Review Article
Print
Review Article
The most promising Southeastern European Tanacetum species: a review of chemical composition and biological studies
expand article infoReneta Gevrenova, Vessela Balabanova, Dimitrina Zheleva-Dimitrova, Georgi Momekov
‡ Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria
Open Access

Abstract

Several species of the genus Tanacetum L. (Asteraceae) spread in the Southestern Europe are traditionally used as medicinal and aromatic plants, including T. vulgare, T. parthenium, T. macrophyllum, T. balsamita, T. poteriifolium. The review is focused on the phytochemical and pharmacological studies of these taxa. Major chemical constituents are acylquinic acids, sesquiterpenes, sesquiterpene lactones, methoxylated flavonoids. An in-depth depiction of more than 100 secondary metabolites was achieved in Tanacetum species by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. The ethnopharmacological studies indicate that species possess antioxidant, enzyme inhibitory and cytotoxic activity along with antimicrobial and antiviral effects. Reports revealed anti-inflamatory and neuromodulatory activity involved in the pharmacological approach in counteracting migraine attacks. Multivariate data analysis allowed the identification of the most discriminant metabolites and bioactivities in the herbal drugs. This review emphasizes T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. balsamita and T. parthenium as potential raw material for health-promoting application in pharmaceutical area.

Keywords

Tanacetum, Southeastern European Tanacetum species, chemical composition, biological activity

Introduction

Tanacetum L. is one of the largest genera in Asteraceae family including more than 152 species spread in Europe, temperate parts of Asia, West Africa and North America, cultivated in South Africa, South America, Australia and New Zealand (Bremer 1994). The classification of Asteraceae has been the subject of several publications and monographs in the recent years. Funk et al. (2009) published the systematics, evolution and biogeography of the family.

The studied Tanacetum species (T. achilleifolium (Bieb.) Schultz Bip., T. argenteum (Lam.) Willd., T. balsamita L., T. cilicium (Boiss.) Grierson, T. corymbosum (L.) Sch. Bip., T. macrophyllum (Waldst. & Kit.) Sch.Bip., T. millefolium (L.) Tzvelev, T. parthenium (L.) Schultz Bip., T. poteriifolium (Ledeb.) Grierson, T. praeteritum (Horwood) Heywood, T. vulgare L.) are distributed in the Southeastern European regions including Balkan Peninsula, Romania, and Turkey (www.worldfloraonline.org).

Typically, the species of genus Tanacetum contain specific glandular structures – glandular hairs (Simmonds et al. 2002). Their essential oil is characterized by various terpenes (oxidized monoterpenes such as 1,8-cineole (173), camphor (172), borneol (178), thujones (185 and 186)), but sesquiterpene lactones are with the greatest importance for the chemophenetics (Venditti et al. 2018).

Abad et al. (1995), Gören et al. (2002) and Khatib et al. (2023) summarized data on the phytochemical composition of the genus Tanacetum, concluding that sesquiterpenes, sesquiterpene lactones (STLs) and ceramides are with main chemotaxonomic significance. As highlighted in the recent review article, the beneficial effects of Tanacetum species have been demonstrated in a number of experimental models with evidences strongly suggesting that the herbal drugs are versatile treatment for inflammation, hyperglycemia, liver injury, and oxidative stress (Khatib et al. 2023). Significant advance has been made in the understanding the biochemical mechanisms underlying sesquiterpenes lactons - mediated cytotoxicity towards cancer cell lines, antimicrobial and antiviral activity of Tanacetum essential oils/extracts, and neuromodulatory effects of T. parthenium.

The selected Tanacetum species provide a rich source of acylquinic acids and methoxylated flavonoids, thus, the unique nature of their health promoting benefit, including oxidative stress prevention and inhibition of key enzymes in the metabolite syndrome has been associated with the naturally high levels of chlorogenic and dicaffeoylquinic acids. The aim of the study is to review and update the phytochemical composition and pharmacological properties emphasizing Southeastern European Tanacetum species.

Phytochemical composition of the species of genus Tanacetum

An overview on the main classes of secondary metabolites and their distribution in the discussed Tanacetum species is depicted in Table 1.

Table 1.

Major classes of secondary metabolites and compounds in genus Tanacetum.

Compounds Tanacetum Species References
Phenolic compounds and derivatives
Hydroxybenzoic acids : protocatechuic (1), gentisic (2), vanillic (3), syringic (4), р-hydroxybenzoic (5), p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (6) and their hexosides, salicylic acid (7), dihydroxyphenylacetic acid-pentosylhexooside (8) T. parthenium, Chrysanthemum balsamita var. balsamita , var. tanacetoides, T. macrophyllum, T. vulgare, T. balsamita, T. balsamita Zengin et al. 2020; Benedec et al. 2016; Venditti et al. 2018; Gevrenova et al. 2020, 2022; Ak et al. 2021
Sugar esters : vanillyl-hexose (9)
4-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-vanillic acid (10) T. macrophyllum Venditti et al. 2018
caffeoyl-syringic acid (11), caffeic acid-O-(hydroxybutanoyl)-hexoside (12), gentisic acid-O-(caffeoyl)-hexoside (13) T. macrophyllum Gevrenova et al. 2020
vanillic acid -4-O-(6-О)-caffeoyl)-hexoside (14) T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum Gevrenova et al. 2020; Ak et al. 2021
caffeic acid-O-(salicyl)-hexoside (15) T. vulgare
Hydroxycinnamic acids and derivatives
caffeic (16), o-, m-, p-coumaric (17, 18, 19), ferulic acid (20) and their hexosides T. parthenium, T. vulgare, Chrysanthemum balsamita var, balsamita, var. tanacetoides, T. macrophyllum, T. vulgare, T. balsamita Zengin et al. 2020; Benedec et al. 2016; Baszek et al. 2016; Baranauskiene et al. 2014; Gevrenova et al. 2020, 2022; Ak et al. 2021
Sugar esters : caffeoyl-hexose (21), caffeoylgluconic acid (22)
Caffeoylquinic (CQA), feruloylquinic (FQA), p-coumarylquinic (p-CoQA)acids
chlorogenic (5-CQA) (23), neochlorogenic (3-CQA) (24), 1-CQA (25), 4-CQA (26), 3,4-diCQA (27), 3,5-diCQA (28), 4,5-diCQA (29), 5-FQA (30), 4-FQA (31), 5-p-CoQA (32), 3-HC-5-CQA (33), 1-C-3HCQA (34), 3-DC-5-CQA (35), 3-F-5-CQA (36), 4-F-5-CQA (37), 4-C-5-FQA (38), 3-F-4-CQA (39), 3-p-Co-5-CQA (40), 1-p-Co-5-CQA (41), 4-C-5- p-CoQA (42), 3,4,5-triCQA (43) T. parthenium, T. macrophyllum, Chrysanthemum balsamita var. balsamita , var. tanacetoides, T. vulgare, T. balsamita, T. macrophyllum Zengin et al. 2020; Benedec et al. 2016; Venditti et al. 2018; Baranauskiene et al. 2014; Baszek et al. 2016; Devrnja et al. 2017; Gevrenova et al. 2020, 2022; Ak et al. 2021
1-FQA (44), 1-p-CoQA (45), 1,5-diCQA (46), 3-HC-4-CQA (47), 4-HC-5-CQA (48), 3-C-4-DCQA (49), 1-C-3-DCQA (50), 1-C-5-DCQA (51), 3-p-Co-4-CQA (52), 3-C-4-p-CoQA (53), 4-p-Co-5-CQA (54), 3-F-4-CQA (55), 1-C-5-FQA (56), 3-C-5-FQA (57), 1-C-3-FQA (58), 1,3,5- triCQA (59), 1,3,4- triCQA (60) T. macrophyllum Gevrenova et al. 2020
3-p-CoQA (61), 3-p-CoQA (62), 3-C-5-HCQA (63), 1-C-3-HCQA (64), 4-DC-5-CQA (65), 3-C-5-p-CoQA (66) T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum Gevrenova et al. 2020; Ak et al. 2021
3-DC-5-CQA (67) T. vulgare Ak et al. 2021
rosmarinic (68), cichoric acid (69) T. vulgare, Т. balsamita Baszek et al. 2016
quinic acid (70) T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. balsamita Baranauskiene et al. 2014; Venditti et al. 2018
shikimic acid (71) T. vulgare, Т. balsamita Ak et al. 2021; Gevrenova et al. 2023
Flavonoids
Flavonols – quercetin (Qu) (72), Qu 3-О-galactoside (73), Qu 3-О-glucoside (74), Qu 3-О-rhamnoside (75), rutin (76), kaempferol (Km) (77), Km 3-O-glucoside (78), isorhamnetin 3-О-glucoside (79), T. parthenium, T. vulgare, T. balsamita, T. macrophyllum Zengin et l. 2020; Devrnja et al. 2017; Baszek et al. 2016; Venditti te al. 2018
Km-3-O-glucuronide (80) T. macrophyllum
Qu 3-glucuronide (81), gossypetin 8-О-glucoside (82) Km 7-O-rutinoside (83) T. vulgare, T. balsamita Devrnja et al. 2017; Gevrenova et al. 2023
isorhamnetin O-hexuronide (84) T. balsamita, T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum Gevrenova et al. 2020; Ak et al. 2021
isorhamnetin O-pentoside (85) T. balsamita
Qu-7-O-hexuronide (86), Qu-O-acetylhexoside (87) T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum
6-methoxylated flavonols
6-hydroxykaempferol-3,6-dimethyl ether (88) T. parthenium Williams et al. 1999a, 1999b
6-hydroxykaempferol-3,6,4’-trmethyl ether (89) T. parthenium, T. macrophyllum Williams et al. 1999a, 1999b
quercetagetin-3,6-dimethyl ether (axillarin) (90) T. vulgare, T. parthenium, T. balsamita Baranauskiene et al. 2014; Williams et al. 1999a, 1999b
quercetagetin-3,6,3’-trimethyl ether (91) T. vulgare, T. parthenium, T. macrophyllum, T. cilicium Williams et al. 1999a, 1999b
quercetin 6-methyl ether (patuletin) (92) T. balsamita, T. macrophyllum, T. vulgare Gevrenova et al. 2020, 2022; Ak et al. 2021
quercetagetin-6,3’-dimethyl ether (spinacetin) (93) T. balsamita Gevrenova et al. 2023
quercetagetin-3, 6,3’(4’)-trimethyl ether (94)
6-methoxykaempferol (95)
T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. balsamita Gevrenova et al. 2020, 2022; Ak et al. 2021
Flavones – luteolin (Lu) (96), apigenin (Аpi) (97), Api 7-O-glucoside (98), Api 7-O-glucuronide (99), chrysieriol (100) T. parthenium, T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. cilicium, T. balsamita, T. parthenium, T. parthenium, T. cilicium, T. vulgare, T.macrophyllum, T. vulgare, T.macrophyllum, T. vulgare Williams et al. 1999a, 1999b; Zengin et al. 2020; Baranauskiene et al. 2014; Devrnja et al. 2017; Venditti et al. 2018
Api 7-O-glucosylglucuronide (101) Api 7-O-diglucuronide (102) Api-4‘-methyl ether (acacetin) (103)
diosmetin 7-О-glucuronide (104)
scutellarein (105), baicalein 7-glucuronide (106) T. vulgare Devrnja et al. 2017
saponarin (107), Lu 7-О-glucuronide (108), Lu 7-О-glucoside (109), Lu 7-О-rutinoside (110), Api 7-O-rutinoside (111) T. vulgare, T. parthenium, T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. cilicium, T. balsamita, T. balsamita Devrnja et al. 2017; Williams et al. 1999a, 1999b; Gevrenova et al. 2023
Lu O-hexuronide (112), Lu O-hexuronosyl-O-hexoside (113), Lu O-pentosylhexoside (114), Api O-hexuronide (115), Api O-pentosylhexoside (116), chrysoeriol O-pentosylhexoside (117), chrysoeriol O-hexuronide (118) T. balsamita, T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum Gevrenova et al. 2020, 2022; Ak et al. 2021
6-hydroxyluteolin O-hexoside (119), Lu 7-O-gentiobioside (120), Lu 7-O-neohesperidoside (121), Lu O-acetylhexoside (122), Lu O-caffeoylhexoside (123) T. vulgare Ak et al. 2021
6-methoxilated flavones
Lu-6-methyl ether (nepetin) (124) T. vulgare, T. balsamita, T.macrophyllum Williams et al. 1999a, 1999b; Devrnja et al. 2017; Baranauskiene et al. 2014; Ivanescu et al. 2018
scutelarein-6-methyl ether (hispidulin) (125) T. vulgare, T.macrophyllum, T. corymbosum, T. balsamita Williams et al. 1999a, 1999b; Devrnja et al. 2017; Baranauskiene et al. 2014; Ivanescu et al. 2018; Venditti et al. 2018
scutelarein-6, 4‘-dimethyl ether (126) T. vulgare, T.macrophyllum, T. cilicium
3,7-dihydroxy-6,3‘,4‘-trimethoxyflavone (eupatilin)/santin (127) T. vulgare, T.macrophyllum, T. balsamita Gevrenova et al. 2020, 2022; Ak et al. 2021
5, 3‘-dihydroxy-6,7,4‘-trimethoxyflavone (eupatorin) (128) T. corymbosum, T.macrophyllum, T. balsamita
5,7,4‘-trihydroxy-6,3‘-dimethoxyflavon (jaceosidin) (129) T. corymbosum, T.macrophyllum, T. balsamita, T. vulgare
3‘-hydroxy-3,6,7,4‘-tetramethoxyflavone (casticin) (130) 5, 4‘-dihydroxy-6,7-dimethoxyflavone (cirsimaritin) (131) T. vulgare, T.macrophyllum, T. corymbosum, T.macrophyllum, T. vulgare, T. balsamita
5,3’,4’-trihydroxy-6,7-dimethoxyflavone (cirsiliol) (132) T. balsamita
jaceosidin O-hexuronide (133) T. vulgare
C-glycosides - naringenin 6,8-diC-hexoside (134), homoorientin (135), apigenin 6,8-diC-hexoside (136) T. balsamita, T. balsamita, T. vulgare Gevrenova et al. 2023
nepetin O-pentosylhexoside (137), axillarin O-pentosylhexoside (138), hispidulin-O-pentosylhexoside (139), jaceosidin O-hexuronide (140), jaceosidin O-hexoside (141), eupatilin O-hexoside (142) T. balsamita Gevrenova et al. 2023
hispidulin O-hexuronide (143) T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum
nepetin O-hexoside (144) T. balsamita, T. macrophyllum, T. vulgare
nepetin O-hexuronide (145) T. vulgare
Flavanones – hesperetin (146), erioddictyol (147), naringenin (148), methoxyeriodictyol O-hexuronide (149), eriodictyol O-hexuronide (150), naringenin O-hexuronide (151), hesperetin O-rutinoside (152), hesperetin O-hexuronide (153) T. parthenium, T. vulgare, T. vulgare Zengin et l. 2020; Ak et al. 2021
Sterols
β-sitosterol (154), stigmasterol (155), campesterol (156), ergosterol (157) T. vulgare, T.macrophyllum, T. corymbosum Ivanescu et al. 2018
Monoterpenes
α-pinene (158), β-pinene (159), camphene (160), sabinene (161), myrcene (162), α-terpinene (163), limonene (164), p-cymene (165), terpinolene (166), cis-sabinene hydrate (167), trans-sabinene hydrate (168), pinocarvone (169), β-cyclocitral (170), linalool (171), camphor (172), 1,8-cineol (eucalyptol) (173), carvone (174), trans-pinocarvone (175), α-terpineol (176), δ-terpineol (177), borneol (178), isobornyl acetate (179), bornyl acetate (180), α-phellandrene (181), chrysanthenol (182), thymol (183), carvacrol (184), α-thujone (185), β-thujone (186) T. macrophyllum, T. vulgare, T. balsamita Demirci and Baser 2007; Radulovic et al. 2010; Venditti et al. 2018
trans-chrysanthenyl acetate (187), γ-terpinene (188), аrtemisia ketone (189), artemisia alcohol (190), Z (E)-dihydrocarvone (191) T. vulgare Baszek et al. 2016; Devrnja et al. 2017
Sesquiterpenes
α-copaene (192), β-copaene (193), β-caryophyllene (194), β-bisabolene (195) ,β-farnesene (196), α-humulene (197), germacrene D (198), α-muurolene (199), γ-muurolene (200), bicyclogermacrene (201), δ –cadinene (202), γ-cadinene (203), zingiberene (204), farnesol (205), spathulenol (206), cubebol (207), caryophyllene oxid (208), 10-epi-γ-eudesmol (209), β-sesquiphellandrene (210), α-amorphene (211), cyclosativene (212), sesquilavandulol (213), γ-eudesmol (214), α-bisabolol (215), copaborneol (216), T. macrophyllum, T. vulgare, T. balsamita Demirci and Baser 2007; Radulovic et al. 2010; Polatoğlu al. 2013; Venditti et al. 2018
longiverbenone (217) T. vulgare
Sesquiterpene lactones
Guaianolides
canin (218), artecanin (219), secotanapartholide А (220), В (221), 8α-hydroxyachillin (222), macrotanacin (223), tanaphillin (224) T. macrophyllum, T. parthenium Todorova and Evstatieva 2001;
tanapartin-β-peroxide (225), 3,4-β-epoxy-8-deoxicumambrin (226), 8-deoxycumambrin (227), achillin (228), 4α, 10α-dihydroxy-1,5Н-guaia-2,11(13)dien-12,6α-olide (229), 10β-hydroxycichopumelide (230) T. parthenium
Germacranolides
9β-propionyloxycostunolide (231), 9β-butyryloxycostunolide (232), 1α, 10β-epoxyhaageanolide (233), 9β-propionyloxy- (234), 9β-isobutyryloxy- (235) and 9β-(2-methyl)-butyryloxy-1α, 10β-epoxyhaageanolide (236) T. balsamita De Almeida et al. 2016; Todorova and Evstatieva 2001
hanphyllin (237), artemisiifolin (238) T. macrophyllum
parthenolide (239) T. parthenium De Almeida et al. 2016
tatridin А (240), В(241) T. vulgare Todorova and Evstatieva 2001
hydroxypelenolide (242) T. parthenium
Eudesmanolides
artecalin (243) T. macrophyllum
reynosin (244), armefolin (245),
1β-hydroxyarbusculin А (246)
T. vulgare, T. parthenium
santamarin (247) T. parthenium
vulgarin, 4-epi-vulgarin (248), T. achilleifolium, T. millefolium
11,13-dihydro-santamarin (249) T. vulgare, T. achilleifolium, T. millefolium
1β,4α,6α-trihydroxy-11(13)-eudesman-12,8-olide (250), 1β,4α-dihydroxy-6α-tigloyloxy-11(13)-eudesmen-12,8-olide (251) T. corymbosum
tanacetin (252), 1-epi-ludovicin C (253), 3α-hydroxyreynosin (254), 3-epi-armefolin (255) T. vulgare
ludovicin А (256), В (257) T. vulgare ssp. siculum, T. praeteritum Rosselli et al. 2012; Gören 1995
douglanin (258) T. vulgare ssp. siculum, T. praeteritum, T. argenteum subsp. canum Rosselli et al. 2012; Gören and Tahtasakal 1997
1α-hydroxy-1-deoxoarglanine (259) T. vulgare ssp. siculum, T. praeteritum Rosselli et al. 2012; Gören 1995
11,13-dehydrosantonin (260) T. vulgare ssp. siculum Rosselli et al. 2012

Phenolic acids and flavonoids

Ak et al. (2021) performed a study of hexane, hydroethanolic and aqueous extract from T. vulgare aerial parts, stems and flowering heads. They reported the highest total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) in both T. vulgare hydroethanolic extracts from stems and aerial parts (up to 93 mg GAE (gallic acid equivalent)/g dry extract and 53 mg RE (rutin equivalent)/g). TFC up 82 mg RE /g was determined in the methanol-aqueous extract from T. macrophyllum flowering heads (Gevrenova et al. 2020). Extraction methods highly impact the TPC and TFC yielding up to 65.05 mg GAE/g (TPC) by accelerated solvent extraction and 55.40 mg RE/g (TFC) by maceration in the ethanolic extracts from T. parthenium (Zengin et al. 2020). TPC varied in large ranges – the lowest levels were reported for T. vulgare (26.37 mg GAE/g), T. corymbosum (5.90 mg GAE/g) and T. macrophyllum (0.64 mg GAE/g), while it reached up to 221 mg GAE/g in T. vulgare roots (Devrnja et al. 2017; Ivanescu et al. 2018).

In a comparative analysis of TPC in different agrorefinery products from the residue after the hydrodistillation of the essential oil from T. vulgare aerial parts (aqueous extract, acetone balsam and acetone extract), the highest content was found in the aqueous extract (142.30 mg GAE/g dry extract) (Baranauskiene et al. 2014).

Williams et al. (1999a, 1999b) investigated epicuticular (surface) and vacuolar flavonoids in 7 species of genus Tanacetum. The lipophilic compounds consisted mainly of 6-hydroxykaempferol-3,6,4’-trimethylether (89) and quercetagetin-3,6,3’-trimethylether (91), together with 11 other surface flavonoids (Table 1). The methyl ethers of scutellarein (125, 126) and 6-hydroxyluteolin (124) are characteristic of species with corymb inflorescences of flowering heads. Vacuolar flavonoid glycosides are represented by apigenin 7-O-glucoside (98) and luteolin 7-O-glucoside (109), 6-hydroxyluteolin 7-glucoside (119) occurs in T. vulgare and T. pseudoachillea; chrysoeriol 7-glucuronide (118) – in T. parthenium, T. macrophyllum and T. corymbosum. Highly methoxylated flavonoids such as eupatilin (127), eupatorin (127), casticin (130) have been proven in the recent studies (Devrnja et al. 2017; Ivanescu et al. 2018). Methoxylated derivatives of quercetagetin (90–94), 6-hydroxykaempferol (88 and 89), scutellarein (125 and 126) and 6-hydroxyluteolin (124) have been identified in T. macrophyllum flowering heads and leaves (Williams et al. 1999a). T. macrophyllum aerial parts were especially rich in the glucosides and glucuronides of apigenin (98, 99, 102, and 115) and kaempferol (79 and 81)(Venditti et al. 2018).

HPLC-DAD analysis of the major compounds in ethanol-aqueous extracts of T. vulgare and T. balsamita showed 1.37 g/100 g extract and 0.93 g/100 g chlorogenic acid (23), and 3.33 g/100 g and 2.78 g/100 g chicoric acid (69), respectively (Baczek et al. 2017). The total content of the determined phenolic acids (caffeic (16), ferulic (20), chlorogenic (23), rosmarinic (68) and chicoric acids (69)) was over 4 g/100 g extract in both species. The highest content of apigenin 7-O-glucoside (98) (1.10 g/100 g extract) was determined in T. vulgare, and of chrysoeriol (100) (0.63 g/100 g) in T. balsamita.

Mono- and dicaffeoylquinic acids, flavone and flavonol glucosides and glucuronides were identified/annotated in methanolic, hydroalcoholic and aqueous extracts of T. vulgare by UPLC/ESI-QTOF-MS, LC-DAD/ESI-TOF-MS and HPLC-MS (Baranauskiene et al. 2014; Devrnja et al. 2017; Ivanescu et al. 2018) (Table 1). Among the methoxylated flavonoids, wide spread in Asteraceae family, the greatest diversity was found in T. macrophyllum: eupatilin (127) (144.09 µg/g), hispidulin (125) (55.83 µg/g), eupatorin (128) (1.48 µg/g), and acacetin (103), jaceosidine (129) and casticin(130) were below 1 µg/g (Ivanescu et al. 2018). Zengin et al. (2020) determined chlorogenic acid (23) up to 487 mg/kg, quercetin (72) – up to 377 mg/kg and p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (6) – up to 280 mg/kg in the T. parthenium ethanolic extract obtained by accelerated solvent extraction.

Recently, a hyphenated platform liquid chromatography - high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) for annotation and dereplication of acylquinic acids (AQAs), 6-methoxylated flavonoids and sesquiterpene lactones in selected Tanacetum speies was developed (Gevrenova et al. 2020, 2023; Ak et al. 2021). Secondary metabolites were annotated/identified in methanol-aqueous extracts from the flowering heads, leaves and roots of Tanacetum macrophyllum, T. vulgare and T. balsamita. They were profiled and characterized by reverse phase chromatography coupled with hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap HRMS. The annotation/dereplication was based on the diagnostic fragment ions for each subclass of the compounds. An in-depth depiction of more than 100 secondary metabolites was achieved.

Overall, monoAQA, diAQA and triAQA (23–67) were evidenced in the assayed Tanacetum species (Table 1). Among them, caffeoyl-, feruloyl- and coumaroylquinic acids, dicaffeoylquinic, feruloyl-caffeolylquinic, p-coumaroyl-caffeoylquinic, hydroxydihydrocaffeoyl (HC)-caffeolylquinic and dehydrocaffeoyl (DC)-caffeoylquinic acids were annotated together with tricaffeoylquinic acids and dicaffeoylquinic acid-hexosides. A variety of methoxylated derivatives of scutellarein (125 and 126), quercetagetin (91–94) and 6-hydroxyluteolin (124) was dereplicated.

For the first time, an exceptional variation of AQAs in T. macrophyllum was reported (Gevrenova et al. 2020). Multivariate data analysis (PCA and hierarchical clustering analysis) allowed for the identification of markers able to discriminate the aerial parts and flowering heads from the roots (Gevrenova et al. 2020). Among them, methoxylated flavonoids patuletin (92), eupatorin (128), quercetagetin trimethyl ether (94) and STLs artekalin (243) (eudesmanolide) and artemisiifolin (238) (germacranolide) were dereplicated. In addition, flowering heads are discernable by 4-p-coumaroyl-5-caffeoylquinic acid (54) and 4-caffeoyl-5-p-coumaroylquinic acid (42) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Structure of some acylquinic acids and flavonoids in Tanacetum species.

PCA and discriminant analyses allowed for the identification of the most discriminant secondary metabolites and bioactivities in T. vulgare flowering heads, stems and aerial parts in terms of extraction solvents (Ak et al. 2021). Among the compounds are jaceosidin (129), kaempferol 3-O-glucoside (78), luteolin 7-O-glucoside (109), naringenin O-hexuronide (151), caffeic acid O-hexoside, caffeoyl-hexose (21), thujone (185 and 186), and caryophyllen/bisabolene (194).

Essential oil. Chemotypes in Tanacetum species

The main feature of genus Tanacetum and the species of tribe Anthemideae is the production of a specific “non-standard” group of monoterpenes, the result of the so-called “middle-to-tail” coupling of the terpene precursors isopentenyl pyrophosphate and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (in contrast to the typical “head-to-tail” condensation) (Abad et al. 1995). A major precursor in this group is chrysanthemic acid. Opening the ring of this compound in various ways leads to the formation of artemisia ketone (189), artemisia alcohol (190), etc. Abad et al. (1995) divided Tanacetum species into two main groups according to essential oil (EO) composition: “monoterpene group (T. vulgare, T. parthenium, T. boarale)” and “sesquiterpene group” (species from Central and Southeast Europe: T. macrophyllum, T. cilicium, T. corymbosum, T. millefolium).

The bitter taste of the aerial parts of Tanacetum species is due to sesquiterpenes (farnesene (196), germacrene D (198), etc.). The EO composition of Tanacetum species and its biological activity is summarized by Kumar and Tyagi (2013). Over 200 compounds have been identified. The main characteristic is the chemovariability in the species and subspecies taxonomic category. The main components are camphor (172), bornyl acetate (180), α-phellandrene (181), chrysanthenyl acetate (187), α-terpinene (163), p-cymene (165), terpinen-4-ol (177), α-terpineol (176), caryophyllene oxide (208), α- and β-thujone (185 and 186), α-pinene (158), camphene (160), β-caryophyllene (194), carvacrol (184) etc. (Table 1) (Kumar and Tyagi 2013).

About 30 chemotypes have been reported for T. vulgare depending on the composition of the essential oil and their main components, as well as for T. balsamita - 4 (Baczek et al. 2017; Devrnja et al. 2017). The most common chemotypes are β-thujone (186), α-thujone (185), camphor (172), trans-chrysanthenyl acetate (187), eucalyptol (173), and artemisia ketone (189). Less common are the chemotypes α-pinene (158), sabinene (161), dihydrocarvone (191), chrysanthenol (182) (Rohloff et al. 2004). In Europe, the most common hemotypes are thujone (185 and 186), camphor (172), chrysantenyl acetate (187), and artemisia ketone (189). Regarding T. balsamita, 4 main chemotypes have been described in the literature survey – carvone (174), camphor (172), camphor (172)+thujone (185 and 186), carvone (174)+thujone (185 and 186) (Baczek et al. 2017). Trans-chrysanthenol (182), β-thujone (186), bornyl acetate (180) and pinocarvone (175) types have also been described.

GC-MS analysis of EM from T. vulgare (aerial parts, origin Serbia) showed a 93% content of oxidized monoterpenes, among which trans-chrysanthenyl acetate (187) (41%), trans-chrysanthenol (182) (12.5%), cis-thujone (185 and 186) (5.3%), camphor (172) (5%), 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol) (173) (3.9%) (Devrnja et al. 2017). According to the classification based on the composition of EM, this type belongs to the chrysantenyl acetate (187) chemotype. For Serbia, the types thujone (185 and 186), chrysanthenyl, chrysanthenyl acetate (187) and camphor (172) have been established. Buckwheat EM yield and composition are affected by genetic variation and/or environmental conditions, e.g., the yield of EM from 40 populations in Norway is varying between 0.35 and 1.90% (Rohloff et al. 2004). The chrysantenyl acetate (187) chemotype is characterized by a good antibacterial effect (Devrnja et al. 2017).

In a comparison of EM between T. vulgare (Poland) and T. balsamita (Turkey), it was found that the differences were mainly quantitative - 96% and 83% oxidized monoterpenes, respectively (Baczek et al. 2017). T. balsamita EM mainly contains β-thujone (186) (84.4%), α-thujone (185) (4.7%), eucalyptol (173) (4.1%), while major components in T. vulgare EM are trans-chrysanthenyl acetate (187) (18.4%), (E)-dihydrocarvone (191) (11%) and artemisia ketone (189) (9.2%), β- and α-thujone (185 and 186) are 14.3% and 0.8%. Of the monoterpenes, α-pinene (158) and sabinene (161) are contained in the EM of T. vulgare, and only in traces in T. balsamita. There is also a difference in sesquiterpenes: 5.1% oxidized sesquiterpenes and 0.4% sesquiterpene hydrocarbons in T. vulgare and only 0.7% oxidized sesquiterpenes in T. balsamita (Baczek et al. 2017). Baranauskiene et al. (2014) identified EM from Lithuania as β-thujone (186) chemotype (86%) together with α-thujone (185) (2.5%) and sabinene (161) (2.5%). The composition of T. macrophyllum EM is presented in Table 1. Radulovic et al. (2010) found eucalyptol (173) (8.6%), camphor (172) (6.4%), γ-eudesmol (214) (6.2%) and isobornyl acetate (9.5%) in the EM from aerial parts of T. macrophyllum. In Turkish populations, the main components are β-eudesmol (209) (21.4%) and cis-chrysanthenol (182) (12%) (Demirci and Baser 2007). Polatoğlu et al. (2013) analyzed EM from flowering heads and leaves separately and identified 64.9% oxidized sesquiterpenes (γ-eudesmol (209), sesquivalandulol (213), and copaborneol (216) in the flowering heads, and 47.2% oxidized monoterpenes (eucalyptol (173), bornyl acetate (180), borneol (178), and β-thujone (186)) in the leaves. A different EM profile from flowering heads and leaves of T. macrophyllum (origin Italy) was found by Venditti et al. (2018). EM from the flowering heads is characterized by 39.4% oxidized monoterpenes and 28% oxidized sesquiterpenes; the individual components are 10-epi-γ-eudesmol (204) (12.5%), camphor (172) (11%), linalool (171) (10.8%) and eucalyptol (173) (8.8%). The leaves EM contains more sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (39.3%) - mainly germacrene D (198) (30.9%) and oxylated monoterpenes (25.4%), of which camphor (172) (11.1%) and eucalyptol (173) (5.5%). Oxidized sesquiterpenes in the leaves were fewer and included 10-epi-γ-eudesmol (209) (3.9%) and caryophyllene oxide (208) (3.4%). Significant amount of p-methyl benzyl alcohol was found in T. macrophyllum EM (Abad et al. 1995). Recently, the dominant compounds of T. parthenium EM were found to be camphor (172) (45.47%), trans-chrisantenyl acetate (187) (21.65%), camphene (160) (9.48%), and cis-isogeraniol (5.42%) (Lechkova et al. 2023), while camphor (172) (25.24%), trans-chrysantenyl acetate (187) (18.35%), cis-verbenol (10.58%), thujone (185) (6.06%), eucaliptol (173) (5.99%), and α-campholenal (5.98%) were the main compounds in T. vulgare (Karcheva-Bahchevanska et al. 2023).

Sesquiterpene lactones (STLs)

STLs in Tanacetum species distributed in Bulgaria were studied by Todorova and Evstatieva (2001) (Fig. 2) and correspond to their taxonomic position - in two sections of Tanacetum (T. vulgare, T. achilleifolium, T. millefolium) and sect. Pyrethrum (T. corymbosum, T. macrophyllum, T. parthenium). T. achilleifolium and T. millefolium produce only STLs of eudesmanolid type; they are the only Bulgarian species in which 11, 13 dihydroeudesmanolides were determined. Three chemotypes have been established for T. vulgare: with germacranolides, with eudesmanolides and without STLs (Todorova and Evstatieva 2001). Similar results were found for the species from Italy (Rosselli et al. 2012). T. vulgare STLs have α- methylene-γ-lactone residue (Fig. 2) (Abad et al. 1995). T. corymbosum contains lactones from the small group of eudesman-12,8-olides, which are not typical for the genus (Todorova and Evstatieva 2001).

Figure 2. 

Structure of STLs (germacranolides, guaianolides and eudesmanolides) in species of the genus Tanacetum.

T. macrophyllum and T. parthenium have the all three types of STLs, but mostly - guaianolides, which have a variety of O-containing functional groups. Among the STLs in T. macrophyllum, the guaianolides macrotanacin (223) and tanaphyllin (224) (found in large quantities in the species originating in Bulgaria) should be noted. A major STL in T. parthenium is parthenolide (239). Douglanin (258) has been isolated from T. praeteritum, T. argenteum subsp. canum, T. vulgare ssp. siculum (Gören 1995; Gören and Tahtasakal 1997; Rosselli et al. 2012). Ludovicin B (257), A (256) were found in T. praeteritum and T. vulgare, and 1α-hydroxy-1-deoxyarglanin (259)- T. praeteritum (Gören 1995; Rosselli et al. 2012).

Ethnopharmacological data on the genus Tanacetum

T. parthenium is used as an antipyretic and anti-inflammatory agent, for headaches and earaches (Ivanescu et al. 2018); the leaves are used in English folk medicine to prevent migraines (Kumar and Tyagi 2013). T. balsamita has a sedative, diuretic, carminative and expectorant effect (Venditti et al. 2018). T. vulgare is a diuretic, anthelmintic and acaricidal agent (Baczek et al. 2017; Dere and Akcin 2017; Ivanescu et al. 2018), used as an antispasmodic for stomach pains. In Morocco, T. vulgare is applied as an antihypertensive and diuretic agent (Lahlou et al. 2007). In Bulgaria, the leaves and flowering heads are used as an antiseptic and against dandruff (Kumar and Tyagi 2013).

In Russia, an infusion of T. vulgare flowering heads is used for wound healing, as an analgesic and as an appetite stimulant (Devrnja et al. 2017). In the Mediterranean region, the resistance of T. corymbosum flowering heads is used in parasitic intestinal diseases (worms) (Venditti et al. 2018). The leaves can be used as a spice instead of cinnamon and nutmeg; sometimes, it is used in preparing of omelets, salads, cakes and spice mixes (Baranauskiene et al. 2014). Recommended for its strong aroma, the plants are used as a repellent against flies and other insects.

Phytopharmacological studies of extracts and compounds from species of the genus Tanacetum

The established phytopharmacological effects are mainly of crude extracts or fractions, and essential oils (EM). Comparative analyzes and conclusions are quite difficult to be made by the fact that chemotypes exist for each species, e.g., up to 30 chemotypes for T. vulgare. The biological activity of the plant substances is largely associated with the content of STLs, acylquinic acids and methoxylated flavones and flavonols, which are characteristic of the Asteraceae family. Kumar and Tyagi (2013) summarize data on traditional use and pharmacological studies of essential oils of Tanacetum species. The most important data on the phytopharmacology of the genus are systematized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Protective effects of plant substances and secondary metabolites in Tanacetum species.

Tanacetum species Protective effects References
Antioxidant activity
Methanol extracts from T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. corymbosum T. vulgare showed the highest DPPH activity (IC50 242.8 µg/ml) and reducing power (IC50 112.06 µg/ml) Ivanescu et al. 2018
Methanol extracts from T. vulgare In DPPH assay the highest activity showed the roots with IC50 44 μg/ml following by the flowering heads – 58.3 μg/mL. Reducing power of the root extract was as follows: 0.1 mg/ ml – 0.123, 1 mg/ ml – 0.903 (Trolox 0.926). Devrnja et al. 2017
Hexan, hydroalcoholic and aqueous extracts from T. vulgare flower heads, stems and aerial parts The hydroalcoholic aerial parts extract exhibited the strongest radical scavenging activity (up to 148 mg TE/g and 176 mg TE/g for DPPH and ABTS, respectively) and reducing power (404 and 188 mg TE/g for CUPRAC and FRAP). Infusion and hydroalcoholic stem extracts showed the best metal chelating activity (25 mg EDTAE/g) and total antioxidant capacity (2.07 mg TE/g). Ak et al. 2021
Methanol extracts from T. vulgare and the major compound 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid (3,5-diCQA) (28) DPPH assay revealed: IC50 37 µg/ml for the extract; IC50 9.7 µМ for 3, 5-diCQA and IC50 8.8 µМ for quercetin Juan-Badaturuge et al. 2009
Agrorefinery products from the residuces after the hydrodistiillation of essential oil from T. vulgare The highest antioxidant activity showed the water extract: DPPH (IC50 1.33 mg/ml), ABTS (IC50 1.40 mg/ml), FRAP (546.20 µM Trolox/g extract) and ORAC (11947.5 µM Trolox/g extract). Baranauskiene et al. 2014
Ethanolic extract from T. macrophyllum aerial parts DPPH activity (IC50 32.7 µg/ml); ABTS (IC50 37.2 µg/ml); FRAP (361 mgТЕ/g) Venditti et al. 2018
Hydroethanolic extracts from T. vulgare and T. balsamita T. vulgare extract showed the higher antioxidant activity in compareison with T. balsamita in DPPH assay (13.86 and 13.59 µМ Trolox/g, respectively) and FRAP (585.6 and 339.1 µМ Trolox/g). Baczek et al. 2017
Hydroethanolic extracts (70%) from Chrysanthemum balsamita var. balsamita and Ch. balsamita var. tanacetoides DPPH assay: IC50 59.70 and 121.13 µg/ml, respectively; SNPAC (silver nanoparticle antioxidant capacity): 71.44 and 34.25 µMGAE/g , EPR radical detection: integral intensity 228.04 and 361.50 Benedec et al. 2016
Ethanolic extracts from T. parthenium obtained by accelerated liquid extraction (ALE), microvawe extraction, macearion, Soxhlet and sonication The highest activity showed the extracts obtained by ALE as follows: DPPH (105.26 mg TE/g), ABTS (179.19 mg TE/g), reducing power CUPRAC (485.82 mg TE/g) and FRAP (330.92 mg TE/g). The highest metal chelating capacity and total antioxidant activity showed the extract by maceration: 23.30 mg EDTAE/g, and 2.48 mM TE/g, respectively. Zengin et al. 2020
Ethylacetate, methanol and water extracts from T. poteriifolium The highest activity showed the water extracts as follows: DPPH (238.12 mg TE/g), ABTS (282.54 mg TE/g), reducing power CUPRAC (555.03 mg TE/g) and FRAP (285.79 mg TE/g). The highest metal chelating capacity showed the ethylacetate extract (41.07 mg EDTAE/g). Zengin et al. 2019
Methanol-aqueous extractd from flowering heads, leaves and roots of T. balsamita. The flowering heads extracts showed the highest DPPH (84.54 mg TE/g), ABTS (96.35 mg TE/g), reducing power CUPRAC (151.20 mg TE/g) and FRAP (93.22 mg TE/g). The highest metal chelating capacity showed the ethylacetate extract (36.16 mg EDTAE/g).
Enzyme inhibitory activity
Ethanolic extract from T. macrophyllum aerial parts AchE inhibitory activity with IC50 0.57 mg/ml, 17.89 GALE (galantamin)/g); Galantamin (IC50 10.2 mg/ml) Venditti et al. 2018
Ethanolic extract from T. parthenium α-Glucosidase inhibitory activity 1.63–1.67 mM ACAE (acarbose)/g extract and against α-amylase - 0.51–0.56 mM ACAE/g BСhE inhibitory activity (4.63–5.21 mg GALAE/g); AChE inhibitory activity (2.84–3.38 mg GALAE/g) Zengin et al. 2020
Hexane, hydroalcoholic and aqueous extracts from T. vulgare flowering heads, stems and aerial parts Flower heads hydroethanolic extract showed the best AchE and BChE (1.95 and 1.79 mg GAE/g), and α-glucosidase (10.77 mg ACAE/g) inhibitory activity, while hexan extract inhibited tyrosinase (31.81 mg KAE/g) and α-amylase (0.53 mg ACAE/g). Ak et al. 2021
Methanol-aqueous extracts from T. macrophyllum flowering heads, aerial parts and roots. Aerial parts hydroethanolic extract showed the best AchE and BChE (4.46 and 2.26 mg GAE/g), α-glucosidase (1.45 mg ACAE/g) and tyrosinase (107.64 mg KAE/g) inhibitory activity, while flowering heads extract inhibited α-amylase (0.65 mg ACAE/g). Gevrenova et al. 2020
Methanol-aqueous extractd from flowering heads, leaves and roots of T. balsamita. Leaves hydroethanolic extract showed the best AchE and BChE (2.11 and 2.43 mg GAE/g), α-amylase (0.44 mg ACAE/g) and tyrosinase (54.65 mg KAE/g) inhibitory activity, while the roots extract inhibited α-glucosidase (0.71 mg ACAE/g) Gevrenova et al. 2023
Anti-inflammatory activity
Methoxylated flavones and flavonols from T. parthenium and T. vulgare leaves Methoxylated flavonols inhibit the arachidonic acid metabolism by cyclooxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase pathways. 6-hydroxykaempferol 3,6-dimethyl ether and santin (6-hydroxykaempferol 3,6,4‘-trimethyl ether with IC50 27 and 58 µМ, respectively. Williams et al. 1999a
Acetone extracts and fractions from T. parthenium, T. vulgare, T. niveum and T. ptarmiciflorum (the content of parthenolide (239) was up to 2.62% (T. niveum) In the model of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes IC50 was 0.79 and 1.32 mg dry weight leaves/mL blood for T. parthenium and T. niveum, respectively. The activity was related to the proteinkinase inhibition. Brown et al. 1997
Commercial aqueous extract from T. parthenium (0.5%) parthenolide (239) The extract reduced PGE2 release and IL-1β gene expression in ex-vivo mice cortex, while IL-10 and BDNF gene expressions increased. The extract could be effective in controlling the inflammatory pathways that occur during cortical-spreading depression. Recinella et al. 2020
Neuromodulatory activity
Hexane extracts from T. vulgare flowering heads, stems and aerial parts At 10 µg/ml (non toxic concentation) they reduced MDA, TNFα and BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) gene expression and stimulated norepinephrine release in HypoE22 cells. An involvement of the hexane extracts in the modulation of the hypothalamic appetite-regulating network could be suggest. Ak et al. 2021
Commercial aqueous extract from T. parthenium (0.5%) parthenolide (239) The extract (10–100 μg/mL) decreased in concentration dependant manner the extracellular dopamine level and in the range 10-50 μg/mL increased the dopamine transporter (DAT) gene expression. In silico interaction between parthenolide (239) and DAT binding site was found. Recinella et al. 2020
Antibacterial activity
T. vulgare and T. balsamita G(+/-) bacteria: B. cereus, B. subtilis, S. epidermidis, S. aureus, E. coli, Salmonella enterica (MIC 1–32 mg/ml); K. pneumoniae, Y. enterocolitica (MIC 1–8 mg/ml). T. balsamita essential oil in 4 mg/ml inhibited 58% of the strains, while T. vulgare - 42%. G(+) bacteria (MIC 1–16 mg/ml); K. pneumoniae, Y. enterocolitica (MIC 2–4 mg/ml). T. balsamita extract in 4 mg/ml inhibited 47% of the strains, while T. vulgare - 26%. Baczek et al. 2017
Essential oil
Alcohol-water extracts
Sesquiterpene lactone parthenolide (239) from T. parthenium leaves and fruits Essential oil from stem and flowering heads of Tanacetum argyrophyllum var. argyrophyllum Antibacterial activity against G (+) bacteria Bacillus cereus (125 µg/ml essential oil) Kumar and Tyagi 2013; Polatoglu et al. 2010
Methanolic extracts from T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. corymbosum Moderate activity against G(+) bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus: T. corymbosum (MIC 3.12 mg/ml); T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum (MIC 6.25 mg/ml). Ivanescu et al. 2018
Essential oil from T. vulgare Antibacterial activity against G (+/-) bacteria Еscherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae (MIC 0.03 and 0.11 mg/ml), and Staphylococcus aureus (MIC 0.21 mg/ml) which possess an outer lipopolysaccharide covering, that restricts diffusion of hydrophobic compounds. Devrnja et al. 2017
Antifungal activity
Methanolic extracts from T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. corymbosum Against Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans as follows: T. vulgare > T. macrophyllum > T. corymbosum. Ivanescu et al. 2018
T. vulgare essential oil (contains mainly oxygenated monoterpenes, the major compound is trans-chrysanthenyl acetate (187)) Against pathogenic fungi Aspergillus, Trichoderma and Penicillium; the highest activity towards P. funiculosum with MIC 0.002 mg/ml (bifonazole and ketoconazol have MIC 0.2 mg/ml) Devrnja et al. 2017
Antiviral activity
Different polarity fractions from methanolic extracts of T. vulgare aerial parts and roots Petroleum ether and ethylacetate fractions revealed the highest activity against Herpes simplex viruses HSV-1 and HSV-2 showing a good selectivity indexes and effective concentrations (ЕС50) 69.9 and 95.7 µg/ml (HSV-1), and 61.6 and 59.4 µg/ml (HSV-1), respectively; high activity of 3,5-diCQA (ЕС50 31.1 and 46.99 µg/ml). Positive control aciclovir (ЕС50 0.94 µg/ml) Álvarez et al. 2011
Ethylacetate extract from T. vulgare and STL parthenolide (239) Against HSV-1 showed ЕС50 40 µg/ml and 0.3 µg/ml, respectively. Parthenolide (239) inhibited the virus replication. Onozato et al. 2009
Anthelmintic activity, agaricidal, insecticidal and repellent activity
Crude extract and essential oil (EO) (84% β-thujon 186) from T. vulgare Crude extract in 50, 100, 200 μg/mL and EO (200 μg/mL) showed caused 100% mortality of all adult worms of Schistosoma Godinho et al. 2014
Extract from T. parthenium aerial parts and parthenolide (239) The extract (200 µl/ml) and parthenolide (239) in concentrations from 12.5 to 100 μM showed caused 100% mortality of all adult worms of Schistosoma de Almeida et al. 2016
EO from T. vulgare EO showed agaricidal activity against Tetranychus urticae Chiasson et al. 2001
Parthenolide (239) from T. argentums ssp. аrgenteum Parthenolide (239) showed agaricidal activity against Spodoptera littoralis worms Kumar and Tyagi 2013
Steam distillate of fresh leaves and flowers of T. vulgare Repellents to Colorado potato beetles, Leptinotarsa decemlneata. Kumar and Tyagi 2013
Cytotoxic activity
Methanolic extracts from T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. corymbosum In 200 µg/ml shoed cytotoxicity against a cell line HeLa as follows: 69.87% (T. macrophyllum). 77.68% (T. vulgare) and 93.71% (T. corymbosum), and a cell line Vero (95%–96.98%) Ivanescu et al. 2018
Chloroform extract from T. vulgare showed cytotoxicity towards cell lines HeLa (IC50 47.72 µg/ml), A2780 (IC50 37.53 µg/ml), MCF7(IC50 27.98 µg/ml) by cell cycle arrest (phase S) and apoptosis. Gospodinova et al. 2015
Methanolic extracts from T. vulgare leaves and flowering heads showed cytotoxicity against a cell line HeLa (IC50 < 100 μg/ml). The activity was related to the methoxylated flavonoids nepetin, hispidulin and eupatilin. Devrnja et al. 2017
Sesquiterpene lactones (STLs) eudesmanolide type isolated from T. vulgare ssp. siculum Shoed cytotoxicity against a cell line A549. The main STL is douglanin with IC50 15.3 µМ. Rosselli et al. 2012
EO from T. macrophyllum leaves (germacrene D (198) and 10-epi-γ-eudesmol (209)) EO showed cytotoxicity against a cell lines HCT116 and A375 with IC50 8.5 and 9.17 μg/ml, respectively, and a cell line (positive control cisplatin (0.4 and 2.5 μg/ml). The extract showed cytotoxicity against A375 and HCT116 with IC50 32.5 and 35.6 μg/ml Venditti et al. 2018
Ethanolic extract from T. macrophyllum aerial parts (contains apigenin (97), apigenin 7-glucoside (98), chlorogenic (23) and 3, 5-diCQA (28))

Antioxidant activity

Fraisse et al. (2011) established a correlation between the antioxidant activity, the total dihydroxycinnamic derivatives and the total phenols in extracts of Asteraceae species, among which were T. vulgare and T. parthenium. There is a significant relationship between DPPH radical scavenging activity and TPC (R2 = 0.8904), total dihydroxycinnamic derivatives (R2 = 0.8529) and total caffeoyl derivatives (R2 = 0.7172). Thus, the antioxidant activity mainly depends on the main caffeoyl derivatives; the quantity of 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid (28) in T. parthenium (30.08 g/kg) was 48.92%. In a comparative study of methanolic extracts of T. vulgare different plant parts, TPC was found from 83.6 to 221.7 mg GAE/g dry weight, with the content decreasing in the order roots>leaves>flowering heads>stems (Devrnja et al. 2017). In the DPPH test, the roots have the highest activity with an IC50 of 44 μg/ml, followed by the flowering heads – 58.3 μg/ml. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two indicators is R=-0.8 with R2 = 0.64. In the test for reducing power, the root extract was the most active: in a concentration of 0.1 mg/ml – 0.123, 1 mg/ml – 0.903 (Trolox 0.926).

Applying the biorefinery (agrorefinery) concept, Baranauskiene et al. (2014) compared the antioxidant activity of EO and different products of the residue after hydrodistillation (water extract, acetone balsam and acetone extract). The highest TPC in the aqueous extract (142.30 mg GAE/g dry extract) is also consistent with the highest antioxidant activity in the DPPH assay (IC50 1.33 mg/ml), ABTS (IC50 1.40 mg /ml), FRAP (546.20 µM Trolox/g extract) and ORAC (11947.5 µM Trolox/g extract). The antioxidant potential of two varieties of Chrysanthemum balsamita var. balsamita and Ch. balsamita var. tanacetoides was established in DPPH assays (IC50 59.70 and 121.13 µg/ml, respectively), SNPAC (silver nanoparticle antioxidant capacity) (71.44 and 34.25 µMGAE/g, respectively), EPR radical detection (integral intensity 228.04 and 361.50, respectively) (Benedec et al. 2016).

According to Baranauskiene et al. (2014), the antioxidant activity of the water extracts is due to acylquinic acids - mono- and dicaffeoylquinic acids; the effect of 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid (28) (Juan-Badaturuge et al. 2009) as well as that of flavonoids (Juan-Badaturuge et al. 2009; Pukalskas et al. 2010; Benedec et al. 2016) are specifically discussed.

The antioxidant potential of Tanacetim species is exclusively associated with the content of phenolic acids. The high antioxidant potential of T. vulgare is due to the high content of caffeic (16), rosmarinic (68) and ferulic (20) acids (Baczek et al. 2017). According to Baranauskiene et al. (2014), mono- and dicaffeylquinic acids are with the most pronounced effect as well as 3,5-dicaffeylquinic acid (28) and flavonoids (substituted with hydroxyl groups in ring B and C) (Juan-Badaturuge et al. 2009).

In the antioxidant assays of T. vulgare extracts, the hydroalcoholic aerial parts extract exhibited the strongest radical scavenging activity (up to 148 mg TE/g and 176 mg TE/g for DPPH and ABTS, respectively) and reducing power (404 and 188 mg TE/g for CUPRAC and FRAP) (Ak et al. 2021). The best metal chelating activity and total antioxidant capacity in phosphomolibdenum assay was found for the infusion stem extract (25 mg EDTAE/g) and hydroalcoholic stem extract (2.07 mg TE/g). Discriminant analysis showed that radical scavenging activity (DPPH and ABTS), reducing power (CUPRAC and FRAP), and methal-chelation ability account mostly for the extract discrimination.

Antioxidant activity of T. parthenium was especially pronounced in the ethanolic extracts obtained by accelerated solvent extraction in terms of radical scavenging activity (Zengin et al. 2020), and notably the reducing power in the FRAP assay (up to 330 mg TE/g). Remarkable radical scavenging activity (300 mg TE/g and 573 mg TE/g for DPPH and ABTS) and reducing power (443 mg TE/g and 277 mg TE/g for CUPRAC and FRAP) was assessed for T. macrophyllum roots and flowering heads, respectively (Gevrenova et al. 2020). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that radical scavenging activity (DPPH and ABTS) and reducing power mostly accounted for the high antioxidant potential of T. macrophyllum. Generally, ABTS hold significance for the separation of the studied T. macrophyllum plant parts. Concerning T. balsamita hydromethanolic extracts, supervised partial least square discriminant analysis (PLC-DA) revealed that radical scavenging activity and reducing power have marked impact on the pronounced antioxidant potential of flower heads (Gevrenova et al. 2023). The same trend was observed for the water extracts from T. poteriifolium aerial parts (Zengin et al. 2019). Overall, the smallest antioxidant activity was evaluated for T. balsamita in comparison with T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. poteriifolium and T. parthenium.

Enzyme inhibitory activity

The bio-inhibitory effects of EO can be explained rather by the synergistic effects of their components. The AChE inhibitory potential of some EO terpenes of T. macrophyllum flowering heads and leaves was determined: 1,8-cineole (173) (IC50 = 0.67 mM), camphor (172) (IC50 > 10 mM), germacrene D (198) also has proven inhibitory capacity (Venditti et al. 2018).

On the other hand, the interaction between different terpenes plays an important role, in the light of synergism between monoterpenes and antagonism between monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes. EO of T. macrophyllum flowering heads and leaves had a lower AChE inhibitory effect (IC50 15.23 and 1049 mg/ml) compared to the ethanolic extracts (IC50 0.57 mg/ml). This is a 60-fold lower value than that of galantamine (positive control). In many cases, the insecticidal activity of plant extracts is due to AChE inhibitory activity.

In a comparative study of enzyme inhibitory activity of ethanol extracts of T. parthenium obtained with different extraction methods, activity towards α-glucosidase (1.63–1.67 mM ACAE (acarbose)/g extract) and α-amylase (0.51–0.56 mM ACAE/g) was assayed (Zengin et al. 2020). A strong inhibitory effect on glucosidase combined with a moderate one on amylase has a good effect on postprandial hyperglycemia, which is the main cause of complications such as diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy, cardiovascular problems in diabetics. The inhibitory activity on tyrosinase was from 163.67 mg KAE (kojic acid)/g extract to 183.07 mg KAE/g extract obtained by ultrasound and accelerated liquid extraction, respectively. The inhibition of cholinesterases is more pronounced on BСhE (4.63–5.21 mg GALAE (galantamine)/g), and on AChE - 2.84–3.38 mg GALAE/g extract (Zengin et al. 2020). In this regard, increased activity of AChE was found in the early stages of dementia, and of BСhE – in the later stage. Hierarchical clustering combined with PCA showed that ultrasound extraction was the most distinct from the other extraction methods and was associated with lower antioxidant activity in terms of DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, CUPRAC and tyrosinase inhibitory activity, but with pronounced metal-chelating ability and amylase inhibition (Zengin et al. 2020).

T. vulgare flowering heads hydroethanolic extract showed the best AChE and BChE (1.95 and 1.79 mg GAE/g, respectively), and α-glucosidase (10.77 mg ACAE/g) inhibitory activity, while hexane extract inhibited tyrosinase (31.81 mg KAE/g) and α-amylase (0.53 mg ACAE/g) (Ak et al. 2021). In this context the most pronounced AChE inhibitory potential has been found for the T. macrophyllum methanol-aqueous extract (up to 4.46 mg GAE/g) (Gevrenova et al. 2020). It’s worth noting that the T. balsamita methanol-aqueous extracts exerted lipase inhibitory activity up to 8.15 mg OE (orlistat)/g (Gevrenova et al. 2023).

Anti-inflammatory activity

Methoxylated flavonoids isolated from leaves of T. parthenium and/or T. vulgare have been investigated for inhibition of cyclooxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase (Williams et al. 1999a). The T. parthenium flavonoids 6-hydroxykaempferol 3,6-dimethyl ether (88) and santin (6-hydroxykaempferol 3,6,4’-trimethyl ether) (127) have the same enzyme inhibitory activity profile, but santin is more active (IC50 27 and 58, respectively µM). Quercetagetin 3,6,3’-trimethyl ether (91) was more active against cyclooxygenase (IC50 22 µM). Nepetin (6-hydroxyluteolin) (124) and jaceosidin (6-hydroxyluteolin 6,3’-dimethyl ether) (129) from T. vulgare leaves inhibited both enzymes but were less active against cyclooxygenase (IC50 61 and 89 µM, respectively) compared to the corresponding flavonols. Methoxylated flavonoids inhibit the two main pathways of arachidonic acid metabolism – the cyclooxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase pathways.

The anti-inflammatory activity of T. parthenium, T. vulgare, T. niveum, T. ptarmiciflorum was investigated in a human polymorphonuclear leukocyte model (Brown et al. 1997). In the acetone extracts of the leaves and their fractions, the germacranolide parthenolide (239) was found, which is associated with the anti-inflammatory effect of T. parthenium and T. niveum (1.72% and 2.62% parthenolide (239)); The IC50 was 0.79 and 1.32 mg leaf dry weight/ml blood, respectively. This activity is due to inhibition of protein kinase C.

Antiviral activity

In a comparative study of the antiviral activity of different polarity fractions of methanolic extracts of T. vulgare aerial parts and roots, and compounds of the species on Herpes simplex viruses HSV-1 and HSV-2, it was found that the petroleum ether and ethyl acetate fractions were the most active with a good selective index (Álvarez et al. 2011). The mean effective concentrations (EC50) were 69.9 and 95.7 µg/ml (HSV-1) and 61.6 and 59.4 µg/ml (HSV-1), respectively. The isolated compound with the highest activity was 3,5-dicaffeylquinic acid (28) (EC50 31.1 and 46.99 µg/ml against HSV-1 and HSV-2, respectively). Among the other compounds, the flavonoid axillarin (90) showed strong activity against HSV-2 - EC50 42.7 µg/ml.

STL parthenolide (239) (germacran type) showed the highest cytotoxicity at 25 µg/ml and had no antiviral activity at a concentration 1.5 times lower than the cytotoxic concentration. Parthenolide (239) was found from 0.33% in the crude extract to 2.7% in the chloroform fraction. Antiviral activity of T. vulgare is mainly associated with 3,5-dicaffeylquinic acid (28). Ethyl acetate extract of T. vulgare and parthenolide (239) were tested for HSV-1 antiviral activity; they have an IC50 of 40 µg/ml and 0.3 µg/ml, respectively (Onozato et al. 2009). Parthenolide (239) exhibits activity on viral replication.

Cytotoxic activity

T. vulgare ssp. siculum chloroform extract was analyzed and 5 STLs from the group of eudesmanolides were isolated, which were tested for cytotoxicity against lung carcinoma cell lines A549 and hamster lung fibroblast-like line V79379A. IC50s were 15.3–59.4 µM and 5.0–33.4 µM, respectively (Rosselli et al. 2012). The main STL douglanin (258) shows the highest activity. STL parthenolide (239) is involved in the processes of oxidative stress in prostate carcinoma cells by activating NADPH oxidase - the formation of ROS is the basis of the effects on hepatocellular carcinoma. The compound has anti-angiogenesis and anti-metastatic activity (Shields 2017). Methanol extracts of T. vulgare leaves and flowering heads have a cytotoxic effect on HeLa cell line - IC50 is below 100 μg/mL (Devrnja et al. 2017). The activity is associated with the content of methoxylated flavonoids nepetin (124), hispidulin (125) and eupatilin (127).

Neuromodulatory activity

Toxicological profile of T. vulgare extracts from different polarity was assayed in the brine shrimp (Artemia salina) lethality test where all of them showed a high degree of toxicity with IC50 < 2 mg/ml (Ak et al. 2021). The cytotoxic effects towards HypoE22 cells was found in the concentration range 50–100 μg/mL.

The bioinformatics analysis through the SwissTargetPrediction platform predicted interaction of flavonoids axillarin (90), quercetagetin -3,6,3’(4’)-trimethyl ester (94) and hesperetin (146) together with quinic (70), chlorogenic (23) and dicaffeoylquinic acid (28), and parthenolide (239) with target proteins (hydrolase), electrochemical transporters and transcription factors involved in neuromodulation and neuroprotection (Ak et al. 2021).

The possible neuroprortective effects of T. vulgare extracts was studied on hypothalamic HypoE22 cells (Ak et al. 2021). At 10 µg/ml (non toxic concentation) hexane extracts reduced the marker of oxidative stress MDA (malonyldialdehyde) and gene expression of TNFα (pro-inflammation cytokine). It’s worth noting that down regulation of the BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) gene expression was found. On the other hand, the hexane extracts exerted stimulating effects on the norepinephrine levels in HypoE22 cells. All together, the aforementioned effects suggest putative involvement of the T. vulgare hexane extracts in the modulation of the hypothalamic appetite-regulating network. However, the reduced BDNF gene expression could account also for potential neurotoxicity following the administration of T. vulgare herbal extracts.

T. parthenium (feverfew), has been traditionally employed as a phytotherapeutic remedy in the treatment of migraine (Guibot et al. 2017; Moscano et al. 2019). T. parthenium crude extract and STL parthenolide (239) inhibit serotonin and platelet aggregation relevant to migraine (Marles et al. 1992). Aqueous extract of the species has been shown to inhibit prostaglandin biogenesis and gives a very good result in migraine patients without side effects.

The dopaminergic pathways are key targets for novel pharmacological approaches in counteracting migraine attacks. In this context, anti-inflammatory and neuromodulatory effects of a commercial aqueous T. parthenium extract was studied in an ex vivo model of cortical spreading depression (CSD) in mice cortex. It reduced prostaglandin G2 (PGE2) release and IL-1β gene expression in ex-vivo mice cortex, while up-regulation of IL-10 and BDNF gene expressions was observed. The extract could be effective in controlling the inflammatory pathways that occur during CSD. In the concentration range 10–100 μg/mL the extract decreased in concentration dependant manner the extracellular dopamine level, while between 10 and 50 μg/mL it increased the dopamine transporter (DAT) gene expression. In silico interaction between parthenolide (239) and DAT binding site was found.

Plant substances and products containing Tanacetum sp

The species T. parthenium (L.) Schultz Bip is included in the European Pharmacopoeia. (European Pharmacopoeia 2008). A purified extract of flavonoids and phenolic acids from tansy flowering heads under the name Tanacechol is registered in Russia as a choleretic and antispasmodic agent, which is used in cholecystitis and biliary dyskinesias. SeptimebTM and Setarud (IMODTM) are plant extracts that include tansy and are used in the therapy of sepsis and HIV-positive patients, respectively (Paydary et al. 2012; Pourdast et al. 2017). In Romania, there are herbal supplements of tansy flowering heads in the form of hydroalcoholic extracts and glycerine macerates (Ivănescu et al. 2018).

The commercial EO product from tansy is a thujone type; despite its protective effects, in high concentrations thujone is toxic. The US FDA (Food and Drug Administration) restricts the use of tansy in alcoholic beverages due to the toxic effects of thujone. EMA (European Medicinal Agency) and EC (European Commission) recommend intake of thujone (185 and 186) in products from 3 to 7 mg/day (EMA 2012). Reception with products from the diet of the order of 1 mg on average has no special objections.

Conclusion

Several Tanacetum species are renowned for their ethnomedicinal use in the countries of Southeastern Europe as flavor, carminative, antidiabetic, antiviral and analgesic agents, for alleviation of migraine attask, kidney and stomach problems. Latest studies provide new insights on the Tanacetum species in terms of phytochemical characterization of extracts obtained by different extraction methods and solvents highlighting the efficiency of accelerated liquid extraction and hydroalcoholic and hexane extracts. With recent exponential developmet of metabolite and biological profiling, in combination with multivariate data analysis, in-depth studies on T. vulgare, T. macrophyllum, T. balsamita, T. parthenium and T. poteriifolium bring a more extended view on the secondary metabolites and the mode of action of the taxa. Liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry/diodarray analyses integrated with an assessment of antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory potential allowed for the identification/annotation of more than 100 secondary metabolites emphasizing exceptional variety of acylquinic acids and methoxylated flavones and flavonols in T. macrophyllum, T. vulgare and T. balsamita flowering heads and aerial parts along with sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpene lactones. In addition to evoking an antioxidant response, Tanacetum extracts/isolated compounds displayed inhibitory activity towards acetylholinesterases and enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism which generates further interest in the species as potential candidates for the management of neurodegenerative conditions and metabolite syndrome. Because the down-regulation of prostaglandin and dopamine release supported by the bioinformatics analysis, the inhibition of dopaminergic pathway may be therapeutic target for the treatment of migraine. It is worth noting that further in vivo studies are needed to evaluate health-promoting application of Tanacetum extracts and isolated metabolites in pharmaceutical scale.

Acknowledgments

This study is financed by the European Union-NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, project No. BG-RRP-2.004-0004-C01.

References

  • Abad MJ, Bermejo P, Villar A (1995) An approach to the genus Tanacetum L. (Compositae): Phytochemical and pharmacological review. Phytotherapy Research 9: 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2650090202
  • Ak G, Gevrenova R, Sinan KI, Zengin G, Zheleva D, Mahomoodally MF, Senkardes I, Brunetti L, Leone S, Di Simone SC, Recinella L, Chiavaroli A, Menghini L, Orlando G, Ferrante C (2021) Tanacetum vulgare L. (Tansy) as an effective bioresource with promising pharmacological effects from natural arsenal. Food and Chemical Toxicology 153: 112268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112268
  • Álvarez AL, Habtemariam S, Juan-Badaturuge M, Jackson C, Parra F (2011) In vitro anti HSV-1 and HSV-2 activity of Tanacetum vulgare extracts and isolated compounds: An approach to their mechanism of action. Phytotherapy Research 25: 263–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.3382
  • Baczek KB, Kosakowska O, Przybyl JL, Pióro-Jabrucka E, Costa R, Mondello L, Gniewosz M, Synowiec A, Węglarz Z (2017) Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of essential oils and extracts from costmary (Tanacetum balsamita L.) and tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L.). Industrial Crops and Products 102: 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.03.009
  • Baranauskiene R, Kazernaviciute R, Pukalskiene M, Mazdzieriene R, Venskutonis PR (2014) Agrorefinery of Tanacetum vulgare L. into valuable products and evaluation of their antioxidant properties and phytochemical composition. Industrial Crops and Products 60: 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.05.047
  • Benedec D, Filip L, Vlase L, Bele C, Sevastre B, Raita O, Olah N-K, Hanganu D (2016) In vitro study of antioxidant activity and phenolic content of Chrysanthemum balsamita varieties. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 29: 1359–1364.
  • Bremer K (1994) Asteraceae: Cladistics and Classification. Timber Press, Portland.
  • Chiasson H, Bélanger A, Bostanian N, Vincent C, Poliquin A (2001) Acaricidal properties of Artemisia absinthium and Tanacetum vulgare (Asteraceae) essential oils obtained by three methods of extraction. Journal of Economic Entomology 94(1): 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-94.1.167
  • de Almeida LMS, de Carvalho LSA, Gazolla MC, Pinto PLS, da Silva MPN, de Moraes J, da Silva Filho AA (2016) Flavonoids and sesquiterpene lactones from Artemisia absinthium and Tanacetum parthenium against Schistosoma mansoni Worms. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2016: 9521349. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9521349
  • Dere S, Akcin TA (2017) Anatomical and micromorphological properties of some Tanacetum L. (Asteraceae) taxa from Turkey and their systematic implications. Acta Botanica Croatica 76: 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/botcro-2017-0005
  • Devrnja N, Anđelković B, Aranđelović S, Radulović S, Soković M, Krstić-Milošević D, Ristić M, Ćalić D (2017) Comparative studies on the antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of Tanacetum vulgare L. essential oil and methanol extracts. South African Journal of Botany 111: 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.03.028
  • EMA [European Medicines Agency] (2012) Public statement on the use of herbal medicinal products containing thujone EMA/HMPC/732886.
  • European Pharmacopoeia [8th ed.] (2008) Tanaceti parthenii herba 01/2008:1516. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Health Care (EDQM), Council of Europe Strasbourg.
  • Funk VA, Susanna A, Stussey TF, Bayer RJ [Eds] (2009) Systematics, evolution, and biogeography of Compositae. IAPT, Vienna.
  • Gevrenova R, Zheleva-Dimitrova D, Balabanova V, Voynikov Y, Sinan KI, Mahomoodally MF, Zengin G (2020) Integrated phytochemistry, bio-functional potential and multivariate analysis of Tanacetum macrophyllum (Waldst. & Kit.) Sch. Bip. and Telekia speciosa (Schreb.) Baumg. (Asteraceae). Industrial Crops and Products 155: 112817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112817
  • Gevrenova R, Zengin G, Sinan KI, Zheleva-Dimitrova D, Balabanova V, Kolmayer M, Voynikov Y, Joubert O (2023) An in-depth study of metabolite profile and biological potential of Tanacetum balsamita L. (costmary). Plants 12(1): 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010022
  • Godinho L, de Carvalho L, Barbosa CC, Dias MM, de Faria Pinto P, Crotti AEM, Pinto PLS, de Moraes J, Da Silva Filho AA (2014) Anthelmintic activity of crude extract and essential oil of Tanacetum vulgare (Asteraceae) against adult worms of Schistosoma mansoni. Scientific World Journal 2014: 460342. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/460342
  • Gören N, Arda N, Caliskan Z (2002) Chemical characterization and biological activities of the genus Tanacetum (Compositae). Studies in Natural Products Chemistry 27: 547–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-5995(02)80044-8
  • Gospodinova Z, Antov G, Angelova S, Krasteva M (2014) In vitro antitumor potential of Bulgarian Tanacetum vulgare L. on human breast adenocarcinoma cells. Results in Pharma Sciences 4: 468–472.
  • Gospodinova Z, Bozsity N, Ocsovszki I, Orbán-Gyapai O, Krasteva M, Zupkó I (2015) Chloroformic fraction of Tanacetum vulgare L. induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MCF7 cells. International Journal of Pharma Sciences 5: 986–990.
  • Guilbot A, Bangratz M, Ait Abdellah S, Lucas C (2017) A combination of coenzyme Q10, feverfew and magnesium for migraine prophylaxis: A prospective observational study. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 17: 433. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1933-7
  • Ivănescu B, Tuchiluș C, Corciovă A, Lungu C, Mihai CT, Gheldiu AM, Vlase L (2018) Antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity of Tanacetum vulgare, Tanacetum corymbosum and Tanacetum macrophyllum extracts. Farmacia 66: 282–288.
  • Juan-Badaturuge M, Habtemariam S, Jackson C, Thomas MJK (2009) Anti-oxidant principles of Tanacetum vulgare L. aerial parts. Natural Product Communications 4: 1561–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X0900401121
  • Karcheva-Bahchevanska D, Benbassat N, Georgieva Y, Lechkova B, Ivanova S, Ivanov K, Todorova V, Peychev L, Peychev Z, Denev P (2023) A study of the chemical composition, antioxidant potential, and acute toxicity of Bulgarian Tanacetum vulgare L. essential oil. Molecules 28: 6155. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28166155
  • Khatib S, Sobeh M, Faraloni C, Bouissane L (2023) Tanacetum species: Bridging empirical knowledge, phytochemistry, nutritional value, health benefits and clinical evidence. Frontiers in Pharmacology 14: 1169629. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1169629
  • Kumar V, Tyagi D (2013) Chemical composition and biological activities of essential oils of genus Tanacetum - A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2: 155–159.
  • Lahlou S, Tahraoui A, Israili Z, Lyoussi B (2007) Diuretic activity of the aqueous extracts of Carum carvi and Tanacetum vulgare in normal rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 110: 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.10.005
  • Lechkova B, Karcheva-Bahchevanska D, Ivanov K, Todorova V, Benbassat N, Penkova N, Atanassova P, Peychev L, Hrischev P, Peychev Z, Terziev D, Ivanova S (2023) A study of the chemical composition, acute and subacute toxicity of Bulgarian Tanacetum parthenium essential oil. Molecules 28: 4906. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28134906
  • Marles RJ, Kaminski J, Arnason JT, Pazos-Sanou L, Heptinstall S, Fischer NH, Crompton CW, Kindack DG, Awang DV (1992) A bioassay for inhibition of serotonin release from bovine platelets. Journal of Natural Products 55: 1044–1056. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50086a003
  • Moscano F, Guioducci M, Maltoni L, Striano P, Ledda MG, Zoroddu F, Raucci U, Villa MP, Parisi P (2019) An observation study of fixed-dose Tanacetum parthenium nutraceutical preparation for prophylaxis of pediatric headache. Italian Journal of Pediatrics 45: 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-019-0624-z
  • Onozato T, Nakamura CV, Cortez DA, Filho BPD, Ueda-Nakamura T (2009) Tanacetum vulgare: Antiherpes virus activity of crude extract and the purified compound parthenolide. Phytotherapy Research 23: 791–796. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2638
  • Paydary K, Emamzadeh-Fard S, Khorram Khorshid HR, Kamali K, SeyedAlinaghi SA, Mohraz M (2012) Safety and efficacy of Setarud (IMODTM) among people living with HIV/AIDS: A review. Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery 7: 66–72. https://doi.org/10.2174/157489112799829756
  • Polatoglu K, Demirci F, Demirci B, Gören N, Can Baser KH (2010) Antimicrobial activity and essential oil composition of a new T. argyrophyllum (C. Koch) Tvzel var. argyrophyllum chemotype. Journal of Oleo Science 59: 307–313. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.59.307
  • Polatoğlu K, Karakoç ÖC, Demirci F, Gören N, Can Başer KH (2013) Sitophilus granaries L. (Coleoptera) toxicity and biological activities of the essential oils of Tanacetum macrophyllum (Waldst & Kit.) Schultz Bip. Journal of Oleo Science 64: 881–893. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.ess15078
  • Pourdast A, Sanaei M, Jafari S, Mohammadi M, Khalili H, Shafiee G, Ahadi Z, Rostami M, Alizad S, Heshmat R, Mohraz M (2017) Effect of SeptimebTM as a new natural extract on severe sepsis: A randomized clinical trial. Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine 8: 35–43.
  • Pukalskas A, Venskutonis PR, Dijkgraaf I, van Beek TA (2010) Isolation, identification and activity of natural antioxidants from costmary (Chrysanthemum balsamita) cultivated in Lithuania. Food Chemistry 122: 804–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.03.064
  • Radulovic NS, Blagojević PD, Skropeta D (2010) Misidentification of tansy, Tanacetum macrophyllum, as yarrow, Achillea grandifolia: a health risk or benefit? Natural Product Communications 5: 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1000500129
  • Recinella L, Chiavaroli A, di Giacomo V, Antolini MD, Acquaviva A, Leone S, Brunetti L, Menghini L, Ak G, Zengin G, Di Simone SC, Ferrante C, Orlando G (2020) Anti-inflammatory and neuromodulatory effects induced by Tanacetum parthenium water extract: Results from in silico, in vitro and ex vivo studies. Molecules 26: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010022
  • Rohloff J, Mordal R, Dragland S (2004) Chemotypical variation of Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L.) from 40 different locations in Norway. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52: 1742–1748. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0352430
  • Rosselli S, Bruno M, Raimondo F, Spadaro V, Varol M, Koparal AT, Maggio A (2012) Cytotoxic effect of eudesmanolides isolated from flowers of Tanacetum vulgare ssp. siculum. Molecules 7: 8186–8195. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17078186
  • Simmonds CB, Krishna S, Saxena PK (2002) Morphocytological characterization of feverfew, Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Schultz Bip. Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants 9: 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J044v09n01_05
  • Venditti A, Frezza C, Sciubba F, Serafini M, Bianco A, Cianfaglione K, Lupidi G, Quassinti L, Bramucci M, Maggi F (2018) Volatile components, polar constituents and biological activity of tansy daisy (Tanacetum macrophyllum (Waldst. et Kit.) Schultz Bip.). Industrial Crop and Prodcts 118: 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.056
  • Williams CA, Harborne JB, Geiger H, Hoult JRS (1999a) The flavonoids of Tanacetum parthenium and T. vulgare and their anti-inflammatory properties. Phytochemistry 51: 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00021-7
  • Zengin G, Sieniawska E, Senkardes I, Picot-Allain MCN, Sinan KI, Mahomoodally MF (2019) Antioxidant abilities, key enzyme inhibitory potential and phytochemical profile of Tanacetum poteriifolium Grierson. Industrial Crop and Products 140: 111629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111629
  • Zengin G, Cvetanović A, Gašić U, Stupar A, Bulut G, Şenkardes I, Dogan A, Sinan KI, Uysal S, Aumeeruddy-Elalfi Z (2020) Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.). Sch. Bip. Industrial Crop and Products 146: 112202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202
login to comment