Research Article |
Corresponding author: Loan T. T. Le ( ttloan@ctump.edu.vn ) Corresponding author: Thang Nguyen ( nthang@ctump.edu.vn ) Academic editor: Rumiana Simeonova
© 2024 Liem T. Nguyen, Vuong B. Nguyen, Tu V. Tran, Loan T. T. Le, Mai H. T. Phuong, Thang Nguyen.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Nguyen LT, Nguyen VB, Tran TV, Le LTT, Phuong MHT, Nguyen T (2024) Effects of the EM CYP2C19 type and MDR1 3435CC gene on Helicobacter pylori eradication rate in patients with duodenal ulcer by the four-drug regimen of rabeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline, and tinidazole. Pharmacia 71: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.71.e108090
|
Background: The MDR1 genotype and the CYP2C19 phenotype determine how much PPI is absorbed from the gut and how much is processed in the liver.
Objective: To assess the impact of CYP2C19 and MDR1 C3435T gene polymorphisms on the efficiency of H. pylori eradication treatment with a 4-drug regimen of rabeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline, and tinidazole (RBTT) in patients with duodenal ulcers.
Methods: The study was conducted at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Gene polymorphisms for CYP2C19 and MDR1 C3435T were detected through a blood test. The RBTT 4-drug regimen was used to eradicate H. pylori.
Results: The success rate of the RBTT regimen for eradicating H. pylori in female patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype was 20.0% lower than the rate of 91.7% for the group without both phenotype and genotype (p = 0.01, OR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.00–0.45).
Conclusion: Compared to the group lacking both phenotypes and genotypes, female patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype had a lower rate of H. pylori eradication by RBTT regimen.
Helicobacter pylori, CYP2C19, MDR1 C3435T
Upper gastrointestinal conditions such as peptic ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and duodenal ulcer were associated with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection (
33% of H. pylori in Vietnam were resistant to clarithromycin (
The nitroimidazole class of antibiotics included the drugs metronidazole and tinidazole. On the other hand, Tinidazole might have certain benefits over metronidazole, according to some studies. When cultivating H. pylori bacteria and creating antibiograms, metronidazole and clarithromycin were less sensitive to H. pylori bacteria than tinidazole and clarithromycin (
Orally administered PPIs were absorbed through the gastrointestinal mucosa by the membrane transport enzyme P-glycoprotein encoded by the gene MDR1 (
As a result, we decided to investigate whether the CYP2C19 phenotype and the MDR1 C3435T genotype had an impact on the outcomes of the 4-drug regimen with bismuth used to treat H. pylori in Vietnamese patients. This regimen consists of rabeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline, and tinidazole (RBTT) and was administered for 14 days.
Patients at the Hospital of Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy who had duodenal ulcers and had H. pylori infection from 2015 to 2016.
The patient was diagnosed with duodenal ulcer (Endoscopy with duodenal ulcer ≥ 5 mm), H. pylori infection diagnosis (both rapid urease test and positive histopathology), and non-treatment H. pylori before. Patients who were at least 18 years old. All participants gave informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion standards for pre-treatment: patients who had undergone gastric bypass surgery before, problems from a duodenal ulcer, including bleeding from the stomach and perforation. Cirrhosis, cancer, and Crohn’s disease patients who also had other serious diseases. Women who were breastfeeding and pregnant. In addition to aspirin, the patient was taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicines. The patient had a history of medication allergies to the ones used in the trial.
Patients who deliberately modified their drug regimens or unilaterally utilized medicines for ailments other than those recommended by their doctors were excluded from receiving treatment (such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, etc.).
Type of study: intervention progress, longitudinal follow-up.
Olympus GIF 180 gastroduodenal endoscope from Japan. To fix the stomach mucosa biopsy specimen, the vial included 10% neutral formalin. EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) anticoagulant in 5 mL test tubes. Nam Khoa Trading Service Company Limited, Ho Chi Minh City, provided the sample for the fast urease test (NK-Pylori test).
The Applied Biosystem’s PCR machine system 9700 and Beckman Coulter’s CEQ 8800 sequencers were used to evaluate the CYP2C19 and MDR1 C3435T genes, respectively.
Drugs for treating duodenal ulcers and getting rid of H. pylori were from the hospital pharmacy of Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Brand name Pariet 20 mg of the Japanese manufacturer Eisai for rabeprazole sodium. Trymo 120 mg, Colloidal Bismuth Subcitrate 120 mg, Raptakos Brett Company, India. Tinidazole 500 mg (brand name Tinidazol 500 mg), Tetracycline Hydrochloride 500 mg (trade name Tetracyclin 500 mg) by Domesco Company, Vietnam.
Of the 102 participants in the trial, 22 were qualified for therapy and genetic testing for the CYP2C19 and MDR1C3435T genes. Ten patients who were eligible for inclusion in the study of the efficacy of the RBTT regimen but did not return for a follow-up exam and endoscopic diagnosis of H. pylori and 92 re-examination patients who were eligible (Fig.
Of the 102 duodenal ulcer patients who participated in the study, male patients made up 77.5% of the group, while female patients made up 22.5%. Men had a proportion of the CYP2C19*2 and *3 alleles of 26.6% and 3.8%, respectively, whereas females had a proportion of 19.6% and 4.3%. With p = 0.33 and p = 1.00, respectively, there was no difference in the proportions of the *2 and *3 alleles in males compared to females. Similar to how there was no difference between males and females in the ratio of CYP2C19 phenotypes (CYP2C19 EM, IM, and PM phenotypes, respectively), 49.4%, 40.5%, and 10.1% (no CYP2C19 PM phenotype). EM and IM for CYP2C19 were 52.2% and 47.8%, respectively, with a p-value of 0.05 (Table
The CYP2C19 allele and phenotypes in 102 individuals with Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulcers.
CYP2C19 Gene | n | Gender | p | OR, 95% Cl | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allele *2 | Male | Female | |||
Yes | 51 | 42 (26.6) | 9 (19.6) | 0.33 | 1.48, 0.66–3.34 |
No | 153 | 116 (73.4) | 37 (80.4) | ||
Allele *3 | |||||
Yes | 8 | 6 (3.8) | 2 (4.3) | 1 | 0.86, 0.16–4.45 |
No | 196 | 152 (96.2) | 44 (95.7) | ||
Phenotype of EM | |||||
Yes | 51 | 39 (49.4) | 12 (52.2) | 0.81 | 0.89, 0.35–2.26 |
No | 51 | 40 (50.6) | 11 (47.8) | ||
Phenotype of IM | |||||
Yes | 43 | 32 (40.5) | 11 (47.8) | 0.53 | 0.74, 0.29–1.88 |
No | 59 | 47 (59.5) | 12 (52.2) | ||
Phenotype of PM | |||||
Yes | 8 | 8 (10.1) | 0 (0.0) | - | - |
No | 94 | 71 (89.9) | 23 (100.0) |
Men and women in the study’s 102 H. pylori infected duodenal ulcer patients both had MDR1C3435T alleles and genotypes. The proportion of the MDR1 3435T allele in men was 35.4% lower than that of the 3435T allele, at 64.6%. The rates of the common MDR1 C3435T genotypes were 3435CC and 3435CT, accounting for 44.3% and 40.5%, respectively. The MDR1 genotype 3435CC accounted for the highest proportion of 60.9%, followed by genotypes 3435CT and 3435TT with rates of 34.8% and 21.7%, respectively. In women, MDR1 allele 3435C was 78.3% more common than allele 3435T, at 4.3%. When comparing men and women, there was no difference in the MDR1 C3435T genotype and allele ratios (p > 0.05) (Table
MDR1 C3435T allele and genotype ratio in duodenal ulcer patients infected with Helicobacter pylori (n = 102).
Gene MDR1 C3435T | n | Gender | p | OR, 95% Cl | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allele 3435T | Male | Female | |||
Yes | 66 | 56 (35.4) | 10 (21.7) | 0.08 | 1.97, 0.91–4.28 |
No | 138 | 102 (64.6) | 36 (78.3) | ||
3435CC genotype | |||||
Yes | 49 | 35 (44.3) | 14 (60.9) | 0.16 | 0.51, 0.19–1.31 |
No | 53 | 44 (55.7) | 9 (39.1) | ||
3435CT genotype | |||||
Yes | 40 | 32 (40.5) | 8 (34.8) | 0.62 | 1.27, 0.48–3.36 |
No | 62 | 47 (59.5) | 15 (65.2) | ||
3435TT genotype | |||||
Yes | 13 | 12 (15.2) | 1 (4.3) | 0.28 | 3.94, 0.48–32.05 |
No | 89 | 67 (84.8) | 22 (95.7) |
Among patients with H. pylori-infected duodenal ulcers had the CYP2C19 phenotype and the MDR1 C3435T genotype, the most common combination is CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype, which occurred in 25/102 patients, followed by IM + 3435CC (21/102), IM + 3435CT (18/102) and EM + 3435CT (17/102). Other CYP2C19 phenotype + MDR1 C3435T genotype were less common. There didn’t have MDR1 3435TT genotype + CYP2C19 PM phenotype, in particular (Table
Distribution of CYP2C19 phenotypes and MDR1 C3435T genotypes in duodenal ulcer patients infected with Helicobacter pylori.
CYP2C19 phenotype | MDR1 C3435T genotype | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
3435CC | 3435CT | 3435TT | ||
EM | 25 | 17 | 9 | 51 |
IM | 21 | 18 | 4 | 43 |
PM | 3 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
Total | 49 | 40 | 13 | 102 |
Distribution of Helicobacter pylori eradication results according to CYP2C19 phenotype and MDR1 C3435T genotype.
After H. pylori eradication treatment, 92 patients were examined endoscopically and tested for H. pylori bacteria. We found that the rate of successful H. pylori eradication in patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype was 87.5%, IM was 94.4%, and PM was 100%. There was no difference in H. pylori eradication treatment rates between the CYP2C19 EM vs. IM phenotype (p = 0.45) and the CYP2C19 EM vs. IM+PM phenotype (p = 0.27). Results of successful H. pylori eradication treatment in genotype MDR1: 3435CC was 87.0%, 3435CT was 97.1%, and 3435TT was 90.09%. There was no difference in H. pylori eradication treatment rates in MDR1 genotypes 3435CC vs. 3435CT (p = 0.13), 3435CC vs. 3435TT (p = 1.00), and 3435CC vs. 3435CT + 3435TT (p = 0.26) (Table
Results of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in CYP2C19 phenotype, MDR1 C3435T genotype (n = 92).
Factor | n | Eradication | p | OR, 95% Cl | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP2C19 phenotype | Success | Failure | |||
EM | 48 | 42 (87.5) | 6 (12.5) | 0.45 | 0.41, 0.07–2.17 |
IM | 36 | 34 (94.4) | 2 (5.6) | ||
CYP2C19 phenotype | |||||
EM | 48 | 42 (87.5) | 6 (12.5) | 0.27 | 0.33, 0.06–1.74 |
IM + PM | 44 | 42 (95.5) | 2 (4.5) | ||
MDR1 C3435T genotype | |||||
3435CC | 46 | 40 (87.0) | 6 (13.0) | 0.13 | 0.19, 0.02–1.71 |
3435CT | 35 | 34 (97.1) | 1 (2.9) | ||
MDR1 C3435T genotype | |||||
3435CC | 46 | 40 (87.0) | 6 (13.0) | 1 | 0.66, 0.07–6.18 |
3435TT | 11 | 10 (90.9) | 1 (9.1) | ||
MDR1 C3435T genotype | |||||
3435CC | 46 | 40 (87.0) | 6 (13.0) | 0.26 | 0.30, 0.05–1.58 |
3435CT + 3435TT | 46 | 44 (95.7) | 2 (4.3) |
Regarding the factors of CYP2C19 phenotype and MDR1 C3435T genotype affecting the efficacy of treatment for eradication of H. pylori, we found the H. pylori eradication treatment rate in the group of patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype and the MDR1 3435CC genotype was 80.0%, significantly lower than the rate in the group of patients without both phenotypes and genotypes. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the group without co-factors and the CYP2C19 phenotype (EM + IM) + MDR1 genotype (3435CC + 3435TT) of 90.4% in terms of the efficiency of H. pylori eradication treatment. The times for both phenotype and genotype above were 94.7% (p = 1.00). In the CYP2C19 (EM + IM) phenotype and MDR1 3435CC genotype, the H. pylori eradication treatment rate was 86.0%, compared with the group without both phenotypes and genotypes at 95.9% (p = 0.14). The eradication rate of H. pylori therapy was 87.2% in the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 genotype (3435CC + 3435TT), compared to the group lacking both phenotypes and genotypes at 94.3% (p = 0.27) (Table
Results of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in CYP2C19 phenotype + MDR1 C3435T genotype (n = 92).
Factor | n | Eradication | p | OR, 95% Cl | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(EM+IM) + (3435CC + 3435CT) | Success | Failure | |||
Yes | 73 | 66 (90.4) | 7 (9.6) | 1 | 0.52, 0.06–4.53 |
No | 19 | 18 (94.7) | 1 (5.3) | ||
(EM + IM) + 3435CC | |||||
Yes | 43 | 37 (86.0) | 6 (14.0) | 0.14 | 0.26, 0.05–1.37 |
No | 49 | 47 (95.9) | 2 (4.1) | ||
EM + (3435CC + 3435CT) | |||||
Yes | 39 | 34 (87.2) | 5 (12.8) | 0.27 | 0.40, 0.09–1.82 |
No | 53 | 50 (94.3) | 3 (5.7) | ||
EM + 3435CC | |||||
Yes | 25 | 20 (80.0) | 5 (20.0) | 0.03 | 0.18, 0.04–0.85 |
No | 67 | 64 (95.5) | 3 (4.5) |
We performed a multivariable regression analysis of factors affecting treatment outcomes, including age group (≥60 vs. <60), gender (female vs. male), the density of H. pylori (moderate and severe vs. mild), drinking alcohol (no vs. yes), smoking (no vs. yes), and CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype (no vs. yes). The results suggested that sex and CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype were related to the effects of H. pylori eradication treatment, respectively (p < 0.01, OR = 38.77, 95%CI: 3.98–377.09) and (p = 0.01, OR = 13.64, 95%CI: 1.73–107.19) (Table
Multivariate regression analysis of factors affecting the outcomes of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment (n = 92).
Factor | OR | 95% Cl | P |
---|---|---|---|
Age: ≥60 | 4.41 | 0.20–94.74 | 0.34 |
Gender: female | 38.77 | 3.98–377.09 | <0.01 |
Density of H. pylori: moderate and severe | 7.12 | 0.85–59.13 | 0.06 |
Drinking alcohol: yes | 2.91 | 0.19–43.00 | 0.43 |
Smoking: yes | 1.44 | 0.09–21.86 | 0.79 |
CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype: yes | 13.64 | 1.73–107.19 | 0.01 |
The treatment rate of H. pylori eradication in female patients with CYP2C19 EM and the MDR1 3435CC genotype was 20.0%, significantly lower than that of female patients without both phenotypes and genotypes at 91.7% (p = 0.01, OR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.00–0.45). However, there was no difference in the efficacy of H. pylori eradication treatment in male patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype compared to the group without both phenotypes and genotypes, 90.4% vs. 94.7% (p = 1.00) (Table
Results of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in CYP2C19EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype by gender.
Factor | n | Eradication | p | OR, 95% Cl | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male: EM and 3435CC | Success | Failure | |||
Yes | 20 | 19 (95.0) | 1 (5.0) | 1 | 0.71, 0.06–8.36 |
No | 55 | 53 (96.4) | 2 (3.6) | ||
Female: EM and 3435CC | |||||
Yes | 5 | 1 (20.0) | 4 (80.0) | 0.01 | 0.02, 0.00–0.45 |
No | 12 | 11 (91.7) | 1 (8.3) |
The treatment rate of H. pylori eradication in female patients with CYP2C19 EM and the MDR1 3435CC genotype was 20.0%, significantly lower than that of female patients without both phenotypes and genotypes at 91.7% (p = 0.01, OR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.00–0.45). However, there was no difference in the efficacy of H. pylori eradication treatment in male patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype compared to the group without both phenotypes and genotypes, 90.4% vs. 94.7% (p = 1.00) (Table
Research results showed that the rate of successful H. pylori eradication treatment in CYP2C19 EM phenotype is 87.5%, IM is 97.2%, and PM is 100%. There was no difference in the H. pylori eradication treatment rate between the CYP2C19 EM phenotypes compared with IM and IM + PM (p > 0.05). According to a study by Bui Huu Hoang on 186 patients - H. pylori eradication therapy was based on an antibiogram with the PPI drug esomeprazole; the results were consistent with several studies in Vietnam. The eradication rate of H. pylori success was not different between groups, and the phenotype of CYP2C19 EM was 84.7%, IM was 80.8%, and PM was 81.8%, with p > 0.05 (
Several studies worldwide had shown the influence of the CYP2C19 phenotype on H. pylori eradication treatment results. According to Okimoto T.’s research on H. pylori eradication treatment in 111 patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer/duodenal ulcer, atrophic gastritis, and gastric cancer with the RAC regimen (rabeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin) for seven days, the success rate of H. pylori eradication treatment in the CYP2C19 EM phenotype was 69.7%, IM was 74.4%, and PM was 68.4%, CYP2C19 phenotype did not affect treatment outcome. In 108 patients treated for seven days with EAC regimens (esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin), the success rate in the CYP2C19 EM phenotype was 77.3%, the IM phenotype was 75.5%, and the PM phenotype was 71.4%; the CYP2C19 phenotype had no effect on treatment outcome (
The study results showed no difference in the successful H. pylori eradication treatment rate between genotypes MDR1 3435CC compared with 3435CT, 3435TT, and 3435CT + 3435TT, respectively (p > 0.05). The research results were consistent with several studies worldwide on the influence of the MDR1 C3435T gene on the results of H. pylori eradication treatment. According to the Oh J.H. study on H. pylori eradication treatment on 210 patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastritis infected with H. pylori with a three-drug regimen PAC (pantoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin) for seven days; the successful eradication rate of H. pylori in patients with genotype MDR1 3435CC, 3435CT, and 3435TT was 82.7%, 84.4%, and 76.9%, respectively; there was no difference in the eradication treatment rate successful eradication of H. pylori among MDR1 genotype groups 3435CC, 3435CT, and 3435TT, with p > 0.05 (
Patients without the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype had an H. pylori eradication outcome of 95.5% and 80% of the above phenotype + genotype (p = 0.03; OR = 0.18; 95%CI: 0.04–0.85). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, the results of H. pylori eradication treatment were different between the group with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype and neither of the above phenotypes + genotypes (p = 0.01, OR) = 13.64, 95%CI: 1.73–107.19). In male patients, H. pylori eradication efficiency was higher than that of female patients (p < 0.01, OR = 38.77, 95%CI: 3.98–377.09). When analyzing the influence of the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype on the outcome of H. pylori eradication treatment by gender. In females with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 genotype 3435CC, the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication was reduced (p = 0.01, OR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.00–0.45). 3435CC, on the other hand, did not affect the outcome of H. pylori eradication treatment in men with CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 genotype (p = 1.00). The findings were consistent with previous research on Oh J. H. H. pylori eradication treatment with the PAC regimen. In the successful H. pylori eradication group (57% male and 43% female), males had a higher successful H. pylori eradication rate than females (OR = 2.64, p = 0.01) (33). However, the author had not analyzed the influence of CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype on the outcome of H. pylori eradication treatment by gender. We found no comparable studies in Vietnam or around the world to compare with our findings on the influence of CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype on H. pylori results. According to Sugimoto M., the results of H. pylori eradication treatment were affected by many factors, such as antibiotic resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin of the H. pylori bacteria, the fast-metabolizing CYP2C19 genotype, the MDR1 3435CC genotype of the patient, etc. (Sugimoto et al. 2014). In our study, the group of patients with the fast-metabolizing CYP2C19 phenotype (CYP2C19 EM) or the MDR1 3435CC genotype did not affect the outcome of H. pylori eradication when using the RBTT regimen. However, patients with both CYP2C19 EM phenotypes + MDR1 3435CC genotype had a lower rate of successful H. pylori eradication with RBTT regimens than patients without a concurrent phenotype + genotype. In these patients with the MDR1 3435CC genotype, the absorption of PPIs was reduced more than with genotypes 3435CT and 3435TT, possibly resulting in lower blood levels of the drug and leading to a poor inhibitory effected on the gastric acid secretion of PPIs. In patients with the CYP2C19 phenotype, EM metabolized PPIs more rapidly through the liver than the IM and PM phenotypes, resulting in lower blood concentrations of PPIs, resulting in less inhibition of gastric acid secretion compared with the IM and PM phenotypes. Therefore, when a patient has two CYP2C19 EM phenotypes + MDR1 3435CC genotype, it reduces the absorption of PPIs into the body and rapid metabolism of PPIs in the liver, leading to a decrease in blood concentration and decreased inhibition of gastric acid secretion, thereby reducing the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication therapy compared with people without both genotypes.
The strength of our study was to study both the CYP2C19 gene and the MDR1 C3435T gene on the same duodenal ulcer patient. The news in our study was that the results showed that the female sex with both the CYP2C19 EM phenotype and the MDR1 3435CC genotype had lower effectiveness in H. pylori eradication than the group without both of the above phenotypes and genotypes. The weakness in our study was the low number of female patients.
The results of H. pylori eradication treatment in our study found that for female patients with the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype, the rate of H. pylori eradication treatment was lower than that of the group without both phenotype and genotype at the same time. In male patients, there was no difference in the efficacy of H. pylori eradication treatment in the CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype compared with the control group. We recommend that in countries with a high ratio of CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype, a low prognosis for H. pylori eradication should be observed. For female patients, more research is needed on the effect of CYP2C19 EM phenotype + MDR1 3435CC genotype on the results of H. pylori eradication treatment with a larger sample size.
Conceptualization, L.T.N., T.V.T. and V.B.N.; methodology, L.T.N., T.V.T. and V.B.N.; software, L.T.N., T.V.T. and V.B.N.; validation, L.T.N., T.V.T. and V.B.N.; formal analysis, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L.; investigation, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L.; resources, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L.; data curation, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.T.N.; writing—review and editing, L.T.N., M.H.T.P. and T.N.; visualization, L.T.N., M.H.T.P. and T.N.; supervision, L.T.N., L.T.T.L. and T.N.; project administration, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L.; funding acquisition, L.T.N. and L.T.T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research received no external funding.
The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Vietnam Military Medical University (approval No. 1911/QÐ-HVQY dated 11 August 2015).
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.