Research Article
Print
Research Article
Effects of the EM CYP2C19 type and MDR1 3435CC gene on Helicobacter pylori eradication rate in patients with duodenal ulcer by the four-drug regimen of rabeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline, and tinidazole
expand article infoLiem T. Nguyen, Vuong B. Nguyen§, Tu V. Tran§, Loan T. T. Le, Mai H. T. Phuong, Thang Nguyen
‡ Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City, Vietnam
§ Vietnam Military Medical University, Ha Noi City, Vietnam
Open Access

Abstract

Background: The MDR1 genotype and the CYP2C19 phenotype determine how much PPI is absorbed from the gut and how much is processed in the liver.

Objective: To assess the impact of CYP2C19 and MDR1 C3435T gene polymorphisms on the efficiency of H. pylori eradication treatment with a 4-drug regimen of rabeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline, and tinidazole (RBTT) in patients with duodenal ulcers.

Methods: The study was conducted at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Gene polymorphisms for CYP2C19 and MDR1 C3435T were detected through a blood test. The RBTT 4-drug regimen was used to eradicate H. pylori.

Results: The success rate of the RBTT regimen for eradicating H. pylori in female patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype was 20.0% lower than the rate of 91.7% for the group without both phenotype and genotype (p = 0.01, OR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.00–0.45).

Conclusion: Compared to the group lacking both phenotypes and genotypes, female patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype had a lower rate of H. pylori eradication by RBTT regimen.

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori, CYP2C19, MDR1 C3435T

Introduction

Upper gastrointestinal conditions such as peptic ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and duodenal ulcer were associated with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection (Graham 2014).

33% of H. pylori in Vietnam were resistant to clarithromycin (Binh et al. 2013). The Maastricht IV consensus advised treating H. pylori for the first time with a four-drug regimen comprising bismuth in regions where H. pylori strains were resistant to clarithromycin in more than 15–20% of cases (Malfertheiner et al. 2012). According to the Vietnam Gastroenterology Association’s advice, a 4-drug regimen containing bismuth (PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, metronidazole, or tinidazole) should be used for 7–14 days as the first treatment for H. pylori eradication in the South of Vietnam (Vietnam Association of Gastroenterology 2013). Antibiotics, bismuth, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were among the medications used to treat H. pylori (Malfertheiner et al. 2007). A variety of factors, such as CYP2C19 genotype, MDR1 3435CC patient genotype, antibiotic resistance of the H. pylori bacteria, etc., affected the outcome of H. pylori treatment (Sugimoto et al. 2014).

The nitroimidazole class of antibiotics included the drugs metronidazole and tinidazole. On the other hand, Tinidazole might have certain benefits over metronidazole, according to some studies. When cultivating H. pylori bacteria and creating antibiograms, metronidazole and clarithromycin were less sensitive to H. pylori bacteria than tinidazole and clarithromycin (Svensson et al. 2002). A three-drug regimen comprising metronidazole was less effective than one using tinidazole for treating H. pylori eradication (Abbas et al. 2003). In contrast to the three-drug regimen containing metronidazole, which had 3/91 patients experience side effects that necessitated stopping therapy, all 80 patients who received the three-drug regimen containing tinidazole finished the course of treatment (Berutti et al. 2008). With the regimen of ranitidine bismuth citrates, tetracycline, and tinidazole, the results of the second H. pylori eradication treatment reached 80% (Rinaldi et al. 1999).

Orally administered PPIs were absorbed through the gastrointestinal mucosa by the membrane transport enzyme P-glycoprotein encoded by the gene MDR1 (Hoffmeyer et al. 2000; Pauli-Magnus et al. 2001). The MDR1 gene had 28 exons, the study by Hoffmeyer S. indicated that the expression and function of the MDR1 gene were correlated with the polymorphism in exon 26 (C3435T). The amount of MDR1 gene expression was 2-fold lower in homozygous T allele carriers than in homozygous C allele carriers (Hoffmeyer et al. 2000). The liver was placed that PPIs were metabolized by the S-mephenytoin hydroxylase enzyme, which was encoded by the CYP2C19 gene. (Litalien et al. 2005). According to the degree of metabolism, the phenotype of CYP2C19 consisted of fast metabolizer: EM (extensive metabolizer), genotype CYP2C19*1/*1, intermediate metabolizer: IM (intermediate metabolizer), genotype CYP2C19*1/*2, and poor metabolizer: PM (poor metabolizer), genotype CYP2C19*2/*2, *2/*3, and *3/*3 (Maev et al. 2014). The PPI medication rabeprazole was metabolized by the CYP2C19 enzyme the least (Rouby et al. 2018). According to various research conducted throughout the globe, the genotype MDR1 C3435T had an impact on how well PPIs including omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and esomeprazole worked to eradicate H. pylori (Gawronska-Szklarz et al. 2005; Furuta et al. 2007; Li Meng et al. 2017). When utilizing new-generation PPIs (esomeprazole, rabeprazole), the rate of H. pylori eradication in patients with the fast-metabolizing CYP2C19 genotype was greater than that of first-generation PPIs (McNicholl et al. 2012). The rate of effective H. pylori eradication in patients taking the PPI medicine rabeprazole was lower in those with the fast-metabolizing CYP2C19 phenotype than in those with the moderate and poor metabolizers (Kuo et al. 2010; Ormeci et al. 2016). However, several trials utilizing rabeprazole or esomeprazole PPIs found no differences in H. pylori eradication rates between CYP2C19 phenotypes (Tang et al. 2013).

As a result, we decided to investigate whether the CYP2C19 phenotype and the MDR1 C3435T genotype had an impact on the outcomes of the 4-drug regimen with bismuth used to treat H. pylori in Vietnamese patients. This regimen consists of rabeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline, and tinidazole (RBTT) and was administered for 14 days.

Materials and methods

Study materials

Patients at the Hospital of Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy who had duodenal ulcers and had H. pylori infection from 2015 to 2016.

Selection criteria

The patient was diagnosed with duodenal ulcer (Endoscopy with duodenal ulcer ≥ 5 mm), H. pylori infection diagnosis (both rapid urease test and positive histopathology), and non-treatment H. pylori before. Patients who were at least 18 years old. All participants gave informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion standards for pre-treatment: patients who had undergone gastric bypass surgery before, problems from a duodenal ulcer, including bleeding from the stomach and perforation. Cirrhosis, cancer, and Crohn’s disease patients who also had other serious diseases. Women who were breastfeeding and pregnant. In addition to aspirin, the patient was taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicines. The patient had a history of medication allergies to the ones used in the trial.

Patients who deliberately modified their drug regimens or unilaterally utilized medicines for ailments other than those recommended by their doctors were excluded from receiving treatment (such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, etc.).

Study design

Type of study: intervention progress, longitudinal follow-up.

Study facilities

Olympus GIF 180 gastroduodenal endoscope from Japan. To fix the stomach mucosa biopsy specimen, the vial included 10% neutral formalin. EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) anticoagulant in 5 mL test tubes. Nam Khoa Trading Service Company Limited, Ho Chi Minh City, provided the sample for the fast urease test (NK-Pylori test).

The Applied Biosystem’s PCR machine system 9700 and Beckman Coulter’s CEQ 8800 sequencers were used to evaluate the CYP2C19 and MDR1 C3435T genes, respectively.

Drugs for treating duodenal ulcers and getting rid of H. pylori were from the hospital pharmacy of Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Brand name Pariet 20 mg of the Japanese manufacturer Eisai for rabeprazole sodium. Trymo 120 mg, Colloidal Bismuth Subcitrate 120 mg, Raptakos Brett Company, India. Tinidazole 500 mg (brand name Tinidazol 500 mg), Tetracycline Hydrochloride 500 mg (trade name Tetracyclin 500 mg) by Domesco Company, Vietnam.

Implementation steps

  1. Patient reception and clinical examination: Smoking according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2009). Drinking according to the AUDIT-C (The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption) alcohol used disorder screening questionnaire by Bradley K.A. (Bradley et al. 2007).
  2. Gastroduodenal endoscopy: Diagnosis of duodenal ulcer ≥ 5 mm. We performed biopsies of gastric mucosa with 2 pieces in the antrum 3 cm from the pyloric orifice and 2 pieces in the body on the greater curvature. 2 biopsies (1 in corpus, 1 in antrum) for rapid urease test and 2 biopsies (1 in corpus, 1 in antrum) for histopathology to diagnose H. pylori infection.
  3. Rapid urease test for Helicobacter pylori detection: We took two biopsies (1 in corpus, 1 in antrum), and put them in the sample for rapid urease test. The results must be read in 60 minutes. When the reagent transformed from yellow to lotus pink during a rapid urease test, it was positive. If the test sample’s color did not change after the aforementioned period, it was deemed negative.
  4. Histopathological tests of the gastric mucosa diagnose Helicobacter pylori: we took 2 biopsies (1 in corpus, 1 in antrum), placed them in 2 bottles of 10% formol solution, labeled the bottles with the name and code, and sent the bottles to the University Hospital’s Anatomy Department. Medicine Can Tho. We detected H. pylori infection on Giemsa and Hematoxylin-eosin staining slides and assessed H. pylori density according to the new Sydney Categorization System’s classification standards, which was based on histopathology, classified as mild, moderate, or severe. (Dixon et al. 1996).
  5. CYP2C19 gene and MDR1 C3435T gene test procedure:
  1. Blood collection: we assisted the patient in going to the laboratory at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy to get a blood draw, took 5 mL of blood from the rotary vein, placed it in a test tube with the anticoagulant EDTA, spun the test tube, and used a centrifuge to separate the leukocytes, put in test tubes, stored and preserved.
  2. Allele-specific bidirectional PCR with the Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS) technique for the CYP2C19 test (Newton et al. 1989): primer pair (Outer- CYP2C19*2-F: 5’-CTACACATGTACAATAAAAATTTCCCCATCAAG-3’/Outer- CYP2C19*2-R: 5’-CTGCAGAACAGAGCTTTTCCTATCCTGA-3’) detected polymorphisms rs4244285 (G681A- CYP2C19*2), primer pair (Outer- CYP2C19*2-F: Outer- CYP2C19*3-F: 5’-ACATTCCCGGCCTATTTGTCTTTTACTTTGG-3’/Outer- CYP2C19*3-R: 5’-GAGCTAATGGGCTTAGAAGCCTGATCT-3’) detected polymorphisms rs4986893 (G636A- CYP2C19*3). We directed gene sequencing of the MDR1 gene by the C3435T SNP rs1045642 (A/C/T) primer sequence (Outer-MRD1-F: 5’-CTTGTATACAGGTAAGGGTGATTTGGT-3’/Outer-MDR1-R: 5’-GAAACATGACAGTTCCTCCAAGGCATAC-3’) (Sanger et al. 1975) was used to conduct the test. The experiment was carried out in the Molecular Biology Department, 108 Central Military Hospital.
  1. Treatment of duodenal ulcer with Helicobacter pylori infection.
  1. Patients used a 4-drug regimen with bismuth continuously for 14 days: 2 doses of Rabeprazole (Pariet) 20 mg each day/ four times a day; 120 mg of bismuth (Trymo)/ one pill at a time; took one 500 mg pill of tetracycline four times in one dose; took one 500 mg pill of tinidazole two times in one dose.
  2. Continued treatment with rabeprazole (Pariet) 20 mg, taking 1 tablet, 2 times in 1, continuously for 14 days to repair the duodenal ulcer once the H. pylori eradication program is complete.
  3. Post-treatment follow-up: Four weeks after the RBTT regimen ended, a second follow-up appointment was planned for each patient (2 weeks after stopping rabeprazole). Rapid urease test, biopsy of the stomach mucosa, and histological detection of H. pylori were all performed during endoscopic assessment of ulcers.
  1. Assessment of the efficacy of H. pylori infection therapy for duodenal ulcers.
  1. Assessing two issues—the successful eradication of H. pylori and the treatment of H. pylori-infected duodenal ulcers—would help determine how effective this approach was (negative H. pylori on both rapid urease test and histopathology).
  2. Patients who had not received effective care: Treatment for H. pylori eradication failure results in consideration of switching to a new regimen, under the 2013 recommendation of the Vietnam Association of Gastroenterology (Vietnam Association of Gastroenterology 2013).
  3. Non-scarred ulcers: continued taking PPIs for another 4 weeks.
  1. Data processing and analysis.
  1. We used the computer program SPSS 20.0, all data were processed. The Pearson Chi-Square Test assessed the proportional difference between the two groups. Use the Fisher’s Exact Test if the comparison sample size was 5 in more than 20% of the cases; to ascertain the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, we used a logistic regression analysis (LOGRAPH). The test results were rated as statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Results

Patients’ characteristics in the study

Of the 102 participants in the trial, 22 were qualified for therapy and genetic testing for the CYP2C19 and MDR1C3435T genes. Ten patients who were eligible for inclusion in the study of the efficacy of the RBTT regimen but did not return for a follow-up exam and endoscopic diagnosis of H. pylori and 92 re-examination patients who were eligible (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Diagnosis and H. pylori eradication therapy. (*) RBTT: rabeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline, tinidazole.

Of the 102 duodenal ulcer patients who participated in the study, male patients made up 77.5% of the group, while female patients made up 22.5%. Men had a proportion of the CYP2C19*2 and *3 alleles of 26.6% and 3.8%, respectively, whereas females had a proportion of 19.6% and 4.3%. With p = 0.33 and p = 1.00, respectively, there was no difference in the proportions of the *2 and *3 alleles in males compared to females. Similar to how there was no difference between males and females in the ratio of CYP2C19 phenotypes (CYP2C19 EM, IM, and PM phenotypes, respectively), 49.4%, 40.5%, and 10.1% (no CYP2C19 PM phenotype). EM and IM for CYP2C19 were 52.2% and 47.8%, respectively, with a p-value of 0.05 (Table 1).

Table 1.

The CYP2C19 allele and phenotypes in 102 individuals with Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulcers.

CYP2C19 Gene n Gender p OR, 95% Cl
Allele *2 Male Female
Yes 51 42 (26.6) 9 (19.6) 0.33 1.48, 0.66–3.34
No 153 116 (73.4) 37 (80.4)
Allele *3
Yes 8 6 (3.8) 2 (4.3) 1 0.86, 0.16–4.45
No 196 152 (96.2) 44 (95.7)
Phenotype of EM
Yes 51 39 (49.4) 12 (52.2) 0.81 0.89, 0.35–2.26
No 51 40 (50.6) 11 (47.8)
Phenotype of IM
Yes 43 32 (40.5) 11 (47.8) 0.53 0.74, 0.29–1.88
No 59 47 (59.5) 12 (52.2)
Phenotype of PM
Yes 8 8 (10.1) 0 (0.0) - -
No 94 71 (89.9) 23 (100.0)

Men and women in the study’s 102 H. pylori infected duodenal ulcer patients both had MDR1C3435T alleles and genotypes. The proportion of the MDR1 3435T allele in men was 35.4% lower than that of the 3435T allele, at 64.6%. The rates of the common MDR1 C3435T genotypes were 3435CC and 3435CT, accounting for 44.3% and 40.5%, respectively. The MDR1 genotype 3435CC accounted for the highest proportion of 60.9%, followed by genotypes 3435CT and 3435TT with rates of 34.8% and 21.7%, respectively. In women, MDR1 allele 3435C was 78.3% more common than allele 3435T, at 4.3%. When comparing men and women, there was no difference in the MDR1 C3435T genotype and allele ratios (p > 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2.

MDR1 C3435T allele and genotype ratio in duodenal ulcer patients infected with Helicobacter pylori (n = 102).

Gene MDR1 C3435T n Gender p OR, 95% Cl
Allele 3435T Male Female
Yes 66 56 (35.4) 10 (21.7) 0.08 1.97, 0.91–4.28
No 138 102 (64.6) 36 (78.3)
3435CC genotype
Yes 49 35 (44.3) 14 (60.9) 0.16 0.51, 0.19–1.31
No 53 44 (55.7) 9 (39.1)
3435CT genotype
Yes 40 32 (40.5) 8 (34.8) 0.62 1.27, 0.48–3.36
No 62 47 (59.5) 15 (65.2)
3435TT genotype
Yes 13 12 (15.2) 1 (4.3) 0.28 3.94, 0.48–32.05
No 89 67 (84.8) 22 (95.7)

Among patients with H. pylori-infected duodenal ulcers had the CYP2C19 phenotype and the MDR1 C3435T genotype, the most common combination is CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype, which occurred in 25/102 patients, followed by IM + 3435CC (21/102), IM + 3435CT (18/102) and EM + 3435CT (17/102). Other CYP2C19 phenotype + MDR1 C3435T genotype were less common. There didn’t have MDR1 3435TT genotype + CYP2C19 PM phenotype, in particular (Table 3).

Table 3.

Distribution of CYP2C19 phenotypes and MDR1 C3435T genotypes in duodenal ulcer patients infected with Helicobacter pylori.

CYP2C19 phenotype MDR1 C3435T genotype Total
3435CC 3435CT 3435TT
EM 25 17 9 51
IM 21 18 4 43
PM 3 5 0 8
Total 49 40 13 102

Distribution of Helicobacter pylori eradication results according to CYP2C19 phenotype and MDR1 C3435T genotype.

After H. pylori eradication treatment, 92 patients were examined endoscopically and tested for H. pylori bacteria. We found that the rate of successful H. pylori eradication in patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype was 87.5%, IM was 94.4%, and PM was 100%. There was no difference in H. pylori eradication treatment rates between the CYP2C19 EM vs. IM phenotype (p = 0.45) and the CYP2C19 EM vs. IM+PM phenotype (p = 0.27). Results of successful H. pylori eradication treatment in genotype MDR1: 3435CC was 87.0%, 3435CT was 97.1%, and 3435TT was 90.09%. There was no difference in H. pylori eradication treatment rates in MDR1 genotypes 3435CC vs. 3435CT (p = 0.13), 3435CC vs. 3435TT (p = 1.00), and 3435CC vs. 3435CT + 3435TT (p = 0.26) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Results of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in CYP2C19 phenotype, MDR1 C3435T genotype (n = 92).

Factor n Eradication p OR, 95% Cl
CYP2C19 phenotype Success Failure
EM 48 42 (87.5) 6 (12.5) 0.45 0.41, 0.07–2.17
IM 36 34 (94.4) 2 (5.6)
CYP2C19 phenotype
EM 48 42 (87.5) 6 (12.5) 0.27 0.33, 0.06–1.74
IM + PM 44 42 (95.5) 2 (4.5)
MDR1 C3435T genotype
3435CC 46 40 (87.0) 6 (13.0) 0.13 0.19, 0.02–1.71
3435CT 35 34 (97.1) 1 (2.9)
MDR1 C3435T genotype
3435CC 46 40 (87.0) 6 (13.0) 1 0.66, 0.07–6.18
3435TT 11 10 (90.9) 1 (9.1)
MDR1 C3435T genotype
3435CC 46 40 (87.0) 6 (13.0) 0.26 0.30, 0.05–1.58
3435CT + 3435TT 46 44 (95.7) 2 (4.3)

Regarding the factors of CYP2C19 phenotype and MDR1 C3435T genotype affecting the efficacy of treatment for eradication of H. pylori, we found the H. pylori eradication treatment rate in the group of patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype and the MDR1 3435CC genotype was 80.0%, significantly lower than the rate in the group of patients without both phenotypes and genotypes. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the group without co-factors and the CYP2C19 phenotype (EM + IM) + MDR1 genotype (3435CC + 3435TT) of 90.4% in terms of the efficiency of H. pylori eradication treatment. The times for both phenotype and genotype above were 94.7% (p = 1.00). In the CYP2C19 (EM + IM) phenotype and MDR1 3435CC genotype, the H. pylori eradication treatment rate was 86.0%, compared with the group without both phenotypes and genotypes at 95.9% (p = 0.14). The eradication rate of H. pylori therapy was 87.2% in the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 genotype (3435CC + 3435TT), compared to the group lacking both phenotypes and genotypes at 94.3% (p = 0.27) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Results of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in CYP2C19 phenotype + MDR1 C3435T genotype (n = 92).

Factor n Eradication p OR, 95% Cl
(EM+IM) + (3435CC + 3435CT) Success Failure
Yes 73 66 (90.4) 7 (9.6) 1 0.52, 0.06–4.53
No 19 18 (94.7) 1 (5.3)
(EM + IM) + 3435CC
Yes 43 37 (86.0) 6 (14.0) 0.14 0.26, 0.05–1.37
No 49 47 (95.9) 2 (4.1)
EM + (3435CC + 3435CT)
Yes 39 34 (87.2) 5 (12.8) 0.27 0.40, 0.09–1.82
No 53 50 (94.3) 3 (5.7)
EM + 3435CC
Yes 25 20 (80.0) 5 (20.0) 0.03 0.18, 0.04–0.85
No 67 64 (95.5) 3 (4.5)

We performed a multivariable regression analysis of factors affecting treatment outcomes, including age group (≥60 vs. <60), gender (female vs. male), the density of H. pylori (moderate and severe vs. mild), drinking alcohol (no vs. yes), smoking (no vs. yes), and CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype (no vs. yes). The results suggested that sex and CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype were related to the effects of H. pylori eradication treatment, respectively (p < 0.01, OR = 38.77, 95%CI: 3.98–377.09) and (p = 0.01, OR = 13.64, 95%CI: 1.73–107.19) (Table 6).

Table 6.

Multivariate regression analysis of factors affecting the outcomes of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment (n = 92).

Factor OR 95% Cl P
Age: ≥60 4.41 0.20–94.74 0.34
Gender: female 38.77 3.98–377.09 <0.01
Density of H. pylori: moderate and severe 7.12 0.85–59.13 0.06
Drinking alcohol: yes 2.91 0.19–43.00 0.43
Smoking: yes 1.44 0.09–21.86 0.79
CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype: yes 13.64 1.73–107.19 0.01

The treatment rate of H. pylori eradication in female patients with CYP2C19 EM and the MDR1 3435CC genotype was 20.0%, significantly lower than that of female patients without both phenotypes and genotypes at 91.7% (p = 0.01, OR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.00–0.45). However, there was no difference in the efficacy of H. pylori eradication treatment in male patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype compared to the group without both phenotypes and genotypes, 90.4% vs. 94.7% (p = 1.00) (Table 7).

Table 7.

Results of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in CYP2C19EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype by gender.

Factor n Eradication p OR, 95% Cl
Male: EM and 3435CC Success Failure
Yes 20 19 (95.0) 1 (5.0) 1 0.71, 0.06–8.36
No 55 53 (96.4) 2 (3.6)
Female: EM and 3435CC
Yes 5 1 (20.0) 4 (80.0) 0.01 0.02, 0.00–0.45
No 12 11 (91.7) 1 (8.3)

The treatment rate of H. pylori eradication in female patients with CYP2C19 EM and the MDR1 3435CC genotype was 20.0%, significantly lower than that of female patients without both phenotypes and genotypes at 91.7% (p = 0.01, OR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.00–0.45). However, there was no difference in the efficacy of H. pylori eradication treatment in male patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype compared to the group without both phenotypes and genotypes, 90.4% vs. 94.7% (p = 1.00) (Table 7).

Discussion

The relationship between the CYP2C19 phenotype and the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori treatment

Research results showed that the rate of successful H. pylori eradication treatment in CYP2C19 EM phenotype is 87.5%, IM is 97.2%, and PM is 100%. There was no difference in the H. pylori eradication treatment rate between the CYP2C19 EM phenotypes compared with IM and IM + PM (p > 0.05). According to a study by Bui Huu Hoang on 186 patients - H. pylori eradication therapy was based on an antibiogram with the PPI drug esomeprazole; the results were consistent with several studies in Vietnam. The eradication rate of H. pylori success was not different between groups, and the phenotype of CYP2C19 EM was 84.7%, IM was 80.8%, and PM was 81.8%, with p > 0.05 (Hoang et al. 2017). According to research by Ho Tan Phat on 97 patients who had previously failed to get rid of H. pylori, the eradication rate increased while using the EBTM regimen (esomeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole) for 14 days. Across groups of CYP2C19 phenotypes, effective H. pylori eradication did not vary (in patients with successful H. pylori eradication, the CYP2C19 EM phenotypic rate was 48.9%, IM phenotypic rate was 41.3%, and the PM phenotypic ratio was reported to be 48.9%, IM, and PM is 9.8%, with p > 0.05) (Phat et al. 2018).

Several studies worldwide had shown the influence of the CYP2C19 phenotype on H. pylori eradication treatment results. According to Okimoto T.’s research on H. pylori eradication treatment in 111 patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer/duodenal ulcer, atrophic gastritis, and gastric cancer with the RAC regimen (rabeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin) for seven days, the success rate of H. pylori eradication treatment in the CYP2C19 EM phenotype was 69.7%, IM was 74.4%, and PM was 68.4%, CYP2C19 phenotype did not affect treatment outcome. In 108 patients treated for seven days with EAC regimens (esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin), the success rate in the CYP2C19 EM phenotype was 77.3%, the IM phenotype was 75.5%, and the PM phenotype was 71.4%; the CYP2C19 phenotype had no effect on treatment outcome (Okimoto et al. 2016). In research by Lin T.J. H. pylori eradication treatment in 88 patients with a 14-day serial regimen with the PPI drug rabeprazole, in the successful H. pylori eradication group, the phenotype rate of CYP2C19 EM was 41.77%, IM was 45.57%, and PM was 12.66%. In the failed H. pylori eradication therapy group, the phenotype rate of CYP2C19 EM was 66.67%, IM was 16.67%, and PM was 16.67%. The CYP2C19 phenotype did not affect the outcome of H. pylori treatment (Lin et al. 2018). The study of Auttajaroon J. treated over 100 patients with dyspeptic H. pylori infection for seven days (47 patients) and 14 days (53 patients) with an RBCL regimen (rabeprazole, bismuth, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin). The rate of successful H. pylori eradication in the group of patients treated for seven days in the CYP2C19 RM phenotype was 92.0%, IM was 81.0%, and PM was 100%. The rate of successful H. pylori eradication in the 14-day group of patients with the CYP2C19 RM phenotype was 96.3%, IM was 93.3%, and PM was 100%. The CYP2C19 phenotype did not affect the outcome of H. pylori treatment (Auttajaroon and Vilaichone 2019). Our results were consistent with the above studies. When using a bismuth 4-drug regimen with the proton pump inhibitor rabeprazole, the CYP2C19 phenotype did not affect the results of H. pylori treatment.

The relationship between the genotype of MDR1 C3435T and the effectiveness of treatment of Helicobacter pylori

The study results showed no difference in the successful H. pylori eradication treatment rate between genotypes MDR1 3435CC compared with 3435CT, 3435TT, and 3435CT + 3435TT, respectively (p > 0.05). The research results were consistent with several studies worldwide on the influence of the MDR1 C3435T gene on the results of H. pylori eradication treatment. According to the Oh J.H. study on H. pylori eradication treatment on 210 patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastritis infected with H. pylori with a three-drug regimen PAC (pantoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin) for seven days; the successful eradication rate of H. pylori in patients with genotype MDR1 3435CC, 3435CT, and 3435TT was 82.7%, 84.4%, and 76.9%, respectively; there was no difference in the eradication treatment rate successful eradication of H. pylori among MDR1 genotype groups 3435CC, 3435CT, and 3435TT, with p > 0.05 (Oh et al. 2009). According to Gawronska-Szklarz B. study on H. pylori eradication treatment with a three-drug regimen of PAM (pantoprazole, amoxicillin, metronidazole) in 139 peptic ulcer patients infected with H. pylori, eradication treatment rate H. pylori success in patients with genotype MDR1 3435CC is 75.0%, 3435CT is 73.77%, and 3435TT is 73.53%; the rate of H. pylori eradication treatment failure in the group of patients with genotype MDR1 3435CC was 25.0%, 3435CT was 26.23%, and 3435TT was 26.47%. The results showed no difference in the H. pylori eradication treatment rate between the genotype groups MDR1 C3435T, with p > 0.05 (Gawronska-Szklarz et al. 2010). According to research by Karaca R.O. on 194 patients with duodenal ulcer and H. pylori-positive gastritis with a serial regimen (pantoprazole, bismuth, amoxicillin) for seven days and then (pantoprazole, metronidazole, bismuth, tetracycline) for seven days; in the group of successful H. pylori eradication treatment, the genotype rate of MDR1 3435CC was 16.1%, 3435CT was 55.2%, and 3435TT was 28.7%; in the group of failed H. pylori eradication, the genotype ratio of MDR1 3435CC was 33.3%, 3435CT was 50.0%, and the 3435TT genotype was 16.7%, there was no difference in the rate of successful H. pylori eradication treatment between genotype groups: MDR1 genes 3435CC, 3435CT, and 3435TT, with p > 0.05 (Karaca et al. 2017). Our study and the above studies showed that the MDR1 C3435T gene polymorphism did not affect the results of H. pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer disease using a PPI-containing regimen such as pantoprazole or rabeprazole.

The relationship between CYP2C19 phenotype + MDR1 C3435T genotype with the results of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment

Patients without the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype had an H. pylori eradication outcome of 95.5% and 80% of the above phenotype + genotype (p = 0.03; OR = 0.18; 95%CI: 0.04–0.85). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, the results of H. pylori eradication treatment were different between the group with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype and neither of the above phenotypes + genotypes (p = 0.01, OR) = 13.64, 95%CI: 1.73–107.19). In male patients, H. pylori eradication efficiency was higher than that of female patients (p < 0.01, OR = 38.77, 95%CI: 3.98–377.09). When analyzing the influence of the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype on the outcome of H. pylori eradication treatment by gender. In females with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 genotype 3435CC, the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication was reduced (p = 0.01, OR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.00–0.45). 3435CC, on the other hand, did not affect the outcome of H. pylori eradication treatment in men with CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 genotype (p = 1.00). The findings were consistent with previous research on Oh J. H. H. pylori eradication treatment with the PAC regimen. In the successful H. pylori eradication group (57% male and 43% female), males had a higher successful H. pylori eradication rate than females (OR = 2.64, p = 0.01) (33). However, the author had not analyzed the influence of CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype on the outcome of H. pylori eradication treatment by gender. We found no comparable studies in Vietnam or around the world to compare with our findings on the influence of CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype on H. pylori results. According to Sugimoto M., the results of H. pylori eradication treatment were affected by many factors, such as antibiotic resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin of the H. pylori bacteria, the fast-metabolizing CYP2C19 genotype, the MDR1 3435CC genotype of the patient, etc. (Sugimoto et al. 2014). In our study, the group of patients with the fast-metabolizing CYP2C19 phenotype (CYP2C19 EM) or the MDR1 3435CC genotype did not affect the outcome of H. pylori eradication when using the RBTT regimen. However, patients with both CYP2C19 EM phenotypes + MDR1 3435CC genotype had a lower rate of successful H. pylori eradication with RBTT regimens than patients without a concurrent phenotype + genotype. In these patients with the MDR1 3435CC genotype, the absorption of PPIs was reduced more than with genotypes 3435CT and 3435TT, possibly resulting in lower blood levels of the drug and leading to a poor inhibitory effected on the gastric acid secretion of PPIs. In patients with the CYP2C19 phenotype, EM metabolized PPIs more rapidly through the liver than the IM and PM phenotypes, resulting in lower blood concentrations of PPIs, resulting in less inhibition of gastric acid secretion compared with the IM and PM phenotypes. Therefore, when a patient has two CYP2C19 EM phenotypes + MDR1 3435CC genotype, it reduces the absorption of PPIs into the body and rapid metabolism of PPIs in the liver, leading to a decrease in blood concentration and decreased inhibition of gastric acid secretion, thereby reducing the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication therapy compared with people without both genotypes.

The strength of our study was to study both the CYP2C19 gene and the MDR1 C3435T gene on the same duodenal ulcer patient. The news in our study was that the results showed that the female sex with both the CYP2C19 EM phenotype and the MDR1 3435CC genotype had lower effectiveness in H. pylori eradication than the group without both of the above phenotypes and genotypes. The weakness in our study was the low number of female patients.

Conclusion

The results of H. pylori eradication treatment in our study found that for female patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype, the rate of H. pylori eradication treatment was lower than that of the group without both phenotype and genotype at the same time. In male patients, there was no difference in the efficacy of H. pylori eradication treatment in the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype compared with the control group. We recommend that in countries with a high ratio of CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype, a low prognosis for H. pylori eradication should be observed. For female patients, more research is needed on the effect of CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype on the results of H. pylori eradication treatment with a larger sample size.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, L.T.N., T.V.T. and V.B.N.; methodology, L.T.N., T.V.T. and V.B.N.; software, L.T.N., T.V.T. and V.B.N.; validation, L.T.N., T.V.T. and V.B.N.; formal analysis, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L.; investigation, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L.; resources, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L.; data curation, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.T.N.; writing—review and editing, L.T.N., M.H.T.P. and T.N.; visualization, L.T.N., M.H.T.P. and T.N.; supervision, L.T.N., L.T.T.L. and T.N.; project administration, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L.; funding acquisition, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional review board statement

The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Vietnam Military Medical University (approval No. 1911/QÐ-HVQY dated 11 August 2015).

Informed consent statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

References

  • Abbas SZ, Abbas AB, Crawshaw A, Shaw S, English J, McGovern D, Vivian G, Dalton HR (2003) Diagnosis and eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulceration in the community. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 53(3): 90–94.
  • Auttajaroon J, Vilaichone RK (2019) Once-daily rabeprazole, levofloxacin, clarithromycin-MR, and bismuth for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized study of 7 or 14 days (ONCE study). Helicobacter 24(5): e12615. https://doi.org/10.1111/hel.12615
  • Berrutti M, Pellicano R, Astegiano M, Smedile A, Saracco G, Morgando A, De Angelis C, Repici A, Fagoonee S, Leone N, Rizzetto M (2008) Helicobacter pylori eradication: metronidazole or tinidazole? Data from Turin, Italy. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 54(4): 355–358.
  • Binh TT, Shiota S, Nguyen LT, Ho DD, Hoang HH, Ta L, Trinh DT, Fujioka T, Yamaoka Y (2013) The incidence of primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Vietnam. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterol 47(3): 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182676e2b
  • Bradley KA, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ, Williams EC, Frank D, Kivlahan DR (2007) AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 31(7): 1208–1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00403.x
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) State-specific secondhand smoke exposure and current cigarette smoking among adults-United States. Morbidity and mortality weekly report 58(44): 1232–1235.
  • Dixon M F, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P (1996) Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. The American journal of surgical pathology 20(10): 1161–1181. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199610000-00001
  • Furuta T, Sugimoto M, Shirai N, Matsushita F, Nakajima H, Kumagai J, Senoo K, Kodaira C, Nishino M, Yamade M, Ikuma M, Watanabe H, Umemura K, Ishizaki T, Hishida A (2007) Effect of MDR1 C3435T polymorphism on cure rates of Helicobacter pylori infection by triple therapy with lansoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin in relation to CYP 2C19 genotypes and 23S rRNA genotypes of H. pylori. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 26(5): 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03408.x
  • Gawrońska-Szklarz B, Siuda A, Kurzawski M, Bielicki D, Marlicz W, Droździk M (2010) Effects of CYP2C19, MDR1, and interleukin 1-B gene variants on the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection by triple therapy with pantoprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 66(7): 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0818-1
  • Gawrońska-Szklarz B, Wrześniewska J, Starzyńska T, Pawlik A, Safranow K, Ferenc K, Droździk M (2005) Effect of CYP2C19 and MDR1 polymorphisms on cure rate in patients with acid-related disorders with Helicobacter pylori infection. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 61(5–6): 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-005-0901-1
  • Hoang HB, Thao TXL, An BL, Thuy TTD (2017) Antibiogram and CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with history of treatment failure. Medical Journal of Ho Chi Minh City 3(21): 120–129.
  • Hoffmeyer S, Burk O, von Richter O, Arnold HP, Brockmöller J, Johne A, Cascorbi I, Gerloff T, Roots I, Eichelbaum M, Brinkmann U (2000) Functional polymorphisms of the human multidrug-resistance gene: multiple sequence variations and correlation of one allele with P-glycoprotein expression and activity in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97(7): 3473–3478. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.7.3473
  • Karaca RO, Kalkisim S, Altinbas A, Kilincalp S, Yuksel I, Goktas MT, Yasar U, Bozkurt A, Babaoglu MO (2017) Effects of genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 enzymes and MDR1 transporter on pantoprazole metabolism and Helicobacter pylori eradication. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology 120(2): 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12667
  • Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, Atherton J, Axon AT, Bazzoli F, Gensini GF, Gisbert JP, Graham DY, Rokkas T (2012) Management of Helicobacter pylori infection the Maastricht IV/ Florence Consensus Report. Gut 61(5): 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302084
  • Kuo CH, Wang SS, Hsu WH, Kuo FC, Weng BC, Li CJ, Hsu PI, Chen A, Hung WC, Yang YC, Wang WM, Wu DC (2010) Rabeprazole can overcome the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism on quadruple therapy. Helicobacter 15(4): 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-5378.2010.00761.x
  • Li Meng LM, Li TaiJie LT, Guo ShiHui GS, Liang HongJie LH, Jiang DunKe JD (2017) The effect of MDR1 C3435T polymorphism on the eradication rate of H. pylori infection in PPI-based triple therapy: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(13): e6489. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006489
  • Lin TJ, Lee HC, Lin CL, Wang CK, Chen KY, Wu DC (2018) CYP2C19 polymorphism has no influence on rabeprazole-based hybrid therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. World Journal of Clinical Cases 6(12): 514–520. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i12.514
  • Maev IV, Andreev DN, Kucheryavyi YA, Dicheva DT (2014) Host Factors Influencing the Eradication Rate of Helicobacter pylori. World Applied Sciences Journal 30(30): 134–140.
  • Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, Bazzoli F, El-Omar E, Graham D, Hunt R, Rokkas T, Vakil N, Kuipers EJ (2007) Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report. Gut 56(6): 772–781. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2006.101634
  • McNicholl AG, Linares PM, Nyssen OP, Calvet X, Gisbert JP (2012) Meta-analysis: esomeprazole or rabeprazole vs. first-generation pump inhibitors in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 36(5): 414–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05211.x
  • Newton CR, Graham A, Heptinstall LE, Powell SJ, Summers C, Kalsheker N, Smith JC, Markham AF (1989) Analysis of any point mutation in DNA. The amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Nucleic Acids Research 17(7): 2503–2516. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.7.2503
  • Oh JH, Dong MS, Choi MG, Yoo HW, Lee SB, Park YI, Chung IS (2009) Effects of CYP2C19 and MDR1 genotype on the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection by triple therapy with pantoprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 24(2): 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05605.x
  • Okimoto T, Mizukami K, Ogawa R, Okamoto K, Shuto M, Fukuda K, Kodama M, Murakami K (2016) Esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-based triple therapy eradicated Helicobacter pylori comparably regardless of clarithromycin susceptibility and CYP2C19 genotypes. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition 59(2): 149–153. https://doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.16-18
  • Ormeci A, Emrence Z, Baran B, Gokturk S, Soyer OM, Evirgen S, Akyuz F, Karaca C, Besisik F, Kaymakoglu S, Ustek D, Demir K (2016) Effect of cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphisms on the Helicobacter pylori eradication rate following two-week triple therapy with pantoprazole or rabeprazole. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences 20(5): 879–885.
  • Pauli-Magnus C, Rekersbrink S, Klotz U, Fromm MF (2001) Interaction of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole with P-glycoprotein. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 364(6): 551–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-001-0489-7
  • Phat TH, Phuong NTAT, Hoa PT, Nguyen PM, Trang TDT, Ai VN, Chau HN, Ngan TKT, Han TNL, Diep THN (2018) Evaluation of the efficacy of a bismuth quadruple regimen and the impact of CYP2C19 genotype in eradicating Helicobacter pylori that have failed prior treatment. Medical Journal of Ho Chi Minh City 5(22): 98–104.
  • Rinaldi Z, Francesco , Hassan , Winn , Stoppino , Faleo , Attili (1999) Helicobacter pylori eradication with proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies and re-treatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy. Aliment Pharmacololy & Therapeutics 13(2): 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00462.x
  • Rouby El, Lima JJ, Johnson JA (2018) Proton pump inhibitors: from CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics to precision medicine. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 14(4): 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2018.1461835
  • Sugimoto M, Furuta T (2014) Efficacy of tailored Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility and CYP2C19 genotype. World Journal of Gastroenterol 20(21): 6400–6411. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6400
  • Svensson M, Ström M, Nilsson M, Sörberg M, Nilsson LE (2002) Pharmacodynamic effects of nitroimidazoles alone and in combination with clarithromycin on Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 46(7): 2244–2248. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.46.7.2244-2248.2002
  • Tang HL, Li Y, Hu YF, Xie HG, Zhai SD (2013) Effects of CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants on the eradication of H. pylori infection in patients treated with proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimens: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. PLOS ONE 8(4): e62162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062162
  • Vietnam Association of Gastroenterology (2013) Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori in Vietnam. Medical Publishing House.
login to comment