Research Article |
Corresponding author: Embun Suci Nasution ( embun@usu.ac.id ) Academic editor: Rumiana Simeonova
© 2023 Embun Suci Nasution, Hari Ronaldo Tanjung, Inggianti Putri.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Nasution ES, Tanjung HR, Putri I (2023) Evaluation of antibiotics using ATC/DDD and DU 90% methods on ICU patients at Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital. Pharmacia 70(4): 1223-1230. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.70.e103566
|
Background: Evaluation of the use of antibiotics is the control of antimicrobial resistance. The ATC/DDD method was recommended to evaluate drug use quantitatively which can be used to compare the quantity of antibiotic use between hospitals and between countries. This research was a descriptive study with retrospective data collection cross-sectional. This research was conducted at the ICU of Universitas Sumatera Utara hospital in August-November 2022 from medical record data for the period January-December 2021 which included patient demographics, patient diagnoses, antibiotic dosage forms, routes of administration, types of antibiotics, dosage, duration of antibiotics use, and duration of treatment.
Methods: Evaluation of antibiotic doses using the ATC/DDD method. The results of the study from 57 medical records that met the inclusion criteria showed that the ICU patients who used the most antibiotics were male (59.7%), the age group was >56 years (56.14%), patient diagnoses with COVID-19 (33.33%), and the dosage form was injection with the intravenous route of administration. The most frequently used antibiotics were levofloxacin (48.54%) 45.61 DDD/100 patient-days and ceftriaxone (30.06%) 28.25 DDD/100 patient-days, and the average value of Length of Stay (LOS) is 5.4 ±3.98 days with a total DDD/100 patient-days value of 93.96 (reference value of 51–67 DDD/100 patient-days). DU 90% segment namely levofloxacin (48.69%), ceftriaxone (30.16%) and meropenem (12.82%). The results of the study concluded that the use of antibiotics in ICU patients at Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital showed a high DDD/100 patient-days rate. Therefore, it is necessary for hospital to continuously monitor and evaluated the rational use of antibiotics to prevent resistance of antibiotics.
antibiotics, ATC/DDD method, ICU, DU 90%
Infectious diseases are caused by the entry and multiplication of microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, and protozoa, into the body, causing organ damage. Most infections are caused by bacteria (
The Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is an organizational unit for special clinical services that is separate from other units and operates in an integrated manner with other departments in a hospital (
This was a descriptive study with retrospective cross-sectional data collection. The medication records of all patients in the ICU used antibiotics at the Universitas Sumatera Utara hospital period January and December 2021. This study included patients who met the inclusion criteria. Medication record sheets were reviewed to gather necessary information (sex, age, diagnosis, dosage forms, route of administration, LOS, type of antibiotic, dosage, and duration of antibiotic use). The inclusion criteria were as follows:
Quantitative evaluation of antibiotics using the ATC/DDD method from the collected data is then grouped by type antibiotics, dosage forms, dose, ATC code classification, and the DDD value set by the WHO Collaborating Center for Drugs Statistics Methodology via the website (http://www.wwhocc.no/atc-ddd-index). The number of uses was then calculated (frequency multiplied by the number of days of hospitalization when the patient received antibiotics), total strength of antibiotics used (strength × number usage), total per group, total days of stay, or Length of Stay (LOS) during ICU treatment. Quantitative analysis was performed using the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) method unit DDD/100 patient-days using the following formula:
(WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. [accessed on 13 October 2022]).
Evaluation of the use of antibiotics using the DU 90% method of the ATC/DDD calculation results was entered into the formula:
Drug utilization (DU) of 90% was obtained by dividing the number of DDD/100 patient-days of antibiotics by the total DDD/100 patient-days of all antibiotics used in ICU patients, and then multiplying by 100%. The percentage of antibiotic use is then accumulated and sorted from the highest to the lowest percentage (WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. [accessed on 13 October 2022]). Antibiotic utilization was based on the ATC code issued by the WHO. The choice of antibiotic code was based on the diagnosis of the disease (WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. [accessed on 13 October 2022]).
The data are presented in the form of percentage tables, and average values were processed using Microsoft Excel.
This study included 57 medical records that met our inclusion criteria. The patient characteristics included sex, age, diagnosis, comorbidity, and LOS, as shown in Table
Characteristics of ICU Patients at USU Hospital Period January-December 2021.
Gender | Total |
---|---|
Male | 34 (59.7%) |
Female | 23 (40.3%) |
Age (years) | |
18–25 | 1 (1.8%) |
26–35 | 5 (8.8%) |
36–45 | 10 (17.5%) |
46–55 | 9 (15.8%) |
>56 | 32 (56.14%) |
Diagnosis | |
Covid-19 | 19 (33.33%) |
Decreased awareness of various causes | 12 (21.05%) |
Post-surgical | 12 (21.05%) |
Respiratory failure | 2 (3.50%) |
Acute lung edema | 1 (1.75%) |
Antibody dependent enhancement | 1 (1.75%) |
Pleural effusion | 1 (1.75%) |
Chronic kidney failure | 1 (1.75%) |
Hematoma | 1 (1.75%) |
Massive haemoptysis | 1 (1.75%) |
Uterine myoma | 1 (1.75%) |
Head bleeding | 1 (17.5%) |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) | 1 (1.75%) |
Status epilepticus | 1 (1.75%) |
Hemorrhagic stroke | 1 (1.75%) |
Ischemic stroke | 1 (1.75%) |
Comorbidity | |
Community acquired pneumonia | 9 (52.95%) |
Sepsis | 5 (29.41%) |
Hospital-acquired pneumonia | 2 (11.76%) |
Tuberculosis | 1 (5.88%) |
Length of stay (days) | |
≤4 | 30 (52.63%) |
5–9 | 18 (31.57%) |
≥10 | 9 (15.78%) |
During the study period, the total population comprised 102 medical records, and 57 medical records were samples that met the inclusion criteria. Table
The study revealed that patients aged >56 years were the most frequently used antibiotics. This is similar to
The most common diagnosis that warranted admission to the ICU was COVID-19, followed by decreased awareness of various causes and post-surgical patients. The patient’s ICU also had comorbid illnesses, community pneumonia, sepsis, hospital pneumonia, and tuberculosis. The most common disease is COVID-19 because in the January-December 2021 period, the coronavirus, which can be transmitted, is spreading. According to Adimara et al. (2021), COVID-19 in severe cases can cause damage to organ function, which can cause other diseases such as pneumonia, sepsis, acute respiratory syndrome, kidney failure, and even death.
Decreased consciousness often occurs in ICU patients because it is an indication of failure of the function of the integrity of the brain from organ failure such as heart, respiratory, and circulatory failure, which will lead to brain failure with consequent death. This is related to the post-surgery experience of ICU patients (Indra et al. 2020).
LOS is the length of time that each patient is hospitalized, which is obtained by dividing the number of days of stay by the number of patients. The LOS is calculated from the time the patient enters the ICU until he/she leaves the ICU. The length of hospital stay was 308 days and the average LOS was 5.4 ±3.98 days. The most common duration of antibiotic administration to patients during treatment in the ICU was 3 days. If the patient’s condition improved, the patient was transferred to the inpatient room and antibiotics were administered according to the clinical pathway of the patient’s diagnosis. In general, patients with bacterial infections are hospitalized for 7–10 days, but this depends on comorbidities, the development of complications, and the severity of the disease. The duration of therapy for each individual may differ depending on the clinical response and comorbidity, as in the treatment of pneumonia caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the duration of therapy can reach 7–21 days depending on the level of infection (
Table
Antibiotics Used in ICU Patients at USU Hospital Period January-December 2021.
Type of antibiotic | Total number of antibiotic prescrisption | |
---|---|---|
Single | Levofloxacin | 98 (38.8%) |
Ceftriaxone | 87 (34.5%) | |
Meropenem | 41 (16.5%) | |
Cefoperazone | 10 (3.9%) | |
Azithromycin | 7 (2.7%) | |
Ciprofloxacin | 5 (1.9%) | |
Cefazolin | 2 (0.8%) | |
Cefotaxime | 1 (0.4%) | |
Ampicillin sulbactam | 1 (0.4%) | |
Total | 252 (100%) | |
Combination | Levofloxacin + Cefotaxime + Ampicillin Sulbactam | 9 (15.25%) |
Ceftriaxone + Levofloxacin | 8 (13.55%) | |
Doxycycline + Clindamycin + Metronidazole + Tazam | 6 (10.16%) | |
Ceftriaxone + Ciprofloxacin | 5 (8.47%) | |
Meropenem + Amikacin | 5 (8.47%) | |
Ceftriaxone + Gentamicin | 5 (8.47%) | |
Ceftriaxone + Meropenem + Levofloxacin | 5 (8.47%) | |
Rifampicin + Pyrazinamide + Streptomycin + Meropenem | 4 (6.77%) | |
Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole | 2 (3.38%) | |
Meropenem + Metronidazole | 2 (3.38%) | |
Ceftriaxone + Gentamicin + Metronidazole | 2 (3.38%) | |
Meropenem + Ceftriaxone + Ciprofloxacin + Doxycycline | 2 (3.38%) | |
Meropenem + Levofloxacin + Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole | 1 (1.69%) | |
Meropenem + Ciprofloxacin | 1 (1.69%) | |
Azithromycin + Levofloxacin | 1 (1.69%) | |
Ciprofloxacin + Ceftazidime | 1 (1.69%) | |
Total | 59 (100%) |
Nine types of antibiotics were administered alone and 16 types of antibiotics were administered in combination. Antibiotics were then classified based on the ATC code according to the WHO Collaborating Center for Drug Statistics Methodology Guideline in 2022. In this study, only a single administration of antibiotics was associated with an ATC code. The use of antibiotics based on the ATC codes is shown in Table
Classification of antibiotic | Name of antibiotic | ATC code | Route of administration |
---|---|---|---|
3rd Generation Quinolones (Fluoroquinolon) | Levofloxacine | J01MA12 | Intravenous |
3rd Generation Cephalosporins | Ceftriaxone | J01DD04 | Intravenous |
Carbapenem | Meropenem | J01DH02 | Intravenous |
3rd Generation Cephalosporins | Cefoperazone | J01DD12 | Intravenous |
Macrolides | Azithromycin | J01FA10 | oral |
2nd Generation Quinolones (Fluoroquinolon) | Ciprofloxacin | J01MA02 | Intravenous |
1st Generation Cephalosporin | Cefazolin | J01DB04 | Intravenous |
Penicillin | Cefotaxime | J01DD01 | Intravenous |
3rd Generation Cephalosporins | Ampicillin Sulbactam | J01CA01 | Intravenous |
As shown in Table
Inpatient clinical conditions typically require intravenous drug therapy. Intravenous drug administration requires complex procedures and special preparation (
Table
ATC code | Name of antibiotic | Total dose used (mg) | DDD default value (mg) | DDD usage | DDD 100/patient- days | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J01MA12 | Levofloxacin | 70250 | 500 | 140.5 | 45.61 | 48.54 |
J01DD04 | Ceftriaxone | 174000 | 2000 | 87 | 28.25 | 30.06 |
J01DH02 | Meropenem | 111000 | 3000 | 37 | 12.01 | 12.78 |
J01DD12 | Azithromycin | 3500 | 300 | 11.7 | 3.8 | 4.04 |
J01FA10 | Ciprofloxacin | 4600 | 800 | 5.75 | 1.87 | 1.99 |
J01MA02 | Cefoperazone | 20000 | 4000 | 5 | 1.62 | 1.72 |
J01DB04 | Ampicillin sulbactam | 6000 | 6000 | 1 | 0.32 | 0.34 |
J01CA01 | Cefazolin | 3000 | 3000 | 1 | 0.32 | 0.34 |
J01DD01 | Cefotaxime | 2000 | 4000 | 0.5 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
Total DDD/100 patient-days | 93.96 | 100 |
The current high use of antibiotics is due to infectious diseases, which still predominate in Indonesia. Infectious diseases caused by the growth of microbes in the body due to internal and external factors that must be considered include maintaining cleanliness, using personal protective equipment, carrying out septic and aseptic actions, and the ability to prevent infection transmission in hospitals are actions that provide quality services (
Based on the results of this study, the most widely used antibiotic was levofloxacin, with a total use of 45.61 DDD/100 patient-days (48.54%). In Muhammad’s (2018) study, the DDD/100 patient-day levofloxacin value was 53.88 (48.16%). The use of levofloxacin at Universitas Sumatera Utara hospitals is still low when compared to Muhammad’s study, but in
The second most commonly used antibiotic was the third-generation cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, with a total DDD/100 patient-days of 28.25 (30.06%). In a study by
The evaluation of drug use by determining DU 90% can be used in conjunction with the ATC/DDD method for control purposes in drug planning and procurement. As shown in table 5, the antibiotics included in the DU 90% segment were levofloxacin (48.69%), ceftriaxone (30.16%), and meropenem (12.82%), and the antibiotics included in the 10% segment were azithromycin (4.05%), ciprofloxacin (1.99%), cefoperazone (1.72%), ampicillin sulbactam (0.34%), cefazolim (0.34%), and cefotaxime (0.17%). This is different from the study by
ATC code | Name of antibiotic | DDD/100 patient-days | DU 90% | Segment DU |
---|---|---|---|---|
J01MA12 | Levofloxacin | 45.61 | 48.69 | |
J01DD04 | Ceftriaxone | 28.25 | 30.16 | 90% |
J01DH02 | Meropenem | 12.01 | 12.82 | |
J01FA10 | Azithromycin | 3.8 | 4.05 | |
J01MA02 | Ciprofloxacin | 1.87 | 1.99 | |
J01DD12 | Cefoperazone | 1.62 | 1.72 | |
J01CA01 | Ampicillin Sulbactam | 0.32 | 0.34 | 10% |
J01DB04 | Cefazolin | 0.32 | 0.34 | |
J01DD01 | Cefotaxime | 0.16 | 0.17 |
Antibiotics included in the 90% segment indicate that these antibiotics are most widely used, and antibiotics included in the 10% segment indicate that these antibiotics are used little in prescribing antibiotics (WHO 2022). A DU value of 90% is the reference data for examining the quality of prescription and adherence to guidelines and formularies. Knowing the DU value of 90% can be used for drug evaluation, drug use control, and appropriate interventions if non-compliance with the formulary (
This study revealed that 90% namely levofloxacin (48.69%), ceftriaxone (30.16%), and meropenem (12.82%). The results of the study were the same as those of the study by
Based on the WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification of antibiotics for evaluation and monitoring of use (2021), the three antibiotics were included in the Watch group antibiotics, which included antibiotic classes that have higher resistance potential and include most of the highest priority agents among the Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine and/or antibiotics that are at relatively high risk of selection of bacterial resistance. Priority should be given to these medicinal products as key targets for management programs and monitoring. Selected Watch Group antibiotics, listed as individual medicinal products in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicinal Products for a limited number of specific infectious diseases, are recommended as first- or second-choice empirical therapy options. Therefore, stakeholders must be careful in using antibiotics by evaluating the utilization implemented strictly and continuously (2021 AWaRe classification (who.int)).
The study revealed the average value of LOS was 5.4 days with a total DDD/100 patient-days value of 93.96 and DU 90% namely levofloxacin (48.69%), ceftriaxone (30.16%), and meropenem (12.82%). It can be concluded that the DDD/100 patient-day value remained high. This condition indicates the need for further studies to ensure that antibiotic utilization is rational to achieve the outcome of the therapy and increase the quality of life of the patient.
ATC/DDD, The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Dose; DDD, Defined Daily Dose; ICU, the Insentive Care Units; LOS, Length of Stay; MRSA, by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; DU, Drug Utilization; COVID-19, Corona Virus 19; and AWaRe, WHO Access, Watch, Reserve.
Ethics approval was issued by the Universitas Sumatera Utara Health Research Ethics Committee number 748/KEPK/USU/2022 on 12 August 2022.
Not applicable for consent to participate because the data was taken from medical records.
All datas and software used for supporting the conclusion of this article are available from the public data respiratory at the website of https://bit.ly/3PLgoTR and to access the ATC code at https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/.
ESN designed, coordinated this research and drafted the manuscript. IP carried out the experiment and data analysis. HRT conceived of the study, and participated in research coordination. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The researchers thank the Director, Head, and staff of the Medical Record Division of Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital Medan, Indonesia, and all parties who have provided assistance in the implementation process until the completion of this research. The acknowledgment also goes to Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia, which funded this research.
This research was funded by Universitas Sumatera Utara under the grant number 32/UN5.2.3.1/PPM/SPP-TALENTA USU/2021.