 96%) | X2 (propylene glycol) | X3 (Tween 80) | Ethyl acetate fraction of I. batatas | Sodium metabisulphite | DMDM Hydantoin | Deionized water | |
1 | 11.67 | 13.33 | 5 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
2 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
3 | 7.5 | 18.5 | 4 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
4 | 5 | 24 | 1 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
5 | 8.33 | 20.67 | 1 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
6 | 5 | 24 | 1 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
7 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
8 | 10 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
9 | 5 | 22 | 3 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
10 | 12.5 | 15.5 | 2 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
11 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
12 | 5 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
13 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
14 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
15 | 10 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
16 | 10 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | Ad 100 |
The formulation of the hair tonic is outlined in Table
The pH was measured using a pH meter calibrated by dipping the electrode into two solutions, assuming that the pH of the test solution fell between the pH values of the two solutions. Commonly used solutions for calibration are pH 4 and pH 7 (
Fitting response values were conducted using special quartic and quadratic models (Eqs. 1–2). ANOVA at P < 0.05 was used to assess the statistical significance of the equation.
Y = λ1X1 + λ2X2 + λ3X3 + λ1λ2 X1X2 + λ1λ3 X1X3 + λ2λ3 X2X3 + λ1λ1λ2λ3 X1X1X2X3 + λ1λ2λ2λ3 X1X2X2X3 + λ1λ2λ3λ3 X1X2X3X3 … (special quartic) (Eq 1)
Y = λ1X1 + λ2X2 + λ3X3 + λ1λ2 X1X2 + λ1λ3 X1X3 + λ2λ3 X2X3..(quadratic) (Eq 2)
Y represents the predictive dependent variable (responses), such as physicochemical properties like pH, viscosity, and density. λ denotes constant coefficients for model terms, and X represents the proportions of real-components.
Ipomoea batatas has traditionally been used for hair care, specifically addressing issues like hair loss or alopecia. The causes of alopecia vary from genetic to environmental factors. In light of this traditional application, a phytochemical screening was conducted to identify its phytochemical compounds and assess its antifungal and hair growth stimulant activities in this study. The ethyl acetate subfractions from I. batatas were analyzed using the LC-MS/MS method (Suppl. material
The LC-MS/MS profile of the ethyl acetate subfraction from I. batatas leaves.
Sample | tR (Min) | Formula | Observed m/z | Product Ions m/z | Neutral mass (Da) | Proposed Compounds |
Ethyl acetate subfraction-A | 12.93 | C29H48O2 | 429.3726 | 176.08156, 205.12198, 247.16881, 275.20055, 373.30973, 401.34269, 414.34987 | 428.36543 | Stigmastan-3,6-dione |
14.14 | C38H68O3 | 595.5075 | 275.20207, 289.21490, 303.23225, 555.51282 | 572.51685 | Triacontanoic acid | |
9.54 | C18H30O2 | 279.2318 | 189.12666, 243.21038, 261.22097 | 278.22458 | Trichosanic acid | |
8.72 | C21H30O3 | 331.2243 | 163.11080, 177.12633, 189.12577, 221.15241, 235.16854, 249.18409, 291.23193 | 330.21949 | Tussilagonone | |
11.70 | C30H50O2 | 465.3695 | 407.36759, 425.37587 | 442.38108 | α-Onocerin | |
Ethyl acetate subfraction-B | 10.58 | C33H34N4O3 | 535.2711 | 115.96349, 170.99490, 301.21368, 395.21984, 507.27438, 523.37657 | 534.26309 | Pyrophaeophorbide A |
10.28 | C35H36N4O5 | 593.2774 | - | 592.26857 | Candidate Mass C35H36N4O5 | |
11.48 | C41H62O6 | 651.4602 | - | 650.45464 | Candidate Mass C41H62O6 | |
13.42 | C33H64N4O6 | 613.4894 | - | 612.48259 | Candidate Mass C33H64N4O6 | |
12.41 | C41H62O5 | 635.4652 | - | 634.45973 | Candidate Mass C41H62O5 | |
Ethyl acetate subfraction - C | 11.36 | C34H36N4O3 | 549.2872 | 189.01527, 278.90304, 301.14103, 393.29752, 413.26653 | 548.27874 | Methyl pyrophaeophorbide A |
10.57 | C33H34N4O3 | 535.2704 | 115.96349, 170.99490, 301.21368, 395.21984, 507.27438, 523.37657 | 534.26309 | Pyrophaeophorbide A | |
9.53 | C18H30O2 | 279.2317 | 189.12666, 243.21038, 261.22097 | 278.22458 | Trichosanic acid | |
10.27 | C35H36N4O5 | 593.2764 | - | 592.26857 | Candidate Mass C35H36N4O5 | |
11.04 | C36H38N4O5 | 607.2929 | - | 606.28422 | Candidate Mass C36H38N4O5 | |
Ethyl acetate subfraction - D | 4.06 | C10H10O4 | 195.0651 | 135.04327, 145.02797, 163.03865 | 194.05791 | 3-Hydroxy-4-methoxy-cinnamic acid |
10.58 | C33H34N4O3 | 535.2717 | 115.96349, 170.99490, 301.21368, 395.21984, 507.27438, 523.37657 | 534.26309 | Pyrophaeophorbide A | |
10.70 | C36H38N4O7 | 639.2873 | - | 638.27405 | Candidate Mass C36H38N4O7 | |
10.28 | C35H36N4O5 | 593.2764 | - | 592.26857 | Candidate Mass C35H36N4O5 | |
Ethyl acetate subfraction - E | 4.08 | C10H10O4 | 195.0648 | 135.04327, 145.02797, 163.03865 | 194.05791 | 3-Hydroxy-4-methoxy-cinnamic acid |
9.01 | C21H36O4 | 353.2695 | - | 352.26136 | Candidate Mass C21H36O4 | |
10.78 | C36H38N4O6 | 623.2880 | - | 622.27913 | Candidate Mass C36H38N4O6 | |
10.71 | C36H38N4O7 | 639.2836 | - | 638.27405 | Candidate Mass C36H38N4O7 | |
11.04 | C36H38N4O5 | 607.2925 | - | 606.28422 | Candidate Mass C36H38N4O5 | |
Ethyl acetate subfraction - F | 3.75 | C11H16O3 | 197.1168 | 179.10617 | 196.10994 | Digiprolactone |
9.00 | C21H36O4 | 353.2684 | - | 352.26136 | Candidate Mass C21H36O4 | |
8.84 | C23H40O5 | 419.2767 | - | 396.28757 | Candidate Mass C23H40O5 | |
9.95 | C18H40N2O7 | 397.2921 | - | 396.28355 | Candidate Mass C18H40N2O7 | |
Ethyl acetate subfraction - G | 4.25 | C18H19NO4 | 314.1384 | 177.05407, 235.16865 | 313.13141 | Moupinamide |
10.57 | C33H34N4O3 | 535.2712 | 115.96349, 170.99490, 301.21368, 395.21984, 507.27438, 523.37657 | 534.26309 | Pyrophaeophorbide A | |
10.30 | C35H36N4O5 | 593.2784 | - | 592.26857 | Candidate Mass C35H36N4O5 | |
9.73 | C41H40N2O4 | 625.3046 | - | 624.29881 | Candidate Mass C41H40N2O4 | |
9.82 | C35H36N4O6 | 609.2733 | - | 608.26348 | Candidate Mass C35H36N4O6 | |
Ethyl acetate subfraction - H | 10.57 | C33H34N4O3 | 535.2719 | 115.96349, 170.99490, 301.21368, 395.21984, 507.27438, 523.37657 | 534.26309 | Pyrophaeophorbide A |
10.29 | C35H36N4O5 | 593.2767 | - | 592.26857 | Candidate Mass C35H36N4O5 | |
5.13 | C25H28O10 | 511.1579 | - | 488.16825 | Candidate Mass C25H28O10 | |
4.54 | C23H26O9 | 469.1466 | - | 446.15768 | Candidate Mass C23H26O9 | |
9.81 | C35H36N4O6 | 609.2704 | - | 608.26348 | Candidate Mass C35H36N4O6 | |
Ethyl acetate fraction* | 3.72 | C21H20O12 | 464.40 | 270.91, 299.90 | 462.97 | Hyperoside |
5.54 | C15H10O7 | 302.23 | 150.84, 178.83 | 301.08 | Quercetin | |
6.66 | C15H10O6 | 286.24 | 92.83, 116.86 | 284.78 | Kaempferol |
The in-vitro antifungal assay of the extract revealed varying degrees of activity against Malassezia furfur, depending on the concentration. Specifically, at a 5% ethanolic extract concentration, no discernible antifungal activity was observed. However, at a concentration of 10%, the extract exhibited a mild level of antifungal activity, which further intensified with increasing concentrations (Fig.
Antifungal activity of (A) ethanolic extract and (B) fraction from I. batatas leaves against Malassezia furfur. Legend: a. 0.5% sodium CMC suspension; b. 5% ethanolic extract; c. 10% ethanolic extract; d. 20% ethanolic extract; e. 40% ethanolic extract; f. 80% ethanolic extract; g. 2% ketoconazole suspension; h. n-hexane fraction; i. ethyl acetate fraction; j. butanol fraction; k. aqueous fraction.
Inhibition zone of ethanolic extract from I. batatas leaves against Malassezia furfur.
Sample | Diameter inhibition zone (mm) (mean + SD; n = 3) | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Positive control (ketoconazole) | 25.3 ± 2.2 | Susceptible |
Negative control (sodium CMC) | - | - |
5% ethanolic extract | - | - |
10% ethanolic extract | 8.2 ± 0.3 | Resistant |
20% ethanolic extract | 10.6 ± 2.3 | Resistant |
40% ethanolic extract | 20.2 ± 2.5 | Intermediate |
80% ethanolic extract | 23.6 ± 2.4 | Susceptible |
Inhibition zone of fractions from I. batatas leaves against Malassezia furfur.
Sample | Diameter inhibition zone (mm) (mean + SD; n = 3) | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Positive control (ketoconazole) | 28.6 ± 0.4 | Susceptible |
Negative control (sodium CMC) | - | - |
n-hexane fraction | 11.0 ± 0.3 | Resistant |
Ethyl acetate fraction | 39.9 ± 2.5 | Susceptible |
Butanol fraction | 11.5 ± 0.3 | Resistant |
Aqueous fraction | 30.8 ± 0.4 | Susceptible |
While providing valuable initial insights, this study is considered a preliminary test. Further investigations are imperative to delve deeper into the antifungal potential of the extract and fractions. It is essential to identify the secondary metabolite compounds responsible for the observed antifungal effects. Alkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids, tannins, and polyphenols are among the secondary metabolites believed to contribute to antifungal activity and merit closer scrutiny in subsequent studies. The findings from this research lay the groundwork for future exploration, offering a promising avenue for deriving antifungal activity from I. batatas leaves.
The mechanism of alkaloids as antifungals is to disrupt the formation of the fungal cell membrane. Alkaloids bind to ergosterol, creating holes that lead to cell membrane leakage. This leakage results in fungal cell damage and eventual cell death (
Polyphenols play a crucial role in plants, contributing to resistance against microorganisms, herbivores, and insects (
Flavonoid compounds may act through several targets, such as forming complexes with proteins through nonspecific bonds like hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic effects, and by forming covalent bonds. The mechanism of antimicrobial action may be associated with their ability to attach to microbes, cell envelope transport proteins, enzymes, and other targets. Lipophilic flavonoids may also interfere with microbial membranes (
The concentration of the ethanol extract in stimulating hair growth yielded different results at all concentrations compared to 2% minoxidil. Similar outcomes were also observed with the I. batatas fraction (Figs
Hair growth activity of ethanolic extracts from I. batatas leaves on male rabbits.
Treatment | Hair length (mm) on days | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | |
2% minoxidil | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 6.6 ± 0.3 | 9.7 ± 0.5 | 13.8 ± 2.8 | 16 ± 0.9 | 18.9 ± 3.0 | 19.53 + 0.6* |
Negative control | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 5.2 ± 0.2 | 6.3 ± 0.3 | 8.4 ± 1.0 | 10.5 ± 1.4 | 13.7 ± 1.5 | 15.53 + 0.8^ |
5% extract | 4.8 ± 0.9 | 5.8 ± 0.4 | 7.6 ± 1.2 | 11.6 ± 2.4 | 12.6 ± 2.6 | 17.0 ± 2.3 | 18.53 + 1 |
10% extract | 5.2 ± 0.2 | 6.2 ± 0.4 | 9.0 ± 0.5 | 12.2 ± 2.8 | 15.5 ± 1.0 | 17.9 ± 0.6 | 18.73 + 0.9 |
20% extract | 5.7 ± 0.4 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 10.1 ± 0.6 | 13.6 ± 2.3 | 15.6 ± 0.4 | 19.3 ± 0.7 | 20.1 + 1.2* |
40% extract | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.2 | 8.9 ± 0.6 | 12.9 ± 2.6 | 13.2 ± 3.0 | 19.0 ± 0.9 | 19.67 + 4.1* |
Hair growth activity of ethanolic extract and fractions from I. batatas leaves on male rabbits.
Treatment | Hair length (mm) on days | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | |
2% minoxidil | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 6.0 ± 0.2 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 7.7 ± 0.4 | 8.6 ± 0.4 | 11.3 ± 1.5 | 15.37 + 0.3* |
Negative control | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 1.0 | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 7.1 ± 0.8 | 9.0 ± 0.2 | 13.53 + 0.4^ |
Ethanolic extract | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.2 | 7.2 ± 0.2 | 8.5 ± 0.5 | 11.2 ± 0.6 | 15.13 + 0.6* |
n-Hexane fraction | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 5.7 ± 0.4 | 7.1 ± 0.4 | 8.1 ± 0.5 | 10.7 ± 0.3 | 14.77 + 0.5* |
Ethyl acetate fraction | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 7.2 ± 0.4 | 8.3 ± 0.4 | 10.9 ± 0.7 | 15.1 + 0.8* |
Butanol fraction | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 5.2 ± 0.5 | 6.5 ± 0.2 | 7.7 ± 0.5 | 9.4 ± 0.5 | 13.83 + 0.6^ |
Aqueous fraction | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.5 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 9.5 ± 0.3 | 14.1 + 0.5^ |
The potential stimulation of hair growth is attributed to the secondary metabolite content of this plant. Phytochemical compounds, whether individually or in a mixture form, are often reported as non-medical treatments to alleviate symptoms of various dermatological hair conditions (
Molecular docking analyses were utilized to predict the preferred binding modes of compounds from I. batatas leaves identified through LC-MS/MS results with the androgen receptor (AR). This involved binding affinity predictions and the identification of residual amino acid interactions. The objective of this analysis was to estimate the plant’s potential to stimulate hair growth by inhibiting androgen receptors. It aimed to predict the binding energy, indicating the plant’s inhibitory effect on androgen receptors and its ability to promote hair growth. Lower binding energy suggests higher binding efficiency and enhanced inhibition (
Table
Based on the energy analysis, we focused on examining the interaction patterns of the four best compounds (Fig.
The RMSD of the AR backbone, when complexed with the top four compounds from I. batatas fraction, is depicted in Fig.
Additionally, we analyzed the RMSD pattern for each of the top compounds during the simulation (Fig.
RMSF assesses the fluctuations in the central carbon atom of the protein structure, representing the coordinate oscillations of each amino acid around its reference point during dynamic simulation (
Protein compactness was assessed throughout the simulation by measuring the radius of gyration (Rg) for each complex. The Rg of a protein signifies the dispersion of its atoms around its axial direction, representing the distance between the rotating point and the point where energy transfer has the most significant impact. The interaction of a protein with a ligand can influence protein folding and stability, and this influence can be tracked through their patterns and Rg values. A stable protein folding behavior during the simulation is characterized by low and consistent Rg values (
The molecular dynamics simulation facilitated the computation of binding energies for all identified compounds using the MM-PBSA method, as outlined in Table
Binding affinity prediction of minoxidil and identified compounds from I. batatas leaves against AR.
Identified Compounds (Codes) | Binding Energy (Kcal/mol) |
---|---|
Hyperoside (1) | -7.6 |
Pyropheophorbide A (2) | -7.5 |
Methyl-Pyropheophorbide A (3) | -7.2 |
Quercetin (4) | -6.5 |
α-Onocerin (5) | -6.2 |
Kaempherol (6) | -6.2 |
Stigmastane-3-6-Dione (7) | -6.1 |
Moupinamide (8) | -6.0 |
Tussilagonone (9) | -5.8 |
Digiprolactone (10) | -5.6 |
3-Hydroxy-4-Methoxy-Cinnamic Acid (11) | -4.9 |
Minoxidil | -4.9 |
Triacontanoic Acid (12) | -4.5 |
Trichosanic Acid (13) | -3.8 |
Compounds | ∆EVDW | ∆EEle | ∆EPB | ∆ESASA | ∆EBind |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methyl Pyrophaeophorbide A (3) | -112.115 ± 17.144 | -19.371 ± 17.671 | 76.491 ± 25.505 | -11.867 ± 1.718 | -66.862 ± 16.235 |
Hyperoside (1) | -132.834 ± 16.262 | -201.098 ± 32.720 | 289.643 ± 36.197 | -16.573 ± 0.910 | -60.862 ± 19.466 |
Pyrophaeophorbide A (2) | -97.077 ± 22.476 | -59.536 ± 32.275 | 111.930 ± 46.281 | -10.852 ± 2.138 | -55.534 ± 19.194 |
Quercetin (4) | -81.503 ± 15.472 | -47.662 ± 18.565 | 98.895 ± 24.744 | -9.425 ± 1.208 | -39.695 ± 17.027 |
Minoxidil | -45.602 ± 33.830 | -23.823 ± 28.088 | 44.334 ± 56.177 | -5.457 ± 4.070 | -30.548 ± 25.629 |
Key contributors to the favorable binding across all systems were identified as van der Waals (∆EVDW), electrostatic (∆EEle), and solvent-accessible surface area (∆ESASA) energies. These factors played crucial roles in establishing favorable binding interactions. Conversely, polar solvation energy (∆EPB) exhibited less favorable characteristics, particularly in compounds 1 and 2, where the values were positive compared to other compounds, indicating an unfavorable impact on the binding affinity of the androgen receptor (AR) complex. This observation aligns with the stability analysis of all the identified compounds, reinforcing their potential to inhibit the activity of the AR receptor.
Overall, the four best compounds from purple sweet potato leaves exhibit better binding energy than minoxidil based on energy calculations using the MM-PBSA method, which aligns with the docking results. The findings from this simulation study reinforce the potential of methyl pyropheophorbide A and hyperoside from this plant in binding with AR, contributing to their activity against hair loss.
The application of mixture design in pharmaceutical product development is an efficient method for optimizing formulation composition and gaining fundamental insights into the underlying relationship between independent and observed (dependent) variables (
The best model was selected based on low standard deviation, low predicted sum of squares, and high R-squared p-values. The p-values of the acceptable models were lower than 0.05, and the p-values of lack of fit were higher than 0.05 (
Three independent variables (96% ethanol, propylene glycol, and tween 80 concentrations) were chosen, along with three response variables comprising hair tonic pH, viscosity, and density, to optimize physicochemical properties. Hair tonic is widely used to promote hair growth and strengthen hair follicles. Using excipients that can dissolve and enhance the penetration of active ingredients while maintaining good physicochemical properties is a crucial factor in hair tonic formulations. Ethanol, propylene glycol, and tween 80 play a role as solvents and penetration enhancers.
Sixteen experimental runs were conducted using Design Expert, and each product’s pH, viscosity, and density were determined as responses. The results of the experiments are shown in Table
The results of each response from 16 runs of actual design by software DX-10.
Run | Responses | ||
---|---|---|---|
Y1 (pH) | Y2 (Viscosity) | Y3 (Density) | |
1 | 5.95 | 2.72 | 0.7 |
2 | 6 | 2.44 | 0.79 |
3 | 6.15 | 3.07 | 0.79 |
4 | 6.03 | 3.75 | 0.78 |
5 | 5.96 | 3.57 | 0.7 |
6 | 6.04 | 3.75 | 0.7 |
7 | 6.19 | 2.59 | 0.77 |
8 | 5.92 | 2.74 | 0.79 |
9 | 6.32 | 3.34 | 0.8 |
10 | 5.93 | 2.61 | 0.78 |
11 | 6.12 | 2.44 | 0.8 |
12 | 5.94 | 3.39 | 0.81 |
13 | 6.26 | 2.59 | 0.7 |
14 | 66.09 | 2.58 | 0.7 |
15 | 6.06 | 2.74 | 0.8 |
16 | 5.94 | 3.00 | 0.76 |
Tables of ANOVA can be applied to assess how well the model and each parameter fit the data by analyzing the mean least square error estimates to the mean pure experimental error and ensuring that the errors are normally distributed. Then, the F-test can be used to evaluate the significance of the fit for both the model and the individual parameters (
The statistical parameters applied in selecting and evaluating the best fitted model are regression data (p value and F value), lack-of-fit, coefficient of determination (R2), adjusted coefficient of determination (adjusted R2), and prediction coefficient of determination (prediction R2). Statistical analysis also builds the most suitable model equation (Table
Regression coefficients and statistic data fitted from ANOVA for the adjusted model to experimental data in D-optimal mixtures design for physicochemical properties of hair tonic.
Variable | Response | ||
---|---|---|---|
pH | Viscosity | Density | |
λ1 | 6.22 | 2.24* | 0.78 |
λ2 | 6.03 | 3.79* | 0.73 |
λ3 | -4.50 | 9.88* | -1.44 |
λ1 λ2 | -0.45 | -0.23 | -0.23 |
λ1 λ3 | 15.01* | -9.09* | 2.88* |
λ 2 λ3 | 14.35* | -10.72* | 3.31* |
λ1 λ1 λ2 λ3 | -45.61* | - | - |
λ1 λ2 λ2 λ3 | -14.15 | - | - |
λ1 λ2 λ3 λ3 | 71.82* | - | - |
Model | Special quartic | Quadratic | Quadratic |
p-value | 0.0098 | 0.0034 | 0.0145 |
Lack of fit (p-value) | 0.5061 | 0.3312 | 0.8056 |
F value | 8.53 | 9.02 | 5.81 |
R2 | 0.8787 | 0.9647 | 0.6727 |
Adjusted R2 | 0.7401 | 0.9470 | 0.5090 |
Predicted R2 | -1.1861 | 0.9031 | -0.2393 |
No. | Response | Goal | Lower limit | Upper limit |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | pH | Minimize | 5.92 | 6.32 |
2 | Viscosity | Maximize | 2.44 | 3.75 |
3 | Density | Maximize | 0.7 | 0.81 |
As shown from Table
Contour plots (Fig.
No. | Ethanol 96% | Propylene glycol | Tween 80 | pH | Viscosity | Density | Desirability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 13.39 | 13.71 | 2.9 | 5.92 | 2.53 | 0.78 | 0.881 |
2 | 5.00 | 20.01 | 4.99 | 5.96 | 3.34 | 0.79 | 0.610 |
This research successfully demonstrated the potential of the ethanolic extract and its fractions from I. batatas leaves as an anti-alopecia agent by stimulating hair growth in a rabbit model and exhibiting antifungal activity by inhibiting the growth of M. furfur. The activity of the ethanolic extract and its fractions is attributed to secondary metabolite compounds. Alkaloid compounds (methyl pyropheophorbide A and pyropheophorbide A) and flavonoids (hyperoside and quercetin) identified in this plant have anti-alopecia activity based on in-silico studies through molecular simulation inhibiting androgen receptors. Based on their binding affinity predicted from MM-PBSA calculations and their stability during molecular dynamics, all four compounds showed better affinity and stability than minoxidil. Additionally, 96% ethanol, propylene glycol, and tween 80 at proportions of 13.39%, 13.71%, and 2.9%, respectively, could enhance the physicochemical properties of the hair tonic according to the D-optimal mixture design. The discoveries related to stimulating hair growth, antifungal properties, and the potential inhibition of the androgen receptor in this plant offer promising opportunities for its advancement as a therapeutic solution for hair loss associated with alopecia.
We would like to express our gratitude to all parties who have been involved in, and supported, the implementation of this research until its completion.
Additional infomation
Data type: docx